usmarine
Banned
+2,785|6778

I was watching Discovery Times this evening, when the year 1978 was up for discussion.  After watching that I realized something I never really understood.  That year, and the Carter admin, marked the beginning of some of the worst problems we face today.  Saddam was coming into power, who he had to support in order to fight against Iran, who we perceived to be the bigger threat.  Russia invaded Afghanistan, which put the wheels in motion to the US supporting the Taliban, because we wanted to defeat communism.  Also, Iran was going thru a major shift in their relationship with the US.  It was a good relationship until that year.

I know there are many, MANY things we can point to in history, but the Carter years seem to stand out as the beginning of a lot of problems that we deal with today.

So, not knowing a lot about that era, how do you think Carter should have handled things knowing what we know now?
Ganko_06
Laughter with an S
+167|6661|Camoran's Paradise
Carter is one the lowest rated presidents.  Go figure.
stryyker
bad touch
+1,682|6736|California

As far as i have learned, Carter wasnt much of a "decisive" president. He was kinda halfway on alot of issues.

But who knows how much better a Peanut farmer from Arkansas is than a bumpkin from Texas
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6422|North Carolina

usmarine2005 wrote:

I was watching Discovery Times this evening, when the year 1978 was up for discussion.  After watching that I realized something I never really understood.  That year, and the Carter admin, marked the beginning of some of the worst problems we face today.  Saddam was coming into power, who he had to support in order to fight against Iran, who we perceived to be the bigger threat.  Russia invaded Afghanistan, which put the wheels in motion to the US supporting the Taliban, because we wanted to defeat communism.  Also, Iran was going thru a major shift in their relationship with the US.  It was a good relationship until that year.

I know there are many, MANY things we can point to in history, but the Carter years seem to stand out as the beginning of a lot of problems that we deal with today.

So, not knowing a lot about that era, how do you think Carter should have handled things knowing what we know now?
Carter had one of the most difficult presidencies in modern history.  The oil crisis was probably the worst event that occurred during his term.  While this event still pales in comparison to the profound effect that 9/11 had, the oil crisis reminded us of our foreign dependency for oil.

Personally, I think Carter should have made some quick moves to encourage a move toward alternative energy sources.  If the proper tax incentives had been made back then to explore things like electrical cars as a viable transportation form, then we'd probably be less dependent on oil today.

In dealing with the hostage crisis, I think Carter should have given the Ayatollah an ultimatum: retrieve and return our hostages by July 1980, or we declare war on you and retrieve them ourselves.

1980 would have been the prime time to conquer Iran.  The revolution had just occurred, and Iran was in no position to defend itself against the most powerful country in the world.  We should have gotten Israeli on their asses.
rmilhous
Member
+32|6544|Augusta, Georgia

stryyker wrote:

As far as i have learned, Carter wasnt much of a "decisive" president. He was kinda halfway on alot of issues.

But who knows how much better a Peanut farmer from Arkansas is than a bumpkin from Texas
Hey Stryyker,
Carter was from Georgia. Not that I am proud of that or anything. At least we have Lil' Jon and the East Side Boyz though.

LOL.

:NBS:rmilhous
acEofspadEs6313
Shiny! Let's be bad guys.
+102|6709|NAS Jacksonville, Florida

rmilhous wrote:

stryyker wrote:

As far as i have learned, Carter wasnt much of a "decisive" president. He was kinda halfway on alot of issues.

But who knows how much better a Peanut farmer from Arkansas is than a bumpkin from Texas
Hey Stryyker,
Carter was from Georgia. Not that I am proud of that or anything. At least we have Lil' Jon and the East Side Boyz though.

LOL.

:NBS:rmilhous
Carter was a smart man. I mean, studying nuclear physics and reactor technology only for a few months is beyond what most people can do anyway.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6668|USA

usmarine2005 wrote:

I was watching Discovery Times this evening, when the year 1978 was up for discussion.  After watching that I realized something I never really understood.  That year, and the Carter admin, marked the beginning of some of the worst problems we face today.  Saddam was coming into power, who he had to support in order to fight against Iran, who we perceived to be the bigger threat.  Russia invaded Afghanistan, which put the wheels in motion to the US supporting the Taliban, because we wanted to defeat communism.  Also, Iran was going thru a major shift in their relationship with the US.  It was a good relationship until that year.

I know there are many, MANY things we can point to in history, but the Carter years seem to stand out as the beginning of a lot of problems that we deal with today.

So, not knowing a lot about that era, how do you think Carter should have handled things knowing what we know now?
Jimmy Carter is the father of modern liberalism, as such it is no surprise that his presidency and the problems that arose during it and after it, walk hand in hand.
TeamZephyr
Maintaining My Rage Since 1975
+124|6546|Hillside, Melbourne, Australia

lowing wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

I was watching Discovery Times this evening, when the year 1978 was up for discussion.  After watching that I realized something I never really understood.  That year, and the Carter admin, marked the beginning of some of the worst problems we face today.  Saddam was coming into power, who he had to support in order to fight against Iran, who we perceived to be the bigger threat.  Russia invaded Afghanistan, which put the wheels in motion to the US supporting the Taliban, because we wanted to defeat communism.  Also, Iran was going thru a major shift in their relationship with the US.  It was a good relationship until that year.

I know there are many, MANY things we can point to in history, but the Carter years seem to stand out as the beginning of a lot of problems that we deal with today.

So, not knowing a lot about that era, how do you think Carter should have handled things knowing what we know now?
Jimmy Carter is the father of modern liberalism, as such it is no surprise that his presidency and the problems that arose during it and after it, walk hand in hand.
Yeah, Jimmy Carter invented liberalism, thats why Jimmy Carter is bad.

Liberalism is bad, liberalism should be destroyed!

Screw what the US constitution says, screw Free Religion and Free Speech, liberals are bad! They are the worst people in society and the liberals are keeping America down!
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6668|USA

TeamZephyr wrote:

lowing wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

I was watching Discovery Times this evening, when the year 1978 was up for discussion.  After watching that I realized something I never really understood.  That year, and the Carter admin, marked the beginning of some of the worst problems we face today.  Saddam was coming into power, who he had to support in order to fight against Iran, who we perceived to be the bigger threat.  Russia invaded Afghanistan, which put the wheels in motion to the US supporting the Taliban, because we wanted to defeat communism.  Also, Iran was going thru a major shift in their relationship with the US.  It was a good relationship until that year.

I know there are many, MANY things we can point to in history, but the Carter years seem to stand out as the beginning of a lot of problems that we deal with today.

So, not knowing a lot about that era, how do you think Carter should have handled things knowing what we know now?
Jimmy Carter is the father of modern liberalism, as such it is no surprise that his presidency and the problems that arose during it and after it, walk hand in hand.
Yeah, Jimmy Carter invented liberalism, thats why Jimmy Carter is bad.

Liberalism is bad, liberalism should be destroyed!

Screw what the US constitution says, screw Free Religion and Free Speech, liberals are bad! They are the worst people in society and the liberals are keeping America down!
glad to see you agree. Except ya lost me on that last sentence, how does our constituion has anything to do with Jimmy Carter being a shitty president??
TeamZephyr
Maintaining My Rage Since 1975
+124|6546|Hillside, Melbourne, Australia

lowing wrote:

TeamZephyr wrote:

lowing wrote:


Jimmy Carter is the father of modern liberalism, as such it is no surprise that his presidency and the problems that arose during it and after it, walk hand in hand.
Yeah, Jimmy Carter invented liberalism, thats why Jimmy Carter is bad.

Liberalism is bad, liberalism should be destroyed!

Screw what the US constitution says, screw Free Religion and Free Speech, liberals are bad! They are the worst people in society and the liberals are keeping America down!
glad to see you agree. Except ya lost me on that last sentence, how does our constituion has anything to do with Jimmy Carter being a shitty president??
It has little to do with Jimmy Carter being a crap president, but more to do with your continuous belittlement of liberalism.

I'm also very surprised that your so Anti-American.
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|6774|Argentina

lowing wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

I was watching Discovery Times this evening, when the year 1978 was up for discussion.  After watching that I realized something I never really understood.  That year, and the Carter admin, marked the beginning of some of the worst problems we face today.  Saddam was coming into power, who he had to support in order to fight against Iran, who we perceived to be the bigger threat.  Russia invaded Afghanistan, which put the wheels in motion to the US supporting the Taliban, because we wanted to defeat communism.  Also, Iran was going thru a major shift in their relationship with the US.  It was a good relationship until that year.

I know there are many, MANY things we can point to in history, but the Carter years seem to stand out as the beginning of a lot of problems that we deal with today.

So, not knowing a lot about that era, how do you think Carter should have handled things knowing what we know now?
Jimmy Carter is the father of modern liberalism, as such it is no surprise that his presidency and the problems that arose during it and after it, walk hand in hand.
Oh, yes, Liberals around the World take Carter as the father of modern Liberalism.  All Liberal beliefs were learned from Carter, oh yeah.  You should stop generalizing when talking about Liberals.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6668|USA

TeamZephyr wrote:

lowing wrote:

TeamZephyr wrote:

Yeah, Jimmy Carter invented liberalism, thats why Jimmy Carter is bad.

Liberalism is bad, liberalism should be destroyed!

Screw what the US constitution says, screw Free Religion and Free Speech, liberals are bad! They are the worst people in society and the liberals are keeping America down!
glad to see you agree. Except ya lost me on that last sentence, how does our constituion has anything to do with Jimmy Carter being a shitty president??
It has little to do with Jimmy Carter being a crap president, but more to do with your continuous belittlement of liberalism.

I'm also very surprised that your so Anti-American.
I am?? how so??

I am also sorry that  you are offended, as a liberal, by being called a liberal.

Last edited by lowing (2006-11-24 05:13:58)

lowing
Banned
+1,662|6668|USA

sergeriver wrote:

lowing wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

I was watching Discovery Times this evening, when the year 1978 was up for discussion.  After watching that I realized something I never really understood.  That year, and the Carter admin, marked the beginning of some of the worst problems we face today.  Saddam was coming into power, who he had to support in order to fight against Iran, who we perceived to be the bigger threat.  Russia invaded Afghanistan, which put the wheels in motion to the US supporting the Taliban, because we wanted to defeat communism.  Also, Iran was going thru a major shift in their relationship with the US.  It was a good relationship until that year.

I know there are many, MANY things we can point to in history, but the Carter years seem to stand out as the beginning of a lot of problems that we deal with today.

So, not knowing a lot about that era, how do you think Carter should have handled things knowing what we know now?
Jimmy Carter is the father of modern liberalism, as such it is no surprise that his presidency and the problems that arose during it and after it, walk hand in hand.
Oh, yes, Liberals around the World take Carter as the father of modern Liberalism.  All Liberal beliefs were learned from Carter, oh yeah.  You should stop generalizing when talking about Liberals.
I am not generalizing, Jimmy Carter is the first example,( that I can think of) of a president  that has adopted the European socialist idealogy for  the USA. So in that context in my humble opinon, he is the father of this movement in America.

I will give you that I should have said "in America" previously.

Last edited by lowing (2006-11-24 05:11:56)

sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|6774|Argentina

lowing wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

lowing wrote:


Jimmy Carter is the father of modern liberalism, as such it is no surprise that his presidency and the problems that arose during it and after it, walk hand in hand.
Oh, yes, Liberals around the World take Carter as the father of modern Liberalism.  All Liberal beliefs were learned from Carter, oh yeah.  You should stop generalizing when talking about Liberals.
I am not generalizing, Jimmy Carter is the first example,( that I can think of) of a president  that has adopted the European socialist idealogy for  the USA. So in that context in my humble opinon, he is the father of this movement in America.

I will give you that I should have said "in America" previously.
Ok, now we are talking.  I think Carter is underrated.  He tried to do good things for America with a Socialist view.  He was deeply concerned about the environment and I saw in a documentary he made a lot of things for minorities.  After leaving the office the man did a lot for Human Rights.  He seems to me like a good person, if he was a good or bad president I can't tell, but as Turquoise said, he took the presidency in a difficult moment.
.:XDR:.PureFodder
Member
+105|6846
Well, whatever you say about Carter, it could have been worse.....
https://wwwimage.cbsnews.com/images/2003/06/16/image558769x.jpg
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6462|The Land of Scott Walker

lowing wrote:

I am also sorry that  you are offended, as a liberal, by being called a liberal.
roflmao I've always been fascinated by that, too. I'm a conservative, so I take pride in being called one.  Some liberals really bristle when they're called by their approriate label.
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6462|The Land of Scott Walker

sergeriver wrote:

lowing wrote:

sergeriver wrote:


Oh, yes, Liberals around the World take Carter as the father of modern Liberalism.  All Liberal beliefs were learned from Carter, oh yeah.  You should stop generalizing when talking about Liberals.
I am not generalizing, Jimmy Carter is the first example,( that I can think of) of a president  that has adopted the European socialist idealogy for  the USA. So in that context in my humble opinon, he is the father of this movement in America.

I will give you that I should have said "in America" previously.
Ok, now we are talking.  I think Carter is underrated.  He tried to do good things for America with a Socialist view.  He was deeply concerned about the environment and I saw in a documentary he made a lot of things for minorities.  After leaving the office the man did a lot for Human Rights.  He seems to me like a good person, if he was a good or bad president I can't tell, but as Turquoise said, he took the presidency in a difficult moment.
I give him credit for his human rights work, but he really dropped the ball by not playing hardball with Iran regarding the hostages.  They were released because the terrorists knew Reagan had no problem kicking some ass to rescue the hostages.
Bahiti
Respect! Give it .. Get it!
+55|6665|Land of =KBK=

rmilhous wrote:

stryyker wrote:

As far as i have learned, Carter wasnt much of a "decisive" president. He was kinda halfway on alot of issues.

But who knows how much better a Peanut farmer from Arkansas is than a bumpkin from Texas
Hey Stryyker,
Carter was from Georgia. Not that I am proud of that or anything. At least we have Lil' Jon and the East Side Boyz though.

LOL.

:NBS:rmilhous
I was going to say that he was from Plains, GA.  Plains, GA didn't (and maybe still) have an airport.  So whenever he went home from D.C. he flew into Albany.  They would shut done Olgethorpe Blvd. for his motorcade.  I remember that from when I was in elementary school.  Don't remember much else about him since I was quite young.  But I do remember the motorcade.
commissargizz
Member
+123|6480| Heaven

teanzpher wrote:

Yeah, Jimmy Carter invented liberalism, thats why Jimmy Carter is bad.

Liberalism is bad, liberalism should be destroyed!

Screw what the US constitution says, screw Free Religion and Free Speech, liberals are bad! They are the worst people in society and the liberals are keeping America down!
the above is free speech lucky you can say it...
kr@cker
Bringin' Sexy Back!
+581|6566|Southeastern USA
i love hearing him critcize bush's booming economy when his presidency saw the creation of the term "misery index" just so they had a way to measure how bad things were.
WilhelmSissener
Banned
+557|6750|Oslo, Norway
Well, as much as that makes a little sense that could all be a coincidence...
.:XDR:.PureFodder
Member
+105|6846

Stingray24 wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

lowing wrote:

I am not generalizing, Jimmy Carter is the first example,( that I can think of) of a president  that has adopted the European socialist idealogy for  the USA. So in that context in my humble opinon, he is the father of this movement in America.

I will give you that I should have said "in America" previously.
Ok, now we are talking.  I think Carter is underrated.  He tried to do good things for America with a Socialist view.  He was deeply concerned about the environment and I saw in a documentary he made a lot of things for minorities.  After leaving the office the man did a lot for Human Rights.  He seems to me like a good person, if he was a good or bad president I can't tell, but as Turquoise said, he took the presidency in a difficult moment.
I give him credit for his human rights work, but he really dropped the ball by not playing hardball with Iran regarding the hostages.  They were released because the terrorists knew Reagan had no problem kicking some ass to rescue the hostages.
Hostages Released - Reagan urges American people not to put two and two together

Ronald Reagan urged Americans "not to put two and two together" regarding the coincidental release of Iran's 52 American hostages on the day of his presidential inauguration.
  "I do not want you to notice that something extremely fishy is probably going on here," Reagan said Tuesday. "As leader of the free world, I urge you to believe my hard-line stance against terrorism was Khomeini's sole motivation to free the hostages, rather than any covert dealings between the Iranian government and my new administration."
   "Please," Reagan added, "do not put two and two together."
   Vice president and former CIA Chief George Bush, whose shady mideast connections were not officially used to broker an arms-for-hostages deal, agreed. "With new leadership in the White House and the hostages free after a 444-day ordeal, this should be a time of national healing and renewal. Now is not the time for any suspicions which, however true, may reflect negatively on the new president," said Bush, speaking from his secret underground command post in Tehran.

Nicked from the best book ever
GunSlinger OIF II
Banned.
+1,860|6660

Turquoise wrote:

1980 would have been the prime time to conquer Iran.  The revolution had just occurred, and Iran was in no position to defend itself against the most powerful country in the world.  We should have gotten Israeli on their asses.
then youd have 14 year old girls protesting the war just because and the news media will eventually start talking about defeat about 1 month into it.
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6546|Global Command

sergeriver wrote:

lowing wrote:

sergeriver wrote:


Oh, yes, Liberals around the World take Carter as the father of modern Liberalism.  All Liberal beliefs were learned from Carter, oh yeah.  You should stop generalizing when talking about Liberals.
I am not generalizing, Jimmy Carter is the first example,( that I can think of) of a president  that has adopted the European socialist idealogy for  the USA. So in that context in my humble opinon, he is the father of this movement in America.

I will give you that I should have said "in America" previously.
Ok, now we are talking.  I think Carter is underrated.  He tried to do good things for America with a Socialist view.  He was deeply concerned about the environment and I saw in a documentary he made a lot of things for minorities.  After leaving the office the man did a lot for Human Rights.  He seems to me like a good person, if he was a good or bad president I can't tell, but as Turquoise said, he took the presidency in a difficult moment.
He should take a lesson in post presidency from Ford and quit making himself look like an ass by talking so much about politics.
He was a terrible president, and he is an even worse ex-president.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6422|North Carolina

lowing wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

I was watching Discovery Times this evening, when the year 1978 was up for discussion.  After watching that I realized something I never really understood.  That year, and the Carter admin, marked the beginning of some of the worst problems we face today.  Saddam was coming into power, who he had to support in order to fight against Iran, who we perceived to be the bigger threat.  Russia invaded Afghanistan, which put the wheels in motion to the US supporting the Taliban, because we wanted to defeat communism.  Also, Iran was going thru a major shift in their relationship with the US.  It was a good relationship until that year.

I know there are many, MANY things we can point to in history, but the Carter years seem to stand out as the beginning of a lot of problems that we deal with today.

So, not knowing a lot about that era, how do you think Carter should have handled things knowing what we know now?
Jimmy Carter is the father of modern liberalism, as such it is no surprise that his presidency and the problems that arose during it and after it, walk hand in hand.
I disagree.  Clinton and the New Left in America are far more interventionist than Carter was.  The liberalism that is dominant today really isn't that different from conservatism, in terms of foreign policy.  The Democrats are just less aggressive than the Republicans.  However, both the left and the right can trace their foreign policy principles back to JFK.  Carter was kind of an anomaly in that he was the closest thing to an isolationist president in modern history.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard