BF2S Forums BF2s AU Chat!

Last edited by Acreta (2008-05-26 03:46:09)

bakinacake wrote:

Acreta wrote:

also, is it true that if you aren't christened you can't get into heaven?

From what i belive yes, because you have sinned, and that has made you impure in the eyes of God, but through Jesus, he takes your sins for you. As in dieing on tha cross, he died so we didn't have to. Spiritually i mean.

bakinacake wrote:

Pea....Tear.....Griffen wrote:

bakinacake wrote:

not to smoke, drink, or have sex before marriage.

bakinacake wrote:

i think we are one of, or the happiest religion on the earth

Contradicting each other IMO.

personal choice, and anyway, it makes us feel better about ourselves, not having the shame of not knowing what you did the night before.

Mek-Stizzle wrote:

What, then, is the evidence that Jesus Christ lived in this world as a man? The authorities relied upon to prove the reality of Christ are the four Gospels of the New Testament -- Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. These Gospels, and these alone, tell the story of his life. Now we know absolutely nothing of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, apart from what is said of them in the Gospels. Moreover, the Gospels themselves do not claim to have been written by these men. They are not called "The Gospel of Matthew," or "The Gospel of Mark," but "The Gospel According to Matthew," "The Gospel According to Mark," "The Gospel According to Luke," and "The Gospel According to John." No human being knows who wrote a single line in one of these Gospels. No human being knows when they were written, or where. Biblical scholarship has established the fact that the Gospel of Mark is the oldest of the four. The chief reasons for this conclusion are that this Gospel is shorter, simpler, and more natural, than any of the other three. It is shown that the Gospels of Matthew and Luke were enlarged from the Gospel of Mark. The Gospel of Mark knows nothing of the virgin birth, of the Sermon on the Mount, of the Lord's prayer, or of other important facts of the supposed life of Christ. These features were added by Matthew and Luke.

Christ is supposed to have been a Jew, and his disciples are said to have been Jewish fishermen. His language, and the language of his followers must, therefore, have been Aramaic -- the popular language of Palestine in that age. But the Gospels are written in Greek -- every one of them. Nor were they translated from some other language. Every leading Christian scholar since Erasmus, four hundred years ago, has maintained that they were originally written in Greek. This proves that they were not written by Christ's disciples, or by any of the early Christians. Foreign Gospels, written by unknown men, in a foreign tongue, several generations after the death of those who are supposed to have known the facts -- such is the evidence relied upon to prove that Jesus lived.

His home was Nazareth. He was called "Jesus of Nazareth"; and there he is said to have lived until the closing years of his life. Now comes the question -- Was there a city of Nazareth in that age? The Encyclopaedia Biblica, a work written by theologians, the greatest biblical reference work in the English language, says: "We cannot perhaps venture to assert positively that there was a city of Nazareth in Jesus' time." No certainty that there was a city of Nazareth! Not only are the supposed facts of the life of Christ imaginary, but the city of his birth and youth and manhood existed, so far as we know, only on the map of mythology. What amazing evidence to prove the reality of a Divine man! Absolute ignorance as to his ancestry; nothing whatever known of the time of his birth, and even the existence of the city where he is said to have been born, a matter of grave question!

Philo, one of the most renowned writers the Jewish race has produced, was born before the beginning of the Christian Era, and lived for many years after the time at which Jesus is supposed to have died. His home was in or near Jerusalem, where Jesus is said to have preached, to have performed miracles, to have been crucified, and to have risen from the dead. Had Jesus done these things, the writings of Philo would certainly contain some record of his life. Yet this philosopher, who must have been familiar with Herod's massacre of the innocents, and with the preaching, miracles and death of Jesus, had these things occurred; who wrote an account of the Jews, covering this period, and discussed the very questions that are said to have been near to Christ's heart, never once mentioned the name of, or any deed connected with, the reputed Savior of the world.

TheAussieReaper wrote:

Fenris_GreyClaw wrote:

If Jesus can turn water into wine and walk on water, does the water he walk on turn to wine and make him fall in 'cause he can't walk on wine?

He'd have trouble getting the fuck out of it too cause he'd be drowning in the wine and getting drunker and drunker. Personally a drunk Jesus imo would be hilarious.

Pea....Tear.....Griffen wrote:

bakinacake wrote:

Pea....Tear.....Griffen wrote:

bakinacake wrote:

not to smoke, drink, or have sex before marriage.

Contradicting each other IMO.

personal choice, and anyway, it makes us feel better about ourselves, not having the shame of not knowing what you did the night before.

Im always proud of what i did the night before.