FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6663|'Murka

Kmarion wrote:

With a rag the water is going in your mouth, throat, nose, etc.. They say the rag is much worse than when they use cellophane. It is impossible to avoid panic. It's not like holding your breath in a bath tub. Believe me, if it was there would be no controversy.
I realize it's worse than holding your breath. I was pointing out the amount of time it was actually one on 1/3 of the detainees interrogated using this method.

35 seconds. That's five seconds more than half a minute.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
.:ronin:.|Patton
Respekct dad i love u always
+946|7062|Marathon, Florida Keys
Would you rather us be like the Saddam Hussein regime? When they interrogated you they cut off your fingers one by one until they got the answer out of you... Or stuck a rifle in the face of a family member for the answer. Waterboarding is not torture, and why the hell would you feel sorry for a terrorist anyway?
https://i54.photobucket.com/albums/g117/patton1337/stats.jpg
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6663|'Murka

Because they have inner children that have been wounded.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
Braddock
Agitator
+916|6543|Éire
A couple of points on the thread so far...

usmarine ...'the liberals' are at it again eh? If you simply mean liberal politicians then fair enough, fuck them; because in the US whether you're a Democrat politician or a Republican politician you're usually just a power hungry cunt that will voice any opinion that might grab public attention and secure some votes. If, on the other hand, you are trying to claim that there is some shadowy organisation that all people of varying levels of moderate political views have to sign up to called 'the liberals' then I can tell you usmarine such a thing does not exist. I'm not sure on this but I don't think all the liberal-minded people of America got together and had a referendum on the issue of torture techniques.

I myself did not jump on the 'torture is uncool' bandwagon because public opinion swayed that way; I've been on that 'bandwagon' since people I know personally were locked up under the internment act and subjected to all sorts of questionable interrogation processes during the troubles in Northern Ireland.

FEOS & Co. ...it's obvious you're in the 'you have to break a few eggs to make an omelette' camp on the issue of torture but, as has already been raised here, the fact is information gleaned under duress is pretty much useless due to unreliability. And again what about the innocent ones ...what do you say to them afterwards? "Oops, sorry about that ...we're still the good guys though"?

It's like this basically: torture is carried out by many countries (Russia, China, USA, North Korea, Israel etc.), if you as an American feel okay with that then that is up to you but don't go kidding yourself that your country is somehow better or above any of these other countries and certainly don't waste your time trying to convince the rest of the world of this.

Last edited by Braddock (2007-12-11 19:50:10)

usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7014

Braddock wrote:

don't waste your time trying to convince the rest of the world of this.
You guys seemed to be obsessed with this point.  Yet we do not really care how you feel in all honesty, and I am sure the feeling is mutual.  But like I said to Cam, the behavior of both sides in NI a few years ago does not give you any high ground either.
Braddock
Agitator
+916|6543|Éire

usmarine2005 wrote:

Braddock wrote:

don't waste your time trying to convince the rest of the world of this.
You guys seemed to be obsessed with this point.  Yet we do not really care how you feel in all honesty, and I am sure the feeling is mutual.  But like I said to Cam, the behavior of both sides in NI a few years ago does not give you any high ground either.
You yourself might not really care but your Government seems to. We have to listen to America waffle on in the UN about how such and such a country has weapons of mass destruction or such and such a country has a desire to build nuclear capabilities or how such and such a country is not operating a fair and democratic system of government ...judge not lest ye be judged.

I don't really see where you're going with the whole Northern Ireland thing to be honest. I don't think Northern Ireland has ever tried to present itself as some sort of manifest destiny, holier than thou example to the world. Sure torture was used during the troubles ...doesn't make it right, same way as it's not right when it's used by the US now. What's your point ...am I not allowed to claim torture is wrong because the IRA may have used it during the troubles?
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7014

Braddock wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

Braddock wrote:

don't waste your time trying to convince the rest of the world of this.
You guys seemed to be obsessed with this point.  Yet we do not really care how you feel in all honesty, and I am sure the feeling is mutual.  But like I said to Cam, the behavior of both sides in NI a few years ago does not give you any high ground either.
You yourself might not really care but your Government seems to. We have to listen to America waffle on in the UN about how such and such a country has weapons of mass destruction or such and such a country has a desire to build nuclear capabilities or how such and such a country is not operating a fair and democratic system of government ...judge not lest ye be judged.

I don't really see where you're going with the whole Northern Ireland thing to be honest. I don't think Northern Ireland has ever tried to present itself as some sort of manifest destiny, holier than thou example to the world. Sure torture was used during the troubles ...doesn't make it right, same way as it's not right when it's used by the US now. What's your point ...am I not allowed to claim torture is wrong because the IRA may have used it during the troubles?
No I am not sure where you got that we say we are on some moral high ground.  We don't chop off peoples heads or have morality police like some countries, but I do not remember anyone saying we are morally better than Ireland, or England, or India, etc.  Maybe some President did say that.  If they did, fill me in, since I do not listen to their crap.
Braddock
Agitator
+916|6543|Éire

usmarine2005 wrote:

Braddock wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:


You guys seemed to be obsessed with this point.  Yet we do not really care how you feel in all honesty, and I am sure the feeling is mutual.  But like I said to Cam, the behavior of both sides in NI a few years ago does not give you any high ground either.
You yourself might not really care but your Government seems to. We have to listen to America waffle on in the UN about how such and such a country has weapons of mass destruction or such and such a country has a desire to build nuclear capabilities or how such and such a country is not operating a fair and democratic system of government ...judge not lest ye be judged.

I don't really see where you're going with the whole Northern Ireland thing to be honest. I don't think Northern Ireland has ever tried to present itself as some sort of manifest destiny, holier than thou example to the world. Sure torture was used during the troubles ...doesn't make it right, same way as it's not right when it's used by the US now. What's your point ...am I not allowed to claim torture is wrong because the IRA may have used it during the troubles?
No I am not sure where you got that we say we are on some moral high ground.  We don't chop off peoples heads or have morality police like some countries, but I do not remember anyone saying we are morally better than Ireland, or England, or India, etc.  Maybe some President did say that.  If they did, fill me in, since I do not listen to their crap.
You invaded Iraq because you thought that their system of government was wrong and unjust and that you could provide them with a better one. That seems to me like believing you know better than others. You've also continually claimed that governments in Cuba, Venezuela and Iran are either undemocratic, tyrannical or all of the above.

You say you don't have morality police but it seems as though the Government have a lot more power now when it comes to checking up on what kind of literature you're reading, what you're looking at on the web and what kind of political opinions you have these days.

You don't chop off heads but you do use a variety of torture techniques on people who aren't given proper due legal process. You know there are actually countries that exist that don't condone any torture of any kind.
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7014

Braddock wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

Braddock wrote:


You yourself might not really care but your Government seems to. We have to listen to America waffle on in the UN about how such and such a country has weapons of mass destruction or such and such a country has a desire to build nuclear capabilities or how such and such a country is not operating a fair and democratic system of government ...judge not lest ye be judged.

I don't really see where you're going with the whole Northern Ireland thing to be honest. I don't think Northern Ireland has ever tried to present itself as some sort of manifest destiny, holier than thou example to the world. Sure torture was used during the troubles ...doesn't make it right, same way as it's not right when it's used by the US now. What's your point ...am I not allowed to claim torture is wrong because the IRA may have used it during the troubles?
No I am not sure where you got that we say we are on some moral high ground.  We don't chop off peoples heads or have morality police like some countries, but I do not remember anyone saying we are morally better than Ireland, or England, or India, etc.  Maybe some President did say that.  If they did, fill me in, since I do not listen to their crap.
You invaded Iraq because you thought that their system of government was wrong and unjust and that you could provide them with a better one. That seems to me like believing you know better than others. You've also continually claimed that governments in Cuba, Venezuela and Iran are either undemocratic, tyrannical or all of the above.

You say you don't have morality police but it seems as though the Government have a lot more power now when it comes to checking up on what kind of literature you're reading, what you're looking at on the web and what kind of political opinions you have these days.

You don't chop off heads but you do use a variety of torture techniques on people who aren't given proper due legal process. You know there are actually countries that exist that don't condone any torture of any kind.
So England also yes?  They went to Iraq.

People float on doors across an ocean to get from Cuba to the US.  Our mistake for thinking that I guess.
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6927|Canberra, AUS
marine, whether you ARE better worse in reality is irrelevant. Braddock's point is that you can't go around judging other people yet expect not to be judged in the same manner.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
Braddock
Agitator
+916|6543|Éire

usmarine2005 wrote:

Braddock wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:


No I am not sure where you got that we say we are on some moral high ground.  We don't chop off peoples heads or have morality police like some countries, but I do not remember anyone saying we are morally better than Ireland, or England, or India, etc.  Maybe some President did say that.  If they did, fill me in, since I do not listen to their crap.
You invaded Iraq because you thought that their system of government was wrong and unjust and that you could provide them with a better one. That seems to me like believing you know better than others. You've also continually claimed that governments in Cuba, Venezuela and Iran are either undemocratic, tyrannical or all of the above.

You say you don't have morality police but it seems as though the Government have a lot more power now when it comes to checking up on what kind of literature you're reading, what you're looking at on the web and what kind of political opinions you have these days.

You don't chop off heads but you do use a variety of torture techniques on people who aren't given proper due legal process. You know there are actually countries that exist that don't condone any torture of any kind.
So England also yes?  They went to Iraq.

People float on doors across an ocean to get from Cuba to the US.  Our mistake for thinking that I guess.
Yes England also (well Britain actually). You always ask me that like I'm going to stick up for England. Britain's grubby little hands are as dirty as yours when it comes to the Middle East.

It's your business to deal with those that attempt to enter the US from Cuba, it's not your business to interfere in how Cuba is governed though.
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7014

Spark wrote:

marine, whether you ARE better worse in reality is irrelevant. Braddock's point is that you can't go around judging other people yet expect not to be judged in the same manner.
I am not expecting anything.  We have threads for that....plenty of them.  How about we stick to the subject of this one.  I am so sick of you guys saying "ya well the US........."  STOP.  Can you not talk just about the subject? 

This thread is about the US and its treatment of suspected terrorists and how this has become a talking point for Dems and Repubs.  Talking about the US vs (insert country) is not the point.  Yet you people cannot help yourselves.  I swear we need a US only section or something for stuff like this.
B.Schuss
I'm back, baby... ( sort of )
+664|7094|Cologne, Germany

usmarine2005 wrote:

B.Schuss wrote:

so often the US claim the moral high ground on these issues, and call others out for human rights violations.

Double standard ftl...
Please give examples.
well, Iraq, for starters ? Wasn't one of the reasons why you invaded in the first place that Saddam was a dictator and violated human rights, i.e. tortured his own people ?

Ironically, it is quite likely that waterboarding was used as an interrogation technique in iraqui prisons prior to the invasion, too...

disclaimer: yes, I know, saddam did things to his own people that were worse than waterboarding, but you asked for examples, and iraq is a valid one, I suppose.

look at gitmo, for example. It was set up specifically to lock up and interrogate people who were caught and are held under dubious legal circumstances, with little to no access to legal counsel, or a right to a fair process. I mean, come on, that is one of the classic examples for a country that violates human rights.

Imagine some third world country had set up a camp like gitmo, and started rounding up "terror suspects" like that, putting civilians before military tribunals. Wouldn't you call that violation of human rights ? Wouldn't the US be among the first to call them out ? Wouldn't you be calling them a "police state", and rightly so ?

I am not saying that the US is as bad as Iraq under Saddam, mind you. I am merely pointing out that in your efforts in the war on terror, you seem to have thrown some of your most important principles overboard. Democratic principles, that should set us apart from the people that we fight. If we abandon these principles, what right do we have to criticize others when they do the same ?

On a personal note, I am still amazed ( and sadened, tbh ) that so many US members of congress knew about these interrogation techniques and did nothing to stop them. Some even demanded that the CIA push harder. How can these people look at themselves in the mirror ?
I mean, didn't they act against the same principles they swore to uphold as members of the legislative branch ?
MrE`158
Member
+103|6876

usmarine2005 wrote:

Spark wrote:

marine, whether you ARE better worse in reality is irrelevant. Braddock's point is that you can't go around judging other people yet expect not to be judged in the same manner.
I am not expecting anything.  We have threads for that....plenty of them.  How about we stick to the subject of this one.  I am so sick of you guys saying "ya well the US........."  STOP.  Can you not talk just about the subject? 

This thread is about the US and its treatment of suspected terrorists and how this has become a talking point for Dems and Repubs.  Talking about the US vs (insert country) is not the point.  Yet you people cannot help yourselves.  I swear we need a US only section or something for stuff like this.
I think that one of the reasons people have found it hard to not go down the USA vs. Someone route on this topic is because the victims of the torture in question weren't American.  I've read through your posts and I agree with you, America hasn't made any actual attempt to proclaim itself the world police, or the good guy, or whatever.  But we get a lot of American media out here, and if those stirring speeches of Bush's weren't directed at us, they were presumably directed at the American people, and that's fine.

But there was (and is) an awful lot of talk about freeing people from oppression and tyranny and so on, which is why it looks so bad when it's revealed that the guys who say they're freeing people are in fact torturing people, and locking them up without any kind of due process.  You know as well as I do that if a bunch of American citizens were captured and locked away by someone else, with no regard to any law or convention of any kind, national or international, there'd be a collosal shit-storm and it'd probably wind up with American troops moving to free them.  And they'd be right to do so.

The issue of waterboarding is, so far as I'm concerned, a tiny part of the much bigger issue of how the US has conducted itself.  The USA as a nation has some wonderful ideas about freedom and the protection of rights enshrined in its constitution, and to see so much of that cast aside by the exploitation of a legal loophole (and a dubious one at that) is saddening.  The truth of it is that if it wasn't the USA, with it's incredible military and economic power, other nations would have made a bigger fuss, but no-one can risk going up against the US for fear of some kind of reprisal (even the loss of international trade deals could hurt a country badly when the USA is involved).

That's why people get upset, I think.  It's not because America proclaims itself to be one of the good guys and then does bad things, it's because America, by its own definitions of what the country is, should be one of the good guys.  Removing Saddam was great, smashing the Taliban was fantastic.  Imprisoning people for years without even so much as charging them with an offence?  Not so good. 

Sorry, I've rambled, I'm tired.  The waterboarding is tiny and irrelevent, but it's symptomatic of worse stuff.
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6663|'Murka

Braddock wrote:

A couple of points on the thread so far...

FEOS & Co. ...it's obvious you're in the 'you have to break a few eggs to make an omelette' camp on the issue of torture but, as has already been raised here, the fact is information gleaned under duress is pretty much useless due to unreliability. And again what about the innocent ones ...what do you say to them afterwards? "Oops, sorry about that ...we're still the good guys though"?
Unreliability: Info obtained from two of the three (and quite possibly all three) led to the roll up of additional terrorists and stopped attacks. Please explain how "unreliable" information led to these events.

Innocent: Please show how the two that we know of (KSM and Abu Zubaida) were in any way innocent. We can't speak to the third one, as we don't know his name. I'm willing to bet he's in the same group as the other two.

Your faults in logic are thus:

1) waterboarding was in widespread use by the US--false
2) the info gained by the use of waterboarding was unreliable--again, false.

While, in general, information gained by physically harming prisoners is unreliable, there is no proof that the information gained in these 3 cases of waterboarding (not physically harmed, and did I mention that there were only three?) was unreliable. In fact, the data would indicate the exact opposite.

So, to summarize: No innocents were waterboarded, the data retrieved via waterboarding was accurate.

Your applications of generalizations to a specific set of circumstances while blatantly ignoring the facts involved in those circumstances simply because they contradict your general feelings on the topic is below your typical standard in here.

Braddock wrote:

It's like this basically: torture is carried out by many countries (Russia, China, USA, North Korea, Israel etc.), if you as an American feel okay with that then that is up to you but don't go kidding yourself that your country is somehow better or above any of these other countries and certainly don't waste your time trying to convince the rest of the world of this.
I don't recall saying anywhere that the US was better than anyone. In fact, I made a post about that exact concept not too long ago...so try another tack, as that one simply won't work. If the worst thing other countries did to their prisoners was waterboarding, you would have an argument. However, that simply isn't the case.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
IG-Calibre
comhalta
+226|6995|Tír Eoghan, Tuaisceart Éireann

usmarine2005 wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

We're not nuts. We just have principles and values to which we think people should adhere when carrying out what ultimatley turned out to be a rather collateral-damage-tastic poorly managed wild goose chase.
Ya... NI is an awesome example of values.
NI is an awesome example of why torture is a pointless exercise in extracting information. Look at all the convictions later quashed of innocent people who were tortured into admitting a load of bullshit.. yeah that serves justice..right? fact of the matter is the tortured will tell you whatever you want to hear, it has no credible bases other than to satisfy sick fucking minds.. the end.

Last edited by IG-Calibre (2007-12-12 07:42:11)

CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6808

IG-Calibre wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

We're not nuts. We just have principles and values to which we think people should adhere when carrying out what ultimatley turned out to be a rather collateral-damage-tastic poorly managed wild goose chase.
Ya... NI is an awesome example of values.
NI is an awesome example of why torture is a pointless exercise in extracting information. Look at all the convictions later quashed of innocent people who were tortured into admitting a load of bullshit.. yeah that serves justice..right? fact of the matter is the tortured will tell you whatever you want to hear, it has no credible bases other than to satisfy sick fucking minds.. the end.
Aye. Six people imprisoned for 16 years of a life sentence for a crime they never committed and a confession they signed after being tortured by the British police...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birmingham … uestioning

Also try watching this Oscar-nominated movie about the Guildford Four:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_the_Nam … %28film%29

Last edited by CameronPoe (2007-12-12 08:24:55)

M.O.A.B
'Light 'em up!'
+1,220|6475|Escea

Braddock wrote:

it's not your business to interfere in how Cuba is governed though.
Then again you could say, its not your business to interfere in how information is extracted. Would you think some fanatic terror suspect is going to tell you everything if you sit him down on a nice big comfy chair and offer him a drink and something to eat? Im guessing, no.
IG-Calibre
comhalta
+226|6995|Tír Eoghan, Tuaisceart Éireann

CameronPoe wrote:

IG-Calibre wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

Ya... NI is an awesome example of values.
NI is an awesome example of why torture is a pointless exercise in extracting information. Look at all the convictions later quashed of innocent people who were tortured into admitting a load of bullshit.. yeah that serves justice..right? fact of the matter is the tortured will tell you whatever you want to hear, it has no credible bases other than to satisfy sick fucking minds.. the end.
Aye. Six people imprisoned for 16 years of a life sentence for a crime they never committed and a confession they signed after being tortured by the British police...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birmingham … uestioning

Also try watching this Oscar-nominated movie about the Guildford Four:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_the_Nam … %28film%29
there are plenty of other victims as well not so well highlighted. I did some work with prisoners "interrogated" in Castlereagh barracks as part of my university work and it was one of the most harrowing experiences of my life tbf. All it left were people with fractured broken minds & spirits, there only crime was police suspicion..

Last edited by IG-Calibre (2007-12-12 08:54:39)

usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7014

B.Schuss wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

B.Schuss wrote:

so often the US claim the moral high ground on these issues, and call others out for human rights violations.

Double standard ftl...
Please give examples.
well, Iraq, for starters ? Wasn't one of the reasons why you invaded in the first place that Saddam was a dictator and violated human rights, i.e. tortured his own people ?

Ironically, it is quite likely that waterboarding was used as an interrogation technique in iraqui prisons prior to the invasion, too...

disclaimer: yes, I know, saddam did things to his own people that were worse than waterboarding, but you asked for examples, and iraq is a valid one, I suppose.

look at gitmo, for example. It was set up specifically to lock up and interrogate people who were caught and are held under dubious legal circumstances, with little to no access to legal counsel, or a right to a fair process. I mean, come on, that is one of the classic examples for a country that violates human rights.

Imagine some third world country had set up a camp like gitmo, and started rounding up "terror suspects" like that, putting civilians before military tribunals. Wouldn't you call that violation of human rights ? Wouldn't the US be among the first to call them out ? Wouldn't you be calling them a "police state", and rightly so ?

I am not saying that the US is as bad as Iraq under Saddam, mind you. I am merely pointing out that in your efforts in the war on terror, you seem to have thrown some of your most important principles overboard. Democratic principles, that should set us apart from the people that we fight. If we abandon these principles, what right do we have to criticize others when they do the same ?

On a personal note, I am still amazed ( and sadened, tbh ) that so many US members of congress knew about these interrogation techniques and did nothing to stop them. Some even demanded that the CIA push harder. How can these people look at themselves in the mirror ?
I mean, didn't they act against the same principles they swore to uphold as members of the legislative branch ?
Again, you are telling me what we have done.  I know what we have done.  How is that claiming the moral high ground?  Just because we call someone else out does not mean we are taking the moral high ground......or does it?  I mean that is what you are doing right now.  And you are German right?  Do you really want to play the moral high ground game?

Of course we think we are the good guys.  Al-Q thinks they are the good guys.   IRA think they are the good guys.  The SS thought they were the good guys. 

You are telling me, as if you know, why we went to Iraq.  Would the UN going to Darfur mean that those countries are taking the moral high ground?  When NATO went to Bosnia was that taking the moral high ground?  When France and Argentina went to the first gulf war, was that taking the moral high ground?

Sorry, but I am a but confused by what you mean.
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7010|Argentina

usmarine2005 wrote:

B.Schuss wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:


Please give examples.
well, Iraq, for starters ? Wasn't one of the reasons why you invaded in the first place that Saddam was a dictator and violated human rights, i.e. tortured his own people ?

Ironically, it is quite likely that waterboarding was used as an interrogation technique in iraqui prisons prior to the invasion, too...

disclaimer: yes, I know, saddam did things to his own people that were worse than waterboarding, but you asked for examples, and iraq is a valid one, I suppose.

look at gitmo, for example. It was set up specifically to lock up and interrogate people who were caught and are held under dubious legal circumstances, with little to no access to legal counsel, or a right to a fair process. I mean, come on, that is one of the classic examples for a country that violates human rights.

Imagine some third world country had set up a camp like gitmo, and started rounding up "terror suspects" like that, putting civilians before military tribunals. Wouldn't you call that violation of human rights ? Wouldn't the US be among the first to call them out ? Wouldn't you be calling them a "police state", and rightly so ?

I am not saying that the US is as bad as Iraq under Saddam, mind you. I am merely pointing out that in your efforts in the war on terror, you seem to have thrown some of your most important principles overboard. Democratic principles, that should set us apart from the people that we fight. If we abandon these principles, what right do we have to criticize others when they do the same ?

On a personal note, I am still amazed ( and sadened, tbh ) that so many US members of congress knew about these interrogation techniques and did nothing to stop them. Some even demanded that the CIA push harder. How can these people look at themselves in the mirror ?
I mean, didn't they act against the same principles they swore to uphold as members of the legislative branch ?
Again, you are telling me what we have done.  I know what we have done.  How is that claiming the moral high ground?  Just because we call someone else out does not mean we are taking the moral high ground......or does it?  I mean that is what you are doing right now.  And you are German right?  Do you really want to play the moral high ground game?

Of course we think we are the good guys.  Al-Q thinks they are the good guys.   IRA think they are the good guys.  The SS thought they were the good guys. 

You are telling me, as if you know, why we went to Iraq.  Would the UN going to Darfur mean that those countries are taking the moral high ground?  When NATO went to Bosnia was that taking the moral high ground?  When France and Argentina went to the first gulf war, was that taking the moral high ground?

Sorry, but I am a but confused by what you mean.
You know that playing the Hitler card with a German guy is very cheap.
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7014

IG-Calibre wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

IG-Calibre wrote:


NI is an awesome example of why torture is a pointless exercise in extracting information. Look at all the convictions later quashed of innocent people who were tortured into admitting a load of bullshit.. yeah that serves justice..right? fact of the matter is the tortured will tell you whatever you want to hear, it has no credible bases other than to satisfy sick fucking minds.. the end.
Aye. Six people imprisoned for 16 years of a life sentence for a crime they never committed and a confession they signed after being tortured by the British police...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birmingham … uestioning

Also try watching this Oscar-nominated movie about the Guildford Four:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_the_Nam … %28film%29
there are plenty of other victims as well not so well highlighted. I did some work with prisoners "interrogated" in Castlereagh barracks as part of my university work and it was one of the most harrowing experiences of my life tbf. All it left were people with fractured broken minds & spirits, there only crime was police suspicion..
Ok.  So what is YOUR solution then?   

Let me give you an example:

You find out someone is going to blow up a building in your country.  You find someone who you think may have information that could stop that attack.  So, how do you get the info?  How do you get the info out of someone who is sworn to kill you?
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7010|Argentina

usmarine2005 wrote:

IG-Calibre wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:


Aye. Six people imprisoned for 16 years of a life sentence for a crime they never committed and a confession they signed after being tortured by the British police...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birmingham … uestioning

Also try watching this Oscar-nominated movie about the Guildford Four:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_the_Nam … %28film%29
there are plenty of other victims as well not so well highlighted. I did some work with prisoners "interrogated" in Castlereagh barracks as part of my university work and it was one of the most harrowing experiences of my life tbf. All it left were people with fractured broken minds & spirits, there only crime was police suspicion..
Ok.  So what is YOUR solution then?   

Let me give you an example:

You find out someone is going to blow up a building in your country.  You find someone who you think may have information that could stop that attack.  So, how do you get the info?  How do you get the info out of someone who is sworn to kill you?
You interrogate him under the Geneva Conventions.
IG-Calibre
comhalta
+226|6995|Tír Eoghan, Tuaisceart Éireann

usmarine2005 wrote:

IG-Calibre wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:


Aye. Six people imprisoned for 16 years of a life sentence for a crime they never committed and a confession they signed after being tortured by the British police...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birmingham … uestioning

Also try watching this Oscar-nominated movie about the Guildford Four:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_the_Nam … %28film%29
there are plenty of other victims as well not so well highlighted. I did some work with prisoners "interrogated" in Castlereagh barracks as part of my university work and it was one of the most harrowing experiences of my life tbf. All it left were people with fractured broken minds & spirits, there only crime was police suspicion..
Ok.  So what is YOUR solution then?   

Let me give you an example:

You find out someone is going to blow up a building in your country.  You find someone who you think may have information that could stop that attack.  So, how do you get the info?  How do you get the info out of someone who is sworn to kill you?
i'd start with the finger nails, then the teeth, then i'd whip the bollox out and get out the electrodes.. what about you?
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6808
Nothing is going to dissuade usmarine from his desire to pull the teeth out of anyone who even looks at him the wrong way or that perhaps had felafel for lunch. Plus he doesn't care that it makes America look like shit that they stoop to using torture.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2007-12-12 09:12:07)

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard