You lack imagination, sir.jonsimon wrote:
Considering we've only had 3 EVER IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES and only two of them involved more than 1 death and one of them occurred in 77, no, I don't think we'd have any terrorism.SlightlySto0pid wrote:
You don't think we'd have terrorist attacks in the U.S. (ala suicide bombers, random acts of violence, etc) if it wasn't for the war in Iraq? Terrorists gotta kill innocents somewhere.
P.S. Both the WTC bombings are surrounded with controversy and allegations and evidence of government involvement.
And another wild exaggeration of a situation you know nothing about. Until you have first hand experience with what's going on there, stop. Have a little respect for the people who died there, on both sides. Being a little bitch on the internet isn't helping anyone.Bubbalo wrote:
I think you mean to say "Every time a US soldier leaves his barracks in Iraq".Not wrote:
I swear every time this kid makes a post an innocent child dies a horrible death, and I nearly have a stroke.
Who the hell are you?SlightlySto0pid wrote:
YOUR POINT IS RETARDED, this thread has no point except to get you attention.Bubbalo wrote:
I find it funny how so few people on these forums are willing to accept that the world isn't all about good guys and bad guys, and then say I'm not mature.
Either way, you seem incapable of understanding the point of this thread, and I will discuss it no further. You can feel free to continue to do so.
I suspected that Bubbalo would make something like this. NExt time, don't make it so cryptic, k?
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
Imaginary bombs never killed anyone.SlightlySto0pid wrote:
You lack imagination, sir.jonsimon wrote:
Considering we've only had 3 EVER IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES and only two of them involved more than 1 death and one of them occurred in 77, no, I don't think we'd have any terrorism.SlightlySto0pid wrote:
You don't think we'd have terrorist attacks in the U.S. (ala suicide bombers, random acts of violence, etc) if it wasn't for the war in Iraq? Terrorists gotta kill innocents somewhere.
P.S. Both the WTC bombings are surrounded with controversy and allegations and evidence of government involvement.
SlightlySto0pid wrote:
YOUR POINT IS RETARDED, this thread has no point except to get you attention.Bubbalo wrote:
I find it funny how so few people on these forums are willing to accept that the world isn't all about good guys and bad guys, and then say I'm not mature.
Either way, you seem incapable of understanding the point of this thread, and I will discuss it no further. You can feel free to continue to do so.
Let me give you the simple version.jonsimon wrote:
Imaginary bombs never killed anyone.SlightlySto0pid wrote:
You lack imagination, sir.jonsimon wrote:
Considering we've only had 3 EVER IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES and only two of them involved more than 1 death and one of them occurred in 77, no, I don't think we'd have any terrorism.
P.S. Both the WTC bombings are surrounded with controversy and allegations and evidence of government involvement.
The future is unpredictable. You can't tell me you know what would happen any more than I can, but your version makes no sense.
See, I got it. You just didnt notice.weamo8 wrote:
So from my point of view, you are evil, but from your point of view I'm evil? We don't agree? We see things differently? Holy Shit Bubbalo, I'm glad you are here to tell us these things. Great post, you're Aces!Bubbalo wrote:
Bertster7 wrote:
I'm surprised no one seems to have noticed that the only connection between these men is they have all conducted attacks on the WTC. Nothing to do with Iraq at all.For those interested, the point of this post is that when I criticise US soldiers in a post meant for honouring them I'm evil, yet when you do the exact same thing in a post for honoring the other side it's somehow okay.Bubbalo wrote:
who fight in opposition to the US occupation of Iraq and the rest of the Middle East
Major.League.Infidel: You've made 39 posts and you're already calling for the banning of another member? Are you really that full of yourself?
Thats bullshit, there have been at least 5 against the US on US soil, and you're completely disregarding terrorist attacks overseas that were directed against US nationals.jonsimon wrote:
Considering we've only had 3 EVER IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES and only two of them involved more than 1 death and one of them occurred in 77, no, I don't think we'd have any terrorism.
Holy crap I think we have a conspiracy theorist. Did we land on the moon? Ok never mind, I'm going to pretend you didn't just say that last part.jonsimon wrote:
Considering we've only had 3 EVER IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES and only two of them involved more than 1 death and one of them occurred in 77, no, I don't think we'd have any terrorism.SlightlySto0pid wrote:
You don't think we'd have terrorist attacks in the U.S. (ala suicide bombers, random acts of violence, etc) if it wasn't for the war in Iraq? Terrorists gotta kill innocents somewhere.
P.S. Both the WTC bombings are surrounded with controversy and allegations and evidence of government involvement.
In the past terrorism hasn't been a problem, and where should it have come from? Islamic Fundamentalism and its jihad against Western society is only a recent threat but a quickly growing one.
I would say as a generalization the main reason the US has a military force in the middle east is to show that we are not weak, but are failing at the moment.
[conspiracy]Clearly they were pulled off by our own government and don't count[/conspiracy]Elamdri wrote:
Thats bullshit, there have been at least 5 against the US on US soil, and you're completely disregarding terrorist attacks overseas that were directed against US nationals.jonsimon wrote:
Considering we've only had 3 EVER IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES and only two of them involved more than 1 death and one of them occurred in 77, no, I don't think we'd have any terrorism.
We aren't failing so much as we are fighting an impossible battle. I believe we are supposed to leave Iraq once they can take care of themselves (which realistically means never. ever.) We cannot discourage the enemy into stopping. Look at Israel...Flaming_Maniac wrote:
Holy crap I think we have a conspiracy theorist. Did we land on the moon? Ok never mind, I'm going to pretend you didn't just say that last part.jonsimon wrote:
Considering we've only had 3 EVER IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES and only two of them involved more than 1 death and one of them occurred in 77, no, I don't think we'd have any terrorism.SlightlySto0pid wrote:
You don't think we'd have terrorist attacks in the U.S. (ala suicide bombers, random acts of violence, etc) if it wasn't for the war in Iraq? Terrorists gotta kill innocents somewhere.
P.S. Both the WTC bombings are surrounded with controversy and allegations and evidence of government involvement.
In the past terrorism hasn't been a problem, and where should it have come from? Islamic Fundamentalism and its jihad against Western society is only a recent threat but a quickly growing one.
I would say as a generalization the main reason the US has a military force in the middle east is to show that we are not weak, but are failing at the moment.
Read the post I was replying to, the subject was attacks on US soil. Oh, and want to find other attacks besides the two WTC bombings?Elamdri wrote:
Thats bullshit, there have been at least 5 against the US on US soil, and you're completely disregarding terrorist attacks overseas that were directed against US nationals.jonsimon wrote:
Considering we've only had 3 EVER IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES and only two of them involved more than 1 death and one of them occurred in 77, no, I don't think we'd have any terrorism.
Which is why I think we're failing. It's a nasty situation, and there isn't really anything you can do about it.SlightlySto0pid wrote:
We aren't failing so much as we are fighting an impossible battle. I believe we are supposed to leave Iraq once they can take care of themselves (which realistically means never. ever.) We cannot discourage the enemy into stopping. Look at Israel...Flaming_Maniac wrote:
Holy crap I think we have a conspiracy theorist. Did we land on the moon? Ok never mind, I'm going to pretend you didn't just say that last part.jonsimon wrote:
Considering we've only had 3 EVER IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES and only two of them involved more than 1 death and one of them occurred in 77, no, I don't think we'd have any terrorism.
P.S. Both the WTC bombings are surrounded with controversy and allegations and evidence of government involvement.
In the past terrorism hasn't been a problem, and where should it have come from? Islamic Fundamentalism and its jihad against Western society is only a recent threat but a quickly growing one.
I would say as a generalization the main reason the US has a military force in the middle east is to show that we are not weak, but are failing at the moment.
JONsimon......you fail at life.
We've been abusing the middle east since the Cold War, this isn't a new fad, just new for the media.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
Holy crap I think we have a conspiracy theorist. Did we land on the moon? Ok never mind, I'm going to pretend you didn't just say that last part.jonsimon wrote:
Considering we've only had 3 EVER IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES and only two of them involved more than 1 death and one of them occurred in 77, no, I don't think we'd have any terrorism.SlightlySto0pid wrote:
You don't think we'd have terrorist attacks in the U.S. (ala suicide bombers, random acts of violence, etc) if it wasn't for the war in Iraq? Terrorists gotta kill innocents somewhere.
P.S. Both the WTC bombings are surrounded with controversy and allegations and evidence of government involvement.
In the past terrorism hasn't been a problem, and where should it have come from? Islamic Fundamentalism and its jihad against Western society is only a recent threat but a quickly growing one.
I would say as a generalization the main reason the US has a military force in the middle east is to show that we are not weak, but are failing at the moment.
The US is in Iraq to ensure Oil is purchased in US dollars. We went to afganhistan to make sure the pipeline is built there, and not russia.
Excellent, because based on all the responses given you never clearly made a point.Bubbalo wrote:
I find it funny how so few people on these forums are willing to accept that the world isn't all about good guys and bad guys, and then say I'm not mature.
Either way, you seem incapable of understanding the point of this thread, and I will discuss it no further. You can feel free to continue to do so.
Now if you actually stated it, not only would it have been helpful, but there could have been a debate...
this kid is trying to get a rise out of everyone. you should just ignore him and hell probably change his opinions in a week. he spouts rhetoric against EVERYTHING the "con crew" here at bf2s talks about. if thats what he wants to do then let him, we all know that its not really what he believes, its just cool to be different at that age. hell grow out of it im sure....if not hell go become a "freedom fighter" like those he says are so great.
Fuck you mother fucker. Why the mother fuck has this thread been allowed to continue? Suck my fucking cock you anti-american cockwashes.
Last edited by usmarine2007 (2006-12-07 19:20:31)
Bubbalo, I trust you have some nefarious reason for posting this, otherwise, fuck you and I mean that sincerely.Bubbalo wrote:
This thread is to honour those courageous heroes who fight in opposition to the US occupation of Iraq and the rest of the Middle East, sacrificing their own lives to do so. I'll start with a little roll of honour, which we can add to as we progress:
Mohammed Atta
Ramzi Binalshibh
Ziad Jarrah
Zacarias Moussaoui
Abdul Rahman Yasin
RIP.
They were not killing civilians to oppose any agenda we had; that was propaganda. They murdered our people to initiate the end of days as told in the book of revelations.
To honor unaffiliated flagless murderers of civilians in any manner is shamefull, and this thread sickens me.
If you and I were at a bar and you said such a thing I would beat you senseless until you needed hospitalization.
I hope for the good people of Australias sake you never have to know what its like to see your fellow countrymen leaping to their deaths from burning buildings toarched by madmen. You live in a box and can't see outside of it; I pity you.
Whatever point you are trying to make is ridiculous, and this is the lowest you have sunken to ever.
Jeeze dude, were you living under a rock all this time or what.HeavyMetalDave wrote:
I'm so confused with this post.....
Who is doing what now????
Are they on our side?
Did these guys fight for the liberation of oppressed people?
What side are they on?
Sorry but I've never heard of them... Did they do something great?
Oh well....
This folks, is an example of the American education system.
He did state it.Pug wrote:
Excellent, because based on all the responses given you never clearly made a point.Bubbalo wrote:
I find it funny how so few people on these forums are willing to accept that the world isn't all about good guys and bad guys, and then say I'm not mature.
Either way, you seem incapable of understanding the point of this thread, and I will discuss it no further. You can feel free to continue to do so.
Now if you actually stated it, not only would it have been helpful, but there could have been a debate...
Reread the thread.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
Some crazy things have been said on this thread (mostly Bubbalo's posts), but honestly, this doesn't warrant a banning.
It does entail the verbal browbeating he's been getting so far though.
It does entail the verbal browbeating he's been getting so far though.
Fuck that, he has said some really disrespectful shit about American soldiers before. This forum is in America...ban the mother fucker.Turquoise wrote:
Some crazy things have been said on this thread (mostly Bubbalo's posts), but honestly, this doesn't warrant a banning.
It does entail the verbal browbeating he's been getting so far though.
Look, I totally understand the disgust and anger you feel from what Bubbalo has basically said about our soldiers, but isn't a ban overboard?usmarine2007 wrote:
Fuck that, he has said some really disrespectful shit about American soldiers before. This forum is in America...ban the mother fucker.Turquoise wrote:
Some crazy things have been said on this thread (mostly Bubbalo's posts), but honestly, this doesn't warrant a banning.
It does entail the verbal browbeating he's been getting so far though.
hes 12 years old, leave him alone.
People get banned for WAY less shit than insulting the men and women who defend this country...the country of THIS forum.Turquoise wrote:
Look, I totally understand the disgust and anger you feel from what Bubbalo has basically said about our soldiers, but isn't a ban overboard?usmarine2007 wrote:
Fuck that, he has said some really disrespectful shit about American soldiers before. This forum is in America...ban the mother fucker.Turquoise wrote:
Some crazy things have been said on this thread (mostly Bubbalo's posts), but honestly, this doesn't warrant a banning.
It does entail the verbal browbeating he's been getting so far though.