BF2S Forums War on Terror > 9/11

Spark wrote:

This thread has gone to the shitter. Anaemia, fuck off. If you "don't care about other opinions" then you are simply not capable of debate.

I'd like to invite everyone else to read that too. I simply cannot believe the idiocy started in this thread. Not talking about any paticular side here.

Seriously.

Either clean this up or close the thread so this inane stupidity does not spill over to the rest of the forum.

I could say the same things about some of the smut you tree huggers put on this forum.

Between 1939 and 1945 appprox 62 million people died as a direct result of WWII.  Were there mistakes made during that war?  Yes.  At the time seeing thousands dying that many people thought the war was for vain reasons.  But now we look back and would you honestly tell me it was?

Men and women join the service knowing there is a chance they might die.  If they dont know this then they are very ignorant. 

Have many lives been lost on this war on terror? Yes.  Have they been lost in vain? No.  Imagine a world with less terror.  A world where women can vote.  A world where a women can prosecute a man for raping her and not fear death.  I world where a child can go to school with worrying about getting suicide bombed.

Yes many have died.  I honor them and praise them every day for what they are doing for me.  You guys sit at yor computer desk and bitch and moan about how the war is stupid.  But what about the child that gets to touch keys on a keyboard for the first time and learn what internet is.  Because it is safe to do so.

I leave you with this quote:

"Now you will receive us. We do not ask for your poor, or your hungry. We do not want your tired and sick.  It is your corrupt we claim.  It is your evil that will be sought by us.  With every breath, we shall hunt them down.  Each day we will spill their blood, 'til it rains down from the skies.  Do not kill. Do not rape. Do not steal. These are principles, which every man of every faith can embrace.  These are not polite suggestions, these are codes of behavior, and those of you that ignore them will pay the dearest cost. There are varying degrees of evil. We urge you lesser forms of filth, not to push the bounds and cross over, in to true corruption, into our domain. For if you do, one day you will look behind you and you will see we three, and on that day you will reap it. And we will send you to whatever god you wish."

How far should this war on terror go?
"The question is not how far. The question is, do you possess the constitution...... to go as far as is needed? "

Last edited by Colfax (2006-09-25 06:59:51)

Colfax wrote:

Spark wrote:

This thread has gone to the shitter. Anaemia, fuck off. If you "don't care about other opinions" then you are simply not capable of debate.

I'd like to invite everyone else to read that too. I simply cannot believe the idiocy started in this thread. Not talking about any paticular side here.

Seriously.

Either clean this up or close the thread so this inane stupidity does not spill over to the rest of the forum.

I could say the same things about some of the smut you tree huggers put on this forum.

Between 1939 and 1945 appprox 62 million people died as a direct result of WWII.  Were there mistakes made during that war?  Yes.  At the time seeing thousands dying that many people thought the war was for vain reasons.  But now we look back and would you honestly tell me it was?

Men and women join the service knowing there is a chance they might die.  If they dont know this then they are very ignorant. 

Have many lives been lost on this war on terror? Yes.  Have they been lost in vain? No.  Imagine a world with less terror.  A world where women can vote.  A world where a women can prosecute a man for raping her and not fear death.  I world where a child can go to school with worrying about getting suicide bombed.

Yes many have died.  I honor them and praise them every day for what they are doing for me.  You guys sit at yor computer desk and bitch and moan about how the war is stupid.  But what about the child that gets to touch keys on a keyboard for the first time and learn what internet is.  Because it is safe to do so.

I leave you with this quote:

"Now you will receive us. We do not ask for your poor, or your hungry. We do not want your tired and sick.  It is your corrupt we claim.  It is your evil that will be sought by us.  With every breath, we shall hunt them down.  Each day we will spill their blood, 'til it rains down from the skies.  Do not kill. Do not rape. Do not steal. These are principles, which every man of every faith can embrace.  These are not polite suggestions, these are codes of behavior, and those of you that ignore them will pay the dearest cost. There are varying degrees of evil. We urge you lesser forms of filth, not to push the bounds and cross over, in to true corruption, into our domain. For if you do, one day you will look behind you and you will see we three, and on that day you will reap it. And we will send you to whatever god you wish."

How far should this war on terror go?
"The question is not how far. The question is, do you possess the constitution...... to go as far as is needed? "

Which is all good and well if the war on terror was stopping terrorism, which it isn't, it's causing it.

Spark wrote:

It's official.

The War on Terror has cost more American lives than the event that spawned it, 9/11.

Seriously, guys. You might have to re-think your strategy.

EDIT: For the stupid and ignorant: I mean MILITARY strategy. E.g. How many troops you have in each patrol.

This might've been said before, but go fuck yourself. You're writing this shit on a BF2 message board. You say, "Seriously, guys. You might have to re-think your strategy.", do you think that anyone here is capable of changing military tactics and targets abroad? Moron. Yes, ask kids and people who hold jobs outside of the government to change how the military is running it's campaign. You must be a genious....... not.

Miller wrote:

Spark wrote:

Miller wrote:

Ok, this makes more sense.  Guess what, Marines have plenty of tanks, and air power, and explosives, and there is no need for Search and destroy.  It's called patrolling.

I don't know. I was just running off random examples in my head.

Maybe we should spend more on intel?

We don't need to spend more, we need to let the CIA and FBI and all our intel providers do whatever they need to.  This includes Torture of POW's! They decided to behead our soldiers, and civilians. Why don't we just be a little nicer, by not killing the poor bastards! We just need our good old WWII psychology back.  They don't talk, we punch them, they decide to not talk again, use a baseball bat on his ribs, decides to not talk again? Give him what he wants and make him a martyr for God's sake.  We need to do everything in our power to deal with these people.

You just don't get it.  Our own government experts have said that the type of torture we are using is ineffective.

Jenkinsbball wrote:

Spark wrote:

It's official.

The War on Terror has cost more American lives than the event that spawned it, 9/11.

Seriously, guys. You might have to re-think your strategy.

EDIT: For the stupid and ignorant: I mean MILITARY strategy. E.g. How many troops you have in each patrol.

This might've been said before, but go fuck yourself. You're writing this shit on a BF2 message board. You say, "Seriously, guys. You might have to re-think your strategy.", do you think that anyone here is capable of changing military tactics and targets abroad? Moron. Yes, ask kids and people who hold jobs outside of the government to change how the military is running it's campaign. You must be a genious....... not.

Why the fuck do you post then?

You fucking little coward twat. People like you should fucking burn. When your house goes up in flames or someone robs you who do you ring? The same people who's memory you just took a shit on. You're fucking scum.

Gawwad wrote:

Stoman wrote:

You fucking little coward twat. People like you should fucking burn. When your house goes up in flames or someone robs you who do you ring? The same people who's memory you just took a shit on. You're fucking scum.

Mind quoting the person you direct your critisism to?

It was written above, bit of a give away

safety is a RIGHT not a priviledge.  5 years and no attacks is hardly an accomplishment.

Spumantiii wrote:

safety is a RIGHT not a priviledge.  5 years and no attacks is hardly an accomplishment.

Why, because isreal is hit almost daily and we need to keep them from getting hit? Well, I would like to know what an accomplisment is to you.  I think it is good that no attacks in 5 years have occured.  How many major attacks have been foiled? By my count two, by the UK with the airliners, and the one staged for September 14. Keep telling me what an accomplishment is, I want to hear it.

Spumantiii wrote:

safety is a RIGHT not a priviledge.  5 years and no attacks is hardly an accomplishment.

Wow. Some people in this world just need to get a clue. All you do is bitch and grab on bits and straws to further your dumbass opinions.

Spark wrote:

It's official.

The War on Terror has cost more American lives than the event that spawned it, 9/11.

Seriously, guys. You might have to re-think your strategy.

EDIT: For the stupid and ignorant: I mean MILITARY strategy. E.g. How many troops you have in each patrol.

Would if I could, but I'm not prestident today.  Maybe tomorrow I'll wake up and be in a position of power.  If so, I'll be sure to come back here to these forums to look for advice

Miller wrote:

Spark wrote:

Miller wrote:

Ok, this makes more sense.  Guess what, Marines have plenty of tanks, and air power, and explosives, and there is no need for Search and destroy.  It's called patrolling.

I don't know. I was just running off random examples in my head.

Maybe we should spend more on intel?

We don't need to spend more, we need to let the CIA and FBI and all our intel providers do whatever they need to.  This includes Torture of POW's! They decided to behead our soldiers, and civilians. Why don't we just be a little nicer, by not killing the poor bastards! We just need our good old WWII psychology back.  They don't talk, we punch them, they decide to not talk again, use a baseball bat on his ribs, decides to not talk again? Give him what he wants and make him a martyr for God's sake.  We need to do everything in our power to deal with these people.

Miller, have you ever been in the Military?  Do you have, or could you have children that will be in the Military?  Why do you think most if not all ex-military are against torturing prisoners?  I'll put it in simple language for you, "Do onto others, as you would have them do onto you"

GATOR591957 wrote:

Miller wrote:

Spark wrote:

I don't know. I was just running off random examples in my head.

Maybe we should spend more on intel?

We don't need to spend more, we need to let the CIA and FBI and all our intel providers do whatever they need to.  This includes Torture of POW's! They decided to behead our soldiers, and civilians. Why don't we just be a little nicer, by not killing the poor bastards! We just need our good old WWII psychology back.  They don't talk, we punch them, they decide to not talk again, use a baseball bat on his ribs, decides to not talk again? Give him what he wants and make him a martyr for God's sake.  We need to do everything in our power to deal with these people.

Miller, have you ever been in the Military?  Do you have, or could you have children that will be in the Military?  Why do you think most if not all ex-military are against torturing prisoners?  I'll put it in simple language for you, "Do onto others, as you would have them do onto you"

Ok then, lets start cutting their heads off.