/Winnar!NooBesT[FiN] wrote:
I wasn't refering to that but anyways I consider this proved wrong.nukchebi0 wrote:
How about you read. This pattern is the component I was referring too. All oxygen gas has this pattern, and this pattern is a component of the atmosphere. Oxygen gas is only O2, not O3, which is ozone, or O1, or O256465.NooBesT[FiN] wrote:
... Can't read or what?
I'm done with this statement.
DeathUnlimited has a male reproductive organ. Let's see you disprove that.
k, You are not First Sergeant, you own a character in the game, who is First Sergeant.doctastrangelove1964 wrote:
I am a first sergeant in BattleField 2. however in BattleField 2142 I am a Commissar Gold.
In 2142, if then will be any battles, you aren't even alive anymore.
There is no person named DeathUnlimited. It is the name of a forum account, and forum accounts don't have male reproductive organs.Tetrino wrote:
DeathUnlimited has a male reproductive organ. Let's see you disprove that.
Last edited by DeathUnlimited (2007-04-12 11:01:06)
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
wake island was apart of WWII
Last edited by voodoosniper7 (2007-04-12 16:57:45)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Wake_Islandvoodoosniper7 wrote:
wake island was apart of WWII
ORLY?
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
Ok that is just downright funny! Fact checking helps! Prove that one wrong - and oops - I think you can.DeathUnlimited wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Wake_Islandvoodoosniper7 wrote:
wake island was apart of WWII
ORLY?
yeah i know wake island was part of WWIIDeathUnlimited wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Wake_Islandvoodoosniper7 wrote:
wake island was apart of WWII
ORLY?
i just worded my statement wrong
Last edited by voodoosniper7 (2007-04-12 16:58:09)
Most of these are just false proofs...
Then what are you referring to? It seems you are just trying to skirt the fact you can't prove it wrong. I have answered everything you have brought against it.NooBesT[FiN] wrote:
I wasn't refering to that but anyways I consider this proved wrong.nukchebi0 wrote:
How about you read. This pattern is the component I was referring too. All oxygen gas has this pattern, and this pattern is a component of the atmosphere. Oxygen gas is only O2, not O3, which is ozone, or O1, or O256465.NooBesT[FiN] wrote:
... Can't read or what?
I'm done with this statement.
Cute. Ok, let's try this. The human who is known as DeathUnlimited on this particular online forum site has a male reproductive organ.DeathUnlimited wrote:
There is no person named DeathUnlimited. It is the name of a forum account, and forum accounts don't have male reproductive organs.Tetrino wrote:
DeathUnlimited has a male reproductive organ. Let's see you disprove that.
Tetrino wrote:
Cute. Ok, let's try this. The human who is known as DeathUnlimited on this particular online forum site has a male reproductive organ.DeathUnlimited wrote:
There is no person named DeathUnlimited. It is the name of a forum account, and forum accounts don't have male reproductive organs.Tetrino wrote:
DeathUnlimited has a male reproductive organ. Let's see you disprove that.
You both need to read the rules again... And to nukchebi0 if you would have read them in the first place we wouldn't have had this conversation unless you are too stupid to understand the rules that is... Which I doubt.nukchebi0 wrote:
Then what are you referring to? It seems you are just trying to skirt the fact you can't prove it wrong. I have answered everything you have brought against it.NooBesT[FiN] wrote:
I wasn't refering to that but anyways I consider this proved wrong.nukchebi0 wrote:
How about you read. This pattern is the component I was referring too. All oxygen gas has this pattern, and this pattern is a component of the atmosphere. Oxygen gas is only O2, not O3, which is ozone, or O1, or O256465.
Are these the rules you're talking about?DeathUnlimited wrote:
Just say something, I'll prove it wrong. Give it a try!
NopeTetrino wrote:
Are these the rules you're talking about?DeathUnlimited wrote:
Just say something, I'll prove it wrong. Give it a try!
Prove this wrong:
+1C = +1C, where C refers to Celcius. Assuming that decimal digits are all exactly the same, 0 > to any figure you see fit.
+1C = +1C, where C refers to Celcius. Assuming that decimal digits are all exactly the same, 0 > to any figure you see fit.
You're wasting your time proving oxygen is not in the Earth's atmosphere. We all know that oxygen is in the Earth's atmosphere. It's true that oxygen is in spacetime as well, but that's not proving anything. Oxygen is both in the Earth's atmosphere and in spacetime.
This is why I hate English, it's always inaccurate.
+1C doesn't equal to 1.00000001C or some other stinking number. +1C = +1C
This is why I love math, it's totally precise.
This is why I hate English, it's always inaccurate.
+1C doesn't equal to 1.00000001C or some other stinking number. +1C = +1C
This is why I love math, it's totally precise.
gues what wesley???math doesnt like youWinterWayfarer wrote:
You're wasting your time proving oxygen is not in the Earth's atmosphere. We all know that oxygen is in the Earth's atmosphere. It's true that oxygen is in spacetime as well, but that's not proving anything. Oxygen is both in the Earth's atmosphere and in spacetime.
This is why I hate English, it's always inaccurate.
+1C doesn't equal to 1.00000001C or some other stinking number. +1C = +1C
This is why I love math, it's totally precise.
Therefore your post is invalid because it's in English, which is a generic label for 26 letters. Letter is also a generic label for an arbitrary collection of lines. Line is a generic label for...you get the point. In fact, you could prove anything wrong with that.topal63 wrote:
Uh you're wrong... first off everything - you know of - exists IN spacetime. The atmosphere is not some kind of container you can put things IN. Or that has any reality to it - that it (something) can IN the atmosphere. You might not like language because it isn't precise, but that is too bad for you.WinterWayfarer wrote:
You're wasting your time proving oxygen is not in the Earth's atmosphere. We all know that oxygen is in the Earth's atmosphere. It's true that oxygen is in spacetime as well, but that's not proving anything. Oxygen is both in the Earth's atmosphere and in spacetime.
This is why I hate English, it's always inaccurate.
+1C doesn't equal to 1.00000001C or some other stinking number. +1C = +1C
This is why I love math, it's totally precise.
"Atmosphere" is a label for something not a thing in-itself, it IS a collection of gases that are gravitationally attracted to the mass of the Earth. Team is a label for people working together - here is no reality to the concept of team external of the members. There is no reality to the concept of "atmosphere" external of its members (the gases that make it up). As I already said "atmosphere" is a label (for a collection, not a real thing it-self, nor is it a container things are in - it is a label).
+1C exist only in your mind, you cannot demonstrate the reality of an exact measurement - ever.
It is always an approximate value and never an exact measure. And it stands as was already stated.
+1C = +1C, exists only in-mind, as a subjective thought, as an analytic construct,
The TRUTH in reality is:
+1C ≈ +1C (is not exact, it is an inexact approximation).
DONE.
But then this thread wouldn't be much fun, would it?
Proved wrong - NEXT!k30dxedle wrote:
Therefore your post is invalid because it's in English, which is a generic label for 26 letters. Letter is also a generic label for an arbitrary collection of lines. Line is a generic label for...you get the point. In fact, you could prove anything wrong with that.topal63 wrote:
Uh you're wrong... first off everything - you know of - exists IN spacetime. The atmosphere is not some kind of container you can put things IN. Or that has any reality to it - that it (something) can IN the atmosphere. You might not like language because it isn't precise, but that is too bad for you.WinterWayfarer wrote:
You're wasting your time proving oxygen is not in the Earth's atmosphere. We all know that oxygen is in the Earth's atmosphere. It's true that oxygen is in spacetime as well, but that's not proving anything. Oxygen is both in the Earth's atmosphere and in spacetime.
This is why I hate English, it's always inaccurate.
+1C doesn't equal to 1.00000001C or some other stinking number. +1C = +1C
This is why I love math, it's totally precise.
"Atmosphere" is a label for something not a thing in-itself, it IS a collection of gases that are gravitationally attracted to the mass of the Earth. Team is a label for people working together - there is no reality to the concept of team external of the members. There is no reality to the concept of "atmosphere" external of its members (the gases that make it up). As I already said "atmosphere" is a label (for a collection, not a real thing it-self, nor is it a container things are in - it is a label).
+1C exist only in your mind, you cannot demonstrate the reality of an exact measurement - ever.
It is always an approximate value and never an exact measure. And it stands as was already stated.
+1C = +1C, exists only in-mind, as a subjective thought, as an analytic construct,
The TRUTH in reality is:
+1C ≈ +1C (is not exact, it is an inexact approximation).
DONE.
But then this thread wouldn't be much fun, would it?
Uh, it would be fun - in other ways too - therefore you're proved wrong again (see below)!
I was having fun with the Kantian thing in-itself problem (and errors of thought associated with it). Together with the problem people don't understand about subjective creations of mind vs the reality external of in-mind subjective creations.
Last edited by topal63 (2007-04-13 13:02:28)
Dark energy exists....
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
Okay how about you read my post before thinking your smart and answering it.
- kyle.
So, topal63, you wasted your time with your answer 'cause you never read my statement. 0 to any figure you see fit.READ ABOVE BY ME wrote:
Assuming that decimal digits are all exactly the same, 0 > to any figure you see fit.
- kyle.
I read it sparky... don't blow a gasket, and my answer was detailed, read it...leetkyle wrote:
Okay how about you read my post before thinking your smart and answering it.So, topal63, you wasted your time with your answer 'cause you never read my statement. 0 to any figure you see fit.READ ABOVE BY ME wrote:
Assuming that decimal digits are all exactly the same, 0 > to any figure you see fit.
- kyle.
You can assume all you want, but in reality, you can't PROVE that +1C when measured is anything other than an inexact answer. It can be precise to a certain decimal place, but not a representation of the exact value. And if you can't PROVE that it is +1C you can't say that it is, or assume that it is.
Last edited by topal63 (2007-04-14 15:47:39)
My BF2s Forums profile name on these BF2s forums is "Slickdawg8" (without the quotes), and this reply is made under the Profile name "Slickdawg8" (without the quotes)
AND one of the things that are in my signature is the userbar that flashes "TAW_SLICKDAWG" and "I PWN" (both without the quotes)
AND one of the things that are in my signature is the userbar that flashes "TAW_SLICKDAWG" and "I PWN" (both without the quotes)
Last edited by Slickdawg8 (2007-04-13 14:50:45)
Your mom is female.
No no no no no.topal63 wrote:
Another way of seeing the WRONGness of this statement is this way.nukchebi0 wrote:
There is oxygen in the Earth's atmosphere.
The oxygen is NOT in the Earth's atmosphere; the atomic element oxygen is in; where everything else we know is in.
Space or rather Space-time.
The Earth is in spacetime.
The oxygen is in spacetime.
You are in spacetime.
The atomic element oxygen is not in the atomopshere, rather it is in spacetime.
The atmopshere is a label for a collection of gases, water-vapor, etc, as elements gravitionally attracted to the mass of the Earth of which both: the Earth's atmosphere and the Earth exist in spacetime.Since this is a measurement and that is what your referring to: a measurement of temperature... it should be clear to you that all measurements are temporary and fleeting moments in time.leetkyle wrote:
Prove this wrong:
+1C = +1C, where C refers to Celcius. Assuming that decimal digits are all exactly the same, 0 > to any figure you see fit.
1 might = 1, inside your brain, but subjective reality cannot be demonstrated to be real; or reality.
So you have to set aside mental analytic constructs that exist only in-mind to examine the reality of this statement.
Does 1 ever equal 1 in reality, and what does it even mean if I measure 1 of anything.
In reality the measurement itself is subject to error. It might be 1.00001 or 0.999997 or some other number of measure the moment you take the reading so,
+1C might actually be = +1.00001C or +0.999997C or +1.00000000000075 or some other value.
And if you repeat the measurements just moments later it might be this,
+1C might actually be = +0.9979998C or +1.00000097C or +1.000000104535 or some other value.
And not at any time were we able to establish that +1C was exactly +1C, or what the actual exact value was.
And assigning any exact value in reality is basically impossible.
The construct ---> this = this, exist only in your mind, in reference to analytic things (like a math equality).
In reality the measure is approximate or: ≈.
Thus +1C DOES NOT EXACTLY = +1C
In reality it is incorrect to say what you've stated,
it is correct to state it this way,
+1C ≈ +1C.
There is oxygen in the Earth's atmosphere and you know it.
+1C = +1C.
+1C does not equal +1.000000001C
In saying that "this = this exists in only your mind", you are quite right, because everything exists within our thoughts, but there are rules to math, and one of these rules is called the Reflexive Postulate, in which any number is equal to itself. In symbols: a = a. Therefore, +1C = +1C.
Red Brass is a copper alloy thats content is 85% copper, 5% zinc, 5% tin and %5 lead.
Muhhahahah.
Muhhahahah.