Mason4Assassin444
retired
+552|6920|USA
http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/11/22/woman. … index.html

I'd like to know this forums opinion on the above story. Are the police justified in thier actions. Even though they may have had the wrong house?
usmarine2007
Banned
+374|6625|Columbus, Ohio
"Of the police brutality cases we've had, this is the most egregious because of the woman's age," Hutchins said


Now this is a retarded sentence.  Brutality?  She shot two cops FFS.
Mason4Assassin444
retired
+552|6920|USA
Just hypothetically. Say you were sleeping and you heard people poking around your house, naturally you grab your home protection piece and investigate. Upon seeing figures in your living room, you open fire.


With this case, there aren't enough details about the warrant and such so Im not sure what to think. Except, if it were me and I was in her position, I would have opened fire also, probably.
usmarine2007
Banned
+374|6625|Columbus, Ohio

Mason4Assassin444 wrote:

Just hypothetically. Say you were sleeping and you heard people poking around your house, naturally you grab your home protection piece and investigate. Upon seeing figures in your living room, you open fire.
They were not in the house, they were approaching the house.  Lets not play the what if game.
Mason4Assassin444
retired
+552|6920|USA
Ok. They announced themselves, forced open the door, but were shot coming across the yard? THis whole story is screwed up. I wonder what the warrant was for?

A 90 year old dealing narcotics? I guess social security isn't what it used to be.
usmarine2007
Banned
+374|6625|Columbus, Ohio

Mason4Assassin444 wrote:

Ok. They announced themselves, forced open the door, but were shot coming across the yard? THis whole story is screwed up. I wonder what the warrant was for?

A 90 year old dealing narcotics? I guess social security isn't what it used to be.
Approaching the house means setting up for entry.  They could have been by the windows, backyard, etc.
Mason4Assassin444
retired
+552|6920|USA
Hmmm.....I think I would have retrieved my gun also. With people by my windows and everything. All I can think is the old lady didn't hear anything. But for her age she was a helluva a shot. There needs to be more details on this story.
IG-Calibre
comhalta
+226|7001|Tír Eoghan, Tuaisceart Éireann
She hit 3 of them? nice shooting for a 90 year old scared shitless because of intruders in her home.. something smells fishy to me tbh..
LaidBackNinja
Pony Slaystation
+343|6967|Charlie One Alpha
This is what happens if you allow everybody to have a 'home defence weapon'. They use it.
"If you want a vision of the future, imagine SecuROM slapping your face with its dick -- forever." -George Orwell
usmarine2007
Banned
+374|6625|Columbus, Ohio
You know what the real bad thing is, she lives in such a bad neighborhood, that a 90yr old woman has to be trigger happy.
Mason4Assassin444
retired
+552|6920|USA
JUst a small point to make here.

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/061506A.shtml

Above is the "no knock" law created to allow police with a warrant to enter a home without announcing themselves. Im not implying that happened in the above case as the officers say they stated who they were. But this law is in place and can be used.

So lets say Cops barge into the wrong house which DOES happen and quite often from SWAT on A&E. YOu defend your home not knowing who it is and your shot dead. How do you feel about the no-knock law?

I understand knocking and announcing your law enforcement, gives the said criminal time to secure a firearm and make a stand. BUt innocent people have died and more will due to "mistakes" cimbined with the no-knock law.


http://www.cato.org/raidmap/    <--Cool link outlining stats of the police raids.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,205040,00.html  <-- agood one for you right-wingers ;P
usmarine2007
Banned
+374|6625|Columbus, Ohio

Mason4Assassin444 wrote:

So lets say Cops barge into the wrong house which DOES happen and quite often from SWAT on A&E. You defend your home not knowing who it is and your shot dead. How do you feel about the no-knock law?
Bad luck.  Shit happens.  What happens if you die because some chick was yapping on her cellphone and caused and accident?  What happens if your plane crashes because someone made a mistake?  Shit happens, people sue for millions, and life goes on.

Last edited by usmarine2007 (2006-11-22 06:07:37)

CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6814
There is something decidedly suspicious about that story. There isn't enough hard information about what happened to throw light on the whys and wherefores of what happened. It strikes me that if she was killed unjustly or in a botched manner the police would try to clear up the place and report the matter in whatever way pleased them, given that the only witness to events was dead. The jury is out until further notice...
Mason4Assassin444
retired
+552|6920|USA

usmarine2007 wrote:

Mason4Assassin444 wrote:

So lets say Cops barge into the wrong house which DOES happen and quite often from SWAT on A&E. You defend your home not knowing who it is and your shot dead. How do you feel about the no-knock law?
Bad luck.  Shit happens.  What happens if you die because some chick was yapping on her cellphone and caused and accident?  What happens if your plane crashes because someone made a mistake?  Shit happens, people sue for millions, and life goes on.
WoW
usmarine2007
Banned
+374|6625|Columbus, Ohio

Mason4Assassin444 wrote:

usmarine2007 wrote:

Mason4Assassin444 wrote:

So lets say Cops barge into the wrong house which DOES happen and quite often from SWAT on A&E. You defend your home not knowing who it is and your shot dead. How do you feel about the no-knock law?
Bad luck.  Shit happens.  What happens if you die because some chick was yapping on her cellphone and caused and accident?  What happens if your plane crashes because someone made a mistake?  Shit happens, people sue for millions, and life goes on.
WoW
What?  Bad stuff happens all the time.  Doctors amputate the wrong body parts, etc.  What do you have against cops?
MECtallica
Member
+73|6762|jalalabad
they were walking towards the house and the woman was shooting them from inside her house. They knocked the fucking door down and shot her. It's not police brutality, its common-fucking-sense.
Mason4Assassin444
retired
+552|6920|USA

usmarine2007 wrote:

Mason4Assassin444 wrote:

usmarine2007 wrote:


Bad luck.  Shit happens.  What happens if you die because some chick was yapping on her cellphone and caused and accident?  What happens if your plane crashes because someone made a mistake?  Shit happens, people sue for millions, and life goes on.
WoW
What?  Bad stuff happens all the time.  Doctors amputate the wrong body parts, etc.  What do you have against cops?
Nothing against cops. Its just boggling how a random traffic accident and plane crash are compared to a law of our courts putting both citizens and the officers further in harms way than necessary.

I don't LIKE hearing about cops being shot. I don't like hearing they killed someone in a botched raid either. And this "no knock" law seems to bring about more harm than good.

You knock and say "POLICE MOTHERFUCKER!"

If the criminal gets a gun and trys to shoot, blow his ass away. Nothing wrong with the old way.
tino275
Member
+14|6870
I see both sides of the coin. I am married to a cop and My brother was killed by cops.  Cops have it tough. they have to deal with shit bags all the time. Alot of times its hard for them to tell the difference between the good and the bad.

The cop population is just like the Civilian population. The vast majority of them are good and want to do a good job. BUT there are alwayse going to be shitbag cops too.  Its just nature. Nothing is 100%

Last edited by tino275 (2006-11-22 06:22:33)

JahManRed
wank
+646|6886|IRELAND

So from what Ive read I thinks the cops kicked in the door then she fired from a window at plain clothes cops approaching the house?
I can see both sides here. When cops come under fire, especially when 3 cops were hit) they return fire.

The other side is, that the women was probably half deaf and didn't here the police warning. (I presume one was given) she thought it was intruders making there way towards her house, so she opened fire.

If the women wasn't surrounded by a climate of fear that seams to be propagated, to take Americans rights away, she might not have been so trigger happy.
I again am presuming the gun was legally held. If it wasn't, then scratch my next sentence.
WTF is a 92 year old woman doing with a gun anyway, with hearing probably failing, decreased mobility etc, she was a liability in the first place and the state should have taken it away from her.

From what I have read, its not the cops fault...........

Last edited by JahManRed (2006-11-22 07:03:36)

Mason4Assassin444
retired
+552|6920|USA

JahManRed wrote:

So from what Ive read I thinks the cops kicked in the door then she fired from a window at plain clothes cops approaching the house?
I can see both sides here. When cops come under fire, especially when 3 cops were hit) they return fire.

The other side is, that the women was probably half deaf and didn't here the police warning. (I presume one was given) she thought it was intruders making there way towards her house, so she opened fire.

If the women wasn't surrounded by a climate of fear that seams to be propagated, to take Americans rights away, she might not have been so trigger happy.
I again am presuming the gun was legally held. If it wasn't, then scratch my next sentence.
WTF is a 92 year old woman doing with a gun anyway, with hearing probably failing, decreased mobility etc, she was a liability in the first place and the state should have taken it away from her.

From what I have read, its not the cops fault...........
Right to Bear Arms brother. Even for a 90 year old.

THis kind of jumps back to that "old people with licsences" thread. Except driving is a privilige and owning a gun is a right.

The whole story is a little shady.  Need more details.

Cops have just been under so much fire lately.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6859|132 and Bush

Mason4Assassin444 wrote:

JUst a small point to make here.

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/061506A.shtml

Above is the "no knock" law created to allow police with a warrant to enter a home without announcing themselves. Im not implying that happened in the above case as the officers say they stated who they were. But this law is in place and can be used.
Assistant Chief Alan Dreher said the officers had a legal warrant and "knocked and announced" before they forced open the door. He said they were justified in shooting once they were fired upon.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/11/ … 5048.shtml
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Mason4Assassin444
retired
+552|6920|USA

Kmarion wrote:

Mason4Assassin444 wrote:

JUst a small point to make here.

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/061506A.shtml

Above is the "no knock" law created to allow police with a warrant to enter a home without announcing themselves. Im not implying that happened in the above case as the officers say they stated who they were. But this law is in place and can be used.
Assistant Chief Alan Dreher said the officers had a legal warrant and "knocked and announced" before they forced open the door. He said they were justified in shooting once they were fired upon.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/11/ … 5048.shtml
Im not disputing that. But what were they searching for? Did they find it?

And then what are your views about the "no knock" law I mentioned earlier. IT doesn't have anything to do with the story but I am just curious what you think of the no knock law.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6859|132 and Bush

Mason4Assassin444 wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

Mason4Assassin444 wrote:

JUst a small point to make here.

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/061506A.shtml

Above is the "no knock" law created to allow police with a warrant to enter a home without announcing themselves. Im not implying that happened in the above case as the officers say they stated who they were. But this law is in place and can be used.
Assistant Chief Alan Dreher said the officers had a legal warrant and "knocked and announced" before they forced open the door. He said they were justified in shooting once they were fired upon.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/11/ … 5048.shtml
Im not disputing that. But what were they searching for? Did they find it?

And then what are your views about the "no knock" law I mentioned earlier. IT doesn't have anything to do with the story but I am just curious what you think of the no knock law.
It appears to be a very dangerous law. I have not educated myself enough to debate it at this point.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Shadovve
Member
+10|6861|Columbus, OH

Mason4Assassin444 wrote:

Just hypothetically. Say you were sleeping and you heard people poking around your house, naturally you grab your home protection piece and investigate. Upon seeing figures in your living room, you open fire.


With this case, there aren't enough details about the warrant and such so Im not sure what to think. Except, if it were me and I was in her position, I would have opened fire also, probably.
You would shoot, before demanding they get out of your house?  Maybe a line something like  "I have called the Police, I have a gun, I would suggest you leave" would be more appropriate....however since they weren't in the house, this logic doesn't apply.
HURLEY
Ima Crunchatize you.
+170|6941|The Lou
Thats funny!!!

im sorry but wtf is a 92 year old lady doing with a gun? if you cant drive, i dont think you should have a gun ethier.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard