usmarine2007
Banned
+374|6793|Columbus, Ohio
"An Arizona state lawmaker wants to define border vigilantes as domestic terrorists and have them charged with criminal felony counts if they are caught patrolling the Mexican border with weapons."

http://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/stor … om_msnbc=1

Not sure what Rep. Kyrsten Sinema, D-Phoenix is talking about, I actually support the minutemen.
dubbs
Member
+105|7057|Lexington, KY

Article wrote:

An Arizona state lawmaker wants to define border vigilantes as domestic terrorists and have them charged with criminal felony counts if they are caught patrolling the Mexican border with weapons.
If the law is going to be that simple, then that would mean that the US Border Patrol, and Reserves are also terrorist.  That would also make the US government a terrorist org.  and it is dumb.

They do not have rights in the US, we should not defend them.
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6955|Global Command
Rep. Kyrsten Sinema is a terrorist.

She has no business in office and we should deport her.


Just like a fucking politician do shit about a problem and throw the law and those that do.
The Minutemen are a fine organization helping do the work the federal government refuses to.
usmarine2007
Banned
+374|6793|Columbus, Ohio
I am amazed yet not so amazed at how she got elected.
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6955|Global Command
How?
mcgid1
Meh...
+129|7142|Austin, TX/San Antonio, TX
So let me get this straight...average joe is trying to help fix a problem that the government knows exists but does nothing about, and as a result gets labeled a terrorist?  WTF is this nation coming to.
Elamdri
The New Johnnie Cochran
+134|7072|Peoria
I don't think the label "terrorist" is appropriate, but these people definitely should be stopped and arrested. Vigilantism isn't the answer.
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6871|The Land of Scott Walker
The Minutemen aren't killing anyone.  They simply detain anyone they catch for the Border Patrol.
Elamdri
The New Johnnie Cochran
+134|7072|Peoria

Stingray24 wrote:

The Minutemen aren't killing anyone.  They simply detain anyone they catch for the Border Patrol.
IMHO, if they wanna patrol the boarder so badly, then they should join the Border Patrol, thats all.
fadedsteve
GOP Sympathizer
+266|6916|Menlo Park, CA
The minutemen seem to be the only ones who give a shit about protecting our sovereignty from Mexico. . .

They are out their everyday trying to enfore our laws. . .why is it that they cant get support from our government?. . .why is it that civilians are doing what the government is supposed to do?. . .which is enforce our border laws/policy, which means ILLEGAL immigration is fucking illegal and those who violate our laws be prosecuted!

Why is the rule of law so hard to follow in regards to this issue. . .
dubbs
Member
+105|7057|Lexington, KY

Elamdri wrote:

Stingray24 wrote:

The Minutemen aren't killing anyone.  They simply detain anyone they catch for the Border Patrol.
IMHO, if they wanna patrol the boarder so badly, then they should join the Border Patrol, thats all.
We all know what happens then.  If you do your job you get put in jail. 

I actually talked to a guy about this, and I wonder if this would break the 2nd amendment. 

2nd amendment wrote:

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
Also, if they were so anti-Hispanic as the article makes them, then why do the patrol the US-Canada border also?
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6831|North Carolina
Steve, there are two simple answers to your questions.

One of them was brought to my attention by ATG -- the government profits from a lot of illegal labor without having to pay out for it (in terms of Social Security fraud by illegals).

The other reason is because we get cheaper services from illegal labor.  Our cost of living is generally lower due to illegal labor.
Fen321
Member
+54|6923|Singularity

dubbs wrote:

Article wrote:

An Arizona state lawmaker wants to define border vigilantes as domestic terrorists and have them charged with criminal felony counts if they are caught patrolling the Mexican border with weapons.
If the law is going to be that simple, then that would mean that the US Border Patrol, and Reserves are also terrorist.  That would also make the US government a terrorist org.  and it is dumb.

They do not have rights in the US, we should not defend them.
Actually that's not true, THEY do have rights in the United States, even if you for some odd reason wish they did not.

INTERNATIONAL LAW protects immigrants regardless of nationality, you cannot treat a foreign national like shit simply because they are foreign. You must treat them to the same level you treat your individuals if not HIGHER(for example a Diplomat for higher)!
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6831|North Carolina

Fen321 wrote:

dubbs wrote:

Article wrote:

An Arizona state lawmaker wants to define border vigilantes as domestic terrorists and have them charged with criminal felony counts if they are caught patrolling the Mexican border with weapons.
If the law is going to be that simple, then that would mean that the US Border Patrol, and Reserves are also terrorist.  That would also make the US government a terrorist org.  and it is dumb.

They do not have rights in the US, we should not defend them.
Actually that's not true, THEY do have rights in the United States, even if you for some odd reason wish they did not.

INTERNATIONAL LAW protects immigrants regardless of nationality, you cannot treat a foreign national like shit simply because they are foreign. You must treat them to the same level you treat your individuals if not HIGHER(for example a Diplomat for higher)!
Here's a valid question: what nation has the balls to enforce international law against the U.S.?  I ask this in all seriousness.  We have the most powerful military and much of the world depends on our trade, so really, what country is really able to punish us if we ignore international law?

I'm not saying might makes right, but it seems like it sure makes it easier to ignore said laws.
stryyker
bad touch
+1,682|7146|California

Protecting the American way of life a Crime. Never thought that day would come.
Elamdri
The New Johnnie Cochran
+134|7072|Peoria

Turquoise wrote:

Fen321 wrote:

dubbs wrote:


If the law is going to be that simple, then that would mean that the US Border Patrol, and Reserves are also terrorist.  That would also make the US government a terrorist org.  and it is dumb.

They do not have rights in the US, we should not defend them.
Actually that's not true, THEY do have rights in the United States, even if you for some odd reason wish they did not.

INTERNATIONAL LAW protects immigrants regardless of nationality, you cannot treat a foreign national like shit simply because they are foreign. You must treat them to the same level you treat your individuals if not HIGHER(for example a Diplomat for higher)!
Here's a valid question: what nation has the balls to enforce international law against the U.S.?  I ask this in all seriousness.  We have the most powerful military and much of the world depends on our trade, so really, what country is really able to punish us if we ignore international law?

I'm not saying might makes right, but it seems like it sure makes it easier to ignore said laws.
And ignoring said laws simply because no one could do anything about it is exactly the reason we get such a bad rap. Just cause your the biggest kid on the block doesn't mean you don't have to play fair.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6831|North Carolina

Elamdri wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Fen321 wrote:


Actually that's not true, THEY do have rights in the United States, even if you for some odd reason wish they did not.

INTERNATIONAL LAW protects immigrants regardless of nationality, you cannot treat a foreign national like shit simply because they are foreign. You must treat them to the same level you treat your individuals if not HIGHER(for example a Diplomat for higher)!
Here's a valid question: what nation has the balls to enforce international law against the U.S.?  I ask this in all seriousness.  We have the most powerful military and much of the world depends on our trade, so really, what country is really able to punish us if we ignore international law?

I'm not saying might makes right, but it seems like it sure makes it easier to ignore said laws.
And ignoring said laws simply because no one could do anything about it is exactly the reason we get such a bad rap. Just cause your the biggest kid on the block doesn't mean you don't have to play fair.
I agree.  I'm just saying that, under the current conditions, international law doesn't hold much weight against us.  I'm not saying it's right (or that it's smart for us to continue this way).
fadedsteve
GOP Sympathizer
+266|6916|Menlo Park, CA

Turquoise wrote:

Steve, there are two simple answers to your questions.

One of them was brought to my attention by ATG -- the government profits from a lot of illegal labor without having to pay out for it (in terms of Social Security fraud by illegals).

The other reason is because we get cheaper services from illegal labor.  Our cost of living is generally lower due to illegal labor.
Tell that explanation to a Union member and see if you dont get a fist in the face. . . .

Our hospitals, justice system, schools, and economy have been NEGATIVELY affected by illegal immigration. 

I live in California, the front line of this problem, and I can tell you illegal immigration is NOT good! Its infact a major problem here, and needs to be dealt with.  Those who dont live in states affected, have absolutely no idea, the cultural, monetary, and legal ramifications this problem is dealing to our local communities.

You living in North Carolina... you have no clue

Last edited by fadedsteve (2007-01-23 23:19:50)

unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,072|7197|PNW

mcgid1 wrote:

So let me get this straight...average joe is trying to help fix a problem that the government knows exists but does nothing about, and as a result gets labeled a terrorist?  WTF is this nation coming to.
Unrestrained bureaucratic federalism.
usmarine2007
Banned
+374|6793|Columbus, Ohio

stryyker wrote:

Protecting the American way of life a Crime. Never thought that day would come.
Talk about FAR left lib eh?
Elamdri
The New Johnnie Cochran
+134|7072|Peoria
I just don't feel that an illegal response to a crime is the right approach. If your so worried, then give them federal status, maybe license them to do what they are currently doing, just make sure its regulated so that the people stay within the law.
Agent_Dung_Bomb
Member
+302|7162|Salt Lake City

Elamdri wrote:

I just don't feel that an illegal response to a crime is the right approach. If your so worried, then give them federal status, maybe license them to do what they are currently doing, just make sure its regulated so that the people stay within the law.
But that's just it, they aren't doing anything illegal.  What this lawmaker wants to do is make what they are doing legally illegal.
ghettoperson
Member
+1,943|7075

dubbs wrote:

Elamdri wrote:

Stingray24 wrote:

The Minutemen aren't killing anyone.  They simply detain anyone they catch for the Border Patrol.
IMHO, if they wanna patrol the boarder so badly, then they should join the Border Patrol, thats all.
We all know what happens then.  If you do your job you get put in jail. 

I actually talked to a guy about this, and I wonder if this would break the 2nd amendment. 

2nd amendment wrote:

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
Also, if they were so anti-Hispanic as the article makes them, then why do the patrol the US-Canada border also?
Who cares whether they're anti-Hispanic or not? They're wasting their time up north; no one illegally immigrates from Canada to the US. They might as well move to the southern border.
rawls2
Mr. Bigglesworth
+89|6986

fadedsteve wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Steve, there are two simple answers to your questions.

One of them was brought to my attention by ATG -- the government profits from a lot of illegal labor without having to pay out for it (in terms of Social Security fraud by illegals).

The other reason is because we get cheaper services from illegal labor.  Our cost of living is generally lower due to illegal labor.
Tell that explanation to a Union member and see if you dont get a fist in the face. . . .

Our hospitals, justice system, schools, and economy have been NEGATIVELY affected by illegal immigration. 

I live in California, the front line of this problem, and I can tell you illegal immigration is NOT good! Its infact a major problem here, and needs to be dealt with.  Those who dont live in states affected, have absolutely no idea, the cultural, monetary, and legal ramifications this problem is dealing to our local communities.

You living in North Carolina... you have no clue
Can't find a job? Do you go to a over crowded school because parents can't afford private school? Have you been assaulted by an illegal? How exactly does this problem affect YOU?
Elamdri
The New Johnnie Cochran
+134|7072|Peoria

Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:

Elamdri wrote:

I just don't feel that an illegal response to a crime is the right approach. If your so worried, then give them federal status, maybe license them to do what they are currently doing, just make sure its regulated so that the people stay within the law.
But that's just it, they aren't doing anything illegal.  What this lawmaker wants to do is make what they are doing legally illegal.
And what happens if one of these boarder men is injured or killed or injures or kills someone? Vigilantes are too romanticized by American society, if its not illegal now, then it should be.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard