People probably won't stop posting on this thread for another month. lol (I just made the 69th page....
Last edited by Monkeyman911 (2007-06-29 09:21:04)
you cant prove a '......probably....' statement right because its just that, its not yes its not know, its indecisive and you cant have an indecisive factMonkeyman911 wrote:
People probably won't stop posting on this thread for another month. lol (I just made the 69th page....
Scotland and england are attached to each other.
People have never stopped posting for a month, so that "another" in you statement is falseMonkeyman911 wrote:
People probably won't stop posting on this thread for another month. lol (I just made the 69th page....
They both are attached to Great Britain, not to each other.Bruce-SuperNub wrote:
Scotland and england are attached to each other.
Also they have got a few meters wide line between then, which is no-mans land.
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
You never proved it wrong, you just used a different term to say what i said. Your topic name is false.
what the fuck, this is summer, i'm supposed to be AWAY from math... GRARARG:LHAFH!!xBlackPantherx wrote:
Nope, it's:I0973 wrote:
(x+4)(x+3) = x^2(x-squared) + 12 ?
x2+7x+12
EDIT:
P.S.
Remember FOIL (first, outer, inner, last)
x*x, then x*3, then x*4, then 3*4 = x2 +3x +4x +12
combine 3x and 4x = x2 + 7x + 12
Your claim was wrong. Scotland is not attached to England.Bruce-SuperNub wrote:
You never proved it wrong, you just used a different term to say what i said. Your topic name is false.
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
No it wasn't, there is no "No mans land" Beyond the wall which separated both countries is the other part of the country, You don't drive from Scotland, into a place where no one owns, into england. If you claim that there is no mans land between Scotland and england, I'll admit i was wrong, until you come up with proof of you proving me wrong. I'll assume you were lying.
Countries don't fit to each other without a border. The borderline is ~a meter wide and it doesn't belong to any of the countries. Borders exist between every country and authentic area. Basically England is not attached to Scotland. there is the borderline between them.Bruce-SuperNub wrote:
No it wasn't, there is no "No mans land" Beyond the wall which separated both countries is the other part of the country, You don't drive from Scotland, into a place where no one owns, into england. If you claim that there is no mans land between Scotland and england, I'll admit i was wrong, until you come up with proof of you proving me wrong. I'll assume you were lying.
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
So, the wall built ontop of the island surface, stops the island's top part being attached to the islands bottom half? Lol, your logic fails you. i didn't say connected, i said attached
Last edited by Bruce-SuperNub (2007-06-29 14:13:46)
The land is the same, but the areas of England and Scotland Are not in touch. If they are not in touch, they are not attached to each other.Bruce-SuperNub wrote:
So, the wall built ontop of the island surface, stops the island's top part being attached to the islands bottom half? Lol, your logic fails you. i didn't say connected, i said attached
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
the sun is hot
"hot" is a variable. Sun is not hot compared to big-big-big stars. Maybe just a little warm.farmerfez wrote:
the sun is hot
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
Scotland and England are actually part of Great Britain. Great Britain is big island and Scotland and England are parts of it named by humans. They are not seperate things, so they can't actually be attached to each other since they are one already.Bruce-SuperNub wrote:
Scotland and england are attached to each other.
Not if "x" is Pi. I don't think.I0973 wrote:
so here is another one (correctly done)
(x+25)(x+3)= x^2 ( copy and pasting squared doesnt work: /) +28x+75
Last edited by xBlackPantherx (2007-06-29 16:57:14)
Wood is made out of tree's
Also you proved me wrong on the Scotland england thing.
Also you proved me wrong on the Scotland england thing.
Last edited by Bruce-SuperNub (2007-06-29 16:17:30)
lol wut?topal63 wrote:
There is no time limit for us, your self-imposed time limit on you "not-thinking" for a whole week - is irrelevant to us. See the original posted statement [below], that posted statement does not place a time limit on us - proving you wrong. So your statement, that you could not think for whole week, is (and has been) proven wrong and your statement [above] implying there is a time limit (for us) to prove you wrong is also wrong. So you're wrong again (twice proven wrong).
____________________________________________________
sfarrar33 wrote:
new statement:
I, that is the real living person behind the bf2s account of the name 'sfarrar33', will not think up a claim that you cannot prove wrong. I will also not think this claim up within the next week and I will not post it here in this thread. (sorry i couldn't think of a way to combine those two sentances and make them easily understandable hence the seperation).
____________________________________________________
The time limit in the above statement is clearly self-imposed. This is not a battle of opinions. You clearly and falsely claimed you could abstain from thinking for a whole week.
If you wish to prove you can abstain from thinking for a whole week, please submit documented medical proof of brain-death, thanks!
you can't pick and choose bits of the statement, you have to prove the whole thing wrong or not at all (i said 'i will not think up a claim', not 'i will not think')
and i can impose a time limit because it is not in the rules that i can't (no changing them now )
therefore it is opinions, because my opinion is that the time limit applies and your opinion is that it doesn't
both of us are members of humanity and therefore out opinions are equal (which is an opinion in itself...but thats whole different philosophical debate...), and since they are equal neither of us can win or loose
the thread is gay
x can be anything but x X x is still x^2xBlackPantherx wrote:
Not if "x" is Pi. I don't think.I0973 wrote:
so here is another one (correctly done)
(x+25)(x+3)= x^2 ( copy and pasting squared doesnt work: /) +28x+75
Time Does not stop...
i am a actual pigeon who has learnt English and to play battlefield 2
if x is the imaginary number i, than x^2 will be -1, but as i is imaginary you cant multipy it by anything other than itself and get a rational answer and so it doesnt exist to times by the 25 and the 3I0973 wrote:
x can be anything but x X x is still x^2xBlackPantherx wrote:
Not if "x" is Pi. I don't think.I0973 wrote:
so here is another one (correctly done)
(x+25)(x+3)= x^2 ( copy and pasting squared doesnt work: /) +28x+75
wood is not made out of trees, it is made out of part of a tree, not the whole thing, as would is not made out of leaves or fruitBruce-SuperNub wrote:
Wood is made out of tree's
Also you proved me wrong on the Scotland england thing.
Thats still not proving me wrong since you admitted wood does come from tree's.mkxiii wrote:
wood is not made out of trees, it is made out of part of a tree, not the whole thing, as would is not made out of leaves or fruitBruce-SuperNub wrote:
Wood is made out of tree's
Also you proved me wrong on the Scotland england thing.
Yes it is.Bruce-SuperNub wrote:
Thats still not proving me wrong since you admitted wood does come from tree's.mkxiii wrote:
wood is not made out of trees, it is made out of part of a tree, not the whole thing, as would is not made out of leaves or fruitBruce-SuperNub wrote:
Wood is made out of tree's
Also you proved me wrong on the Scotland england thing.
You said that it comes out from tree's meaning whole tree which in fact isn't the case. Like mkxiii said not whole tree is used to make wood so therfore you are wrong.