*Repost*
I fapped this morning.
Prove that wrong
I fapped this morning.
Prove that wrong
Jesus Christ is the son of God.
"you know life is what we make it, and a chance is like a picture, it'd be nice if you just take it"
Only the organisms which live in our solar system.Sgt.Davi wrote:
All living organisms get their energy from the sun. (In most cases indirectly)
I'll answer that tomorrow...Funky_Finny wrote:
*Repost*
I fapped this morning.
Prove that wrong
I fapped on the morning of Monday July 16th at roughly 10:30-11AM.NooBesT wrote:
Only the organisms which live in our solar system.Sgt.Davi wrote:
All living organisms get their energy from the sun. (In most cases indirectly)I'll answer that tomorrow...Funky_Finny wrote:
*Repost*
I fapped this morning.
Prove that wrong
I'll do this one for you, guys.d4rkst4r wrote:
Jesus Christ is the son of God.
God is fake. Jesus Christ was and is and will never be real. You may call it an opinion, but I call it a scientific fact.
You know your gonna start a religious flame war with this, and science has NOT said that he is not real... I think you should rethink what you say. It isn't, nor has it ever been a scientific fact. Just your own opinion.Funky_Finny wrote:
I'll do this one for you, guys.d4rkst4r wrote:
Jesus Christ is the son of God.
God is fake. Jesus Christ was and is and will never be real. You may call it an opinion, but I call it a scientific fact.
oh yeah I can walk....if I want to and so can alot of poeple...if they want to
I believe in this, and it can be tested by research;
That He who fucks nuns... will later join the Church.
That He who fucks nuns... will later join the Church.
He was a real person, I believe, but was no son of god. If he was, wheres Mrs. God? Huh?-|TS|-owNzu7 wrote:
You know your gonna start a religious flame war with this, and science has NOT said that he is not real... I think you should rethink what you say. It isn't, nor has it ever been a scientific fact. Just your own opinion.Funky_Finny wrote:
I'll do this one for you, guys.d4rkst4r wrote:
Jesus Christ is the son of God.
God is fake. Jesus Christ was and is and will never be real. You may call it an opinion, but I call it a scientific fact.
X multiplyed by X equals X²
Go on then
Go on then
My intention?-|TS|-owNzu7 wrote:
You know your gonna start a religious flame war with this
Yes. And that's it. NO ONE WILL START A RELIGIOUS ARGUMENT HERE, kay?xBlackPantherx wrote:
He was a real person, I believe, but was no son of god. If he was, wheres Mrs. God? Huh?-|TS|-owNzu7 wrote:
You know your gonna start a religious flame war with this, and science has NOT said that he is not real... I think you should rethink what you say. It isn't, nor has it ever been a scientific fact. Just your own opinion.Funky_Finny wrote:
I'll do this one for you, guys.
God is fake. Jesus Christ was and is and will never be real. You may call it an opinion, but I call it a scientific fact.
This is JunkDrawer, not D&ST.
You and a lot of people can walk even if you don't want to.A-Unit64 wrote:
oh yeah I can walk....if I want to and so can alot of poeple...if they want to
Meh. You forgot the fact than nuns don't fuck.Radical-Archetype wrote:
I believe in this, and it can be tested by research;
That He who fucks nuns... will later join the Church.
Not if X is not a number, only a letter. then X multiplied by X is X multiplied by X1n_n07h1ng_w3_7ru57 wrote:
X multiplyed by X equals X²
Go on then
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
DeathUnlimited, you forgot my fapping one :]
Oh....Funky_Finny wrote:
DeathUnlimited, you forgot my fapping one :]
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/fap
familial adenomatous polyposis
...
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
We, as humans, without some form of propulsion cannot overcome the effects of gravity. And I really mean without propulsion.
Like...a naked person just standing in the middle of a field cannot overcome gravity on their own.
Like...a naked person just standing in the middle of a field cannot overcome gravity on their own.
You can lift your arm can't you? You're moving your arm up and down without any kind of propulsion. Therefor, you can technically overcome gravity1n_n07h1ng_w3_7ru57 wrote:
We, as humans, without some form of propulsion cannot overcome the effects of gravity. And I really mean without propulsion.
Like...a naked person just standing in the middle of a field cannot overcome gravity on their own.
Stand in the middle of a field. Naked. Get someone to film you. Flap your arms. Show us you can fly. Embed it on this forum right here. I will pay you. Also, flapping your arms is providing propulsion.xBlackPantherx wrote:
You can lift your arm can't you? You're moving your arm up and down without any kind of propulsion. Therefor, you can technically overcome gravity1n_n07h1ng_w3_7ru57 wrote:
We, as humans, without some form of propulsion cannot overcome the effects of gravity. And I really mean without propulsion.
Like...a naked person just standing in the middle of a field cannot overcome gravity on their own.
I'll elaborate on what Panther wrote. Standing in that field, your arms are subjected to the force of gravity just like the rest of your body. By contracting the muscles in your shoulder, you can raise your arm, thus overcoming the force of gravity.Funky_Finny wrote:
Stand in the middle of a field. Naked. Get someone to film you. Flap your arms. Show us you can fly. Embed it on this forum right here. I will pay you. Also, flapping your arms is providing propulsion.xBlackPantherx wrote:
You can lift your arm can't you? You're moving your arm up and down without any kind of propulsion. Therefor, you can technically overcome gravity1n_n07h1ng_w3_7ru57 wrote:
We, as humans, without some form of propulsion cannot overcome the effects of gravity. And I really mean without propulsion.
Like...a naked person just standing in the middle of a field cannot overcome gravity on their own.
Here's an illustration:
o \ o
||| ||
/\ /\
No, jackass, I meant your entire body, in a onerDesertFox- wrote:
I'll elaborate on what Panther wrote. Standing in that field, your arms are subjected to the force of gravity just like the rest of your body. By contracting the muscles in your shoulder, you can raise your arm, thus overcoming the force of gravity.Funky_Finny wrote:
Stand in the middle of a field. Naked. Get someone to film you. Flap your arms. Show us you can fly. Embed it on this forum right here. I will pay you. Also, flapping your arms is providing propulsion.xBlackPantherx wrote:
You can lift your arm can't you? You're moving your arm up and down without any kind of propulsion. Therefor, you can technically overcome gravity
Here's an illustration:
o \ o
||| ||
/\ /\
That's not what you said in your original claim (cue DISPROVED). Also, "oner"?
Shh, I know.
And Oner? Give me a break dude, my wife's just gone to Turkey for two weeks It's also very late here
And Oner? Give me a break dude, my wife's just gone to Turkey for two weeks It's also very late here
Oner = doing something in one swift movement, like my foot up your arse if you don't stop complaining about this guys un-prove-wrongable-rule.DesertFox- wrote:
That's not what you said in your original claim (cue DISPROVED). Also, "oner"?
Gravity For Dummies ^^^DesertFox- wrote:
I'll elaborate on what Panther wrote. Standing in that field, your arms are subjected to the force of gravity just like the rest of your body. By contracting the muscles in your shoulder, you can raise your arm, thus overcoming the force of gravity.Funky_Finny wrote:
Stand in the middle of a field. Naked. Get someone to film you. Flap your arms. Show us you can fly. Embed it on this forum right here. I will pay you. Also, flapping your arms is providing propulsion.xBlackPantherx wrote:
You can lift your arm can't you? You're moving your arm up and down without any kind of propulsion. Therefor, you can technically overcome gravity
Here's an illustration:
o \ o
||| ||
/\ /\
You gotta admit - proving someone else's statements wrong - on some point, has its comical merits to some degree.
Of course that statement is subject to being proven wrong!
Of course that statement is subject to being proven wrong!
topal63 wrote:
You gotta admit - proving someone else's statements wrong - on some point, has its comical merits to some degree.
Of course that statement is subject to being proven wrong!
This is the definition used.Dictionary.com on "merit" wrote:
3. merits, the inherent rights and wrongs of a matter, as a lawsuit, unobscured by procedural details, technicalities, personal feelings, etc.: The case will be decided on its merits alone.
One of these is the definition meantDictionary.com on "merit" wrote:
1. claim to respect and praise; excellence; worth.
2. something that deserves or justifies a reward or commendation; a commendable quality, act, etc.: The book's only merit is its sincerity.