Are you fucking with me..... He was the ONE person in that little argument that wasn't flaming. This forum seems to be verging on Nazi'ism.Ty wrote:
Stop flaming Warlord. Tempers seem to have risen after he mentioned a dark period in America's history, just calm down.
Some aren't dead, although punishing anyone for something like that would be Un-American. I think they should have a 2 year trial that gets dragged out, give them a year of probation, and then give them a book deal worth a million bucks on how they achieved greatness.Deadmonkiefart wrote:
And how do you propose we punish the people(who are all long dead) guilty of these crimes?Warlord wrote:
I think hanging black people, lynching, slavery, etc. is equally horrific ... although I guess since it happened in the USA it isn't considered "barbaric" and nobody is accountable.TrollmeaT wrote:
Truly barbaric , the people should be held accountable for their actions.
~ W
~ W
people ARE still getting prosecuted for the crimes that they commited decades ago.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please lock this thread now. Over 1/2 the posts above this line are flames.
Please lock this thread now. Over 1/2 the posts above this line are flames.
Oh great Major Spittle is back. I was beginning to miss him.
Right...The government is really going to research somthing that happened 80+ years ago and get a list of names of people who are still alive. Then is going to be a trial using 80+ year old evidence and thats if they manage to find any. How the hell are they gonna manage that?Warlord wrote:
Some aren't dead, although punishing anyone for something like that would be Un-American. I think they should have a 2 year trial that gets dragged out, give them a year of probation, and then give them a book deal worth a million bucks on how they achieved greatness.Deadmonkiefart wrote:
And how do you propose we punish the people(who are all long dead) guilty of these crimes?Warlord wrote:
I think hanging black people, lynching, slavery, etc. is equally horrific ... although I guess since it happened in the USA it isn't considered "barbaric" and nobody is accountable.
~ W
~ W
What? I wasn't blaming Warlord, you read it incorrectly. I meant "stop flaming the dude named Warlord." Understand now?Vilham wrote:
Are you fucking with me..... He was the ONE person in that little argument that wasn't flaming. This forum seems to be verging on Nazi'ism.Ty wrote:
Stop flaming Warlord. Tempers seem to have risen after he mentioned a dark period in America's history, just calm down.
[Blinking eyes thing]
Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/tzyon
Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/tzyon
I see, soz thought u were telling him to stop flaming others.Ty wrote:
What? I wasn't blaming Warlord, you read it incorrectly. I meant "stop flaming the dude named Warlord." Understand now?Vilham wrote:
Are you fucking with me..... He was the ONE person in that little argument that wasn't flaming. This forum seems to be verging on Nazi'ism.Ty wrote:
Stop flaming Warlord. Tempers seem to have risen after he mentioned a dark period in America's history, just calm down.
My friend Slinga is right, as always. And Vilhan is too, racism is on the raise here.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
people ARE still getting prosecuted for the crimes that they commited decades ago.
I'm sure there has been a hate crime (i.e. a lynching) in the USA more recently than 80 years ago ... The slavery issue not so much, I only used it as an example because it seems to get downplayed when we look at similar situations in other countries today and think they are so fucked up.
We are looking at current events. Not history. If we were talkling about history, we could bring up some seriously bad crap on any country. The reason why this is disturbing is that it happened so recently, and it makes us realise that this stuff still happens today.Warlord wrote:
I'm sure there has been a hate crime (i.e. a lynching) in the USA more recently than 80 years ago ... The slavery issue not so much, I only used it as an example because it seems to get downplayed when we look at similar situations in other countries today and think they are so fucked up.
Until you give us more concrete evidence than "I'm sure", that is not a valid arguement anyway.
On a side note, why are you trying to turn this into another Bash the US thread?
Last edited by Deadmonkiefart (2007-05-04 17:24:54)
And thanks Ty, Vilham for jumping in... I think anyone being racist here should be kicked. It amazes me that some of the same people saying middle eastern culture is barbaric, etc. are doing exactly what they claim to be opposed to, and that is hate.Vilham wrote:
I see, soz thought u were telling him to stop flaming others.Ty wrote:
What? I wasn't blaming Warlord, you read it incorrectly. I meant "stop flaming the dude named Warlord." Understand now?Vilham wrote:
Are you fucking with me..... He was the ONE person in that little argument that wasn't flaming. This forum seems to be verging on Nazi'ism.
Iraq is a hell of a lot worse than it is here. Never in my life have I heard a gunshot (except for the one time I went to a shooting range, but thats a different story), or anything nearly that bad ever in my life.Warlord wrote:
I'm sure there has been a hate crime (i.e. a lynching) in the USA more recently than 80 years ago ... The slavery issue not so much, I only used it as an example because it seems to get downplayed when we look at similar situations in other countries today and think they are so fucked up.
They are both at completely different levels.
Last edited by specops10-4 (2007-05-04 17:24:38)
There are much more horrific things in comparison to a stoning that happen in the USA, trust me ... that was really the whole point I was making way back when.Deadmonkiefart wrote:
We are looking at current events. Not history. If we were talkling about history, we could bring up some seriously bad crap on any country. The reason why this is disturbing is that it happened so recently, and it makes us realise that this stuff still happens today.Warlord wrote:
I'm sure there has been a hate crime (i.e. a lynching) in the USA more recently than 80 years ago ... The slavery issue not so much, I only used it as an example because it seems to get downplayed when we look at similar situations in other countries today and think they are so fucked up.
Last edited by Warlord (2007-05-04 17:29:13)
I dont think I have ever heard of a mob of pissed people attack someone since the 1960's. That wasn't all that long ago, but its long gone now.Warlord wrote:
There are much more horrific things in comparison to a stoning that happen in the USA, trust me ... that was really the whole point.Deadmonkiefart wrote:
We are looking at current events. Not history. If we were talkling about history, we could bring up some seriously bad crap on any country. The reason why this is disturbing is that it happened so recently, and it makes us realise that this stuff still happens today.Warlord wrote:
I'm sure there has been a hate crime (i.e. a lynching) in the USA more recently than 80 years ago ... The slavery issue not so much, I only used it as an example because it seems to get downplayed when we look at similar situations in other countries today and think they are so fucked up.
A recent example may help. Besides, if somthing like this ever happend in the US we would be all over that too.Warlord wrote:
There are much more horrific things in comparison to a stoning that happen in the USA, trust me ... that was really the whole point.Deadmonkiefart wrote:
We are looking at current events. Not history. If we were talkling about history, we could bring up some seriously bad crap on any country. The reason why this is disturbing is that it happened so recently, and it makes us realise that this stuff still happens today.Warlord wrote:
I'm sure there has been a hate crime (i.e. a lynching) in the USA more recently than 80 years ago ... The slavery issue not so much, I only used it as an example because it seems to get downplayed when we look at similar situations in other countries today and think they are so fucked up.
Why do you keep bringing up the US anyway? I find it sad that everyone must remind everyone of America's past mistakes every chance they get.
Honor and Islam are mutually exclusiveATG wrote:
Honor killings are a part of Islam.
Somebody refute me.
It is sad, although it's history. I only bring it up because it's so easy to point the finger at someone else and forget those things. I love the US very much and know it's a great country to live in ... I just think people take it for granted sometimes and don't see the whole picture, that's all. I wish people weren't such crazy fucks either, but unfortunately the world is filled with them.Deadmonkiefart wrote:
A recent example may help. Besides, if somthing like this ever happend in the US we would be all over that too.Warlord wrote:
There are much more horrific things in comparison to a stoning that happen in the USA, trust me ... that was really the whole point.Deadmonkiefart wrote:
We are looking at current events. Not history. If we were talkling about history, we could bring up some seriously bad crap on any country. The reason why this is disturbing is that it happened so recently, and it makes us realise that this stuff still happens today.
Why do you keep bringing up the US anyway? I find it sad that everyone must remind everyone of America's past mistakes every chance they get.
I do not mean to be confrontational, but *I think* you just contradicted yourself. What exactly are you trying to say?
They actually do research and try to use evidence from as far back as 80 years even further.. It's called Cold Case files, they are really putting alot of resources into closing alot of cases.. One in particular that they are still trying to close(and I think not 100% sure they know who it was) is Jack the Ripper..Deadmonkiefart wrote:
Right...The government is really going to research somthing that happened 80+ years ago and get a list of names of people who are still alive. Then is going to be a trial using 80+ year old evidence and thats if they manage to find any. How the hell are they gonna manage that?Warlord wrote:
Some aren't dead, although punishing anyone for something like that would be Un-American. I think they should have a 2 year trial that gets dragged out, give them a year of probation, and then give them a book deal worth a million bucks on how they achieved greatness.Deadmonkiefart wrote:
And how do you propose we punish the people(who are all long dead) guilty of these crimes?
~ W
Give up on it, the people are close to death anyway. Besides, we have enough of Sharpton and the "hate crimes" that go around nowadays.cpt.fass1 wrote:
They actually do research and try to use evidence from as far back as 80 years even further.. It's called Cold Case files, they are really putting alot of resources into closing alot of cases.. One in particular that they are still trying to close(and I think not 100% sure they know who it was) is Jack the Ripper..Deadmonkiefart wrote:
Right...The government is really going to research somthing that happened 80+ years ago and get a list of names of people who are still alive. Then is going to be a trial using 80+ year old evidence and thats if they manage to find any. How the hell are they gonna manage that?Warlord wrote:
Some aren't dead, although punishing anyone for something like that would be Un-American. I think they should have a 2 year trial that gets dragged out, give them a year of probation, and then give them a book deal worth a million bucks on how they achieved greatness.
~ W
Why are the US government trying to close a 150+ year old BRITISH case?cpt.fass1 wrote:
They actually do research and try to use evidence from as far back as 80 years even further.. It's called Cold Case files, they are really putting alot of resources into closing alot of cases.. One in particular that they are still trying to close(and I think not 100% sure they know who it was) is Jack the Ripper..Deadmonkiefart wrote:
Right...The government is really going to research somthing that happened 80+ years ago and get a list of names of people who are still alive. Then is going to be a trial using 80+ year old evidence and thats if they manage to find any. How the hell are they gonna manage that?Warlord wrote:
Some aren't dead, although punishing anyone for something like that would be Un-American. I think they should have a 2 year trial that gets dragged out, give them a year of probation, and then give them a book deal worth a million bucks on how they achieved greatness.
~ W
I'm not sure what you think was contradictory, but hopefully this will answer your question - In Iraq a 17-year girl gets stoned for dating a Sunni, somewhere else you might have a 17-year old stoning a hobo for being homeless ... is there really much difference?Deadmonkiefart wrote:
I do not mean to be confrontational, but *I think* you just contradicted yourself. What exactly are you trying to say?
Last edited by Warlord (2007-05-04 18:16:50)
Damn vile pigs a mental disorder plagues that continent. Nuke it now.Warlord wrote:
I'm not sure what you think was contradictory, but hopefully this will answer your question - In Iraq a 17-year girl gets stoned for dating a Sunni, somewhere else you might have a 17-year old stoning a hobo for being homeless ... is there really much difference?Deadmonkiefart wrote:
I do not mean to be confrontational, but *I think* you just contradicted yourself. What exactly are you trying to say?
+100000000000 to me.
Moral: Your shit is not clean whoever and wherever the fuck you are.
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
Someone finally agrees with me?m3thod wrote:
Damn vile pigs a mental disorder plagues that continent. Nuke it now.Warlord wrote:
I'm not sure what you think was contradictory, but hopefully this will answer your question - In Iraq a 17-year girl gets stoned for dating a Sunni, somewhere else you might have a 17-year old stoning a hobo for being homeless ... is there really much difference?Deadmonkiefart wrote:
I do not mean to be confrontational, but *I think* you just contradicted yourself. What exactly are you trying to say?