http://www.newschannel10.com/global/story.asp?s=5973232
Not bad for a bunch of old men.
Not bad for a bunch of old men.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
doesnt surprise me at all.ATG wrote:
Wow.Vilham wrote:
Um lol.. the attack was probably planned in retaliation to you being there in the first place. No al quada bullshit please. They do not exist, they never did, all it is is a group of old men who hire out people to walk with them in videos to make it out it some huge group.Colfax wrote:
Every time something positive comes out of Iraq (terrorist plot foiled) you liberals scream conspiracy. Its getting old. Think of something original.
that cat called me a "gun-toting hillbilly terrorist" among other things because i support exporting a war to save civilians lives.
little does he know that i tote knives too
Read my post again KmanKmarion wrote:
http://www.newschannel10.com/global/story.asp?s=5973232
Not bad for a bunch of old men.
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
i'm sorry, but that cracked me up!Parker wrote:
doesnt surprise me at all.ATG wrote:
Wow.Vilham wrote:
Um lol.. the attack was probably planned in retaliation to you being there in the first place. No al quada bullshit please. They do not exist, they never did, all it is is a group of old men who hire out people to walk with them in videos to make it out it some huge group.
that cat called me a "gun-toting hillbilly terrorist" among other things because i support exporting a war to save civilians lives.
little does he know that i tote knives too
why do you keep calling people 'cat'?!
Last edited by m3thod (2007-01-22 15:12:09)
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
There is a Hierarchy in fact though. And no, Osama does not call the shots generally. There is structure and a chain of command. I also believe that when ever a Ayman al-Zawahiri is killed there are many waiting to take his place. Sorry if I misunderstood what you were saying m3thod though.m3thod wrote:
Read my post again KmanKmarion wrote:
http://www.newschannel10.com/global/story.asp?s=5973232
Not bad for a bunch of old men.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
The hierarchy and chain of command is at best dysfunctional and at worst non-existent. The wikipedia information is just that, information. There is no credible source to factualise the information. I refuse to believe these 2 gimpy old tards rule the terrorist world.Kmarion wrote:
There is a Hierarchy in fact though. And no, Osama does not call the shots generally. There is structure and a chain of command. I also believe that when ever a Ayman al-Zawahiri is killed there are many waiting to take his place. Sorry if I misunderstood what you were saying m3thod though.m3thod wrote:
Read my post again KmanKmarion wrote:
http://www.newschannel10.com/global/story.asp?s=5973232
Not bad for a bunch of old men.
All we see is OBL and 4eyes taking credit for everything, yet i bet they have no idea what on earth is materialising beyond the cave mouth or Pakistan/Afghan mountain safe house. The Al Qaeda name been developed from negative spin into a monster its masters can no longer control leading to an untold number of deranged men, women and children picking up arms in its name. They have 1 common enemy; to kill the Americans, why do you need a chain of command when there is one goal? OBL & 4eyes now only serve as motivational and propaganda mouthpieces.
Al Qaeda is now just a name that ALL nutjobs can use in unison in there quest for blooda and death.
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
Your hard proofjonsimon wrote:
I'd love to see some hard proof either way on the whole "Terrorists are plotting to kill us" theory.Elamdri wrote:
I'd love to see some hard proof either way on the whole "Al-Qaeda doesn't exist" theory.
1983 - Bombing of US Embassy in Beirut, April 18, 1983 (Hezbollah)
1983 - Bombing of Marine Barracks, Beirut, Oct 23, 1983
1985 - TWA Flight 847 hijacked, U.S. Navy diver killed (Hezbollah)
1985 - Achille Lauro hijacking, wheel-chair bound American killed by (palestinian terrorists )
1986 - Four Americans were killed and nine people, including five Americans, were injured when a bomb exploded aboard TWA Flight 840 as it traveled from Rome to Athens. The aircraft was able to land safely at Athens airport. ( Arab Revolutionary Cells )
1993 - First World Trade Center bombing, February 26: 6 Killed, 1,000 injured (Arab Islamist terrorists)
1996 - Khobar Towers bombing: 19 American servicemen killed (individuals identified as terrorist members of Hizballah Al-Hijaz (Saudi Hezbollah) )
1998 - US embassy bombings: U.S. Kenya Embassy blown up, 214 killed (12 Americans); U.S. Tanzania Embassy blown up, 10 killed ( Al Qaeda)
2000 - USS Cole attacked, 17 U.S. Navy sailors killed ( Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda terrorist organization)
2001 - September 11 attacks, thousands killed (al-Qaeda)
Discredit all these and call them conspiracies libs
So your reply is more a matter of opinion rather than information?m3thod wrote:
The hierarchy and chain of command is at best dysfunctional and at worst non-existent. The wikipedia information is just that, information. There is no credible source to factualise the information. I refuse to believe these 2 gimpy old tards rule the terrorist world.Kmarion wrote:
There is a Hierarchy in fact though. And no, Osama does not call the shots generally. There is structure and a chain of command. I also believe that when ever a Ayman al-Zawahiri is killed there are many waiting to take his place. Sorry if I misunderstood what you were saying m3thod though.m3thod wrote:
Read my post again Kman
All we see is OBL and 4eyes taking credit for everything, yet i bet they have no idea what on earth is materialising beyond the cave mouth or Pakistan/Afghan mountain safe house. The Al Qaeda name been developed from negative spin into a monster its masters can no longer control leading to an untold number of deranged men, women and children picking up arms in its name. They have 1 common enemy; to kill the Americans, why do you need a chain of command when there is one goal? OBL & 4eyes now only serve as motivational and propaganda mouthpieces.
Al Qaeda is now just a name that ALL nutjobs can use in unison in there quest for blooda and death.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
But if we pull out they have no reason to attack us. By staying we attarct this stuff.Colfax wrote:
Yeah pull out of Iraq...great idea....
Ha ha ha ha ha ha, ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha (breath) ha ha ha ha ha!doctastrangelove1964 wrote:
But if we pull out they have no reason to attack us. By staying we attarct this stuff.Colfax wrote:
Yeah pull out of Iraq...great idea....
"Terrorists won't attack us if we get out of Iraq!"? Hilarious! Great joke! Ha ha ha!
back to the stats page for you my frienddoctastrangelove1964 wrote:
But if we pull out they have no reason to attack us. By staying we attarct this stuff.Colfax wrote:
Yeah pull out of Iraq...great idea....
edit
dont be too hard on him, just a tad misguided....maybe's he young?
Last edited by m3thod (2007-01-22 15:57:31)
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
thats a good thing for the US government and economy. More defense contracts, more shit to rebuild. I guess its in the US's best interest to attack as many countries pursuing an ideology instead of an actualy foe. RIGHT???
War is big business. Lockhead, Boeing, Northrop, halliburton etc have to make money somehow.kessel! wrote:
thats a good thing for the US government and economy. More defense contracts, more shit to rebuild. I guess its in the US's best interest to attack as many countries pursuing an ideology instead of an actualy foe. RIGHT???
edit
I'll add BAe before i get slaughtered by dem lot!
Last edited by m3thod (2007-01-22 16:12:04)
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
In case anyone was wondering, that was a joke. Hence the quotes.Elamdri wrote:
I'd love to see some hard proof either way on the whole "Al-Qaeda doesn't exist" theory.
Without cold hard facts all information can be interpreted as opinion.Kmarion wrote:
So your reply is more a matter of opinion rather than information?m3thod wrote:
The hierarchy and chain of command is at best dysfunctional and at worst non-existent. The wikipedia information is just that, information. There is no credible source to factualise the information. I refuse to believe these 2 gimpy old tards rule the terrorist world.Kmarion wrote:
There is a Hierarchy in fact though. And no, Osama does not call the shots generally. There is structure and a chain of command. I also believe that when ever a Ayman al-Zawahiri is killed there are many waiting to take his place. Sorry if I misunderstood what you were saying m3thod though.
All we see is OBL and 4eyes taking credit for everything, yet i bet they have no idea what on earth is materialising beyond the cave mouth or Pakistan/Afghan mountain safe house. The Al Qaeda name been developed from negative spin into a monster its masters can no longer control leading to an untold number of deranged men, women and children picking up arms in its name. They have 1 common enemy; to kill the Americans, why do you need a chain of command when there is one goal? OBL & 4eyes now only serve as motivational and propaganda mouthpieces.
Al Qaeda is now just a name that ALL nutjobs can use in unison in there quest for blood and death.
Last edited by m3thod (2007-01-22 16:08:41)
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
That is that part that no one gets. If some group of imperialists came in took over our government and started ruling our lives, we'd be over there in a heartbeat. I'd be fine if someone wanted to get rid of the current government, just as long as they didn't hang around and change everything.Vilham wrote:
Um lol.. the attack was probably planned in retaliation to you being there in the first place. No al quada bullshit please. They do not exist, they never did, all it is is a group of old men who hire out people to walk with them in videos to make it out it some huge group.Colfax wrote:
Every time something positive comes out of Iraq (terrorist plot foiled) you liberals scream conspiracy. Its getting old. Think of something original.
We'll see about the Al Quada part part though...
Shit is serious in this section kiddo.Elamdri wrote:
In case anyone was wondering, that was a joke. Hence the quotes.Elamdri wrote:
I'd love to see some hard proof either way on the whole "Al-Qaeda doesn't exist" theory.
Last edited by m3thod (2007-01-22 16:08:55)
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
Neither was this, the same old men were responsible for the 2003 USA power blackout:Kmarion wrote:
http://www.newschannel10.com/global/story.asp?s=5973232
Not bad for a bunch of old men.
http://english.daralhayat.com/arab_news … story.html
Except it was bullshit, the failure was caused by faulty alarm systems and other things.
I think the point that was being made is that the media believe Al Qaeda is like a giant army poised to attack. Maybe they are or maybe their not but want you to think that. Maybe their random pockets of bad guys who hate the same thing but are off doing their own thing.
I don't know either way but it does seem like Al Qaeda like to take credit for things even when they had nothing to do with it to stir shit up.
Only if tigers were attacking before you wore the fuckin shirt right?? Cuz the US was getting attacked for 10 years prior.ThomasMorgan wrote:
Well, there's no way to prove it one way or the other. Yeah, we may be preventing terrorist attacks...or they may just not be happening. It's like saying that the shirt I'm wearing repels tigers. I don't see any tigers around here, so by your logic, it must be true.
I love it, no terror attacks and it is no big deal. As soon as one hits, you will want Bush's head on a platter for allowing it to happen.....God, I hate liberals.
Who is responsible for the security of the USA? You Damn fucking right. Billions of dollars are pumped into the CIA, FBI and NSA and yet they still managed a royal fuck up.lowing wrote:
Only if tigers were attacking before you wore the fuckin shirt right?? Cuz the US was getting attacked for 10 years prior.ThomasMorgan wrote:
Well, there's no way to prove it one way or the other. Yeah, we may be preventing terrorist attacks...or they may just not be happening. It's like saying that the shirt I'm wearing repels tigers. I don't see any tigers around here, so by your logic, it must be true.
I love it, no terror attacks and it is no big deal. As soon as one hits, you will want Bush's head on a platter for allowing it to happen.....God, I hate liberals.
You damn right Bush's head should be rolling. You know what your problem is Lowers? you can only appropriate blame to the Libs. Its tiresome.
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
Not only Bush, it was an entire administration fuck up. Blame the liberals, God shove it up your ass. The entire government is deteriorating at a rate much faster than I would have ever imagined and it just as hell isn't just the liberals fault.m3thod wrote:
Who is responsible for the security of the USA? You Damn fucking right. Billions of dollars are pumped into the CIA, FBI and NSA and yet they still managed a royal fuck up.lowing wrote:
Only if tigers were attacking before you wore the fuckin shirt right?? Cuz the US was getting attacked for 10 years prior.ThomasMorgan wrote:
Well, there's no way to prove it one way or the other. Yeah, we may be preventing terrorist attacks...or they may just not be happening. It's like saying that the shirt I'm wearing repels tigers. I don't see any tigers around here, so by your logic, it must be true.
I love it, no terror attacks and it is no big deal. As soon as one hits, you will want Bush's head on a platter for allowing it to happen.....God, I hate liberals.
You damn right Bush's head should be rolling. You know what your problem is Lowers? you can only appropriate blame to the Libs. Its tiresome.
tough shit, I call it like I see it. It is liberals protesting at soldiers funerals, it is liberals who want to cut defense and weaken our nation. It is liberals who print war plans in the fuckin' newspapers, it is liberals who did nothing for a decade of terror attacks.........AND,.......................it is LIBERALS who the terrorists hope get into the white house. The liberals have the support of terrorists, os you tell me, who is fucked up, again??m3thod wrote:
Who is responsible for the security of the USA? You Damn fucking right. Billions of dollars are pumped into the CIA, FBI and NSA and yet they still managed a royal fuck up.lowing wrote:
Only if tigers were attacking before you wore the fuckin shirt right?? Cuz the US was getting attacked for 10 years prior.ThomasMorgan wrote:
Well, there's no way to prove it one way or the other. Yeah, we may be preventing terrorist attacks...or they may just not be happening. It's like saying that the shirt I'm wearing repels tigers. I don't see any tigers around here, so by your logic, it must be true.
I love it, no terror attacks and it is no big deal. As soon as one hits, you will want Bush's head on a platter for allowing it to happen.....God, I hate liberals.
You damn right Bush's head should be rolling. You know what your problem is Lowers? you can only appropriate blame to the Libs. Its tiresome.
And you can only blame the "neocons". Point?m3thod wrote:
you can only appropriate blame to the Libs. Its tiresome.
Hang on, since when was any of this the libs or the cons fault? It's the insurgents fault surely.Stingray24 wrote:
And you can only blame the "neocons". Point?m3thod wrote:
you can only appropriate blame to the Libs. Its tiresome.
We can bitch about the actions of various political factions all we want but they're not the ones out blowing stuff up (not 'our' stuff anyway).
Actually that is hard proof that a building fell. That picture provides no deductive evidence that any terrorists are plotting to kill us or, alternatively, that no terrorists are planning to kill us.Kmarion wrote:
http://i14.tinypic.com/40c3t6v.jpgjonsimon wrote:
I'd love to see some hard proof either way on the whole "Terrorists are plotting to kill us" theory.Elamdri wrote:
I'd love to see some hard proof either way on the whole "Al-Qaeda doesn't exist" theory.
Hard proof
Last edited by jonsimon (2007-01-22 17:46:03)