This one sux but wth, you will reply to this claim and every other claim made on this thread.
Hope this doesn't kill the thread.
Hope this doesn't kill the thread.
Nice day, BTW I just thought I won't reply on this claim (made by me): this day is nice.
/win
/win
Last edited by DeathUnlimited (2007-05-20 12:02:58)
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
guan yu - meng huo = cheng pu² - Is a false statement
guan yu - meng huo = cheng pu² - Is a true statement
You wont answer to these claims
LOL dont ask me wot im doing im just bored but like to see what you would say to this
guan yu - meng huo = cheng pu² - Is a true statement
You wont answer to these claims
LOL dont ask me wot im doing im just bored but like to see what you would say to this
technically, if you look at the rules (rule 1 in particular) they can answer both statement and you cant use each of the answers against them.10973 wrote:
guan yu - meng huo = cheng pu² - Is a false statement
guan yu - meng huo = cheng pu² - Is a true statement
You wont answer to these claims
LOL dont ask me wot im doing im just bored but like to see what you would say to this
IRC is fun..
So the claim is that those formulas are right. My answer is, No they are not.10973 wrote:
guan yu - meng huo = cheng pu² - Is a false statement
guan yu - meng huo = cheng pu² - Is a true statement
You wont answer to these claims
LOL dont ask me wot im doing im just bored but like to see what you would say to this
It is not fun. It is FAR MORE THAN FUN, IT IS LIFEEEEEEEEEEE..teddy..jimmy wrote:
IRC is fun..
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
But, human's have never created or seen antimatter, let alone seen it in action. So my statement stands:DeathUnlimited wrote:
kxBlackPantherx wrote:
This odes not, infact, prove me wrong. Aswell as the fact that your statement is impossible to prove or occure.NooBesT[FiN] wrote:
Something got destroy'd in my brains when I watched the video in this thread.
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?pi … 8#p1437408
This is not my statement, my first statement still stands.
If matter gets in touch with antimatter, it destroys completely.
As far as humans know, matter can not be destroyed.
You are, wrong:xBlackPantherx wrote:
But, human's have never created or seen antimatter, let alone seen it in action. So my statement stands:DeathUnlimited wrote:
kxBlackPantherx wrote:
This odes not, infact, prove me wrong. Aswell as the fact that your statement is impossible to prove or occure.
This is not my statement, my first statement still stands.
If matter gets in touch with antimatter, it destroys completely.
As far as humans know, matter can not be destroyed.
a) Antimatter has been created, it just collapses immediately after it's creation.
b) Humans know that antimatter destroys matter, and that was the thing you claimed: "As far as humans know", not "As far as humans have done"
Last edited by DeathUnlimited (2007-05-20 14:36:51)
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
Hey, I answered that one! Theiving basket!NooBesT[FiN] wrote:
It is commonly known that nothing is impossible.trippy982 wrote:
aww man, nice how about...
The only thing that is impossible is the impossible.
No you didn't answer it, NooBesT did. The fact that he stole it from you is not importantFFLink13 wrote:
Hey, I answered that one! Theiving basket!NooBesT[FiN] wrote:
It is commonly known that nothing is impossible.trippy982 wrote:
aww man, nice how about...
The only thing that is impossible is the impossible.
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
...DeathUnlimited wrote:
No you didn't answer it, NooBesT did. The fact that he stole it from you is not importantFFLink13 wrote:
Hey, I answered that one! Theiving basket!NooBesT[FiN] wrote:
It is commonly known that nothing is impossible.
This topic will continue is the same manner of people posting statements only to have them "proven" wrong by completely tangential replies.
You still haven't disproved the tea one.
You still haven't disproved the tea one.
/winnukchebi0 wrote:
This topic will continue is the same manner of people posting statements only to have them "proven" wrong by completely tangential replies.
You still haven't disproved the tea one.
Last edited by killer21 (2007-05-20 19:19:08)
No, it's equal to:killer21 wrote:
/winnukchebi0 wrote:
This topic will continue is the same manner of people posting statements only to have them "proven" wrong by completely tangential replies.
You still haven't disproved the tea one.
Pi is equal to 3.14159...........
3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445923078164062862089986280348253421170679 8214808651328230664709384460955058223172535940812848111745028410270193852110555964462294895493038196 4428810975665933446128475648233786783165271201909145648566923460348610454326648213393607260249141273 724587006606315588174881520920962829254091715364367892590360011330530548820466521384146951941511609...
i ask this on another thread but that one sucked so i will ask this one. and i will ask it in a way so you can answer my question. my claim is: If you mix a soft drink ie. coke cola, 7 up etc. to red wine there will NOT be any more alcohol released. if you can prove this statement false i will so always mix a soft drink with my wine to get my money's worth
Whatever. We have a rule there that requests you not to take this too seriously. If you are so intelligent and cool, you can prove everything true exactly correctly in your own silent mind.nukchebi0 wrote:
This topic will continue is the same manner of people posting statements only to have them "proven" wrong by completely tangential replies.
You still haven't disproved the tea one.
It is not possible. That's why we have to be so impertinent and uncertain. The unexpected popularity of this thread still, at least in my opinion, proves that we are doing pretty well. I cannot ask you to do anything, but it certainly is annoying that you always just come here telling us how we suck at this, If you don't like it, just stop reading
About that cup one, i think I edited the prove in my answer, go back there and read.
What is your point, Are you saying that the alcohol stays, or the alcohol doesn't stay?agent146 wrote:
If you mix a soft drink ie. coke cola, 7 up etc. to red wine there will NOT be any more alcohol released
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
The name of the clan that i am in and the founder of is: Combat Monkeys
Fish cannot fart without additional lateral pressure provided by an exteranl source, for example, someone squeezing it.
i want to know will you release/make more alcohol is you mixed a soft drink with red wine. i remember numerous times i would mix 7up with red wine at weddings to "dilute" the wine; but father rebuked me and said i was not really diluting the red wine as adding 7up to red wine will make you more drunk because more alcohol is released. is this true or false.DeathUnlimited wrote:
What is your point, Are you saying that the alcohol stays, or the alcohol doesn't stay?agent146 wrote:
If you mix a soft drink ie. coke cola, 7 up etc. to red wine there will NOT be any more alcohol released
I am assuming this is the statement you’re referring to, that you claim has not been disproved? So let me disprove it then - OK.
This is also true for one kilogram of water at any temperature above freezing vs the same one kilogram when frozen (they weigh the same - duh) - there is a difference - but not in mass - there is a difference in volume; thus density (per square meter); how much space is occupied by the matter/mass. In your tea teacup scenario - if I make you fill both to the top - all things being equal - the warm tea in an equal teacup will have less mass when filled to the same level - than the same cooler tea in an equal teacup - when filled/poured into said equal sized-volume teacups - which is the opposite of your statement. The warmer tea will be less dense (takes up more space) than the cooler tea (more dense; the matter/mass requires less space). When both are filled to the top - the cooler tea + teacup will weigh more than the same warmer-tea + teacup. The simple reason being you could pour more of the cooler liquid into the same container by volume (thus more mass is poured into the cup; or to the level-mark). That is why there is vacuum pressure in containers where the contents have been pasteurized (heated). That is what makes certain jars difficult to open (and make a "pop" or "puck" sound) when you open them. Their contents take up less space (are less dense) than they were when they were heated (creating the vacuum pressure).
In conclusion the mass is not changed (you’re wrong). And also, based on your scenario the opposite can happen, if filled to the same level - the cooler one will have more mass in the cup (due to volume-density; it is more dense at a cooler; albeit above freezing; temperature; thus more mass can be poured into the same volume-level).
