now that's more like it. or 20 for $10 bucks at the disposable lab.
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
It's not just being in the right place, it's finding the right place. It takes patience to be a good photographer. The equipment used in photography doesn't really account for much. It's less than half of the ingredients imo. People are sold on the idea that they need to spend thousands in order to be good. The best photographs are usually the ones in which the photographer has relied on their own creativity.Uzique wrote:
but you acknowledge there's more to painting a masterpiece than taking a photo of the year (or decade, even?)
taking a great photo is often being in the right place, in the midst, that's the beauty of photography (and the camera as a tool)
whether or not you 'appreciate' fine art is a matter of taste and education/raising i suppose; being able to recognise genius should be intuitive.
There's a difference between creating art and simply studying what other people have created I guess.Hurricane2k9 wrote:
faux art lol
Last edited by Dilbert_X (2011-07-09 01:03:23)
Last edited by Wallpaper (2011-07-10 22:19:22)
You've got amazing insect shots. Even if they do give me nightmares.Wallpaper wrote:
^ is that 50mm cropped a lot or a 50mm macro? One thing: for bugs, try to get down on their level; a lot of times it can make it more interesting. With that moth it would be pretty difficult though
Heres a weevil:
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6011/592 … 73d34c.jpg
Little Weevil Man by Gregory Moser, on Flickr
Wallpaper wrote:
One thing: for bugs, try to get down on their level; a lot of times it can make it more interesting. With that moth it would be pretty difficult though
Last edited by Wallpaper (2011-07-18 00:46:09)
Last edited by Superior Mind (2011-07-19 16:47:50)
As a WIP?Superior Mind wrote:
The tall building that's black on top and gray on the bottom where the WTC used to be is the new WTC as a WIP.