Isn't it a violation of privacy?CameronPoe wrote:
Erm. It's common sense to monitor them??? A damn sight more effective than travelling thousands of miles to some dusty hellhole to blow up radicals and their innocent neighbours.
They're public meeting places. If someone wants to address the public then I see little problem with checking out their rantings.usmarine2005 wrote:
Isn't it a violation of privacy?CameronPoe wrote:
Erm. It's common sense to monitor them??? A damn sight more effective than travelling thousands of miles to some dusty hellhole to blow up radicals and their innocent neighbours.
Not that I am saying it is, just echoing some forum members views.
Last edited by CameronPoe (2007-05-12 21:17:33)
What is the appropriate means of monitoring then?CameronPoe wrote:
They're public meeting places.usmarine2005 wrote:
Isn't it a violation of privacy?CameronPoe wrote:
Erm. It's common sense to monitor them??? A damn sight more effective than travelling thousands of miles to some dusty hellhole to blow up radicals and their innocent neighbours.
Not that I am saying it is, just echoing some forum members views.
Have muslim employees of the police/secret services, attend sermons.usmarine2005 wrote:
What is the appropriate means of monitoring then?CameronPoe wrote:
They're public meeting places.usmarine2005 wrote:
Isn't it a violation of privacy?
Not that I am saying it is, just echoing some forum members views.
Last edited by CameronPoe (2007-05-12 21:19:16)
Should they wear wires?CameronPoe wrote:
Have muslim employees of the police/secret services, attend sermons.
Common sense when the EU does it... When Bush does it, and goes the full 10 yards (US football -a real man's sport) you bitch....CameronPoe wrote:
Erm. It's common sense to monitor them??? A damn sight more effective than travelling thousands of miles to some dusty hellhole to blow up radicals and their innocent neighbours.
Nope, C4.. If they hear something racy they just push the buttonusmarine2005 wrote:
Should they wear wires?CameronPoe wrote:
Have muslim employees of the police/secret services, attend sermons.
US Football = Rugby with silly protectionDBBrinson1 wrote:
Common sense when the EU does it... When Bush does it, and goes the full 10 yards (US football -a real man's sport) you bitch....CameronPoe wrote:
Erm. It's common sense to monitor them??? A damn sight more effective than travelling thousands of miles to some dusty hellhole to blow up radicals and their innocent neighbours.
lol exactly!!DBBrinson1 wrote:
Common sense when the EU does it... When Bush does it, and goes the full 10 yards (US football -a real man's sport) you bitch....CameronPoe wrote:
Erm. It's common sense to monitor them??? A damn sight more effective than travelling thousands of miles to some dusty hellhole to blow up radicals and their innocent neighbours.
It's an open forum why the hell not?usmarine2005 wrote:
Should they wear wires?CameronPoe wrote:
Have muslim employees of the police/secret services, attend sermons.
I hardly think monitoring a public meeting place and setting that up legally is comparable to setting up wiretaps and attempting to water down personal privacy rights when you purport to stand for 'Liberty'.DBBrinson1 wrote:
Common sense when the EU does it... When Bush does it, and goes the full 10 yards (US football -a real man's sport) you bitch....CameronPoe wrote:
Erm. It's common sense to monitor them??? A damn sight more effective than travelling thousands of miles to some dusty hellhole to blow up radicals and their innocent neighbours.
Last edited by CameronPoe (2007-05-13 05:07:45)
If he said, " We are watching mosques"DBBrinson1 wrote:
Common sense when the EU does it... When Bush does it, and goes the full 10 yards (US football -a real man's sport) you bitch....CameronPoe wrote:
Erm. It's common sense to monitor them??? A damn sight more effective than travelling thousands of miles to some dusty hellhole to blow up radicals and their innocent neighbours.
Examining public speeches is a violation of privacy?usmarine2005 wrote:
Isn't it a violation of privacy?
The plan is to look at Muslim religious leaders who raise the the threat of extremism, who has argued against that?usmarine2005 wrote:
Not that I am saying it is, just echoing some forum members views.
Mekstizzle wrote:
If they have nothing to hide they shouldn't be worried.
Last edited by ghettoperson (2007-05-13 05:20:58)
QFTCameronPoe wrote:
Erm. It's common sense to monitor them??? A damn sight more effective than travelling thousands of miles to some dusty hellhole to blow up radicals and their innocent neighbours.
Ouch ! Be kind and use lube next time, the tyke seems lost of late.DBBrinson1 wrote:
Common sense when the EU does it... When Bush does it, and goes the full 10 yards (US football -a real man's sport) you bitch....CameronPoe wrote:
Erm. It's common sense to monitor them??? A damn sight more effective than travelling thousands of miles to some dusty hellhole to blow up radicals and their innocent neighbours.
Hunter/Jumper - have you just chosen to ignore the COUNTLESS TIMES I have repeated that terrorism must be fought through VIGILANCE and DOMESTIC security measures and not by the counter-productive methods currently being employed? Your posts are so full of holes it's not funny.Hunter/Jumper wrote:
Ouch ! Be kind and use lube next time, the tyke seems lost of late.DBBrinson1 wrote:
Common sense when the EU does it... When Bush does it, and goes the full 10 yards (US football -a real man's sport) you bitch....CameronPoe wrote:
Erm. It's common sense to monitor them??? A damn sight more effective than travelling thousands of miles to some dusty hellhole to blow up radicals and their innocent neighbours.
ps the expression is " the whole nine yards " and it refers to a USN aviation ammunition belt
Last edited by CameronPoe (2007-05-13 10:50:36)
A mosque is a public place?Bubbalo wrote:
Examining public speeches is a violation of privacy?usmarine2005 wrote:
Isn't it a violation of privacy?The plan is to look at Muslim religious leaders who raise the the threat of extremism, who has argued against that?usmarine2005 wrote:
Not that I am saying it is, just echoing some forum members views.
I've been in plenty. They're like a sort of club. Muslims bring their shopping and everything in there. Here's a pic I took inside the Blue Mosque:usmarine2005 wrote:
A mosque is a public place?Bubbalo wrote:
Examining public speeches is a violation of privacy?usmarine2005 wrote:
Isn't it a violation of privacy?The plan is to look at Muslim religious leaders who raise the the threat of extremism, who has argued against that?usmarine2005 wrote:
Not that I am saying it is, just echoing some forum members views.
Last edited by CameronPoe (2007-05-13 10:57:54)