And,
(2.) Wrong again, no there will not always be some amount of heat in your hairs. First, the heat radiation, you’re referring to - is an electromagnetic wave (primarily, not necessarily) in the infrared range of the electromagnetic spectrum. Waves of energy have the dualistic appearance of being particles - that is the energy has the appearance of being discrete, while also appearing to be a wave moving in some invisible indiscernible medium, it occurs somewhat like a packet of information even, having a clearly discernable energy-value, thus a specific-quantity (a quanta), thus discrete, thus like a particle, thus why we refer to electromagnetic wave absorption as the absorption-transfer of photons/quanta (quantized packets of electromagnetic wave energy). So explain exactly how is this photonic energy (electromagnetic wave energy packets; quanta) absorbed by your hair? The fact is you don’t know. So why do you claim it is "in your hair" - when you don't really know if it is; or what it even means to be absorbed. Absorbed means that the packet of electromagnetic-energy (photon/quanta) appears to have been destroyed and merged with the electromagnetic entity called an electron (which has moved to a discretely higher energy state). And, the converse is apparently true; that when the electron moves to a discretely lower energy state - a photon is created and emitted. Absorption = the destruction of a photon, and emission = the creation of a photon. Heat transfer in ordinary matter = the mind-blistering rate of photonic destruction-creation events - that occur moment to moment - as electrons discretely move up an energy state then move discretely down. And at no time is your hair like a fusion reactor. Your hair is not creating photons by itself by converting energy to heat (electromagnetic radiation). Your hair is in the process of transferring heat continuously. It is a dynamic system that requires an outside source to make your hair warm, else it will cool down. Remove the source of heat (electromagnetic radiation); and your hair will equal the amount of heat therein. And that is absolute ZERO.
Second, considering your hair will biodegrade eventually it will not always even be a hair.
____
Hey DeathUnlimited, is this the one he has been on and on and on... about?
(1.) Wrong. Heat, is a measure of the amount of energy transferred from one body (mass) to another (mass) because of the temperature difference between those bodies (masses). Heat is not energy possessed by a body/mass (by the tea or the teacup). The tea or teacup has not changed its mass - it is merely in the process of transfer (see below; for a description of absorption-destruction & emission-creation of electromagnetic wave packets/photons). If it had more mass it would weigh more at different temperatures - and it doesn’t. Also photons (as discrete packets of electro-magnetic radiation) are theoretically mass-less - so adding them to the tea - or teacup will only alter the electron(s) energy state in discrete amounts, and the mass is unaffected.nukchebi0 wrote:
(1.) A warm cup of tea (liquid only) has more mass than another cup of tea with everything the same as the previously mentioned except the temperature, which is less for the second one when compared to the first cup of tea.
(2.) About the hair one: I do have heat, which is energy, in my hairs. So the statement is true. There will always be some amount of heat in my hairs.
This is also true for one kilogram of water at any temperature above freezing vs the same one kilogram when frozen (they weigh the same - duh) - there is a difference - but not in mass - there is a difference in volume; thus density (per square meter); how much space is occupied by the matter/mass. In your tea teacup scenario - if I make you fill both to the top - all things being equal - the warm tea in an equal teacup will have less mass when filled to the same level - than the same cooler tea in an equal teacup - when filled/poured into said equal sized-volume teacups - which is the opposite of your statement. The warmer tea will be less dense (takes up more space) than the cooler tea (more dense; the matter/mass requires less space). When both are filled to the top - the cooler tea + teacup will weigh more than the same warmer-tea + teacup. The simple reason being you could pour more of the cooler liquid into the same container by volume (thus more mass is poured into the cup; or to the level-mark). That is why there is vacuum pressure in containers where the contents have been pasteurized (heated). That is what makes certain jars difficult to open (and make a "pop" or "puck" sound) when you open them. Their contents take up less space (are less dense) than they were when they were heated (creating the vacuum pressure).
In conclusion the mass is not changed (you’re wrong). And also, based on your scenario the opposite can happen, if filled to the same level - the cooler one will have more mass in the cup (due to volume-density; it is more dense at a cooler; albeit above freezing; temperature; thus more mass can be poured into the same volume-level).
