kr@cker
Bringin' Sexy Back!
+581|6807|Southeastern USA

Snipedya14 wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

Sign of the times?
Hey I scanned my voter card for you.
http://our2142.com/images/card2.jpg
Kidding of course.. although I am voting for a Dem gov.
That's shocking. Why does your voting card highlight an affiliation??? Is that normal?
Yep. Your party is printed on the card.

EDIT I am not sure if you are being sarcastic or not...
I believe it varies by state, I don't carry mine with me at all times but i don't believe georgia does so
The_Shipbuilder
Stay the corpse
+261|6758|Los Angeles

thanks_champ wrote:

I consider Jon Stewarts daily show to be somewhat more liberal than conservative - yet its still funny as hell. Air America was probably just boring shit (Im from AUS so I haven't heard it).
Conservatives are better at getting organized. They naturally trust authority and strong voices. They like strong personalities who talk tough, especially to people who disagree with them. Hence they are better at talk radio. They are better skilled at "winning" debates on argumentative type TV shows.

Liberals are better at entertaining and creativity. This is why the Daily Show is an excellent vehicle for liberal politics, and why Air America failed. You can't force something to be liberal that inherently appeals to conservatives, such as talk radio. Likewise, a conservative version of the Daily Show would instantly fail. Conservatives don't do funny or entertaining.
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6702|The Land of Scott Walker

The_Shipbuilder wrote:

Highlights from this article:

- Although Fox News is still the #1 rated cable news channel by a long shot, its total audience fell 24% in the past year
- Fox News' key primetime audience, viewers ages 25-54, was down 7% YoY in October. In sharp contrast, CNN Headline news was up 18% in the same demographic. MSNBC was up 19%.
- Fox News' key primetime audience, viewers ages 25-54, was down in 3Q, 38% below 2Q. 2Q had already been 22% below 1Q, and 1Q had been 28% down from 4Q05.

Interesting stuff.
Huh, still #1 after the decline.  The other networks suck that bad I guess.  I don't watch any of them since I don't have cable tv, just cable net. 

The_Shipbuilder wrote:

It affirms my understanding that liberals have horrible skills when it comes to organizing anything political.

It also affirms my understanding that talk radio (and other such heavily-opinionated talking head media) is most attractive to people who demonstrate the authoritarian personality type, of which amongst liberals there are very few.
The authoritarian personality type? It's not about psychology, it's about hearing my side of the issues, not just the liberal bs side.  I enjoy talk radio because there is actual discussion about the issues I want to hear about.  In direct contrast to tv "news" blaring out the latest rip on a Republican along with a puff piece on a Democrat.  Also, the hosts I listen to rip liberal thought apart with such ease, it's downright entertaining. 

Regarding voter ID cards, my state won’t pass the bill for voter ID cards.  Why? Then the Dems couldn’t have people voting 2-3 times and paying homeless with smokes and beer to vote for them.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6858|132 and Bush

kr@cker wrote:

I believe it varies by state, I don't carry mine with me at all times but i don't believe georgia does so
It varies by county.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6702|The Land of Scott Walker

The_Shipbuilder wrote:

thanks_champ wrote:

I consider Jon Stewarts daily show to be somewhat more liberal than conservative - yet its still funny as hell. Air America was probably just boring shit (Im from AUS so I haven't heard it).
Conservatives are better at getting organized. They naturally trust authority and strong voices. They like strong personalities who talk tough, especially to people who disagree with them. Hence they are better at talk radio. They are better skilled at "winning" debates on argumentative type TV shows.

Liberals are better at entertaining and creativity. This is why the Daily Show is an excellent vehicle for liberal politics, and why Air America failed. You can't force something to be liberal that inherently appeals to conservatives, such as talk radio. Likewise, a conservative version of the Daily Show would instantly fail. Conservatives don't do funny or entertaining.
I think everyone, no matter what side of the aisle, likes someone who doesn't pull punches with people they disagree with.  I could be wrong, though.  Do liberals just give in when they're debating someone they disagree with?  Oh, I forgot, they refuse to answer direct questions and change the subject.   That always works.

Conservative shows = conservative views on the issues, contrasted with liberal views

Liberal shows = satire and humor about conservative views, little expression of what liberals really stand for

Talk radio doesn't work for liberals because they can't defend their views properly.

Last edited by Stingray24 (2006-11-03 10:14:14)

The_Shipbuilder
Stay the corpse
+261|6758|Los Angeles

Stingray24 wrote:

Talk radio doesn't work for liberals because they can't defend their views properly.
I agree with you.

But it's because we are not as talented at winning argumentative-style debates. It has nothing to do with the content nor merit of the views held. Conservatives are simply more skilled at argument tactics.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6858|132 and Bush

^^ Clinton was probably the best debater I have ever seen. He was a great speaker. This is widely known... damn I just complemented Clinton..lol
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6702|The Land of Scott Walker

The_Shipbuilder wrote:

Stingray24 wrote:

Talk radio doesn't work for liberals because they can't defend their views properly.
I agree with you.

But it's because we are not as talented at winning argumentative-style debates. It has nothing to do with the content nor merit of the views held. Conservatives are simply more skilled at argument tactics.
Liberals can't debate straight up based on the merits of their views, because people don't agree with their values when they're given point blank.  They have to wallow in the middle and attempt to be on both sides so enough votes bleed over by people who were fooled.
alpinestar
Member
+304|6853|New York City baby.
sometimes it's better to read than watch tv
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,053|7029|PNW

Turquoise wrote:

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

I am Jack's complete lack of shit-giving.
I wish more people felt apathetic toward Fox News.  They're an embarassment to the right....
On that subject I can't tell how many times I've been told that I 'just subscribe to FOX Kool-aid,' when I haven't had broadcast television for over fifteen years. I was more interested in school and video games.

The_Shipbuilder snippets wrote:

  • 'They [conservatives] naturally trust authority and strong voices.'
  • 'Conservatives are better at getting organized.' 'Liberals are better at entertaining and creativity.'
  • The former simply isn't true. I trust authority as much as I trust any other person. A liberal pushing for bigger government has proven his or her greater trust for authority by default. The latter isn't necessarily true either. The Democrats have proven their worth at the art of slickmeistering.
  • You honestly sound like an Apple ad. I have this mental image of two anthropomorphized computers: a smarmy, casually-dressed 'Mac' smirking and talking about how much better he is as at art and other non-boring projectsa stuffy middle-aged 'PC' in a brown business suit collapsing on the floor, bemoaning his depreciability (as if a Mac was any different), innate lack of creative skill (as if PC's didn't have Photoshop and Avid), and dull nature (which is why PC's have thousands of game titles under their belt)
The implication that conservative points only make sense because they're better argued is ludicrous. While you may not have been aiming for that, others have and do.

The_Shipbuilder wrote:

Stingray24 wrote:

Talk radio doesn't work for liberals because they can't defend their views properly.
I agree with you.

But it's because we are not as talented at winning argumentative-style debates. It has nothing to do with the content nor merit of the views held. Conservatives are simply more skilled at argument tactics.
Actually, it helps when more of your points make sense than the other team's. Additionally, spouting 'hate America' rhetoric is a steep slope to navigate with an American audience. Even some liberal folk I know were sick of being told how they were ruining the world.

alpinestar wrote:

sometimes it's better to read than watch tv
QFFT. Read it and weep, tubeheads.

Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2006-11-03 16:11:09)

lowing
Banned
+1,662|6909|USA

thanks_champ wrote:

lowing wrote:

Well, if these stats paint an interesting picture for you ( one I am positive you love) , what does the complete and utter dismal failure of Air America and liberal talk radio tell you, about what Americans are sick of??
Right out of Bills mouth.

People want to be entertained. Regardless of what political side a program is on, it can either be boring or it can be entertaining. I consider Jon Stewarts daily show to be somewhat more liberal than conservative - yet its still funny as hell. Air America was probably just boring shit (Im from AUS so I haven't heard it). IMO it's got nothing to do with how much of the population wants to listen to what type of propaganda.
I am sure your right............No way it could possibly be the message, huh??
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6909|USA

The_Shipbuilder wrote:

lowing wrote:

Well, if these stats paint an interesting picture for you ( one I am positive you love) , what does the complete and utter dismal failure of Air America and liberal talk radio tell you
It affirms my understanding that liberals have horrible skills when it comes to organizing anything political.

It also affirms my understanding that talk radio (and other such heavily-opinionated talking head media) is most attractive to people who demonstrate the authoritarian personality type, of which amongst liberals there are very few.
Ahhhhh so someone who listen ot talk radio instead of Snoop FUCKING DOGGY FUCKING DOG, must be a fascist.....got it now. makes sense.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6662|North Carolina

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

I am Jack's complete lack of shit-giving.
I wish more people felt apathetic toward Fox News.  They're an embarassment to the right....
On that subject I can't tell how many times I've been told that I 'just subscribe to FOX Kool-aid,' when I haven't had broadcast television for over fifteen years. I was more interested in school and video games.
Good points, and yes, I usually avoid television -- except for Comedy Central and the History Channel.
<[onex]>Headstone
Member
+102|6959|New York

TeamZephyr wrote:

<[onex]>Headstone wrote:

The_Shipbuilder wrote:

Highlights from this article:

- Although Fox News is still the #1 rated cable news channel by a long shot, its total audience fell 24% in the past year
- Fox News' key primetime audience, viewers ages 25-54, was down 7% YoY in October. In sharp contrast, CNN Headline news was up 18% in the same demographic. MSNBC was up 19%.
- Fox News' key primetime audience, viewers ages 25-54, was down in 3Q, 38% below 2Q. 2Q had already been 22% below 1Q, and 1Q had been 28% down from 4Q05.

Interesting stuff.
Its because CNN and MSNBC actually went and got some conservative shows for those peeps to choose from and watch. Some times change is good. I find myself watching those 2 a bit when they have shows on that arnt Left.
Wow I had no idea CNN and MSNBC had shows promoting a worker revolution and the introduction of a socialist state.

I guess I don't watch enough American TV.
Then i guess you dont then. Try watching something other than Anderson 360 or wolf.
<[onex]>Headstone
Member
+102|6959|New York

Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:

lowing wrote:

The_Shipbuilder wrote:

Highlights from this article:

- Although Fox News is still the #1 rated cable news channel by a long shot, its total audience fell 24% in the past year
- Fox News' key primetime audience, viewers ages 25-54, was down 7% YoY in October. In sharp contrast, CNN Headline news was up 18% in the same demographic. MSNBC was up 19%.
- Fox News' key primetime audience, viewers ages 25-54, was down in 3Q, 38% below 2Q. 2Q had already been 22% below 1Q, and 1Q had been 28% down from 4Q05.

Interesting stuff.
Well, if these stats paint an interesting picture for you ( one I am positive you love) , what does the complete and utter dismal failure of Air America and liberal talk radio tell you, about what Americans are sick of??
It tells you that people are getting tired of the polarization, name calling, and all the other bullshit.  They want a balanced report.
Well then they better turn off the F'ing TV news and go outside. because they sure arnt going to get it from CNN MSNBC or the networks. Liberal bias news is running loose and out of control in this and every other country. Welp except those that hold guns to the anchors heads and tell them what to say.
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6702|The Land of Scott Walker

Turquoise wrote:

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

Turquoise wrote:


I wish more people felt apathetic toward Fox News.  They're an embarassment to the right....
On that subject I can't tell how many times I've been told that I 'just subscribe to FOX Kool-aid,' when I haven't had broadcast television for over fifteen years. I was more interested in school and video games.
Good points, and yes, I usually avoid television -- except for Comedy Central and the History Channel.
History Channel FTW!  Alas, I don't have cable tv anymore. *tear*

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard