ATG
Banned
+5,233|6812|Global Command
http://www.sprawlcity.org/


For years I have been listening to members of the left decry " urban sprawl." They seem to want us to stick to the concrete jungles and leave open spaces open.

Question; with the estimated 10-40 million people about to be granted status the question remains; where are the school, roads and hospitals for these people? Any American advocating for illegal alien rights must renounce his right to complain about urban sprawl, smog and traffic.

http://www.vdare.com/guzzardi/health_care.htm

Last edited by ATG (2007-05-18 23:41:37)

dubbs
Member
+105|6915|Lexington, KY
What are you talking about.  The illegals are already here.  They use the schools that are already here, the roads that are already here.  It is not like, one day 10-40 million people just walk into the US borders and say "Hey, we are here".  They already live among us.  They are already using our health care, they already visit our hospitals.  Once again, we are not sending buses into other countries saying we have to have 10-40 million people, and we are taking back to our nation right now. 

ATG, you had some good points in the past, but it seems that you not thinking before you post.  First the hypocritical post about famous people, and how the government must stop illegals, but you still have the right to hire them, because you are not part of the issue.
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6958|Canberra, AUS
Hey, don't look at me. I like urban sprawl - I just don't like the traffic poorly-planned cities bring.

Maybe that's because I live in a city where you can see more trees than buildings...

PS. You seem to be implying that if they don't have status, they don't exist...

Last edited by Spark (2007-05-18 23:51:26)

The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
PureFodder
Member
+225|6569
America worrying about urban sprawl?!

America has roughly a tenth of the population density of England. Most of America is empty space.

Envorinmentallists are being stupid (again).
mcminty
Moderating your content for the Australian Govt.
+879|7005|Sydney, Australia

Spark wrote:


Maybe that's because I live in a city where you can see more trees than buildings...

Or because Canberra was acutally planned out before it was built... unlike Sydney.


Mcminty.
Mason4Assassin444
retired
+552|6946|USA
NOw its 40 million? TOmmorrow it will be 80 million.
Blehm98
conservative hatemonger
+150|6747|meh-land
the rate of immigration will increase, especially if this bill in the house passes...  soon we'll have a hundred thousand mexicans moving into california daily, and they know all they have to do is wait 15 years and they all get amnesty again
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6812|Global Command

dubbs wrote:

ATG, you had some good points in the past, but it seems that you not thinking before you post.  First the hypocritical post about famous people, and how the government must stop illegals, but you still have the right to hire them, because you are not part of the issue.
I'm simply saying that the same liberals who are always crying about the environment and urban sprawl are now giddy about the idea of 10-40 million more people being here.

True, it's not like the 10 million weren't here before, but what about their families and the stampede of new immigrants that will come because they know America does  not believe in enforcing the law.

This is Santa Ana, once the cleanest proudest city in Orange County, the county seat and center of business in Orange County. This city once had mansions and wealth, but now aside from a few streets of dyhards the entire city has been abandoned to illegal aliens.

See any American flags in this crowd?

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/theblog/archive/walkout.jpg

https://www.neo-liberalism.org/4th-and-main-santa-ana-lunchtime.jpeg

Last edited by ATG (2007-05-19 09:30:03)

jonsimon
Member
+224|6778

ATG wrote:

http://www.sprawlcity.org/


For years I have been listening to members of the left decry " urban sprawl." They seem to want us to stick to the concrete jungles and leave open spaces open.

Question; with the estimated 10-40 million people about to be granted status the question remains; where are the school, roads and hospitals for these people? Any American advocating for illegal alien rights must renounce his right to complain about urban sprawl, smog and traffic.

http://www.vdare.com/guzzardi/health_care.htm
Yet another left-attacking thread brought to you by ATG, the fox news of DST.
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6812|Global Command
Those who can't justify their own ramblings often attack mine.

Piss off Jonsimone and go find an anti Israel thread.
jonsimon
Member
+224|6778

PureFodder wrote:

America worrying about urban sprawl?!

America has roughly a tenth of the population density of England. Most of America is empty space.

Envorinmentallists are being stupid (again).
That's a silly stat. You should be comparing the area of urban cities in both countries in sq mi. (or km) Your stat is skewed by the differences in the size of our nations.
jonsimon
Member
+224|6778

ATG wrote:

Those who can't justify their own ramblings often attack mine.

Piss off Jonsimone and go find an anti Israel thread.
If you don't like it when I point out your bias and sensationalism, maybe you should make more objective OPs.
Harmor
Error_Name_Not_Found
+605|6832|San Diego, CA, USA

jonsimon wrote:

ATG wrote:

http://www.sprawlcity.org/


For years I have been listening to members of the left decry " urban sprawl." They seem to want us to stick to the concrete jungles and leave open spaces open.

Question; with the estimated 10-40 million people about to be granted status the question remains; where are the school, roads and hospitals for these people? Any American advocating for illegal alien rights must renounce his right to complain about urban sprawl, smog and traffic.

http://www.vdare.com/guzzardi/health_care.htm
Yet another left-attacking thread brought to you by ATG, the fox news of DST.
If you have proof to refute ATG, then please present it here.  Name-calling because you have nothing to contradict or contrast his point just identifies you as a liberal.


The bill, as it is currently written, will allow family members, so the 12 million here could invite their family members not yet in the United States, thus giving amnesty to 25-40 more people.

When so many new people are added to a country, it does not give them enough time to acclimate to that country, thus the country changes to that of the news immigrants.


  • Healthcare (Medicare, Emergency Rooms closings)
  • Social Services (Social Security, Welfare)
  • Education (costs of schools, English-as-a-second Language classes)
  • 'Anchor Babies' (14-year-olds having babies)
  • Criminal (32% of all violent crime is done by illegals)
  • Employment (H-1B visa depress American wages in that field, Low-skilled Americans have a harder time getting a job)
  • Policial (66% of new immigrants vote Democrat)
My father came legally here in 1970 when he was 16 and my mom legally in 1971 when she was 14.  In 1972 my father joined the military and became a citizen in 1976.  My mom became a citizen in 1982.As a 1st generation American I can say that controlled legal immigration is good for our country.  Our priorties should be:
  • Control the physical border (fences, drones, Border Patrol agents)
  • National Identification Card (national database for employee status verification)
  • Employeer Enforcement (once the National ID is in place, enforce existing laws)
  • Change the Constitution (do not allow children of illegal immigrants to become legal citizens, but DO allow them to apply when they turn 18)

Last edited by Harmor (2007-05-19 10:49:22)

jonsimon
Member
+224|6778

Harmor wrote:

jonsimon wrote:

ATG wrote:

http://www.sprawlcity.org/


For years I have been listening to members of the left decry " urban sprawl." They seem to want us to stick to the concrete jungles and leave open spaces open.

Question; with the estimated 10-40 million people about to be granted status the question remains; where are the school, roads and hospitals for these people? Any American advocating for illegal alien rights must renounce his right to complain about urban sprawl, smog and traffic.

http://www.vdare.com/guzzardi/health_care.htm
Yet another left-attacking thread brought to you by ATG, the fox news of DST.
If you have proof to refute ATG, then please present it here.  Name-calling because you have nothing to contradict or contrast his point just identifies you as a liberal.
You mistunderstand Harmor, I'm not refuting his point, merely identifying a trend among ATGs OPs. Within all ATGs threads, regardless of subject, is a sometimes not so thinly veiled attack on either "liberals" or "the left." These attacks are often associated with sensationalism reminiscent of Fox news, hence the title "the fox news of DST." I appreciate your valiant attempt to heroicly defend ATG, but you misunderstood our conflict entirely. You also used the word liberal in a very ignorant manner. Though it may have been intentional, it doesn't present you as an intelligent person.
SEREMAKER
BABYMAKIN EXPERT √
+2,187|6852|Mountains of NC

jonsimon wrote:

Harmor wrote:

jonsimon wrote:


Yet another left-attacking thread brought to you by ATG, the fox news of DST.
If you have proof to refute ATG, then please present it here.  Name-calling because you have nothing to contradict or contrast his point just identifies you as a liberal.
You mistunderstand Harmor, I'm not refuting his point, merely identifying a trend among ATGs OPs. Within all ATGs threads, regardless of subject, is a sometimes not so thinly veiled attack on either "liberals" or "the left." These attacks are often associated with sensationalism reminiscent of Fox news, hence the title "the fox news of DST." I appreciate your valiant attempt to heroicly defend ATG, but you misunderstood our conflict entirely. You also used the word liberal in a very ignorant manner. Though it may have been intentional, it doesn't present you as an intelligent person.
and how many threads are there attacking right-wings ALOT, so instead of bring up some kind of post on debateing against ATGs thread you would rather go for cheap shots
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/17445/carhartt.jpg
Harmor
Error_Name_Not_Found
+605|6832|San Diego, CA, USA
Liberial is a label, just like I would label Ronald Reagan or Newt Gingrich as Concervative.  To me, its proper label describing what you presented yourself as.

Why not refute his claims and thus putting him in his place.  Seems to me if you think your views are superior that would be better than saying "Yet anohter left-attacking thread brought to you by ATG, the fox news of DST. "
S3v3N
lolwut?
+685|6802|Montucky
I wonder how many of these illegal types are in our prison system.
Blehm98
conservative hatemonger
+150|6747|meh-land
1/3 of all california prisoners are illegal immigrants

i know that one is a fact right there
jonsimon
Member
+224|6778

Harmor wrote:

Liberial is a label, just like I would label Ronald Reagan or Newt Gingrich as Concervative.  To me, its proper label describing what you presented yourself as.

Why not refute his claims and thus putting him in his place.  Seems to me if you think your views are superior that would be better than saying "Yet anohter left-attacking thread brought to you by ATG, the fox news of DST. "
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal

It's not just a label, it has a meaning and correct usage, just like any word. [Edit: It also has a correct spelling. ]

Second, I'm not refuting his point because I'm not taking a stance on this issue in this thread. You don't seem to understand that I am criticizing ATG for his wordage and writing style. If you want me to make a seperate thread addressing the issue, I can do that, but it seems to me it would be construed as a personal attack and closed shortly.

Last edited by jonsimon (2007-05-19 11:33:43)

Harmor
Error_Name_Not_Found
+605|6832|San Diego, CA, USA

Blehm98 wrote:

1/3 of all california prisoners are illegal immigrants

i know that one is a fact right there
If you do a Google Search for 'How many illegal immigrants are in jail?' you get a report that says 32%.

With more than 170,000 prisoners occupying facilities designed for 83,000, California prisons are overcrowded, with most facilities holding more than 200% of their design capacity, forcing prisoners to triple-bunk in open gymnasiums and day rooms. The system, like the state as a whole, lacks a racial/ethnic majority among the population, with Hispanic inmates making up approximately 37% of the population, black and white inmates each representing about 27%, and other inmates representing 8% as of 2006.
Source: Prisons in the United States

With the above statistic, why are their a dispreportionate amount of Hispanics and Black inmates in prisons?
jonsimon
Member
+224|6778

Harmor wrote:

With the above statistic, why are their a dispreportionate amount of Hispanics and Black inmates in prisons?
The poorer or lower classes are the source of the majority of crime. So, your answer is likely that those racial groups happen to be poorer in general. This makes sense considering the majority of wealth in American history has been in the hands of the white majority. This would put modern whites as a whole at an advantage because more whites would be likely to inherit more wealth than other ethnic groups and because the poor tend to remain poor.
~c4~cheppi
Member
+29|6641|Forest Green

mcminty wrote:

Spark wrote:


Maybe that's because I live in a city where you can see more trees than buildings...

Or because Canberra was acutally planned out before it was built... unlike Sydney.


Mcminty.
Which is why people like Sydney ahead of Canberra
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6812|Global Command

jonsimon wrote:

ATG wrote:

Those who can't justify their own ramblings often attack mine.

Piss off Jonsimone and go find an anti Israel thread.
If you don't like it when I point out your bias and sensationalism, maybe you should make more objective OPs.
Since when is it my duty to be unbiased in a OP?
I'm not a reporter, I'm an America citizen, which you are not. I will make threads about topics that are important to me, from my point of view, without the slightest regard as to what or how you may think about it. There is nothing sensational about the OP, you have just resorted to attacking me in general on any thread I make about whatever topic because, bereft of any meaningful thoughts or ideas worthy of threads or serious debate you have nothing better to do.

The fact that you can't see that what I am offering for debate is the hypocrisy in the same political group decrying the expansion of urban zones and greenhouse gasses advocating an open border policy shows you're really not cut out for DST.

Or, if you can see it, yet insist on following me around my threads making useless one line comments about my mentioning the " L " word in a thread you are not cut out, either way.


Illegals deal alienates everyone

By Stephen Dinan
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
May 19, 2007

In forging an immigration deal this week, President Bush turned away from Republican allies in favor of striking a deal with Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, banking on the senior legislator to deliver enough Democrats to pass a bill.
    But the strategy may come back to haunt him, as many Democrats said they can't accept the agreement and Republicans lined up to criticize both the deal and Mr. Bush, their party's leader.
    And it may only get worse for Mr. Bush, as political forces drive the issue: Mitt Romney, the former Massachusetts governor running for the Republican presidential nomination, injected the issue straight into 2008 presidential politics, announcing he was running television commercials calling for better enforcement as the solution to illegal immigration.
    "The president's willingness to accept the granting of amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants has sent a harmful message to Republican voters around the country," said Rep. Mike Pence, Indiana Republican. "But I also believe that'll sort itself out in the primaries of 2008. At the end of the day, this is an issue where I find myself focusing less on politics than what policy I think is in the best interests of the American people."
    Last year, both Mr. Pence and Sen. John Cornyn of Texas appeared to be promising allies for Mr. Bush. Mr. Pence met with the president in the Oval Office to talk about the congressman's plan to have illegal aliens leave the country and apply to re-enter from outside.
    When Democrats won control of Congress, Mr. Bush tacked left, negotiating with Mr. Kennedy, Massachusetts Democrat, and producing a deal on Thursday that many Republicans say is amnesty.
    "The core of the apple here is the fact that 12 million illegal immigrants in this country can get right with the law without leaving the country. I think for most Americans, that is amnesty," Mr. Pence said, adding that from his read of his colleagues -- Democrats and Republicans -- "I don't believe the Senate bill has a future in the House."
    Also on the outside of the deal is Mr. Cornyn, who at one point had a bill that most closely mirrored Mr. Bush's principles of a temporary-worker program and requiring illegal aliens to leave the country without creating a new path to citizenship for them.
    Mr. Bush changed positions last April, embracing a path to citizenship, and in this new deal dropped his insistence on illegal aliens paying back taxes.
    The White House issued a 10-point statement trying to fight back against criticism of the bill, saying it was not amnesty because it includes fines and a delay before a green card is awarded. The statement also touted the administration's commitment to enforcing new, tougher immigration laws.
    "I think the president agrees with every provision in this bill," White House spokesman Tony Fratto told reporters.
    The bill, which had not been completely written by last night, would allow the estimated 12 million to 20 million illegal aliens to come forward and gain probationary status while immigration authorities are hired and an employee-verification system is created. After those changes, the probational aliens could apply for a visa, and after eight years could gain a green card, which is the step before citizenship.

Last edited by ATG (2007-05-19 14:46:20)

jonsimon
Member
+224|6778

ATG wrote:

jonsimon wrote:

ATG wrote:

Those who can't justify their own ramblings often attack mine.

Piss off Jonsimone and go find an anti Israel thread.
If you don't like it when I point out your bias and sensationalism, maybe you should make more objective OPs.
Since when is it my duty to be unbiased in a OP?
I'm not a reporter, I'm an America citizen, which you are not.
It may not be your duty but it is my privilage to criticize you for it. And where do you get the idea I am not an American citizen? Did you conveniently forget my nationality?
Harmor
Error_Name_Not_Found
+605|6832|San Diego, CA, USA

jonsimon wrote:

ATG wrote:

jonsimon wrote:


If you don't like it when I point out your bias and sensationalism, maybe you should make more objective OPs.
Since when is it my duty to be unbiased in a OP?
I'm not a reporter, I'm an America citizen, which you are not.
It may not be your duty but it is my privilage to criticize you for it. And where do you get the idea I am not an American citizen? Did you conveniently forget my nationality?
Notice that your profile doesn't show where you are from...therefore its hard to know what you nationality is unless you had specifically mentioned it in another thread.

ATG is right.  As a Hispanic, a 1st generation American, whose parents immigrated to the United States legally, having an ordered, legal means (even if it takes 8-13 years), is a very good approach to absorb new immigrants.



As much as people hate the United States, its funny that so many of them want to come live here to have all the rights, privileges, and opportunities that their own country does not give them.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard