Nothing many brits would like more but the british goverenment find it hard to say no to americas pleas for help, usually as they arent actually asking its more of retorical statement.stryyker wrote:
Since when does Blair had an affect on the War? Its our war, everyone else go the fuck away.
"I'm not a liberal, I'm a socialist"..lolIG-Calibre wrote:
No lowing not only should santa buy you a dictionary, maybe you should use it, infact double whammy for you pal, you're a hypocrite and a bigot, so bully for you, bravo!! 10/10lowing wrote:
besides, if that were true, that would make me a hypocrite, NOT a bigot. I think you better ask Santa Claus for a dictionary this Christmaslowing wrote:
please show me where I condoned the "whole sale slaughter" of ANY innocent civilians, Palestinian or otherwise.
Eidt: and i'm not a fucking liberal i'm a socialist..
your posts are too witty for me pal.....lol
Nope, it can't, two different meanings, sorry. lolBertster7 wrote:
Could be both.lowing wrote:
besides, if that were true, that would make me a hypocrite, NOT a bigot. I think you better ask Santa Claus for a dictionary this Christmaslowing wrote:
please show me where I condoned the "whole sale slaughter" of ANY innocent civilians, Palestinian or otherwise.
Yes, it could. They are two different meanings, doesn't mean the two aren't compatible.lowing wrote:
Nope, it can't, two different meanings, sorry. lolBertster7 wrote:
Could be both.lowing wrote:
besides, if that were true, that would make me a hypocrite, NOT a bigot. I think you better ask Santa Claus for a dictionary this Christmas
big‧ot
–noun
a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion.
hyp‧o‧crite
–noun
1. a person who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that he or she does not actually possess, esp. a person whose actions belie stated beliefs.
2. a person who feigns some desirable or publicly approved attitude, esp. one whose private life, opinions, or statements belie his or her public statements.
It would make you a bigot for being utterly intolerant of the Palestians views and a hypocrite for supporting the killing of Palestinian civilians (whilst condemning the killing of Israeli civillians by Palestians). I know you have pointed out that you haven't said this, but if you had, it would make you both a bigot and a hypocrite.
It is a disaster in a political sense, and always has been. Why should someone tell us now, we knew it. Whereas it sucks politically, we are winning the war.ATG wrote:
I'm like a reporter reporting the facts.Bubbalo wrote:
I'm confused. What are you saying?
I say disaster in a political sense.
Lets not forget what Saddam is thinking about right now;
I wish they were stoning Saddam.
Oh, I know the definitions of the words, I was wondering if you did, since you CALLED me a "bigot" and DESCRIBED me as a hypocrite as your reason why..Bertster7 wrote:
Yes, it could. They are two different meanings, doesn't mean the two aren't compatible.lowing wrote:
Nope, it can't, two different meanings, sorry. lolBertster7 wrote:
Could be both.
big‧ot
–noun
a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion.
hyp‧o‧crite
–noun
1. a person who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that he or she does not actually possess, esp. a person whose actions belie stated beliefs.
2. a person who feigns some desirable or publicly approved attitude, esp. one whose private life, opinions, or statements belie his or her public statements.
It would make you a bigot for being utterly intolerant of the Palestians views and a hypocrite for supporting the killing of Palestinian civilians (whilst condemning the killing of Israeli civillians by Palestians). I know you have pointed out that you haven't said this, but if you had, it would make you both a bigot and a hypocrite.
I didn't call you either. But from the accusations made I pointed out you could have come across as both, which you didn't seem to think you could.lowing wrote:
Oh, I know the definitions of the words, I was wondering if you did, since you CALLED me a "bigot" and DESCRIBED me as a hypocrite as your reason why..Bertster7 wrote:
Yes, it could. They are two different meanings, doesn't mean the two aren't compatible.lowing wrote:
Nope, it can't, two different meanings, sorry. lol
big‧ot
–noun
a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion.
hyp‧o‧crite
–noun
1. a person who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that he or she does not actually possess, esp. a person whose actions belie stated beliefs.
2. a person who feigns some desirable or publicly approved attitude, esp. one whose private life, opinions, or statements belie his or her public statements.
It would make you a bigot for being utterly intolerant of the Palestians views and a hypocrite for supporting the killing of Palestinian civilians (whilst condemning the killing of Israeli civillians by Palestians). I know you have pointed out that you haven't said this, but if you had, it would make you both a bigot and a hypocrite.
My mistake it was this guy ..........IG-Calibre ..........+1 for the false accusationBertster7 wrote:
I didn't call you either. But from the accusations made I pointed out you could have come across as both, which you didn't seem to think you could.lowing wrote:
Oh, I know the definitions of the words, I was wondering if you did, since you CALLED me a "bigot" and DESCRIBED me as a hypocrite as your reason why..Bertster7 wrote:
Yes, it could. They are two different meanings, doesn't mean the two aren't compatible.
big‧ot
–noun
a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion.
hyp‧o‧crite
–noun
1. a person who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that he or she does not actually possess, esp. a person whose actions belie stated beliefs.
2. a person who feigns some desirable or publicly approved attitude, esp. one whose private life, opinions, or statements belie his or her public statements.
It would make you a bigot for being utterly intolerant of the Palestians views and a hypocrite for supporting the killing of Palestinian civilians (whilst condemning the killing of Israeli civillians by Palestians). I know you have pointed out that you haven't said this, but if you had, it would make you both a bigot and a hypocrite.
Last edited by lowing (2006-11-19 07:51:59)