My two friends were arguing about whether it is more sane to shoot someone just once so the corpse wouldn't be too gross, or multiple times to ensure quick death. So, I decided to ask you guys. I think multiple times is better, because almost all rounds will make a orpse look disugsting, and it is better if the victim has a quick, painless death. But both are grisly, though, and I am not going to do it.
Poll
What is more sane?
| shoot just once to not ruin dead body | 31% | 31% - 16 | ||||
| shoot multiple times to ensure quick death | 68% | 68% - 35 | ||||
| Total: 51 | ||||||
Single round to the face. (Sure death...sometimes)thtthht wrote:
My two friends were arguing about whether it is more sane to shoot someone just once so the corpse wouldn't be too gross, or multiple times to ensure quick death. So, I decided to ask you guys. I think multiple times is better, because almost all rounds will make a orpse look disugsting, and it is better if the victim has a quick, painless death. But both are grisly, though, and I am not going to do it.
Anywho, it doesn't matter where your shoot a person, there is still going to be a big hole spilling blood and other bodily fluids...it's never pretty.
Depends on the round, a .50 Cal will make a much larger hole then a .22.MorbiD.ShoT wrote:
Single round to the face. (Sure death...sometimes)thtthht wrote:
My two friends were arguing about whether it is more sane to shoot someone just once so the corpse wouldn't be too gross, or multiple times to ensure quick death. So, I decided to ask you guys. I think multiple times is better, because almost all rounds will make a orpse look disugsting, and it is better if the victim has a quick, painless death. But both are grisly, though, and I am not going to do it.
Anywho, it doesn't matter where your shoot a person, there is still going to be a big hole spilling blood and other bodily fluids...it's never pretty.
Last edited by r2zoo (2007-06-15 21:53:42)
...No shit.r2zoo wrote:
Depends on the round, a .50 Cal will make a much larger hole then a .22.MorbiD.ShoT wrote:
Single round to the face. (Sure death...sometimes)thtthht wrote:
My two friends were arguing about whether it is more sane to shoot someone just once so the corpse wouldn't be too gross, or multiple times to ensure quick death. So, I decided to ask you guys. I think multiple times is better, because almost all rounds will make a orpse look disugsting, and it is better if the victim has a quick, painless death. But both are grisly, though, and I am not going to do it.
Anywho, it doesn't matter where your shoot a person, there is still going to be a big hole spilling blood and other bodily fluids...it's never pretty.
This really depends on where you hit them, such as, if you hit them in the face the body isn't going to be pretty at all... And in the torso multiple times would be better as you could disguise it for a funeral (if thats what your getting after)
I assume if this were real life that you're not going to line up a perfect headshot, so I said multiple times. I'm also assuming you're using a 9mm pistol or some other small caliber weapon. If it were a .50 cal rifle, hell one shot will do it. But that is very unlikely to be your situation.
More sane? Riiiiiight.
You are killing someone but worrying about how the corpse will look? What, do you have to go to the funeral because you know them? And don't want top give away you did it?
Need more info.
You are killing someone but worrying about how the corpse will look? What, do you have to go to the funeral because you know them? And don't want top give away you did it?
Need more info.
Actually, a .50 Cal would tear a chunk off, not just make a hole. Those things are really underrated in BF2, I've stood behind a guy when he was shooting one on the practice range and wow, those things are loud, the tear throught the targets like crazy and to tell you the truth, I don't think you could survive one shot from one of those unless it was in a leg or somethin.r2zoo wrote:
Depends on the round, a .50 Cal will make a much larger hole then a .22.MorbiD.ShoT wrote:
Single round to the face. (Sure death...sometimes)thtthht wrote:
My two friends were arguing about whether it is more sane to shoot someone just once so the corpse wouldn't be too gross, or multiple times to ensure quick death. So, I decided to ask you guys. I think multiple times is better, because almost all rounds will make a orpse look disugsting, and it is better if the victim has a quick, painless death. But both are grisly, though, and I am not going to do it.
Anywho, it doesn't matter where your shoot a person, there is still going to be a big hole spilling blood and other bodily fluids...it's never pretty.
well i thought this was bf2 and wtf why u think this u emo or somthing, off topic, one person was shot once to the face another mutiple times int he body, where did they find this info bf2s.com their alll going to hell their
this is a stup[id thread but besides that face once shot when im hunting one shot then im shooting claypigeons one shot when im shooting my bwo one shot
this is a stup[id thread but besides that face once shot when im hunting one shot then im shooting claypigeons one shot when im shooting my bwo one shot
You don't want to make a gross corpse? That all depends on your interpretation; I might not even be phased if you sawed someone in half with gunfire.
Don't worry BF2s members. When I kill you, you're dying on the first shot.
Don't worry BF2s members. When I kill you, you're dying on the first shot.
Phew, thanks for the re-assurance.DesertFox- wrote:
You don't want to make a gross corpse? That all depends on your interpretation; I might not even be phased if you sawed someone in half with gunfire.
Don't worry BF2s members. When I kill you, you're dying on the first shot.
id have to go with the multiple-round sure death
i mean come on, you do NOT want to make anyone suffer through a long death just because you want them to look nicer for their family's or w/e
i mean come on, you do NOT want to make anyone suffer through a long death just because you want them to look nicer for their family's or w/e
?Tushers wrote:
well i thought this was bf2 and wtf why u think this u emo or somthing, off topic, one person was shot once to the face another mutiple times int he body, where did they find this info bf2s.com their alll going to hell their
this is a stup[id thread but besides that face once shot when im hunting one shot then im shooting claypigeons one shot when im shooting my bwo one shot
BF2S.com Rules wrote:
Post in English, or as close as you can reasonably get.
Well. You have a gun and you actually have the killing intent.
unless there are gards you need to be scared of why not use the rest of the clip?
unless there are gards you need to be scared of why not use the rest of the clip?
WTF?
I think you should talk it over with your school councilor.
Or better yet a shrink. Seek professional help immediately!
I think you should talk it over with your school councilor.
Or better yet a shrink. Seek professional help immediately!
Depends on calibre.
Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.
does it matter? their dead
No, a .50 Cal creates a fucking void at what it hits, not a hole.r2zoo wrote:
Depends on the round, a .50 Cal will make a much larger hole then a .22.MorbiD.ShoT wrote:
Single round to the face. (Sure death...sometimes)thtthht wrote:
My two friends were arguing about whether it is more sane to shoot someone just once so the corpse wouldn't be too gross, or multiple times to ensure quick death. So, I decided to ask you guys. I think multiple times is better, because almost all rounds will make a orpse look disugsting, and it is better if the victim has a quick, painless death. But both are grisly, though, and I am not going to do it.
Anywho, it doesn't matter where your shoot a person, there is still going to be a big hole spilling blood and other bodily fluids...it's never pretty.
shoot him 50 times, just to make extra sure....
LOL please don't tell me you're going to kill someone
Last edited by التعريفات (2007-06-16 00:50:24)
>.>..... who knows...? i have killed 19 600 people. and i eat them, i think im pretty normal.. do you? O.oالتعريفات wrote:
LOL please don't tell me you're going to kill someone
this isn't a productive area of discussion, nor a sane one.
Multiple times, though not too many, i would imagine bullets cost money.
several times, depends on what you have really and the distance your shooting at. ie. a 9mm at 20 feet you'd aim for the head and hit them once. 9mm at 50-60feet aim for the body and fire multiple times to make sure.
standard NATO rifle round you'd aim for the chest at a decent distance and shoot 2-3 rounds to make sure they're gone.
anything above a .44, just plain shoot em once, as long as it hits them then wherever you've shot them you've taken a huge chunk out of them and at the very least severed some important blood vessel.
standard NATO rifle round you'd aim for the chest at a decent distance and shoot 2-3 rounds to make sure they're gone.
anything above a .44, just plain shoot em once, as long as it hits them then wherever you've shot them you've taken a huge chunk out of them and at the very least severed some important blood vessel.
gotta be quick death, the other is so much more of a trivial issue