CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6981

ATG wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

ATG wrote:

Everytime contemptable blowhards like Ted Kennedy get in front of a mic and go on about how are are fighting a war based on lies
the insurgents see hope and continue fighting.

By suggesting there is internal conflict at home the democrats suggest to the jihadist that if they just keep fighting and hanging in there then eventually we will lose.
The average run-of-the-mill insurgent probably cares little for the internal machinations of US politics. They see an occupation, they will continue to fight it until that occupation ends. The foreign elements may be interested somewhat in what goes on in the US but the average Iraqi probably doesn't give a shit. I personally don't think the USSR would EVER have defeated the Afghans, save perhaps if they nuked the entire length and breadth of the country. The same rules apply today in Afghanistan and sadly in Iraq also.
I don't recall the Ruskies building schools and hospitals Cam. Sewage treat facilities, etc.
Edited my previous post. What's the point in hospitals when they just get blown up, eh? Perhaps they don't want you to build them? Would you accept something off somebody that you would generally describe as 'the Great Satan' (as most of the middle east refers to USA)?

Last edited by CameronPoe (2007-01-15 09:09:21)

Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|7142

CameronPoe wrote:

ATG wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:


The average run-of-the-mill insurgent probably cares little for the internal machinations of US politics. They see an occupation, they will continue to fight it until that occupation ends. The foreign elements may be interested somewhat in what goes on in the US but the average Iraqi probably doesn't give a shit. I personally don't think the USSR would EVER have defeated the Afghans, save perhaps if they nuked the entire length and breadth of the country. The same rules apply today in Afghanistan and sadly in Iraq also.
I don't recall the Ruskies building schools and hospitals Cam. Sewage treat facilities, etc.
Edited my previous post. What's the point in hospitals when they just get blown up, eh? Perhaps they don't want you to build them? Would you accept something off somebody that you would generally describe as 'the Great Satan' (as most of the middle east refers to USA)?
Well Cam, in all due respect, most of the insurgents aren't even from Iraq... They're from and sponsored by other nations.
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6981

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

ATG wrote:

I don't recall the Ruskies building schools and hospitals Cam. Sewage treat facilities, etc.
Edited my previous post. What's the point in hospitals when they just get blown up, eh? Perhaps they don't want you to build them? Would you accept something off somebody that you would generally describe as 'the Great Satan' (as most of the middle east refers to USA)?
Well Cam, in all due respect, most of the insurgents aren't even from Iraq... They're from and sponsored by other nations.
Neither you nor I can quanitfy how many or how few foreigners are involved. The Mehdi Army alone, a fully Iraqi organisation, is testament to the fact that this is not some proxy war but does in fact involve real Iraqis, lots of them.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2007-01-15 09:14:55)

Parker
isteal
+1,452|6820|The Gem Saloon
the soviet occupation of afghanistan was an extremely different situation than to what is occuring in iraq right now. that war was the last true holy war, no one has tried to supress islam since. i have personally met the man that commanded the armed forces in afghanistan for the soviet union, and we discussed at length his use of a unit whose specific duty was to put explosives inside of childrens toys and leave them around the on the ground.


the united states is doing nothing like that at all. and in fact like ATG pointed out we are rebuilding the infrastructure which was destroyed by us, but also by the insurgents.
i do believe that the average insurgent is more aware than you give them credit. this is an asymetrical war, and they understand that with every american death brings that much more instability to the american public. this country is split. anyone who watches any news or gets any information about us knows that. its unfortunate because i dont remember seeing the country this way (too young for vietnam), but thats the way it is.



edit: @ cam-posted after your edit.

