ROGUEDD
BF2s. A Liberal Gang of Faggots.
+452|5608|Fuck this.
fuck yeah
Make X-meds a full member, for the sake of 15 year old anal gangbang porn watchers everywhere!
Adams_BJ
Russian warship, go fuck yourself
+2,054|6842|Little Bentcock
hooah
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,813|6325|eXtreme to the maX

1stSFOD-Delta wrote:

I've already put about 1200 rounds through this USP the past few weeks. Still have about 600 rounds to finish before I leave.

The Combat Competition is an awesome shooter.



This is 30rds total at 21ft. 18 9mm and 12 45 ACP. Almost missed one. Clipped the very edge.
You mean 21 yards? Even then Dilbert is unimpressed.
Fuck Israel
1stSFOD-Delta
Mike "The Spooge Gobbler" Morales
+376|6198|Blue Mountain State
If I reshaped the grip of my USP into a cock, would you be impressed?
https://www.itwirx.com/other/hksignature.jpg

Baba Booey
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,813|6325|eXtreme to the maX
If you could put up an impressive group with a pistol I'd be impressed.

A six inch group at six yards - no. An average service pistol shooter would expect to do better at 25 yards in rapid fire.
Fuck Israel
1stSFOD-Delta
Mike "The Spooge Gobbler" Morales
+376|6198|Blue Mountain State
Yeah
https://www.itwirx.com/other/hksignature.jpg

Baba Booey
UnkleRukus
That Guy
+236|5256|Massachusetts, USA
Dilbutthurt
If the women don't find ya handsome. They should at least find ya handy.
RAIMIUS
You with the face!
+244|6934|US

Dilbert_X wrote:

If you could put up an impressive group with a pistol I'd be impressed.

A six inch group at six yards - no. An average service pistol shooter would expect to do better at 25 yards in rapid fire.
At what cadence is the real question...
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,813|6325|eXtreme to the maX

RAIMIUS wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

If you could put up an impressive group with a pistol I'd be impressed.

A six inch group at six yards - no. An average service pistol shooter would expect to do better at 25 yards in rapid fire.
At what cadence is the real question...
Lets take as a starting point, at ten yards - six shots in five seconds - including the draw from holster and racking the slide - you'd still need to do better than a six inch group.
So roughly 2 shots per second.
eg Practice 1 http://www.jerseypistolclub.info/?p=208

And thats a slow shoot.

Last edited by Dilbert_X (2012-06-02 00:18:15)

Fuck Israel
RAIMIUS
You with the face!
+244|6934|US

Dilbert_X wrote:

RAIMIUS wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

If you could put up an impressive group with a pistol I'd be impressed.

A six inch group at six yards - no. An average service pistol shooter would expect to do better at 25 yards in rapid fire.
At what cadence is the real question...
Lets take as a starting point, at ten yards - six shots in five seconds - including the draw from holster and racking the slide - you'd still need to do better than a six inch group.
So roughly 2 shots per second.
eg Practice 1 http://www.jerseypistolclub.info/?p=208

And thats a slow shoot.
Funny that you call it "a slow shoot" when it is the fastest course of fire you reference.

Standards I usually practice:
http://www.combatshootingandtactics.com/standards.htm

Others: http://www.kuci.org/~dany/firearms/all_ … #standards
rdx-fx
...
+955|6811
how about catching a ricochet off a 25yd steel spinner plate?

hit the plate, bounced off and up, directly into my sight line, caught the jacket with a bit of lead still in it.

have had ricochets and stray rounds go past me.
this is the only time i've caught one.
rdx-fx
...
+955|6811
standard service pistol target X-ring is 1.7", shot at 25yd sustained, 50yd slow fire.
NRA B-6 & B-8 targets

3.36" if you just want the 10 ring...


Personally, I'm at consistent hits on a 6" diameter plate at 25 and 50 yards, with a 9mm HiPower.
Or, consistent hits on a 9" diameter plate at 1025 yards, with a scoped rifle.

Last edited by rdx-fx (2012-06-03 23:19:20)

west-phoenix-az
Guns don't kill people. . . joe bidens advice does
+632|6609
oil filter silencer

https://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p123/west-phoenix-az/BF2S/bf2s_sig_9mmbrass.jpg
Christbane
Member
+51|6454
why the hell would anyone want that on their gun?  to sneak up on small game?
rdx-fx
...
+955|6811
Same kind of people that put an imitation holosight on a bottom-grade .22, yet fork out the cash for 2 tax stamps (auto & suppressor)

"Third World solutions to First World problems"

Really, you could get about the same effects with a full-auto BB gun.
No tax stamps, no BATF hassles, cheaper ammo, and quieter.

Last edited by rdx-fx (2012-06-04 10:06:29)

Christbane
Member
+51|6454
yeah paying for the stamp was the part that really made me say wtf     look bubba I gots me a silenced .22
rdx-fx
...
+955|6811

Christbane wrote:

yeah paying for the stamp was the part that really made me say wtf     look bubba I gots me a silenced .22
Yeah

"Hey Bubba!  Y'know you get about the same effect as a suppressor if you shoot 22 shorts in a full length barrel, right?"

And, really, if you're going to make a full auto .22, build something cool like a 1/5th scale model GAU-8 electric motor actuated gatling, or a scale model M-242 Bushmaster chaingun autocannon.

1/5th Scale GAU-8 in .22 would be about 4' long overall, the drum would be about 7" diameter x 14.25" long, and hold about 2090 rounds of .22LR in a linkless rotary feed system.
Gearbox and electric motor parts sourced from your local R/C hobby shop, barrels from a 10/22 lathe turned (reduce diameter) and modified for application.

The big showstopper between theoretical design idea and prototype is convincing the US BATF to let one build such a toy.
Telling them you're prototyping to mount on a scale model A-10 "drone" probably wouldn't help things either.
Ditto for the scale M-242 (in 7.62x51mm) on a 5'Lx2.5'Wx2'H 1/5th scale M2/M3 Bradley

Last edited by rdx-fx (2012-06-04 12:19:34)

KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,978|6852|949

can anyone recommend a first time AR for someone in California?  As I shoot my friends AR more and more, I'm coming to the conclusion that I'd like to own one.  I saw a youtube review of the S&W M&P15 Sport and it looks like a pretty solid, inexpensive entry level gun (~$700).  Anyone have any experience or other recommendations?  Ideally I'd like to shoot 5.56 rounds so my friend and I can share ammo costs
rdx-fx
...
+955|6811

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

can anyone recommend a first time AR for someone in California?  As I shoot my friends AR more and more, I'm coming to the conclusion that I'd like to own one.  I saw a youtube review of the S&W M&P15 Sport and it looks like a pretty solid, inexpensive entry level gun (~$700).  Anyone have any experience or other recommendations?  Ideally I'd like to shoot 5.56 rounds so my friend and I can share ammo costs
Move out of the PDRC (People's Democratic Republic of Californication)?

The rulers of Cali, in their infinite "wisdom" have determined that magazines, black plastic, bayonette lugs, and other "evil black rifle" accoutrements are verboten.

You'll get better accuracy, and save money if you just get a Remington 700 bolt action rifle in .223 (i.e. 5.56mm AR ammo).
Then, if you have to have something that looks "cool", and improves accuracy, you can put it in an AICS stock.
Changing the stock is simply unscrewing two bolts.

Remington 700SPS in .223 is about $500-$650
AICS stock is about $750

Then you get something that looks similar to;
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ae/Mk.13_MOD_5_sniper_rifle.jpg

or, without the AICS stock;
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cb/Remington_Model_700.JPG/300px-Remington_Model_700.JPG
rdx-fx
...
+955|6811
There are "california compliant" AR15 manufacturers. 
DPMS and Bushmaster are the two prevalent cheap manufacturers.
Stagarms and Rock River Arms are a little better quality.
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,978|6852|949

I don't want a bolt action.  You can use magazines in Cali, they just can only hold 10 rounds.  And it has to take a separate action to remove the magazine (instead of just a push of a button).  The Smith and Wesson i mentioned above comes in a Cali compliant version out the door for less than $650

this is what i was shooting this weekend

View My Video
west-phoenix-az
Guns don't kill people. . . joe bidens advice does
+632|6609
low quality video spotted

Does that CA compliant M&P come with a bullet button?

Last edited by west-phoenix-az (2012-06-04 13:42:35)

https://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p123/west-phoenix-az/BF2S/bf2s_sig_9mmbrass.jpg
rdx-fx
...
+955|6811

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

I don't want a bolt action.  You can use magazines in Cali, they just can only hold 10 rounds.  And it has to take a separate action to remove the magazine (instead of just a push of a button).  The Smith and Wesson i mentioned above comes in a Cali compliant version out the door for less than $650

this is what i was shooting this weekend

View My Video
Your loss.

For cheap fun, S&W makes a .22 semi-auto that looks and feels much like an M-4/AR-15.

For a .223, there's always the California compliant Hello Kitty AR-15
https://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQBUopBxgE4g65YkADDJiNXtLFufAvUBhWgDDN7BbmV193sm5JD7Q
rdx-fx
...
+955|6811
Just ordered a new McMillan A4 stock for a Winchester 70 7mm Magnum I inherited.

https://i54.photobucket.com/albums/g97/Accord06/12122008234.jpg

Should be here sometime around the beginning of October.

Plenty of time to decide on which scope to put on it.
Either a Hensoldt ZF 6-24x72, or a Swarovski Z6 5-30x50.
Leaning towards the Hensoldt, as it'd serve as a spotting scope for a light-weight loadout hunting/stalking setup.
(Lightweight loadout: rifle, pistol, 3-day backpack, sleepingbag/polypad/raincover roll, and minor gadgets that fit in pockets - then I'm gone in the woods for 3-5 days.)
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,978|6852|949

west-phoenix-az wrote:

low quality video spotted

Does that CA compliant M&P come with a bullet button?
yeah i had to reduce the quality for upload.  The gun there is an LMT CQB MRP

It comes with a bullet button, and you can buy mags that have a little piece on the end you can stick in the bullet button to drop the mag.

@rdx: i don't want to get into buying separate stocks and building a weapon piece by piece until I become more familiar with guns in general.  I understand it gets to be an expensive hobby, so I'd rather buy something relatively cheap to start with.  That being said, there's nothing wrong with having a pink AR, OK?

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard