Poll

Would the US be a better place without religion?

Yes60%60% - 76
No39%39% - 50
Total: 126
Agent_Dung_Bomb
Member
+302|6994|Salt Lake City

Until religion stays the fuck out of peoples bedrooms and lives, religion will always be a point of contention.  Gays and lesbians are people too.  I'm hetero, but because my better half and I are not officially married I have broken several laws of this state.

Ironchef, you may have been here for a short period of time, but I live here.  The church rules this state.  If there is a bill that lawmakers think may run against what the church thinks, everything is run before the church before it even comes to a vote.  We have idiots that church members vote into power that think there is a gay agenda handbook.  They think that gays are out to convert everyone.  They honestly think that in teaching evolution they think we came from monkies. 

My dad recently became Catholic, but because of extended family and their Italian heritage they think Adam/Eve and Nohas ark were actual/factual happenings rather than fableistic stories meant to prove a point. At what point do you draw the line.  At what point does having religious beliefs and putting every little bill that may run afoul of a religious organization cross the line.

When the fuck will religious pundits stay the fuck out of lives and bedrooms.  If some one believes, they will believe.  Trying to legislate morality had never had success, and has always lead to destruction in one form or another.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6663|North Carolina
Yeah...  a lot of places would be better without religion.  It doesn't really matter that much to me though, because religion will always exist in some form or another.  I just find it funny that so many people are certain that their religion will stand the test of time.  Eventually, all the major religions of the world today will either disappear or be reduced to a small cult of followers in the next few thousand years.  I can't see the future, but looking at history, it's a pretty safe assumption.

Last edited by Turquoise (2006-11-17 18:27:03)

IG-Calibre
comhalta
+226|7000|Tír Eoghan, Tuaisceart Éireann

IRONCHEF wrote:

jonsimon wrote:

IRONCHEF wrote:

people, people, people....please.  let's be real here.  take your heads out of your agenda laden asses and think for a minute.  realize that when you say "yes, the country would be better without religious people" it encompases ALL religious people..and not just that big voting block that YOU see when you turn on tv and see them tangling in politics.  The real religious people of this country go about silently making things better.  they dig deepest into their pockets when there's an international or national crisis, they selflessly offer their service above and beyond, they contribute to their communities and neighborhoods.  They do things unique to religion that you godless heathens don't even fathom that make this a better country.

But as long as you ignorant youngins continue to equate religion with terrorism/bad politics/intolerance/hatred and the host of other false blanket statements, you'll never be able to answer the OP honestly.

But alass, you have anyway.  So let's get together now and flame the religious crazy man ironchef now... zzzzzzz
I'm glad you won't be surprised if anyone flames you, after all, your choice of wording begs for it. Referring to your opponents as 'heathens', which carries an obvious negative connotation, suggesting your opponents fail to be as intelligent as yourself (in that the 'heathens' can't fathom, or understand, something you have implied you can), blatantly provoking response through the labeling of 'ignorant youngins' and the ironic blanket statement that your opponent is incapable of honesty.

I can see your religious beliefs have imparted within you the everlasting love and acceptance of Jesus.
Ok heathen, let's now point out where you failed...

Your disdain for religious people made you percieve things I did not say or suggest when you assumed I said godless heathens were not intelligent.  It was a sarcastic and spiteful title yet appropriate because if you are not god-worshipping, you are in fact heathens.  As for not fathoming a religious principle, it has little to do with intelligence.  Would it be reasonable for me to accept that I'm unintelligent because i cannot fathom the physics of space travel while trained astronauts can?  Likewise, will a non-religious "heathen" not fathom religious principles as you and many other "heathens" have abundantly illustrated when doing battle with me and stingray in these forums?  For example, do you understand the "justice-mercy" concept and how it's applicable to our lives because of the atonement of Jesus Christ?  DO you "fathom" the scope and process of the gathering of the lost tribes of israel?  Can you begin to understand the intricacies of FAITH?  If you answer no to any of these then you are still intelligent, yet not able to fathom religious principles.
The Gathering of the lost tribes of Iserael you say? We've found a load of them here Northern Ireland! can you send them home?

Last edited by IG-Calibre (2006-11-17 18:27:35)

IRONCHEF
Member
+385|6749|Northern California
Yes, many from Ephraim and Naphtali in the north atlantic area.  If you're referring to "jews", they (the tribe of judah) are not lost..they and benjamin were the 2 tribes not lost.  Their home is present day israel.

Lost are
Reuben
Simeon
Dan
Gad
Asher
Naphtali
Zebulun
Isaachar
Joseph
Manasseh
*honorable mention is for Levi, who was spread among the 10*

Last edited by IRONCHEF (2006-11-17 22:16:29)

RavyGravy
Son.
+617|6664|NSW, Australia

CameronPoe wrote:

The entire enlightened/civilised world no longer needs religion and would be better off without it.
i agree
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,053|7030|PNW

CameronPoe wrote:

The entire enlightened/civilised world no longer needs religion and would be better off without it.
'Ha-ha, you believe in a supreme being...oh my SCIENCE!'

Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2006-11-17 23:19:28)

unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,053|7030|PNW

Spearhead wrote:

HELL_YES

I could live with REAL religious people, but those who are imposing their beliefs on people with different beliefs than themselves are destroying this country.  Same with those who say "I know more than you, because...... I uh... read this thing called the Bible".
Would you be angry if FSM worshipers went door-to-door?
Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|6879|London, England
ANY country would be better without religion. Actually just Abrahamic religions. And by religion that also excludes crappy stuff like Scientology and random cults worshipping banana trees or something.

Last edited by Mekstizzle (2006-11-18 05:15:07)

DesertFox-
The very model of a modern major general
+796|6943|United States of America
In God We Trust

All these atheists say they promote "understanding" and crap of that nature but they more than not seem to have a grudge against everyone else because "You're stupid, use logic. I'm smarter than you all." Nobodys forcing you to follow it, but why the hell are you starting fights over it? No matter what anyone says, it is a religious affiliation.

Last edited by DesertFox423 (2006-11-18 07:51:26)

Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|6840|SE London

DesertFox423 wrote:

In God We Trust

All these atheists say they promote "understanding" and crap of that nature but they more than not seem to have a grudge against everyone else because "You're stupid, use logic. I'm smarter than you all." Nobodys forcing you to follow it, but why the hell are you starting fights over it? No matter what anyone says, it is a religious affiliation.
But how well placed is that trust?
DesertFox-
The very model of a modern major general
+796|6943|United States of America
Very well, thank you.
d4rkst4r
biggie smalls
+72|6711|Ontario, Canada
your preaching to thw wrong crowd, the middle east has the problem with religion
"you know life is what we make it, and a chance is like a picture, it'd be nice if you just take it"
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|6840|SE London

d4rkst4r wrote:

your preaching to thw wrong crowd, the middle east has the problem with religion
No. It's the world that has the problem with religion.
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6796|Long Island, New York
As long as they don't impose their beliefs on me or threaten me that I'll go to hell/whatever, I don't care and don't think it makes a difference.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6859|132 and Bush

Religion whether you agree with it or not helps to hold people morally accountable for their actions. It also provides motivation to help others out who desperately need it. I know it seems that the extreme side of religion appears to dominate history. That is because it is more glamorous than all the charities and missionaries out amongst the world who have saved countless lives and has helped to give people hope.

Edit: I have posted this idea before but I think Religion just happens to be the tool people use to act out their natural human instincts. If there were no religion we would most likely be using something else to act out our barbaric tendencies.

Science help us!!

Last edited by Kmarion (2006-11-18 09:47:25)

Xbone Stormsurgezz
KylieTastic
Games, Girls, Guinness
+85|6710|Cambridge, UK

DesertFox423 wrote:

Nobodys forcing you to follow it
Er... isnt that what religions do? Try to force peole to follow (sorry encourage; 'see the light' or whatever), If G.W Bush could force everyone he would force everine to follow... hes already been quoted as saying that he considered Athiests only better than people like Osama and Saddam

DesertFox423 wrote:

No matter what anyone says, it is a religious affiliation.
Atheism isnt a religion, it is a belief. BIG differnce!
Also, Its not the same kind of belief as religious ones, its more like the belief that the sun will come up in the morning.
DonFck
Hibernator
+3,227|6890|Finland

For reference in success rate, see "Soviet Union"
I need around tree fiddy.
capt. crunch
Member
+8|6707|that place
I believe in God and that's it. I don't go to church at all because Sunday is recoop day
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|6840|SE London

DonFck wrote:

For reference in success rate, see "Soviet Union"
Far more to do with the inherent flaws in communism than anything to do with religion.
jonsimon
Member
+224|6753

Bertster7 wrote:

DonFck wrote:

For reference in success rate, see "Soviet Union"
Far more to do with the inherent flaws in communism than anything to do with religion.
Not even flaws in communism, just economic turbulence and coincidental mismanagement.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6859|132 and Bush

Bertster7 wrote:

DonFck wrote:

For reference in success rate, see "Soviet Union"
Far more to do with the inherent flaws in communism than anything to do with religion.
See China .
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|6840|SE London

Kmarion wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

DonFck wrote:

For reference in success rate, see "Soviet Union"
Far more to do with the inherent flaws in communism than anything to do with religion.
See China .
China was a mess until they embraced capitalist business models. The Soviet Union collapsed due to them trying to shift to a capitalist economic and social model at the same time.

jonsimon wrote:

Not even flaws in communism, just economic turbulence and coincidental mismanagement.
I don't know about that. The collapse wasn't because of communism. Communism is a sound idea in principle but it doesn't work when you bring human nature into the equation. People who work more successfully deserve more, communism doesn't reward productivity as much as capitalism, which is why a capitalist model is always the best one.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6859|132 and Bush

Bertster7 wrote:

jonsimon wrote:

Not even flaws in communism, just economic turbulence and coincidental mismanagement.
I don't know about that. The collapse wasn't because of communism. Communism is a sound idea in principle but it doesn't work when you bring human nature into the equation. People who work more successfully deserve more, communism doesn't reward productivity as much as capitalism, which is why a capitalist model is always the best one.
I believe the word you are looking for is motivation.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6703|The Land of Scott Walker

Spearhead wrote:

HELL_YES

I could live with REAL religious people, but those who are imposing their beliefs on people with different beliefs than themselves are destroying this country.  Same with those who say "I know more than you, because...... I uh... read this thing called the Bible".
Who says that? No Christian I've ever met.
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|6840|SE London

Kmarion wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

jonsimon wrote:

Not even flaws in communism, just economic turbulence and coincidental mismanagement.
I don't know about that. The collapse wasn't because of communism. Communism is a sound idea in principle but it doesn't work when you bring human nature into the equation. People who work more successfully deserve more, communism doesn't reward productivity as much as capitalism, which is why a capitalist model is always the best one.
I believe the word you are looking for is motivation.
Would be rather apt wouldn't it.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard