Last edited by bob_6012 (2007-04-18 16:57:03)
ur right, we should kill that bear/mountain lion that is eating our livestock with our hands!!!Soldier-Of-Wasteland wrote:
Guns are for those who are not man enough to fight with their hands
Yes, by cracking its neckSmitty5613 wrote:
ur right, we should kill that bear/mountain lion that is eating our livestock with our hands!!!Soldier-Of-Wasteland wrote:
Guns are for those who are not man enough to fight with their hands
I would LOVE to see you try that.Soldier-Of-Wasteland wrote:
Yes, by cracking its neckSmitty5613 wrote:
ur right, we should kill that bear/mountain lion that is eating our livestock with our hands!!!Soldier-Of-Wasteland wrote:
Guns are for those who are not man enough to fight with their hands
wanna come visit me out here in Cali then??Soldier-Of-Wasteland wrote:
Yes, by cracking its neckSmitty5613 wrote:
ur right, we should kill that bear/mountain lion that is eating our livestock with our hands!!!Soldier-Of-Wasteland wrote:
Guns are for those who are not man enough to fight with their hands
Go to the beach and perv on the topless chicks.Smitty5613 wrote:
so.. alot of people in the US like to hunt and fish for fun... what stuff do you do in the UK and Australia for fun? (no trying to dis, just curious)
Soldier-Of-Wasteland wrote:
Guns are for those who are not man enough to fight with their hands
Also what happens if you are severely outnumbered, it's not always a one on one situation.ssj3barua wrote:
Unless the mugger has a baseball bat, knife or any other weapon of the likes. Then what, are you suppose to take the beating like a man
nope, we also fish like i said, we play video games, offroad, hang out wit friends, camp, and have other hobbies too... we also go to the beach and perv on topless chicks.. well... maybe not in San Francisco, but everywhere else there is a beach, we do... and that sound more barbaric than huntingDrunkFace wrote:
Go to the beach and perv on the topless chicks.Smitty5613 wrote:
so.. alot of people in the US like to hunt and fish for fun... what stuff do you do in the UK and Australia for fun? (no trying to dis, just curious)
what the fuck kind of question is that?
Is hunting the only fun thing you do in your life? Quiet frankly I think its barbaric and stupid.
Wow that was sheer brilliance thank you for pointing out I'm not a man, i didn't know what was wrong with my life until now, I guess I need to give up all my guns so I can become a fine specimen of a man just like you.Soldier-Of-Wasteland wrote:
Guns are for those who are not man enough to fight with their hands
just curious, but how do you hunt in Australia if guns are banned?? the old school way with spears? or swords? lolInvaderzim wrote:
I know I said I wasnt going to post in thsi thread again but:
In Australia we surf, drink, ride bikes, ski, walk, go fishing and some people even hunt.
Also Smitty, sorry for the psonal attack before but I lost someone very close to me in the port aurthur massecre and what you said just got me enraged.
I don't have a problem with different policies, I would like to see more in depth background checks. I'm concerned that the nutjob from Virginia Tech was able to purchase a firearm legally. He had a student visa and I had heard he had been referred for mental help. Why are these people still able to get firearms? Some of the hijackers on 9/11 came over here with student visas, so I believe that perhaps we should scrutinize that system a little. Unfortunately there was nothing that could have been done legally in the case of the VT tragedy with the laws we have in place as of now, perhaps in the future that will be different. However I have a problem with people getting all ban happy like they did back with the Brady Bill that really didn't do anything to help keep guns off the streets.Invaderzim wrote:
Like I have said before. Guns are not banned in Australia, they are very, very tightly controlled. I was never asking you to ban guns, all I was saying was that if you have tighter controlls on them tradgedies like the virginia shootings could have been avoided.
But kills as a whole go down.Miller wrote:
Why is this still being discussed? If guns are banned kills by knives go up.
That is a step in logic. Who is to say someone won't just go and get a bat and beat your head in instead? Guns make it easier to kill people, but its not like there is some special aura of a gun that makes you want to kill some one.doctastrangelove1964 wrote:
But kills as a whole go down.Miller wrote:
Why is this still being discussed? If guns are banned kills by knives go up.
That's kinda true... but you can't kill 32 people with a knife without being stopped.Miller wrote:
Why is this still being discussed? If guns are banned kills by knives go up. If knives are banned killings by baseball bats go up, etc. Even if guns are banned, does that stop the criminal? I think not... How about we all STFU and try to live without our idea of security being scrutinized every second of every day by you people trying to leave us vulnerable.
You don't have to kill them all at once now do we? Targetting one or two at a time is how I would do it.CommieChipmunk wrote:
That's kinda true... but you can't kill 32 people with a knife without being stopped.Miller wrote:
Why is this still being discussed? If guns are banned kills by knives go up. If knives are banned killings by baseball bats go up, etc. Even if guns are banned, does that stop the criminal? I think not... How about we all STFU and try to live without our idea of security being scrutinized every second of every day by you people trying to leave us vulnerable.
So if he killed 10 people with a knife, what debate would we be having?CommieChipmunk wrote:
That's kinda true... but you can't kill 32 people with a knife without being stopped.
Try to prove that kills as a whole go down, then tell me if rape and break in's go down too. I could kill someone with my BF2 CD, just let me get it out of the computer first. Wait wait, I'd rather shoot the bastard and not give him a chance to get within arms reach. Plus, if kills go down from banning firearms, is it because criminals care to keep within the law or because people that actually obey the law stop using guns?KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
That is a step in logic. Who is to say someone won't just go and get a bat and beat your head in instead? Guns make it easier to kill people, but its not like there is some special aura of a gun that makes you want to kill some one.doctastrangelove1964 wrote:
But kills as a whole go down.Miller wrote:
Why is this still being discussed? If guns are banned kills by knives go up.
You are assuming that since there are a lot of gun deaths, if you outlaw guns there will be no more deaths. That COULD be true, but is not NECESSARILY true.
Last edited by Miller (2007-04-18 18:56:20)