Last edited by Parker (2007-01-15 09:16:32)

Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|7142

CameronPoe wrote:

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:


Edited my previous post. What's the point in hospitals when they just get blown up, eh? Perhaps they don't want you to build them? Would you accept something off somebody that you would generally describe as 'the Great Satan' (as most of the middle east refers to USA)?
Well Cam, in all due respect, most of the insurgents aren't even from Iraq... They're from and sponsored by other nations.
Neither you nor I can quanitfy how many or how few foreigners are involved. The Mehdi Army alone, a fully Iraqi organisation, is testament to the fact that this is not some proxy war but does in fact involve real Iraqis, lots of them.
But I think the main problem is how are they getting the weapons? Shouldn't there be someone making sure no weapons (outside of NATO, USA etc... ) Get into Iraq?
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7026|132 and Bush

m3thod wrote:

usmarine2007 wrote:

Something a lot of you fail to realize is the insurgents have a huge advantage that cannot be defeated by countries who follow the basic "rules" of war.
Don't you just love the blame game?!

My turn! My turn!

I blame the muppets in your government who failed to realise insurgents would pour in, and rather ungentlemanly fail to follow the rules of war.  Bad insurgent! Bad! Bad!
How about blaming the Iraqis who continue to kill each other? The American people would like their men and women home, but the uncivilized greedy assholes can't see the quickest way to get Americans out is to allow stability to happen. The Iraqi government is too dependent on American forces, thats the real problem.

wrote:

Neither you nor I can quanitfy how many or how few foreigners are involved. The Mehdi Army alone, a fully Iraqi organisation, is testament to the fact that this is not some proxy war but does in fact involve real Iraqis, lots of them.
Where are they getting supplied from? I think it's quite obvious Iran is doing everything it can to continue to escalate the situation. Meeting with Chavez to press the oil production to be reduced is further evidence they are trying to destabilize the world.

Last edited by Kmarion (2007-01-15 09:53:33)

Xbone Stormsurgezz
Pug
UR father's brother's nephew's former roommate
+652|6968|Texas - Bigger than France
Just to get us back on track:

It's good the morale is high in Iraq.  It keeps the soldiers focused on their jobs, which means they are less likely to make mistakes, irregardless of political distractions.
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6955|Global Command

CameronPoe wrote:

[The Democrats did harness the questionability of the Iraq war, there is no question about that. But to imagine that has had any effect on a miserably poorly run failure of a military campaign over which they had no control is just plain wrong. Let's face it: Bush is doing his own thing here with the 20,500 troops. If he fails, which he will, then there won't be anyone to blame but himself.
This was one of the most briliant military campaigns in the history of war.
We have taken out two bad regimes with a minimal loss of life to our side.

Democrats have plenty of control; they sit on commitees that decide on who and what gets money. It was offered to be put to a vote, should we pull out and redleploy and the democrats refused to vote!

Bush is doing his own thing as much as other presidents have done, no more. It has occured to me that the apparent dissension here in America is  myth that is put put out there to make our enemies think we are weak and divided. It draws them out, gets them to act.
And then we kill them.

If we fail in Iraq, we have all of ourselves to blame. And the Iraqis can also blame themselves as they build the funeral pyres for their dead.
GATOR591957
Member
+84|7053

ATG wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

Stories like this aren't as entertaining.
http://i16.tinypic.com/40pgb5z.jpg
Three entities are behind the continued unrest in Iraq.

1) the Sunni/Shia militias and the outside meddlers.
2) The Press
3) the democratic party in America.
Are you actually saying the Republicans had nothing to do with it.  You're blaming the Democrats that believed the Republican President.

Nah, I see this as a try to stir up the people thread.
usmarine2007
Banned
+374|6793|Columbus, Ohio
"Peace is not the absence of conflict, but the presence of justice."
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6955|Global Command

usmarine2007 wrote:

"Peace is not the absence of conflict, but the presence of justice."
QFE
XCheapshotX
Member
+2|6739|Geordie Land
I can see morale being high amongst units deployed. I have no combat experience but I imagine being in a secure camp with overwhelming firepower, armour and air support with the men ( and women ) that I've trained with, been on the streets, with my morale would be high too.

Until the US ( and other coalition ) forces actually handed a major defeat in a conventional battle or are forced to leave through a change in government policy I doubt morale will be affected. They know that their parents and friends support them, they know that the man next to him knows what he's doing so may not be that bothered if the people planting the IED bombs on the next patrol are Sunni, Shia, Saudi, Syrian, etc.

We seem to assume that the average grunt knows or cares about the politics behind why they are there, they are just doing their job until they get rotated back home, keeping themselves safe whilst completing the mission their company commander passed to their sergeant and on to them.

Perhaps the veterans on the forum can explain what that they thought about while they were there?
m3thod
All kiiiiiiiiinds of gainz
+2,197|7097|UK

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

m3thod wrote:

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

That is just plain ignorant, ok we can play by the insurgents game! Lets firebomb every city in Iraq to make sure there are no insurgents!
It would have been prudent to have planned carefully for eventualities no?  This is WAR, all sort of nasty shit will happen, people lives will be lost, people will suffer, trillions of dollar down the khazi,  its imperative to plan for everything! Especially those as glaring as the insurgent falls in the west and meddling fanatics in the east.  The decision to got war was rash, incomplete and the occupation has been executed with text book incompetence.

You cannot expect to invade a country slap bang in the middle of we hate the American Infidels central where you are systematically despised and expect to fight these fanatics toe to toe.  This it what i am referring to, to use the excuse "Damn we don't have their advantage of being able to melt into the background" is laughable.  So guess what?  Tough shit, should have thought of this.  I'm no strategic military adviser but an infant could have told you this.

Get it? Now back to Junk CN, you don't have the intellectual capacity to post here.
Well this really isn't a war anymore, the Iraqi Army is defeated, now the troops stationed in Iraq are fighting an enemy that dresses as a civilian, hell you don't know if that guy who sells cigarettes down the street may your killer tomorrow. This type of battle has not been dealt with before, it is hard to adapt to this kind of situation, makes it even harder when the media is like blah blah blah dead in Iraq, war escalates. Not fucking helping at all. What happened to haji waving American flag and thanking American soldiers?


Btw, I find it kind of Ironic that people from the UK says well tough shit US, whilst their own country is in the same situation...
This is guerrilla warfare, and its HAS been utilised before.  The lack of foresight and the strategic (if you can call it that) decisions have been unbelievably piss poor.  Insurgents are rolling in from their breeding grounds in Syria, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Saudi...wait! The whole of the goddamn ME and the Indian Subcontinent! and your whole argument is based in the premise that we didn't expect this?! Wake up bucko my lado this is the one thing you should have expected.....unlike the west people in the ME are not united by nationality it's their faith that binds them together....this is nothing new.  Combine that and a warped perception of Jihad and you've got an enemy will stop at nothing to fuck your ass up.


What makes you think i personally give a flying fuck about British or US soldiers in Iraq?

Last edited by m3thod (2007-01-15 15:02:53)

Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7026|132 and Bush

m3thod wrote:

This is guerrilla warfare, and its HAS been utilised before.
This is guerrilla civil warfare, and its HAS been utilised before.

They are united by religion not nationality. If it were nationality it would not be Shia verse Sunni. But yes, we underestimated the length Iran and Syria would go to disrupting the progress of peace. Those two nations are responsible for ensuring the chaos continues more than anything else. This allows the world to focus on Iraq while Ahmadinejad (Actually Ayatollah Ali Khamenei) continue to pursue nuclear weapons and make promises of wiping Israel and the Western world off the planet...

haha Ahmadinejad... you silly bitch
Xbone Stormsurgezz
m3thod
All kiiiiiiiiinds of gainz
+2,197|7097|UK

Kmarion wrote:

m3thod wrote:

This is guerrilla warfare, and its HAS been utilised before.
This is guerrilla civil warfare, and its HAS been utilised before.

They are united by religion not nationality. If it were nationality it would not be Shia verse Sunni. But yes, we underestimated the length Iran and Syria would go to disrupting the progress of peace. Those two nations are responsible for ensuring the chaos continues more than anything else. This allows the world to focus on Iraq while Ahmadinejad (Actually Ayatollah Ali Khamenei) continue to pursue nuclear weapons and make promises of wiping Israel and the Western world off the planet...

haha Ahmadinejad... you silly bitch
Read my post again.

Civil warfare between Sunni and Shia.  Guerilla warfare between US and Insurgents.  Quite the shitfest huh?

