I can't see how, they are totally independent issues.usmarine2005 wrote:
It was his choice to be a public figure. It was his choice to come back and beg for attention. This is what he gets. You look at it black and white Bert. For him, it is related.Bertster7 wrote:
What do dog fights have to do with the environment? It's unrelated.
No, it isn't.ATG wrote:
Environment is environment.
Don't cry about the planet having a fever when you are part of the virus that doesn't give a shit about other life forms that share it.
You just look like a complete asshole when you preach "uber eco friendliness" and then dine on endangered species...Bertster7 wrote:
No, it isn't.ATG wrote:
Environment is environment.
Don't cry about the planet having a fever when you are part of the virus that doesn't give a shit about other life forms that share it.
A species of fish dying out will not significantly affect peoples day to day lives, the potential consequences of climate change could have a tremendous impact on peoples lives.
Can you not see how the issues are unrelated? It is not a case of environment is environment, that's like saying science is science - there are different fields. One does not have to endorse all to support one.
Why?CommieChipmunk wrote:
You just look like a complete asshole when you preach "uber eco friendliness" and then dine on endangered species...Bertster7 wrote:
No, it isn't.ATG wrote:
Environment is environment.
Don't cry about the planet having a fever when you are part of the virus that doesn't give a shit about other life forms that share it.
A species of fish dying out will not significantly affect peoples day to day lives, the potential consequences of climate change could have a tremendous impact on peoples lives.
Can you not see how the issues are unrelated? It is not a case of environment is environment, that's like saying science is science - there are different fields. One does not have to endorse all to support one.
Lies should be president. Hmm. Well, that's hardly a new concept.ATG wrote:
Lies.sergeriver wrote:
Who should be president? A guy who eats fish or a guy who starts a war over false evidence? A guy who got 500,000 more votes or the other guy? Geez, I dunno.
Chilean Sea Bass is not an endangered species. http://www.state.gov/g/oes/rls/fs/2002/8989.htmCommieChipmunk wrote:
You just look like a complete asshole when you preach "uber eco friendliness" and then dine on endangered species...Bertster7 wrote:
No, it isn't.ATG wrote:
Environment is environment.
Don't cry about the planet having a fever when you are part of the virus that doesn't give a shit about other life forms that share it.
A species of fish dying out will not significantly affect peoples day to day lives, the potential consequences of climate change could have a tremendous impact on peoples lives.
Can you not see how the issues are unrelated? It is not a case of environment is environment, that's like saying science is science - there are different fields. One does not have to endorse all to support one.
You believe the government?TGMaverick wrote:
Chilean Sea Bass is not an endangered species. http://www.state.gov/g/oes/rls/fs/2002/8989.htmCommieChipmunk wrote:
You just look like a complete asshole when you preach "uber eco friendliness" and then dine on endangered species...Bertster7 wrote:
No, it isn't.
A species of fish dying out will not significantly affect peoples day to day lives, the potential consequences of climate change could have a tremendous impact on peoples lives.
Can you not see how the issues are unrelated? It is not a case of environment is environment, that's like saying science is science - there are different fields. One does not have to endorse all to support one.
While the majority of Chilean Sea Bass is poached and/or harvested illegally, it doesn't mean that they're an endangered species.
Apparently you forget that Al Gore was critical of the Bush administration for not taking more action against Iraq during the years we were enforcing the no fly zones and no cooperation from Hussein to verify what EVERYBODY thought Hussein was hiding. Everybody has an extremely short, close minded memory. Gore was actually pushing for war before 9/11. If he had become president we would have gone to war in Iraq as well...no difference!!.sergeriver wrote:
Didn't he go to Iraq coz of WMDs? Didn't Gore get 500,000 more votes than Bush? Maybe I watched the wrong channel.ATG wrote:
The false evidence part and the more votes part.
Holy shit, you actually remember how it really happened and what that blow hard was saying.DeathBecomesYu wrote:
Apparently you forget that Al Gore was critical of the Bush administration for not taking more action against Iraq during the years we were enforcing the no fly zones and no cooperation from Hussein to verify what EVERYBODY thought Hussein was hiding. Everybody has an extremely short, close minded memory. Gore was actually pushing for war before 9/11. If he had become president we would have gone to war in Iraq as well...no difference!!.sergeriver wrote:
Didn't he go to Iraq coz of WMDs? Didn't Gore get 500,000 more votes than Bush? Maybe I watched the wrong channel.ATG wrote:
The false evidence part and the more votes part.
He would have gotten the same intel from the same Iraqi foreign nationals and same CIA, the same photos and we would be there. Again, he CRITICIZED Bush in televised debates about the LACK of military action against Iraq over the stalemate that was going on between the UN and Iraq. Who cares about whether Bush or Gore won by whatever amount of votes....the same result was coming in regards to war. PERIOD!!!!!!!!! Gore was ready for war, pushed for it and 9/11 would have triggered him as well.......
The Daily Telegraph? Therefore it must be true.ATG wrote:
What a moron. All his crying about the environment and now this.Gore and his guests at the weekend ceremony dined on Chilean sea bass - arguably one of the world's most threatened fish species.
He should be laughed out of society, but instead you still have people saying he should be president.
Amazing.
http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/s … 31,00.html
... is this ... an endangered species? No.
Last edited by topal63 (2007-07-18 12:18:14)
.... increasing confidence that the stock [fish pop.] is in healthy condition.
Last edited by topal63 (2007-07-18 12:18:59)
Most people have probably eaten at least one type of fish while it was on a real endangered species list anyway. It's not a big deal.topal63 wrote:
The Daily Telegraph? Therefore it must be true.ATG wrote:
What a moron. All his crying about the environment and now this.Gore and his guests at the weekend ceremony dined on Chilean sea bass - arguably one of the world's most threatened fish species.
He should be laughed out of society, but instead you still have people saying he should be president.
Amazing.
http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/s … 31,00.html
Are you sure that it is an endangered species? Are you sure there aren't legal channels to obtain this specific fish? Are you sure that the fish he ate was even obtained illegally - and constitutes a threat to the species? Are you sure that your "not all there" gut instincts are even remotely right?
Al Gore is only an 'activist' because it suits him to be. In his own private Al Gore time, he's not such an environmentalist after all.Eboreus wrote:
wow what a surprise... here's another secret fact: al gore is not the only idiot politician/activist on this planet!
So conversely, the republicans were crying because the democrats were trying to get them to go to war, now they're crying because they want them to stop. Does this mean the republicans are also spineless traitors?ATG wrote:
Holy shit, you actually remember how it really happened and what that blow hard was saying.DeathBecomesYu wrote:
Apparently you forget that Al Gore was critical of the Bush administration for not taking more action against Iraq during the years we were enforcing the no fly zones and no cooperation from Hussein to verify what EVERYBODY thought Hussein was hiding. Everybody has an extremely short, close minded memory. Gore was actually pushing for war before 9/11. If he had become president we would have gone to war in Iraq as well...no difference!!.sergeriver wrote:
Didn't he go to Iraq coz of WMDs? Didn't Gore get 500,000 more votes than Bush? Maybe I watched the wrong channel.
He would have gotten the same intel from the same Iraqi foreign nationals and same CIA, the same photos and we would be there. Again, he CRITICIZED Bush in televised debates about the LACK of military action against Iraq over the stalemate that was going on between the UN and Iraq. Who cares about whether Bush or Gore won by whatever amount of votes....the same result was coming in regards to war. PERIOD!!!!!!!!! Gore was ready for war, pushed for it and 9/11 would have triggered him as well.......
+1
The democrats and Al Gore were pushing for war and crying because bushes daddy didn't " finish the job".
Which is a main reason why they are complete retards.
Look at the shit they are saying now; it benefits nobody but the enemy and the democrats in congress are spineless traitors.
Last edited by PureFodder (2007-07-18 13:40:35)
Yes. Yes it does.PureFodder wrote:
So conversely, the republicans were crying because the democrats were trying to get them to go to war, now they're crying because they want them to stop. Does this mean the republicans are also spineless traitors?ATG wrote:
Holy shit, you actually remember how it really happened and what that blow hard was saying.DeathBecomesYu wrote:
Apparently you forget that Al Gore was critical of the Bush administration for not taking more action against Iraq during the years we were enforcing the no fly zones and no cooperation from Hussein to verify what EVERYBODY thought Hussein was hiding. Everybody has an extremely short, close minded memory. Gore was actually pushing for war before 9/11. If he had become president we would have gone to war in Iraq as well...no difference!!.
He would have gotten the same intel from the same Iraqi foreign nationals and same CIA, the same photos and we would be there. Again, he CRITICIZED Bush in televised debates about the LACK of military action against Iraq over the stalemate that was going on between the UN and Iraq. Who cares about whether Bush or Gore won by whatever amount of votes....the same result was coming in regards to war. PERIOD!!!!!!!!! Gore was ready for war, pushed for it and 9/11 would have triggered him as well.......
+1
The democrats and Al Gore were pushing for war and crying because bushes daddy didn't " finish the job".
Which is a main reason why they are complete retards.
Look at the shit they are saying now; it benefits nobody but the enemy and the democrats in congress are spineless traitors.
... Al Gore's movie is probably the MOST biased and full of shit documentary ever created. Hell, some of their footage did not match the places described.MAGUIRE93 wrote:
i hate him we had to watch the movie he made a my school
Silly you, remember it was Al Queda training camps after WMD's, then it went to Sadaam was a bad man. Geez kids these days.....sergeriver wrote:
Didn't he go to Iraq coz of WMDs? Didn't Gore get 500,000 more votes than Bush? Maybe I watched the wrong channel.ATG wrote:
The false evidence part and the more votes part.
