And it's interactive since, at least to some agree, we get to influence the storyline. Screw you Interactive Blu-Ray, we have something better!nukchebi0 wrote:
It is much more entertaining than a TV series, since we get to comment on it and actually have our comments listened to.
holy shit i thought that said 4chan for a second thenLT.Victim wrote:
and you said did you 4get anything else...
ZOMG Voldemort!Lai wrote:
And the diary actually talks back,..LT.Victim wrote:
Its not that I really need that much advise, I'm doing pretty good on my own, I just like this thread cause its like a Diary.. I can look back and see what I did.E1_ned wrote:
your sig:
Do what you want, not what others want you to do.
need i say more ? have a Nike moment man.
stop asking advice from people (like myself) who tend to neglect their gf's playing too much bf2. at least the game is here to stay
Good point, we could always try an "Imperius" on Lindsey if she's being too complicatedbennisboy wrote:
ZOMG Voldemort!Lai wrote:
And the diary actually talks back,..LT.Victim wrote:
Its not that I really need that much advise, I'm doing pretty good on my own, I just like this thread cause its like a Diary.. I can look back and see what I did.
Last edited by Lai (2008-01-14 05:32:03)
lol, I'm not sure victim would want thatLai wrote:
Good point, we could always try an "Imperius" on Lindsey if she's being too complicatedbennisboy wrote:
ZOMG Voldemort!Lai wrote:
And the diary actually talks back,..
We'll make him want it, use it on him too!bennisboy wrote:
lol, I'm not sure victim would want that
(Seriously, would be rather sick if he would,..)
Then we shall rule the world!Lai wrote:
We'll make him want it, use it on him too!bennisboy wrote:
lol, I'm not sure victim would want that
(Seriously, would be rather sick if he would,..)
someone needs to get laid...Lai wrote:
And it's interactive since, at least to some agree, we get to influence the storyline. Screw you Interactive Blu-Ray, we have something better!nukchebi0 wrote:
It is much more entertaining than a TV series, since we get to comment on it and actually have our comments listened to.
sad thing is... we're all hooked.Lai wrote:
And the diary actually talks back,.. but seriously, nobody has even tried to advice much since page four or so. The Lt. is just giving and we're just asking for updates, following it like a TV series
when is she going to have a baby and you all find out it is not Mr Mexico's ?
cliffhanger!!! I'm biting my nails
read more tomorrow
I think it's pretty boring, I just come in to this topic for the lulznukchebi0 wrote:
It is much more entertaining than a TV series, since we get to comment on it and actually have our comments listened to.
PS: Lindsey what do you think LT. Victim's man juices taste like? I taste hints of cinnamon
you'll prob find out her boyfriend is a kick boxing champion or ex green beret or something.
go for it. life is too short.
go for it. life is too short.
How would be know, because its black?E1_ned wrote:
when is she going to have a baby and you all find out it is not Mr Mexico's ?Lai wrote:
And the diary actually talks back,.. but seriously, nobody has even tried to advice much since page four or so. The Lt. is just giving and we're just asking for updates, following it like a TV series
dunno... i just read and post crap. i leave the plot to the other writers.
suggestion: a baby with an IQ over a 100 or a never seen before don-Juan-like capabilities iow nothing like the guy with too many holidays.
suggestion: a baby with an IQ over a 100 or a never seen before don-Juan-like capabilities iow nothing like the guy with too many holidays.
Haha, I'd be pretty uncomfortable dating a girl whose commitment to relationships doesn't extend further than to allow herself to do the things you're saying that she did with you, but hey, it's your life.
Fyi, whatever you're called, if you're reading this, Victim likes it up the butt, so you better strap up and put in some work.
Fyi, whatever you're called, if you're reading this, Victim likes it up the butt, so you better strap up and put in some work.
She's confused because she loves the Lt. but feels, at least something, for her "official" boyfriend as well, that has absolutely nothing to do with commitment. If she would have dumped one of the two prior to expressing her feelings, you probably wouldn't have any problem with it, but because she hasn't made up her mind yet, you do? She could of course STFU and only let this surface when she's made her decision, but why would that be any better? She would still feel the same and you can't blame her for that; a lot of people change their mind/heart some time, else everybody would marry at the age of 16 and live happily ever after together. If there's anyone that can be accused of a lack of commitment its the guy that flies all over the world in the middle of a crisis.mikkel wrote:
Haha, I'd be pretty uncomfortable dating a girl whose commitment to relationships doesn't extend further than to allow herself to do the things you're saying that she did with you, but hey, it's your life.
A relationship is typically built on trust. When you break that trust, you've got a problem. If you absolutely have to be with someone else, break up first so that you aren't wiping your ass with someone else's emotions in the process. That has everything to do with commitment.Lai wrote:
She's confused because she loves the Lt. but feels, at least something, for her "official" boyfriend as well, that has absolutely nothing to do with commitment. If she would have dumped one of the two prior to expressing her feelings, you probably wouldn't have any problem with it, but because she hasn't made up her mind yet, you do? She could of course STFU and only let this surface when she's made her decision, but why would that be any better? She would still feel the same and you can't blame her for that; a lot of people change their mind/heart some time, else everybody would marry at the age of 16 and live happily ever after together. If there's anyone that can be accused of a lack of commitment its the guy that flies all over the world in the middle of a crisis.mikkel wrote:
Haha, I'd be pretty uncomfortable dating a girl whose commitment to relationships doesn't extend further than to allow herself to do the things you're saying that she did with you, but hey, it's your life.
Last edited by mikkel (2008-01-14 12:10:13)
But he did NOT do anything initially, she's been completely honest with both guys and whatever she'd done with the Lt., what the Lt. doesn't want to say is, was only after both parties had been briefed.mikkel wrote:
A relationship is typically built on trust. When you break that trust, you've got a problem. If you absolutely have to be with someone else, break up first so that you aren't wiping your ass with someone else's emotions in the process. That has everything to do with commitment.Lai wrote:
She's confused because she loves the Lt. but feels, at least something, for her "official" boyfriend as well, that has absolutely nothing to do with commitment. If she would have dumped one of the two prior to expressing her feelings, you probably wouldn't have any problem with it, but because she hasn't made up her mind yet, you do? She could of course STFU and only let this surface when she's made her decision, but why would that be any better? She would still feel the same and you can't blame her for that; a lot of people change their mind/heart some time, else everybody would marry at the age of 16 and live happily ever after together. If there's anyone that can be accused of a lack of commitment its the guy that flies all over the world in the middle of a crisis.mikkel wrote:
Haha, I'd be pretty uncomfortable dating a girl whose commitment to relationships doesn't extend further than to allow herself to do the things you're saying that she did with you, but hey, it's your life.
I realise that you're trying to excuse their romantic relationship, but I guess it's a matter of principle, and mine dictate that you just don't do that while you're involved with someone else.Lai wrote:
But he did NOT do anything initially, she's been completely honest with both guys and whatever she'd done with the Lt., what the Lt. doesn't want to say is, was only after both parties had been briefed.mikkel wrote:
A relationship is typically built on trust. When you break that trust, you've got a problem. If you absolutely have to be with someone else, break up first so that you aren't wiping your ass with someone else's emotions in the process. That has everything to do with commitment.Lai wrote:
She's confused because she loves the Lt. but feels, at least something, for her "official" boyfriend as well, that has absolutely nothing to do with commitment. If she would have dumped one of the two prior to expressing her feelings, you probably wouldn't have any problem with it, but because she hasn't made up her mind yet, you do? She could of course STFU and only let this surface when she's made her decision, but why would that be any better? She would still feel the same and you can't blame her for that; a lot of people change their mind/heart some time, else everybody would marry at the age of 16 and live happily ever after together. If there's anyone that can be accused of a lack of commitment its the guy that flies all over the world in the middle of a crisis.
I'm not saying that in any relation you can just do anything you want, I'm just obscuring the concept of being "involved". What makes you determine that she is involved with the traveling guy and the traveling guy only? Following your line of thought, it would be best for her to dump both guys untill she's made up her mind, but I doubt any of the three would be happy with that. Yes, she has made quite a mess of the whole situation, but that does not mean she's an unreliable partner in any or every relation, like you initially claimed.mikkel wrote:
I realise that you're trying to excuse their romantic relationship, but I guess it's a matter of principle, and mine dictate that you just don't do that while you're involved with someone else.
Following my line of thought, it would be best for her to stick to one person. I really don't recall claiming anything about her reliability as a partner beyond stating that I personally wouldn't be comfortable with a girlfriend being of principle and diposition allowing her to carry through with what has been described in this thread.Lai wrote:
I'm not saying that in any relation you can just do anything you want, I'm just obscuring the concept of being "involved". What makes you determine that she is involved with the traveling guy and the traveling guy only? Following your line of thought, it would be best for her to dump both guys untill she's made up her mind, but I doubt any of the three would be happy with that. Yes, she has made quite a mess of the whole situation, but that does not mean she's an unreliable partner in any or every relation, like you initially claimed.mikkel wrote:
I realise that you're trying to excuse their romantic relationship, but I guess it's a matter of principle, and mine dictate that you just don't do that while you're involved with someone else.
I don't see what you're trying to make me say. My opinion seems pretty simple and straightforward.
mikkel wrote:
Following my line of thought, it would be best for her to stick to one person. I really don't recall claiming anything about her reliability as a partner beyond stating that I personally wouldn't be comfortable with a girlfriend being of principle and diposition allowing her to carry through with what has been described in this thread.
I don't see what you're trying to make me say. My opinion seems pretty simple and straightforward.
The problem is not what you say but what you insinuate, namely that the girl has a particular looseness of character, and you simply cannot provide a straightforward opinion on a non straightforward matter; if she loves both, who is she to stick with? Evidently she should make a decision, but as for now she is in the process of doing just that. Unless you can make the decision for her or provide any other temporary solution that is agreeable to all three parties, I'd rather give her the time she needs than accuse her by means of some innuendo.mikkel wrote:
Haha, I'd be pretty uncomfortable dating a girl whose commitment to relationships doesn't extend further than to allow herself to do the things you're saying that she did with you, but hey, it's your life.
Last edited by Lai (2008-01-14 13:18:50)
I think your perspective is a little limited here. I'm not insinuating anything, there's no innunendo, I'm simply presenting my take on the situation. If that to you seems to be insinuating anything negative, then perhaps you interpret the facts as stated to be unflattering towards her.Lai wrote:
mikkel wrote:
Following my line of thought, it would be best for her to stick to one person. I really don't recall claiming anything about her reliability as a partner beyond stating that I personally wouldn't be comfortable with a girlfriend being of principle and diposition allowing her to carry through with what has been described in this thread.
I don't see what you're trying to make me say. My opinion seems pretty simple and straightforward.The problem is not what you say but what you insinuate, namely that the girl has a particular looseness of character, and you simply cannot provide a straightforward opinion on a non straightforward matter; if she loves both, who is she to stick with? Evidently she should make a decision, but as for now she is in the process of doing just that. Unless you can make the decision for her or provide any other temporary solution that is agreeable to all three parties, I'd rather give her the time she needs than accuse her by means of some innuendo.mikkel wrote:
Haha, I'd be pretty uncomfortable dating a girl whose commitment to relationships doesn't extend further than to allow herself to do the things you're saying that she did with you, but hey, it's your life.
You're grossly misunderstanding my position here. I have no interest in whether she has conflicting feelings for two or ten different people. I simply remarked that her way of acting on emotion as documented in this thread betrays a trust that's usually established when you enter into a relationship. Whether you choose to keep this trust sacred, or abuse it, is completely straightforward.
Last edited by mikkel (2008-01-14 13:52:34)
Ya, but the thing is, the other party hasn't really been briefed all that much at all..Lai wrote:
But he did NOT do anything initially, she's been completely honest with both guys and whatever she'd done with the Lt., what the Lt. doesn't want to say is, was only after both parties had been briefed.mikkel wrote:
A relationship is typically built on trust. When you break that trust, you've got a problem. If you absolutely have to be with someone else, break up first so that you aren't wiping your ass with someone else's emotions in the process. That has everything to do with commitment.Lai wrote:
She's confused because she loves the Lt. but feels, at least something, for her "official" boyfriend as well, that has absolutely nothing to do with commitment. If she would have dumped one of the two prior to expressing her feelings, you probably wouldn't have any problem with it, but because she hasn't made up her mind yet, you do? She could of course STFU and only let this surface when she's made her decision, but why would that be any better? She would still feel the same and you can't blame her for that; a lot of people change their mind/heart some time, else everybody would marry at the age of 16 and live happily ever after together. If there's anyone that can be accused of a lack of commitment its the guy that flies all over the world in the middle of a crisis.
He doesn't know half of the story.. just that she has "feelings" for me, and that she has been hanging out with me a lot.
Uhm,.. well if he can't figure the rest out that much, he's stupid
Well, its kinda a touchy topic..Lai wrote:
Uhm,.. well if he can't figure the rest out that much, he's stupid
Her mom knows more then he does.. lol