Cheez wrote:
Winamp! Winamp!
It really whips the llama's ass!
Winamp for awesome skins and compatibility. Sometimes I use KMPlayer since its sexeh.
2 years and 9 months ago and nothing has changedzeidmaan wrote:
For videos I use vlan. Its very simple to use and very good. Also it comes with all the codecs you will ever need (except FRAPS).
For music its winamp since I was born.
Except both programms got much better
winamp for audio
mpc for videos
mpc for videos
VLAN = VLC = crappy video playerzeidmaan wrote:
2 years and 9 months ago and nothing has changedzeidmaan wrote:
For videos I use vlan. Its very simple to use and very good. Also it comes with all the codecs you will ever need (except FRAPS).
For music its winamp since I was born.
Except both programms got much better
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=120599
I find it funny that the Zimmer wrote both threads.
also, I quite like rhythmbox
I find it funny that the Zimmer wrote both threads.
also, I quite like rhythmbox
Last edited by Miggle (2010-02-15 10:28:20)
Winamp sucks, I just hate software that tries to install a bunch of other things with itself.. I have to toggle in to your toolbar, not out, same with sending anonymous data..
Songbird is nice, though.
Songbird is nice, though.
I don't get it, why do people think VLC sucks? It can play everything and all Codecs are integrated which means you don't get a seperate codec pack you have to install like with MPC...Winston_Churchill wrote:
VLAN = VLC = crappy video playerzeidmaan wrote:
2 years and 9 months ago and nothing has changedzeidmaan wrote:
For videos I use vlan. Its very simple to use and very good. Also it comes with all the codecs you will ever need (except FRAPS).
For music its winamp since I was born.
Except both programms got much better
I can not find ANYTHING wrong with VLC...
Last edited by FloppY_ (2010-02-15 14:52:53)
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
Truth.Finray wrote:
Songbird is nice
using it right now, listening to music and using built in browser
It has a fairly weak codec pack, playing HD movies on it usually results in choppiness and audio lagFloppY_ wrote:
I don't get it, why do people think VLC sucks? It can play everything and all Codecs are integrated which means you don't get a seperate codec pack you have to install like with MPC...Winston_Churchill wrote:
VLAN = VLC = crappy video playerzeidmaan wrote:
2 years and 9 months ago and nothing has changed
Except both programms got much better
I can not find ANYTHING wrong with VLC...
fooobar2000 for music
I have never experienced neitherWinston_Churchill wrote:
It has a fairly weak codec pack, playing HD movies on it usually results in choppiness and audio lagFloppY_ wrote:
I don't get it, why do people think VLC sucks? It can play everything and all Codecs are integrated which means you don't get a seperate codec pack you have to install like with MPC...Winston_Churchill wrote:
VLAN = VLC = crappy video player
I can not find ANYTHING wrong with VLC...
But then again, I am satisfied with aXXo's 700mb videos...
Last edited by FloppY_ (2010-02-16 03:43:57)
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
winamp for audio
vlc for videos
vlc for videos
Winamp for audio
Vlc for SD videos
MPC-HC for HD videos
Vlc for SD videos
MPC-HC for HD videos
I don't know about this, I have some very small encodes of Mythbusters - about 150mB for a 40 minute episode. They look a lot better on MPC-HC than on VLC.tupla_s wrote:
Vlc for SD videos
MPC-HC for HD videos
Ugh, aXXo is among the worst release groups in the world. Try playing a FraMeSToR encode on VLCFloppY_ wrote:
I have never experienced neitherWinston_Churchill wrote:
It has a fairly weak codec pack, playing HD movies on it usually results in choppiness and audio lagFloppY_ wrote:
I don't get it, why do people think VLC sucks? It can play everything and all Codecs are integrated which means you don't get a seperate codec pack you have to install like with MPC...
I can not find ANYTHING wrong with VLC...
But then again, I am satisfied with aXXo's 700mb videos...
Lol Winamp. Such fail, along with Songbird. Songbird still cannot monitor more than one music folder, still rapes Ram and their new 'feather' is pretty hideous. Winamp has fugly skins and isn't light on the computer either.
Nice double post Zim
Songbird combined with 7 can monitor as many folders as you want since you can put folders under Music Library -> Monitor Music Library. Works perfectly. And Winamp has some sexy skins, still not a huge fan though. However, I still havent found my perfect music player.
Songbird combined with 7 can monitor as many folders as you want since you can put folders under Music Library -> Monitor Music Library. Works perfectly. And Winamp has some sexy skins, still not a huge fan though. However, I still havent found my perfect music player.
You know what annoys me?
All the technically good music players look like shit, while the graphically pleasing ones are terrible.
All the technically good music players look like shit, while the graphically pleasing ones are terrible.
Who'd have thought it was so hard to make a decent music player ...
I know, right?liquidat0r wrote:
Who'd have thought it was so hard to make a decent music player ...
I've asked myself that question millions of times.
AIMP2 for life. It's like Winamp, except it doesn't suck.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
Loving this opinionated circlejerk
Yeah guys, winamp is just terrible. Am I cool yet? Am I?
Yeah guys, winamp is just terrible. Am I cool yet? Am I?
But Winamp is terrible. I should know, I used it for years.Lucien wrote:
Loving this opinionated circlejerk
Yeah guys, winamp is just terrible. Am I cool yet? Am I?
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
Oh right, yes, you used it for years, well shit that completely proves you right
fucking forumites
fucking forumites