m1a2 in SF

2007-01-30 16:33:11

#1

thtthht: maximum bullshit; +50|6539|teh alien spaceshit

It seems that SF m1a2 seems to be much weaker than vanilla m1a2. Whenever I play ghost town, I seem to lose almost all of the matches against the t-90, which seems to hae been nerfed. I think the m1a2 is more of an infantry killer, while the t-90 is a vhecle killer. But compared to real life m1, both sucks. Other than that, bf2 is great. If you have anything else that you think has been changed, please post.

Last edited by thtthht (2007-01-30 16:33:50)

2007-01-30 16:42:15

#2

Ender2309: has joined the GOP; +470|6780|USA

uhh...you're completely wrong buddy. its the same vehicle. you're just getting the shaft when it comes to maps and opponents.

2007-01-30 16:43:39

#3

l41e: Member; +677|6857

Nope. Only one ustnk_m1a2 file for the entirety of vanilla/SF/AF. Same for the rutnk_t90.

2007-01-30 16:43:47

#4

-TL-: Srs lurker; +25|6701|Oklahoma City

I think it is slightly different than the vanilla M1, but I've never noticed an imbalace with the T-90.

2007-01-30 16:45:41

#5

Ender2309: has joined the GOP; +470|6780|USA

-TL- wrote:
I think it is slightly different than the vanilla M1, but I've never noticed an imbalace with the T-90.

nope. they both use the exact same .con and .tweak files for everything from the model to the wheels to the engine.

the only possible difference would be a slightly different skin to fit the darker SF maps better.

2007-01-30 17:03:44

#6

ryanv12: Member; +10|6550|San Francisco, CA, USA

Perhaps you're just running into some good players who know how to place shells into the M1's weak points. Learn to aim for the tracks in head on battle and you'll win most of your engagements

2007-01-31 01:53:22

#7

AWSMFOX: Banned; +405|6672|A W S M F O X

I swear the SVD is better in SF than vanilla.

Or massive communist conspiracy!?

2007-01-31 01:57:08

#8

notorious: Nay vee, bay bee.; +1,396|6955|The United Center

The nightvision is much better in SF than in BF2 also.

2007-01-31 02:00:19

#9

Fenix14: scout rush kekeke ^___^; +116|6765|Brisbane, Aus

JET_G raidensen wrote:
I swear the SVD is better in SF than vanilla.

Or massive communist conspiracy!?

well the crosshair is red..... could be both

2007-01-31 03:06:48

#10

Penetrator: Certified Twat; +296|6717|Bournemouth, South England

The zip line in BF2 sucks, its great with it being invisible, but I always fall off and die. Not like SF, where everyone can see it.

2007-01-31 03:10:34

#11

DoctorFruitloop: Level 13 Wrongdoer; +515|6755|Doncaster, UK

ROFL, just ROFL!

2007-01-31 10:11:09

#12

AWSMFOX: Banned; +405|6672|A W S M F O X

ThomasMorgan wrote:
The nightvision is much better in SF than in BF2 also.

yes, i noticed that too, the one in vanilla must have been made in taiwan.

2007-01-31 10:19:12

#13

duranddurand: Member; +0|6505

ure just up against people who know where the weakness of the m1a2 is....but i have also noticed that when im in a t-90 and squaring off against a m1a2 i usually win....and i hit the same spot if the situation is reversed. just seems to me like the armor on the m1a2 is a tad weaker

2007-01-31 10:21:46

#14

Surgeons: U shud proabbly f off u fat prik; +3,097|6698|Gogledd Cymru

anyone else noticed that the nightvision blows in bf2 compare to sf ?

2007-01-31 10:25:34

#15

venom6: Since day One.; +247|6767|Hungary

I just dont understand why does the SAS got that crappy M1A2 Tank ?
Dont has the Uk its own tank the Challanger whats in Euro Force...

2007-01-31 11:06:02

#16

Stubbee: Religions Hate Facts, Questions and Doubts; +223|6952|Reality

k30dxedle wrote:
Nope. Only one ustnk_m1a2 file for the entirety of vanilla/SF/AF. Same for the rutnk_t90.

ok so what is the xpak_m1a2 folder in the xpak mods folder?
and why is the xpak .tweak file not the same size as vanilla's .tweak file?

cant be bothered to search for the difference however the first page re: hit points and such seem identical as first glance.

the t-90 doesn't have and xpak folder so it has to be identical.

the ghost town levels folder doesn't have any modified content wrt either tank.

The US economy is a giant Ponzi scheme. And 'to big to fail' is code speak for 'niahnahniahniahnah 99 percenters'

2007-01-31 11:13:13

#17

yuckfou09: hide your terrorists ^,^; +94|6885|Ft. Drum, NY

ThomasMorgan wrote:
The nightvision is much better in SF than in BF2 also.

yeah....lmfao and arent the grappling hooks on karkand the ub3r shit?!

2007-01-31 11:13:58

#18

chittydog: less busy; +586|7044|Kubra, Damn it!

ThomasMorgan wrote:
The nightvision is much better in SF than in BF2 also.

surgeon_bond wrote:
anyone else noticed that the nightvision blows in bf2 compare to sf ?

At least wait a couple of pages into the thread before you start stealing other people's jokes, surgeon.

2007-01-31 17:45:24

#19

JaggedPanther: Member; +61|6682

The F35 was nerfed in The Iron Gator, and by nerfed I mean sitting on the carrier getting a tune up...

2007-01-31 18:36:26

#20

S3v3N: lolwut?; +685|6727|Montucky

I wish there was forklifts in Vanilla BF2...

2007-01-31 19:41:59

#21

fadedsteve: GOP Sympathizer; +266|6699|Menlo Park, CA

venom6 wrote:
I just dont understand why does the SAS got that crappy M1A2 Tank ?
Dont has the Uk its own tank the Challanger whats in Euro Force...

yea I dont get that either! the SAS should have the Challenger tank. . .

BF2S Forums m1a2 in SF

-TL- wrote:

JET_G raidensen wrote:

ThomasMorgan wrote:

k30dxedle wrote:

ThomasMorgan wrote:

ThomasMorgan wrote:

surgeon_bond wrote:

venom6 wrote:

Board footer