Fallschirmjager10
Member
+36|6718

PspRpg-7 wrote:

No, we want a PLA vs USMC infantry map, INFANTRY! >.<
Me too, thats why im making one lol, but this editor is incredibly difficulty...
PspRpg-7
-
+961|6955

cowami wrote:

PspRpg-7 wrote:

No, we want a PLA vs USMC infantry map, INFANTRY! >.<

cowami wrote:

EDIT: On topic, don't forget that there should be ladders/stairs leading up to the roof for the "highrise" flag.
Also, make the streets tiny and cramped, like the real Hong Kong. This way, the tanks and other armor would have to stay on main (i.e. wide) thoroughfares in order to avoid C4 traps, while at the same time providing a place for infantry to take cover from vehicle fire.
Pffft, I want a map similar to Karkand...But with PLA instead of MEC. Is that so hard to ask? And Karkand would look purdy with a tropical setting...Hawt.
Gooners
Wiki Contributor
+2,700|6890

^^Mmmm that would be teh sex. I can see it now. The child of Wake-Karkand.
Undetected_Killer
Le fuck?
+98|6543|FIYAH FIYAH FIYAAAAAAH

Gooners wrote:

^^Mmmm that would be teh sex. I can see it now. The child of Wake-Karkand.
ZOMFG.

And less battle-fog.
PspRpg-7
-
+961|6955

Gooners wrote:

^^Mmmm that would be teh sex. I can see it now. The child of Wake-Karkand.
Would that mean a claymore-J10 hybrid...? *shudder*
cowami
OY, BITCHTITS!
+1,106|6547|Noo Yawk, Noo Yawk

PspRpg-7 wrote:

Gooners wrote:

^^Mmmm that would be teh sex. I can see it now. The child of Wake-Karkand.
Would that mean a claymore-J10 hybrid...? *shudder*
/pun

You mean the Clay-10?!

AHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA!

/end pun
https://i.imgur.com/PfIpcdn.gif
PspRpg-7
-
+961|6955

cowami wrote:

PspRpg-7 wrote:

Gooners wrote:

^^Mmmm that would be teh sex. I can see it now. The child of Wake-Karkand.
Would that mean a claymore-J10 hybrid...? *shudder*
/pun

You mean the Clay-10?!

AHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA!

/end pun
So lame. >.<
tgust5
Member
+22|6884
good idea--but that was a large area---i guess it would have to be scaled down like wake island was.
-]Eucalyptus[-
I'm a MOO MOO STARRR!!1
+17|7001|Switzerland (Im not swiss tho)
ok this might be a technicality, but i dont think an aircraft carrier could be in that channel and so close to land. the depth of the water isnt enough
Cheez
Herman is a warmaphrodite
+1,027|6696|King Of The Islands

-]Eucalyptus[- wrote:

ok this might be a technicality, but i dont think an aircraft carrier could be in that channel and so close to land. the depth of the water isnt enough
Aside from the fact they wouldn't park the thing so close...
My state was founded by Batman. Your opinion is invalid.
Eagle
Togs8896 is my evil alter ego
+567|6888|New Hampshire, USA

-]Eucalyptus[- wrote:

ok this might be a technicality, but i dont think an aircraft carrier could be in that channel and so close to land. the depth of the water isnt enough
Well, there is a cruise ship docked there so the carrier cant be much bigger than that eh?
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/14407/Sig_Pats.jpg
-]Eucalyptus[-
I'm a MOO MOO STARRR!!1
+17|7001|Switzerland (Im not swiss tho)

-=]NS[=-Eagle wrote:

-]Eucalyptus[- wrote:

ok this might be a technicality, but i dont think an aircraft carrier could be in that channel and so close to land. the depth of the water isnt enough
Well, there is a cruise ship docked there so the carrier cant be much bigger than that eh?


an aircraft carrier is much, much bigger than any cruise ship



LONG LIVE THE USS REGAN!!!
pj666
Member
+16|6623|Sydney, Australia
Unless anyone has noticed, the suggested map on the first post is about 100 times the size of Oman or Wake. It is too big.

What is needed is an urban map this is like Karkand, except wall to wall buildings.

You could have a carrier, Honkers is a deep water harbour. Failing that, just have a base on the docks that is uncappable like Karkand. Or not (would make PLA attacks on the base more important ....)
Fenix14
scout rush kekeke ^___^
+116|6814|Brisbane, Aus

I wouldn't have a carrier there really (since you want an urban map) maybe just a section of city cut off from the mainland covered in military hardware, and a dock full of boats

So it'll be a mad rush to land and cap the cities for the US

and a mad rush to eryx/snipe/mow down the US boats for the PLA
FFLink
There is.
+1,380|6948|Devon, England

cowami wrote:

FFLink13 wrote:

I could make it, but I would need different buldings
Do it, FF. You know you want to. Search your feelings, you know them to be true...

/huggles Star Wars
Like I said, it will look shit without the right buildings

I don't know how to make buildings either.
B-Scimitar
Defeating your warriors.
+116|6667|Espoo, Finland

-]Eucalyptus[- wrote:

-=]NS[=-Eagle wrote:

-]Eucalyptus[- wrote:

ok this might be a technicality, but i dont think an aircraft carrier could be in that channel and so close to land. the depth of the water isnt enough
Well, there is a cruise ship docked there so the carrier cant be much bigger than that eh?


an aircraft carrier is much, much bigger than any cruise ship



LONG LIVE THE USS REGAN!!!
USS Reagan:
Draft: ~12m (40ft)
Length: 333m (1092ft)

MS Freedom of the Seas:
Draft: 8,5m (28ft)
Length: 339m (1111ft)

Well, not that much bigger after all..
venom6
Since day One.
+247|6816|Hungary
Nicw ideas but i think 1-2 black hawks would be enough and no cobra and as u said no jets.
That would make it to a PLA Karkand map whats based on infantry and armor combat yeah ofc we need a 2nd PLA map whats a city map and has a cobra...something like Sharqi.
Hopefully EA/DICE did not forget that there are still people who play bf2 !
PrivateVendetta
I DEMAND XMAS THEME
+704|6449|Roma
These all sound so cool,

Wakand......*Dribbles*
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/29388/stopped%20scrolling%21.png

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard