Ok, let's suppose they used their taxi to loot wood. What is the fucking deal? They may be called thieves. Are the soldiers police officers, and if they were allowed to act like them, should they punish those people that way? In the US you get life prison for looting wood? Wow, then I prefer the Saddam Regime dude.Fancy_Pollux wrote:
Although I covered this in my previous post, allow me to reiterate. They used their "taxi" to loot wood. If that car truly was his livelihood, he should've used it as a taxi and earned the money to buy the wood. Also, the analogy I used was hardly "halfwit". You, ironically, just neglected to comprehend its significance. So, once again, I will spoon-feed you that as well. Those particular Iraqis took advantage of a national crisis to steal wood, just like looters taking advantage of a hurricane. As we all know, Iraq in its current state is plagued by civil disorder. What you saw was an appropriate level of punishment in dealing with this (in the U.S. they would be given life in prison). Additionally, your claim "we don't loot for survival, we loot because we are greedy and are taking advantage of the situation" is also false. Hurricane Katrina is a shining example of that. No matter where you are, you will have looters acting out of greed and those acting to survive. However, the motive does not make it any less of a crime.PRiMACORD wrote:
Lucky they weren't shot for stealing wood so they could fucking survive?
You are comparing a force of nature to us going there and fucking there country over, once again, bravo on the halfwit analogy. In the US, we don't loot for survival, we loot because we are greedy and are taking advantage of the situation.
You should make friends with this guy:
http://dictionary.reference.com/search? … =0&y=0
If it comes to give the proper punishment if you smash the car for looting wood, what should the three soldiers receive for smashing the car? Let's see, perhaps, they should be smashed by C5 airplane loaded with army stuff.