And,
(2.) Wrong again, no there will not always be some amount of heat in your hairs. First, the heat radiation, you’re referring to - is an electromagnetic wave (primarily, not necessarily) in the infrared range of the electromagnetic spectrum. Waves of energy have the dualistic appearance of being particles - that is the energy has the appearance of being discrete, while also appearing to be a wave moving in some invisible indiscernible medium, it occurs somewhat like a packet of information even, having a clearly discernable energy-value, thus a specific-quantity (a quanta), thus discrete, thus like a particle, thus why we refer to electromagnetic wave absorption as the absorption-transfer of photons/quanta (quantized packets of electromagnetic wave energy). So explain exactly how is this photonic energy (electromagnetic wave energy packets; quanta) absorbed by your hair? The fact is you don’t know. So why do you claim it is "in your hair" - when you don't really know if it is; or what it even means to be absorbed. Absorbed means that the packet of electromagnetic-energy (photon/quanta) appears to have been destroyed and merged with the electromagnetic entity called an electron (which has moved to a discretely higher energy state). And, the converse is apparently true; that when the electron moves to a discretely lower energy state - a photon is created and emitted. Absorption = the destruction of a photon, and emission = the creation of a photon. Heat transfer in ordinary matter = the mind-blistering rate of photonic destruction-creation events - that occur moment to moment - as electrons discretely move up an energy state then move discretely down. And at no time is your hair like a fusion reactor. Your hair is not creating photons by itself by converting energy to heat (electromagnetic radiation). Your hair is in the process of transferring heat continuously. It is a dynamic system that requires an outside source to make your hair warm, else it will cool down. Remove the source of heat (electromagnetic radiation); and your hair will equal the amount of heat therein. And that is absolute ZERO.
Second, considering your hair will biodegrade eventually it will not always even be a hair.
____
Hey DeathUnlimited, is this the one he has been on and on and on... about?
Last edited by topal63 (2007-05-21 15:32:39)
The gravitational force of an object is determined by it's mass.
Me, Varemo, DoctaStrangeEmo, FFEmo13, EmoHomoUnlimited, and Flaming_Female_Homosexual are not emo's.
Ryan wrote:
Me, Varemo, DoctaStrangeEmo, FFEmo13, EmoHomoUnlimited, and Flaming_Female_Homosexual are not emo's.
FFEmo13 wrote:
/wrist
I am sorry, I could not find any African, or Aborigine calns/tribes of that name, are you sure you are not on weeds?Someone025 wrote:
The name of the clan that i am in and the founder of is: Combat Monkeys
Let's say we feed fish some leaven, it will damn sure fartPenetrator_01 wrote:
Fish cannot fart without additional lateral pressure provided by an exteranl source, for example, someone squeezing it.
It will not raise. Wine alcohol is made by specific bacterias, which die in the wanted alcohol level. No more alcohol will be formed in the wine after their death.agent146 wrote:
i want to know will you release/make more alcohol is you mixed a soft drink with red wine. i remember numerous times i would mix 7up with red wine at weddings to "dilute" the wine; but father rebuked me and said i was not really diluting the red wine as adding 7up to red wine will make you more drunk because more alcohol is released. is this true or false.DeathUnlimited wrote:
What is your point, Are you saying that the alcohol stays, or the alcohol doesn't stay?agent146 wrote:
If you mix a soft drink ie. coke cola, 7 up etc. to red wine there will NOT be any more alcohol released
No, it is determined by a curve in time-space, the gravity.specops10-4 wrote:
The gravitational force of an object is determined by it's mass.
DeathUnlimited slits his wristsRyan wrote:
Me, Varemo, DoctaStrangeEmo, FFEmo13, EmoHomoUnlimited, and Flaming_Female_Homosexual are not emo's.
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
The IRC people are better than the normal BF2s crowd (despite being more homosexual and emo).