Anyway the real puppet masters are the wacko religious leaders, they will be blindly followed...i know people who need to go to Fridays prayers like it's almost a matter of life and death.  You only have to hear who's name was being chanted at Saddam execution...How do you deal with these indivduals without letting the shit hit the fan? Good luck on that one.

Last edited by m3thod (2007-01-15 15:38:03)

Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7026|132 and Bush

m3thod wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

m3thod wrote:

This is guerrilla warfare, and its HAS been utilised before.
This is guerrilla civil warfare, and its HAS been utilised before.

They are united by religion not nationality. If it were nationality it would not be Shia verse Sunni. But yes, we underestimated the length Iran and Syria would go to disrupting the progress of peace. Those two nations are responsible for ensuring the chaos continues more than anything else. This allows the world to focus on Iraq while Ahmadinejad (Actually Ayatollah Ali Khamenei) continue to pursue nuclear weapons and make promises of wiping Israel and the Western world off the planet...

haha Ahmadinejad... you silly bitch
Read my post again.

Civil warfare between Sunni and Shia.  Guerilla warfare between US and Insurgents.  Quite the shitfest huh?

Anyway the real puppet masters are the wacko religious leaders, they will be blindly followed...i know people who need to go to Fridays prayers like it's almost a matter of life and death.  You only have to hear at who's name was being chanted at Saddam execution...How do you deal with these indivduals without letting the shit hit the fan? Good luck on that one.
I was adding to your point. I said but, yes.. thats why it seemed like I was disagreeing .

The only people who can stop this permanently is the Iraqi's.

Last edited by Kmarion (2007-01-15 15:37:42)

Xbone Stormsurgezz
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6955|Global Command
You deal with Sadr with artillery or a 500 pounder.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7026|132 and Bush

We either address the role Iran is playing or get out. Our soldiers deserve more than the mediocrity of sitting back and responding to the threat yet never being allowed to eliminate it.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
.:XDR:.PureFodder
Member
+105|7255
If morale is so high, why has the suicide rate in the US armed forces doubled within a year?
http://www.channel4.com/news/special-re … sp?id=4372
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6981

.:XDR:.PureFodder wrote:

If morale is so high, why has the suicide rate in the US armed forces doubled within a year?
http://www.channel4.com/news/special-re … sp?id=4372
It's probably because of the Democrat party.
usmarine2007
Banned
+374|6793|Columbus, Ohio

.:XDR:.PureFodder wrote:

If morale is so high, why has the suicide rate in the US armed forces doubled within a year?
http://www.channel4.com/news/special-re … sp?id=4372
That would be Vets, not troops currently in Iraq.

Fail.

Last edited by usmarine2007 (2007-01-16 05:26:54)

Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|7142

usmarine2007 wrote:

.:XDR:.PureFodder wrote:

If morale is so high, why has the suicide rate in the US armed forces doubled within a year?
http://www.channel4.com/news/special-re … sp?id=4372
That would be Vets, not troops currently in Iraq.

Fail.
You mean /Fail
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6987
So, basically as long as they stay in Iraq they're safe from suicide, but returning to society is too horrendous.

Or maybe they don't go back to Iraq because their morale is so low, and then kill themselves as well.

Both compelling theories.
.:XDR:.PureFodder
Member
+105|7255

usmarine2007 wrote:

.:XDR:.PureFodder wrote:

If morale is so high, why has the suicide rate in the US armed forces doubled within a year?
http://www.channel4.com/news/special-re … sp?id=4372
That would be Vets, not troops currently in Iraq.

Fail.
You neither watched the report or read the whole article
"But its statistics do show the suicide rate in Iraq is double what it was for the US Army in peacetime."

You fail.
usmarine2007
Banned
+374|6793|Columbus, Ohio

Bubbalo wrote:

So, basically as long as they stay in Iraq they're safe from suicide, but returning to society is too horrendous.

Or maybe they don't go back to Iraq because their morale is so low, and then kill themselves as well.

Both compelling theories.
You tell me.  You guys have all the answers not me.  I am not an expert on suicide.  I haven't killed myself, and I have been to two wars.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard