(Could'nt sleep) I say HK416/417. I know the XM8 project was canceled but i still think it would've been better then the current guns. I like look and design of those guns.(And the HK417 maybe able to use AK47 mags like the Scar-H) So what do you guys think/suggest?
- Index »
- Community »
- Everything Else »
- What gun should the US Military adopt as a replacement to the M16/M4?
M4 is just fine...and they should bring back the M-60.
Well not from the stories i've heard.usmarine2005 wrote:
M4 is just fine...and they should bring back the M-60.
Hell yeah! The M60 is the ownage! Why oh why did they replace it with the M249?
I think the H&K 416 would be an awesome choice. Its a lot more reliable under punishment from what I've seen and read about. If I had a choice after that I would probably go with the SCAR-H in .308.
Israeli IMI Tavor TAR-21, 5.56 or 7.62 converted. Great urban combat weapon and deadly to 300m. If they were to replace it this is the way I would go as US seems to be engaging in more urban based combat operations. Plus who knows more about fighting Islamic fundamentalists than the Israelis.
Last edited by Arcano-D.E.S (2007-07-17 22:13:44)
True true. Most marines wish they had .308 guns like the Insurgents(Take em down in a shot or 2 not 3 or 4 with the current .223 rounds)Velker wrote:
I think the H&K 416 would be an awesome choice. Its a lot more reliable under punishment from what I've seen and read about. If I had a choice after that I would probably go with the SCAR-H in .308.
You guys have to remember the stockpiles of NATO ammo before you suggest new weapons.
Tavor fires NATO 5.56mm. Winning so far.
Yeah they do have alot of .308 rounds left over from the FAL's dont they? Also does'nt the M14 have the ability to pick up 47 rounds like the Scar-H?usmarine2005 wrote:
You guys have to remember the stockpiles of NATO ammo before you suggest new weapons.
a potato gun. but seriously....bring back the uzi.
No, the M-14 uses the same cartridge as teh M-60. Plus, M-14's use a straight mag, not banana curve.David.Podedworny wrote:
Yeah they do have alot of .308 rounds left over from the FAL's dont they? Also does'nt the M14 have the ability to pick up 47 rounds like the Scar-H?usmarine2005 wrote:
You guys have to remember the stockpiles of NATO ammo before you suggest new weapons.
Lol man thats too gangsta. The Mp5 is better thought more accurate. But i really miss the ability to dual wield them(Fear me Bitches http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvX14Oiy … mp;search=)agent146 wrote:
a potato gun. but seriously....bring back the uzi.
Really what blocks it?PsychoKillers wrote:
No, the M-14 uses the same cartridge as teh M-60. Plus, M-14's use a straight mag, not banana curve.David.Podedworny wrote:
Yeah they do have alot of .308 rounds left over from the FAL's dont they? Also does'nt the M14 have the ability to pick up 47 rounds like the Scar-H?usmarine2005 wrote:
You guys have to remember the stockpiles of NATO ammo before you suggest new weapons.
Muskets
- Superior Mind
- (not macbeth)
- +1,755|6689
He said rounds, not magazines when referring to the M14. And what blocks it would be the magazine housing...David.Podedworny wrote:
Lol man thats too gangsta. The Mp5 is better thought more accurate. But i really miss the ability to dual wield them(Fear me Bitches http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvX14Oiy … mp;search=)agent146 wrote:
a potato gun. but seriously....bring back the uzi.Really what blocks it?PsychoKillers wrote:
No, the M-14 uses the same cartridge as teh M-60. Plus, M-14's use a straight mag, not banana curve.David.Podedworny wrote:
Yeah they do have alot of .308 rounds left over from the FAL's dont they? Also does'nt the M14 have the ability to pick up 47 rounds like the Scar-H?
no, the uzi was outdated by the MP5 you love so much.agent146 wrote:
a potato gun. but seriously....bring back the uzi.
M4/M16 just with 6.8mm ammo. Let the SAWs eat the 223.
steyr aug http://www.world.guns.ru/assault/as20-e.htm
Last edited by <SharpShot> (2007-07-17 22:52:55)
I'd go with the H&K416 as well. I've seen some test vids of it, like the modular nature of the design, and note that it's really just an evolutionary step in the M4/16 lineage.
Fook it, we give everyone an M24 and 40 claymores and let them either spend days in the bushes or let them run straight at the enemy with a claymore.
These
Give foreigners another reason to despise the US? No way man.RDMC(2) wrote:
Fook it, we give everyone an M24 and 40 claymores and let them either spend days in the bushes or let them run straight at the enemy with a claymore.
It is with FF off right? Plus, 40 isn't enough.
G36. Is there a better gun to use when fighting in cities in the middle east?
MP7, no barrel sticking out. Don't really need super-high-powered guns in close combat.Sup3r_Dr4gon wrote:
G36. Is there a better gun to use when fighting in cities in the middle east?
M14
Ah, a man after my old CS heart! I think this was my second favorite weapon in the world back then, the first being my good looks. Hey-yo!!<SharpShot> wrote:
steyr aug http://www.world.guns.ru/assault/as20-e.htm
- Index »
- Community »
- Everything Else »
- What gun should the US Military adopt as a replacement to the M16/M4?