stryyker
bad touch
+1,682|7145|California

Running the World's most powerful nation is a very hard job, no? I see alot of shit in this section bashing him about his every move (a reason I refrain from posting here). But for all intensive purposes people, The President of the United States, is the most powerful man in the World. If you think you could run the nation better, please tell me all about it, ya?

edit: Personally, I hate Bush, but I have respect for him, for just being the President in general.

Last edited by stryyker (2007-01-11 20:13:51)

RedTwizzler
I do it for the lulz.
+124|6963|Chicago

stryyker wrote:

Running the World's most powerful nation is a very hard job, no? I see alot of shit in this section bashing him about his every move (a reason I refrain from posting here). But for all intensive purposes people, The President of the United States, is the most powerful man in the World. If you think you could run the nation better, please tell me all about it, ya?
It is an important job, and it is a tough job. However, this is the reason that he SHOULDN'T have been elected in the first place. Creating an unreal national debt, as well as turning unprecedented international support of the US against us, are not actions becoming of the most powerful man in the world.
SysTray
"Generous mods" < Thats right Systray !
+180|7246|Delaware
I bash him because of the idiot factor, not the president factor.

I bash other people because he's the president, they voted for him.
Parker
isteal
+1,452|6820|The Gem Saloon
lets all think about what would have happend if the robot al gore was in office on 9-11..................
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6987
Keep in mind that he doesn't actually have to run everything: rather, he provides general direction, as well as being more involved in important decisions.  The running of the country is done by administrators and similar, who do what he says.  That is to say, I think there are a lot of people who could do the job better, because it isn't really that hard, given that you have expert advice at your fingertips.
mtb0minime
minimember
+2,418|7080

I admire President Bush for putting up with all the shit he gets. People only talk negative on him because the insane looney liberals are obsessed with spreading their propaganda on the media. Because of Bush, Iran has no money to make nuclear weapons. Our country refuses to buy oil from them, and we have encouraged other big countries like China, Japan, Britain to not buy oil from Iran either so that they cannot fuel their nuclear program. It's stuff like this that Bush doesn't get enough credit for.
BN
smells like wee wee
+159|7193
If i was running the worlds most powerful nation i would start acting like it. This mob could not organise a decent fart.

i would start by investing in my own people. healthcare, education, reducing poverty. All the things a government should be providing.
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6987

Parker wrote:

lets all think about what would have happend if the robot al gore was in office on 9-11..................
Parker is, apparently, psychic.  Once you've told us what would have happened, perhaps you can help me find my keys.  I could have sworn I left them next to the door, but they just aren't there.
SysTray
"Generous mods" < Thats right Systray !
+180|7246|Delaware

Parker wrote:

lets all think about what would have happend if the robot al gore was in office on 9-11..................
Let's think what would have happened if I picked the right lottery numbers too...

He wasn't in office, so he doesn't matter. Bush matters, unfortunately. You can't justify the Iraq conflict, period. Here's a crazy thought: After 9/11, Bush wanted to find Osama. We weren't even in the right country after awhile man...
thtthht
maximum bullshit
+50|6756|teh alien spaceshit

stryyker wrote:

Running the World's most powerful nation is a very hard job, no? I see alot of shit in this section bashing him about his every move (a reason I refrain from posting here). But for all intensive purposes people, The President of the United States, is the most powerful man in the World. If you think you could run the nation better, please tell me all about it, ya?

edit: Personally, I hate Bush, but I have respect for him, for just being the President in general.
Agreed. Stop giving him so much pressure, and he might do something good!
BN
smells like wee wee
+159|7193

Parker wrote:

lets all think about what would have happend if the robot al gore was in office on 9-11..................
Would more people have died? Would less people have died?


Let’s deflect all incompetence relating to 9-11 to someone else rather than the sitting government.
OmniDeath
~
+726|7069

I avoid discussing politics mostly due to all the hard headed people who only argue and refuse to discuss things maturely, but if people hate him so much, they shouldn't have voted for him. He was elected TWO times so he must have been doing something right...
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6987
or cheating and lieing and being voted in on a minority............................
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6955|Global Command
https://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i316/glennmac7/ATT12649.gif
UnknownRanger
Squirrels, natures little speedbump.
+610|6770|Cali
Now that is just fuc*ed up!
Ty
Mass Media Casualty
+2,398|7200|Noizyland

No-one said being the President was an easy job. That's why there are elections so that the most capable candidate gets the job. In the last two elections this just hasn't happened.

He got in the Presidency through more the merits of those working for him/related to him than his own qualities. He has since proven that he is the wrong man for the job. Just because he is the President, dosn't mean he deserves to be. This is generally the reason I have no respect for him, President of the most powerful nation on earth or not.
[Blinking eyes thing]
Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/tzyon
Parker
isteal
+1,452|6820|The Gem Saloon
ok i was making a statement that reflected my views. get me.
i think that george bush has done a damn good job in two terms that were filled with chaos. get me.
i also think that al gore would have done a horrible job. GET ME!
flame flame flame




hhhhhmmmmmmm, let see. justification of the iraq conflict.
ok since thats what people seem to be really hung up on, let me see if i can explain it to you.

first, we were attacked on 9-11 by terrorists.
second, these terrorists come from, mainly the middle east.
third, if we do not make ourselves available to attack in theyre backyard, they WILL attack us here. dont believe me? look at israel.
thats it plain and simple. it comes down to national security.
flame me, i laugh at you.
spray_and_pray
Member
+52|6917|Perth. Western Australia

Parker wrote:

ok i was making a statement that reflected my views. get me.
i think that george bush has done a damn good job in two terms that were filled with chaos. get me.
i also think that al gore would have done a horrible job. GET ME!
flame flame flame




hhhhhmmmmmmm, let see. justification of the iraq conflict.
ok since thats what people seem to be really hung up on, let me see if i can explain it to you.

first, we were attacked on 9-11 by terrorists.
second, these terrorists come from, mainly the middle east.
third, if we do not make ourselves available to attack in theyre backyard, they WILL attack us here. dont believe me? look at israel.
thats it plain and simple. it comes down to national security.
flame me, i laugh at you.
1 second so because a small group not a country attacked you, You will go to a country kill 600 000 innocent people and lose more troops in the process then the amount you lost in the actual attack? You killed more of their innocents then the terrorists killed yours? Who is the terrorist again?
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6955|Global Command

spray_and_pray wrote:

Parker wrote:

ok i was making a statement that reflected my views. get me.
i think that george bush has done a damn good job in two terms that were filled with chaos. get me.
i also think that al gore would have done a horrible job. GET ME!
flame flame flame




hhhhhmmmmmmm, let see. justification of the iraq conflict.
ok since thats what people seem to be really hung up on, let me see if i can explain it to you.

first, we were attacked on 9-11 by terrorists.
second, these terrorists come from, mainly the middle east.
third, if we do not make ourselves available to attack in theyre backyard, they WILL attack us here. dont believe me? look at israel.
thats it plain and simple. it comes down to national security.
flame me, i laugh at you.
1 second so because a small group not a country attacked you, You will go to a country kill 600 000 innocent people and lose more troops in the process then the amount you lost in the actual attack? You killed more of their innocents then the terrorists killed yours? Who is the terrorist again?
Thats silly.
600000 is a bogus number and your not being intellectually honest. We lost more troops in a month in WW2 than in we have in more than four years of combat in the middle east.
Go put your head back in the sand, I'll wake you up when the Marines are finished doing their job.
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|7142

ATG wrote:

spray_and_pray wrote:

Parker wrote:

ok i was making a statement that reflected my views. get me.
i think that george bush has done a damn good job in two terms that were filled with chaos. get me.
i also think that al gore would have done a horrible job. GET ME!
flame flame flame




hhhhhmmmmmmm, let see. justification of the iraq conflict.
ok since thats what people seem to be really hung up on, let me see if i can explain it to you.

first, we were attacked on 9-11 by terrorists.
second, these terrorists come from, mainly the middle east.
third, if we do not make ourselves available to attack in theyre backyard, they WILL attack us here. dont believe me? look at israel.
thats it plain and simple. it comes down to national security.
flame me, i laugh at you.
1 second so because a small group not a country attacked you, You will go to a country kill 600 000 innocent people and lose more troops in the process then the amount you lost in the actual attack? You killed more of their innocents then the terrorists killed yours? Who is the terrorist again?
Thats silly.
600000 is a bogus number and your not being intellectually honest. We lost more troops in a month in WW2 than in we have in more than four years of combat in the middle east.
Go put your head back in the sand, I'll wake you up when the Marines are finished doing their job.
QFT.

Iraq was never about terrorism... It was about removing a dictator who may have WMD's and he may be capable to use them. Now the mission for Iraq is to stabilize the country. When your in a situation like Iraq, you never know who's the enemy or not.
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6955|Global Command
Not only that, but sometimes you can't say who the enemy is.
Well, he did yesterday when he said interference will no longer be tollerated.
spray_and_pray
Member
+52|6917|Perth. Western Australia
Sorry that was done by a bunch of people looking around for death certificates and their studies have been known to be close to under a percentage of under 10%. You can easily deny facts like you should since 10% of 600 000 is 60 000 meaning 540 000 makes no difference does it? I dont guess you live or have any friends in Iraq which are civlilians? No you watch fox news all day and listen to their bullshit. The job of the Marines will never be accomplished so in a few years when you are still fighting this war of terror ill be sure to laugh at you. Bush is now provoking Iran, Syria. Your troops are stretched to the limits. Enjoy drafting when you go to Iraq ill pray for you. Tell me what its like when you get back. Do you know much troops who have been there? Most dont even beleive in the cause anymore but are just fighting to save themselves and their friends.

And even no matter what amount of deaths your government says what 100 000? And they did say 3000 troops. The US has killed 33 times more innocents then died in 9/11. The US is the greater terrorist, just on a much larger global scale as well as being the biggest threat to the world as we know it.
BN
smells like wee wee
+159|7193

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

who may have WMD's and he may be capable to use them.
NO, it was sold the he DID have weapons. Not maybe.
fadedsteve
GOP Sympathizer
+266|6916|Menlo Park, CA
We found wmd's, just not in the quantity that was expected!

btw I wonder what was in the endless caravans of trucks headed for the Syrian border before the war started??? wonder if you guys remembered that little blip on the news when that was happening. . . .

The guy who knows where the weapons are, is Assad the President of Syria!!!
BN
smells like wee wee
+159|7193

fadedsteve wrote:

We found wmd's, just not in the quantity that was expected!
Yeah about .1% of the amount that we were told he had.


fadedsteve wrote:

btw I wonder what was in the endless caravans of trucks headed for the Syrian border before the war started??? wonder if you guys remembered that little blip on the news when that was happening
Who told you that? the same people who said Iraq was trying to buy yellow cake uranium? Or the Mobile germ warfare labs that turned out to be hydrogen tanks for weather balloons?

It was dog shit intelligence. The CIA admits it.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard