I heard Russia was positive it was a big blast, but everyone is ignoring them.
Could be, but I'd use as little of my nuclear goodness as I possibly could for a test run.
Sounds like fun. Anyone wanna go ask NK which of the options is the truth ?
Well I would hope this guy is positive; I doubt he wants to make an ass of himself to the worlds media...jonsimon wrote:
I heard Russia was positive it was a big blast, but everyone is ignoring them.
I think NK is all talk......they may have actually done it, but I think they will just make threats, but I think their all talk.
But do you think they're all talk?{BMF}*Frank_The_Tank wrote:
I think NK is all talk......they may have actually done it, but I think they will just make threats, but I think their all talk.
i personally hope it was a very large conventional weapon the set off. like we need any other additions to the nuclear weapons club. good or bad.
I agree, although N. Korea likely has the ability to build nuclear weapons, I don't think they will be able to do so in large quantity (at least not for a while). They would be total retards if they were to waste precious weapons grade material on a big test.Ikarti wrote:
Could be, but I'd use as little of my nuclear goodness as I possibly could for a test run.
though you have to remember, Kim Jong-Il (or however you spell it) is not quite ... shall we say stable? I wouldn't put it past him to go and try and bomb something
Well, that WOULD provide a good test, wouldn't it ?PitViper401 wrote:
though you have to remember, Kim Jong-Il (or however you spell it) is not quite ... shall we say stable? I wouldn't put it past him to go and try and bomb something
hes probably gonna bomb matt stone and trey parker, creators of team america for all their nasty wittle worwdsTwist wrote:
Well, that WOULD provide a good test, wouldn't it ?PitViper401 wrote:
though you have to remember, Kim Jong-Il (or however you spell it) is not quite ... shall we say stable? I wouldn't put it past him to go and try and bomb something
You base this assesment on?PitViper401 wrote:
Kim Jong-Il (or however you spell it) is not quite ... shall we say stable?
Our news agencies listed another possible reason for the 'smallness'. They theorized that since we dont know how deep it was detonated, we cant precisely estimate the yield. If the detonation was deep enough, then the vibrations from a 20 kiloton bomb - (witch is an expectable yield for a 'modern first test') - would seem like the ones that were recorded. Im not saying that this is the case, just listing one more theory about the event.
Furthermore, one reason to think it was indeed an atom bomb (whether it was 0,5-2 kt or 20 kt, makes no difference) is the reaction of China. They probably have the best intel about the North Koreans.
It would have to be pretty deep. Besides which, they probably have a rough idea of how deep the facility is.SpaceApollyon wrote:
Our news agencies listed another possible reason for the 'smallness'. They theorized that since we dont know how deep it was detonated, we cant precisely estimate the yield. If the detonation was deep enough, then the vibrations from a 20 kiloton bomb - (witch is an expectable yield for a 'modern first test') - would seem like the ones that were recorded. Im not saying that this is the case, just listing one more theory about the event.
Yes, because the North Koreans are all about sharing.SpaceApollyon wrote:
Furthermore, one reason to think it was indeed an atom bomb (whether it was 0,5-2 kt or 20 kt, makes no difference) is the reaction of China. They probably have the best intel about the North Koreans.
Nobody made a big deal when France did several Nuke tests last decade.
Because everyone would know, that they would surrender before using nukes.sergeriver wrote:
Nobody made a big deal when France did several Nuke tests last decade.
So True.cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
Because everyone would know, that they would surrender before using nukes.sergeriver wrote:
Nobody made a big deal when France did several Nuke tests last decade.
It's all speculation untill they drop the bomb or they don't
But why is a big deal if NK does it and it's not a problem at all when France did it?Arkhon wrote:
So True.cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
Because everyone would know, that they would surrender before using nukes.sergeriver wrote:
Nobody made a big deal when France did several Nuke tests last decade.
It's all speculation untill they drop the bomb or they don't
Because last time I checked France wasn't similar to a military dictatorship and they didn't have a man who thought he was god running the place.sergeriver wrote:
But why is a big deal if NK does it and it's not a problem at all when France did it?Arkhon wrote:
So True.cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
Because everyone would know, that they would surrender before using nukes.
It's all speculation untill they drop the bomb or they don't
North Korea has a higher chance of using nukes than france....sergeriver wrote:
But why is a big deal if NK does it and it's not a problem at all when France did it?Arkhon wrote:
So True.cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
Because everyone would know, that they would surrender before using nukes.
It's all speculation untill they drop the bomb or they don't
Cmon, be real, using a nuke is using it against yourself. NK is only showing the World their stuff.cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
North Korea has a higher chance of using nukes than france....sergeriver wrote:
But why is a big deal if NK does it and it's not a problem at all when France did it?Arkhon wrote:
So True.
It's all speculation untill they drop the bomb or they don't
Oh, yes, because you have a direct line to his house .Arkhon wrote:
Because last time I checked France wasn't similar to a military dictatorship and they didn't have a man who thought he was god running the place.
The NK leadership cult is based around Kim Jong-Il's father, Kim Il-Sung.
Can I ask why everyone seems to try to Jump all over sergeriver ...the last few posts Ive read all end up with people having a go at him and not the topic.... why do so many people come in to flame the people or the topic...If you have nothing interesting to add STFU and Get out!!
I like seregiver. He is nice. Even though he calls me names like "asshead".joker3327 wrote:
Can I ask why everyone seems to try to Jump all over sergeriver ...the last few posts Ive read all end up with people having a go at him and not the topic.... why do so many people come in to flame the people or the topic...If you have nothing interesting to add STFU and Get out!!