Which map is better: Verdun or Sidi?

2006-10-06 18:20:07

#1

Superior Mind: (not macbeth); +1,755|6711

If you've played the beta and demo then voice your opinion. Personaly I think Sidi Powerplant sucks nuts. Verdun was much better.
Dont forget to tell us why

Last edited by Superior Mind (2006-10-06 18:23:29)

x

2006-10-06 18:23:21

#2

ColtsX: #baddie; +157|6565

Sidi Powerplant on conquest = win

so many good armor whoreing spots.

2006-10-06 18:25:20

#3

Master*: Banned; +416|6513|United States

verdun, better for infantry

2006-10-06 18:41:46

#4

[-DER-]Omega: membeR; +188|6846|Lithuania

Sidi - great for sniping; lots of flags to cap

https://bf3s.com/sigs/fe717ed1eb823c939460a42f15bced7dd0057c51.png

2006-10-06 18:43:25

#5

stryyker: bad touch; +1,682|6739|California

Verdun, Because the Beta was 10x better

2006-10-06 18:43:55

#6

Karo6972: Syrup Man; +2|6814

I loved Verdun, it was a lot of fun to run around on (the camouflage actually works to some extent). Sidi seems very brown and bleak... Granted I may be looking at this biased seeing as on Verdun we got points, unlocks, etc. But, Sidi is alright.

2006-10-06 18:50:59

#7

[-DER-]Omega: membeR; +188|6846|Lithuania

stryyker wrote:
Verdun, Because the Beta was 10x better

Wth were you on at the time? The beta was a complete disaster compared to the demo... crashes and lag all over the place. The demo runs as smooth as butter, at least for me.

2006-10-06 18:51:57

#8

Karo6972: Syrup Man; +2|6814

[-DER-]Omega wrote:
stryyker wrote:
Verdun, Because the Beta was 10x better
Wth were you on at the time? The beta was a complete disaster compared to the demo... crashes and lag all over the place. The demo runs as smooth as butter, at least for me.

But BESIDES the crashing and lag, it was so much fun... Unlocks ftw.

2006-10-06 18:57:53

#9

Sgt.Gene: ...; +215|6782

Sidi FTW I hated Verdun with a passion.

2006-10-06 18:58:20

#10

stryyker: bad touch; +1,682|6739|California

[-DER-]Omega wrote:
stryyker wrote:
Verdun, Because the Beta was 10x better
Wth were you on at the time? The beta was a complete disaster compared to the demo... crashes and lag all over the place. The demo runs as smooth as butter, at least for me.

uhh... Unlocks?

2006-10-06 18:58:21

#11

Towelly: It's A State Of Mind; +399|6609|Your attic

Karo6972 wrote:
[-DER-]Omega wrote:
stryyker wrote:
Verdun, Because the Beta was 10x better
Wth were you on at the time? The beta was a complete disaster compared to the demo... crashes and lag all over the place. The demo runs as smooth as butter, at least for me.
But BESIDES the crashing and lag, it was so much fun... Unlocks ftw.

Yep, aside from everything else, not including any unlocks in the demo was their biggist mistake so far, I never got much lag in the beta, and the crashes where expected.

All I can say is

Demo = fail
Full Game = if they sort all the crash issues out, and sort out the drop in fps in the titans then they could have a good game, we'll see how it pans out.

And on topic, Verdun is/was better than Sidi by a country mile.

Last edited by Towelly (2006-10-06 18:59:20)

2006-10-06 19:03:34

#12

[-DER-]Omega: membeR; +188|6846|Lithuania

Towelly wrote:
Karo6972 wrote:
[-DER-]Omega wrote:

Wth were you on at the time? The beta was a complete disaster compared to the demo... crashes and lag all over the place. The demo runs as smooth as butter, at least for me.
But BESIDES the crashing and lag, it was so much fun... Unlocks ftw.
Yep, aside from everything else, not including any unlocks in the demo was their biggist mistake so far, I never got much lag in the beta, and the crashes where expected.

All I can say is

Demo = fail
Full Game = if they sort all the crash issues out, and sort out the drop in fps in the titans then they could have a good game, we'll see how it pans out.

And on topic, Verdun is/was better than Sidi by a country mile.

Did you play beta2? Every other round resulted in a crash for most people. What is the point of unlocks anyway when the game is coming out in (not even) two weeks?

2006-10-06 19:08:33

#13

stryyker: bad touch; +1,682|6739|California

....because the Park 52 blows? because i want my active camo and a fucking Lambert Carbine, ffs

2006-10-06 19:14:35

#14

Towelly: It's A State Of Mind; +399|6609|Your attic

[-DER-]Omega wrote:
Towelly wrote:
Karo6972 wrote:

But BESIDES the crashing and lag, it was so much fun... Unlocks ftw.
Yep, aside from everything else, not including any unlocks in the demo was their biggist mistake so far, I never got much lag in the beta, and the crashes where expected.

All I can say is

Demo = fail
Full Game = if they sort all the crash issues out, and sort out the drop in fps in the titans then they could have a good game, we'll see how it pans out.

And on topic, Verdun is/was better than Sidi by a country mile.
Did you play beta2? Every other round resulted in a crash for most people. What is the point of unlocks anyway when the game is coming out in (not even) two weeks?

No, I in no way played the beta, I wasn't number 60 something in the rankings by the time I'd reported everything that needed reporting......

Yes the crashes where annoying, but quite often I could go 10+ rounds on the beta without a crash (yea, I was addicted, go me)

2006-10-06 20:09:53

#15

DrMod: Member; +3|6444|stuck in a asualt pod help!!

heres some beta and demo pros and coms beta pros : unlocks YAY! ranks YAY!!

cons CRASHING EVERY 2 SECONDS LAGGGGG (did i mention lagg)

DEMO pros uhhhh no crashes less LAGGG

CONS NO UNLOCKS + NO RANKS + DEMO IS LIKE PLAYING LAN ALL THE TIME = WORST. DEMO .EVER!!!!!!! (ok im done ive let it all out SUCKS DEMO SUCKS SUCKS SUCKS (okay im done sorry bout caps!)

2006-10-06 20:14:33

#16

Sarrk: O-O-O A-O A; +788|6674|Brisbane, Australia

Sidi Rapes all over Verdun, verdun is only fun for a while, theres only so much ice and snow I can take before it gets boring, also it was a pretty open map, no cover between bases

roflwinnarz

2006-10-06 20:49:52

#17

VeNg3nCe^: ¦Tactics Øver Principles¦; +314|6724|Antarctica

stryyker wrote:
Verdun, Because the Beta was 10x better

Agreed. Sidi isn't bad but its kinda 'blah'

2006-10-06 20:54:16

#18

stryyker: bad touch; +1,682|6739|California

Colony has a dirty tankwhore boner for Sidi, therefore i have compiled a theory

Colony + Tiger = Gay
and if Sidi Plant + Colony + Tiger = Gay, Therefore:

Colony = Gay Tanker

2006-10-06 21:29:24

#19

VeNg3nCe^: ¦Tactics Øver Principles¦; +314|6724|Antarctica

stryyker wrote:
Colony has a dirty tankwhore boner for Sidi, therefore i have compiled a theory

Colony + Tiger = Gay
and if Sidi Plant + Colony + Tiger = Gay, Therefore:

Colony = Gay Tanker

That is the worst deductive reasoning I have ever seen. Fail.

2006-10-06 21:31:06

#20

stryyker: bad touch; +1,682|6739|California

VeNg3nCe^ wrote:
stryyker wrote:
Colony has a dirty tankwhore boner for Sidi, therefore i have compiled a theory

Colony + Tiger = Gay
and if Sidi Plant + Colony + Tiger = Gay, Therefore:

Colony = Gay Tanker
That is the worst deductive reasoning I have ever seen. Fail.

Its not deductive reasoning, for one

and for two, I could just say colony is a tankwhore, already

Sidi Power Plant	41%	41% - 15
Verdun	58%	58% - 21
Total: 36

BF2S Forums Which map is better: Verdun or Sidi?

Poll

stryyker wrote:

[-DER-]Omega wrote:

stryyker wrote:

[-DER-]Omega wrote:

stryyker wrote:

Karo6972 wrote:

[-DER-]Omega wrote:

stryyker wrote:

Towelly wrote:

Karo6972 wrote:

[-DER-]Omega wrote:

[-DER-]Omega wrote:

Towelly wrote:

Karo6972 wrote:

stryyker wrote:

stryyker wrote:

VeNg3nCe^ wrote:

stryyker wrote:

Board footer