BF2S Forums Still Waiting for Your Outrage in America Muslims

lowing wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

lowing wrote:

Really, I thought the 911 finacing came from the Saudi Govt.

I thought Hamas was a state govt.

NO I know you do not condone these acts Cam, but you didn't list them at all, not even as a low priority.

a) Palestine is not a state or a nation as yet.

b) Why would the Saudi Arabian government finance the 9/11 attacks when they have a vested interest in the US economy and are personal friends with the Bush dynasty?

Oh, well shit if Palestine does not exist, and Israel does, what is everyone bitching about? How can you complain that your land was taken away when you really never had it ot begin with?

I dunno Cam, but was it not determained that the Saudi's had a part in it?

Maybe it's because Britain made kind of a promise to all Arab nations that helped in the World Wars, that they would become independent for it. That, btw, includes Palestine. And guess what Palestine got? You call this independence?

-konfusion

lowing wrote:

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/meast/04/22/iraq.main.ap/index.html

Once again, no outrage, by anyone.

They must be saving up for the next time we put a burlap sack on someone's head.

This part is much telling about their culture:

Abdul-Karim Khalaf, a police spokesman for Ninevah province, said the executions were in response to the killing two weeks ago of a Yazidi woman who had recently converted to Islam after she fell in love with a Muslim and ran off with him. Her relatives had disapproved of the match and dragged her back to Bashika, where she was stoned to death, he said.

Braddock wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070420/ap_on_re_as/pakistan_child_executioner

I do not want words from a couple people, I want the same outrage you show when you feel wronged by us.

Why when you never express outrage at US wrongdoing yourself? You want everyone you usually disagree with to explicitly prove that they are more objective than you? We already know they are

I do express outrage, but not by protests, riots, or interviews on TV.  However, if I were to express my outrage that way for one set of issues, I should have to do it also for the other set right?  Wouldn't that be fair?  Wouldn't that show my intolerance and disdain towards the radicals?