I think all the city maps would be much better without claymores. The other maps though, are a little iffy.
- Index »
- Games »
- Battlefield Series »
- Battlefield 2 »
- Would gameplay improve if claymores were removed?
Poll
Would gameplay improve if claymores were removed?
| Yes. | 22% | 22% - 61 | ||||
| No. | 62% | 62% - 168 | ||||
| Nerf them instead. | 15% | 15% - 41 | ||||
| Total: 270 | ||||||
I said Yes, because, they can not be taken out by a grenade or explosion. If this were to change, then I would agree to having them.
it would be if snipers could pick them up after they have been deployed
Just remove the no TK option (so its like 1.12) and claymores aren't a problem.
Would it improve gameplay? Not really
Would it be less irritating? fuck yes
Would it be less irritating? fuck yes
Without claymores snipers would be far less of a problem. I like the idea of that, but then where's the challenge?
Why not just remove all the weapons from the game, then we can all just hold hands and sing Kumbaya.
Why not just remove all the weapons from the game, then we can all just hold hands and sing Kumbaya.
it's called tactics and warfare...
VeNg3nCe^ wrote:
Just remove the no TK option (so its like 1.12) and claymores aren't a problem.
cospengle wrote:
Why not just remove all the weapons from the game, then we can all just hold hands and sing Kumbaya.
QFEThomasMorgan wrote:
VeNg3nCe^ wrote:
Just remove the no TK option (so its like 1.12) and claymores aren't a problem.
GR34 wrote:
it would be if snipers could pick them up after they have been deployed
oh really? ever used a claymore? i have... normally (im talking about like the soldier the game depicts) they are attached to a long ass cord with a little green box at the end... of which you have to squeeze to get a reaction from.. they just dont go off when an enemy walks in front of them... so yes.. take them out, turn back on ff or make them used like the c4 in game.....Sigarms357 wrote:
it's called tactics and warfare...
Yes they do.DaZeD863 wrote:
oh really? ever used a claymore? i have... normally (im talking about like the soldier the game depicts) they are attached to a long ass cord with a little green box at the end... of which you have to squeeze to get a reaction from.. they just dont go off when an enemy walks in front of them... so yes.. take them out, turn back on ff or make them used like the c4 in game.....Sigarms357 wrote:
it's called tactics and warfare...
Claymores are my friends.
genius_man16 wrote:
Would it improve gameplay? Not really
Would it be less irritating? fuck yes
Bitch bitch bitch.
As Ea sports say "If it's in the game..It's in the game"
What's next...grenades. Where does it end.
Oh I know. How about we have a feather kit and everyone runs around bashing each other with giant feathers, and each unlock is a bigger feather of a different color.
If you don't like the game I'm sure there is a Barbie you can go buy from a bargain bin.
As Ea sports say "If it's in the game..It's in the game"
What's next...grenades. Where does it end.
Oh I know. How about we have a feather kit and everyone runs around bashing each other with giant feathers, and each unlock is a bigger feather of a different color.
If you don't like the game I'm sure there is a Barbie you can go buy from a bargain bin.
Last edited by lAgBlRhino (2006-09-07 20:51:23)
in game yes.. real life no... joe squeezes little green box... big ass mess where the claymore was....Goven wrote:
Yes they do.DaZeD863 wrote:
oh really? ever used a claymore? i have... normally (im talking about like the soldier the game depicts) they are attached to a long ass cord with a little green box at the end... of which you have to squeeze to get a reaction from.. they just dont go off when an enemy walks in front of them... so yes.. take them out, turn back on ff or make them used like the c4 in game.....Sigarms357 wrote:
it's called tactics and warfare...
IRL, claymores have more than one way of being triggered. These include movement sensors, trip wires and of course, manual detonation. They also have a kill blast of 50m and damage out to 100mDaZeD863 wrote:
in game yes.. real life no... joe squeezes little green box... big ass mess where the claymore was....Goven wrote:
Yes they do.DaZeD863 wrote:
oh really? ever used a claymore? i have... normally (im talking about like the soldier the game depicts) they are attached to a long ass cord with a little green box at the end... of which you have to squeeze to get a reaction from.. they just dont go off when an enemy walks in front of them... so yes.. take them out, turn back on ff or make them used like the c4 in game.....
I can't believe you guys play on servers that have FF off, how lame is that????? No wonder you are bitching about claymores.
Claymores are a surprise weapon. If they can be seen, they should be able to be disarmed or exploded. That would be the only request I would make.
Claymores are an anti-personnel weapon. They are supposed to kill people, which they do. Effectively.
They can be disarmed by an engineer. Why isn't that enough?
They can be disarmed by an engineer. Why isn't that enough?
Claymores cause more trouble than there worth. I dont even know why they changed them anyways.
aardfrith wrote:
Claymores are an anti-personnel weapon. They are supposed to kill people, which they do. Effectively.
They can be disarmed by an engineer. Why isn't that enough?
Better idea, un-nerf back as they were before 1.2 so they are destructible with frags and have a 5* meter blast instead of 7*.
5 and 7 meters are ~15 and ~21 feet respectivly.
5 and 7 meters are ~15 and ~21 feet respectivly.
No
Claymores are not a problem, open your eyes and watch out for them. Snipers need them to cover their back. without them, snipers would be killed twice as much as they already are.
Claymores are not a problem, open your eyes and watch out for them. Snipers need them to cover their back. without them, snipers would be killed twice as much as they already are.
you people are so fucking dumb. take this out take that out. like that one guy said lets just take out all the weapons. you fucking pussies cant handle one thing about the game you think it should eb changed. i hate planes on maps. but do i think they should remove them no i just deal with it. claymors are part of the game if you dont like it stfu and go play somethng else. just like people who cry about people using the nade launcher. its part of the fucking game so why not use it. its people like you that have ruined this game not ea. if you fucking pussies didnt cry about everything then they wouldnt have to put out all these new patches to make you cry babies happy. nerfing shit. why not just stfu and play.
- Index »
- Games »
- Battlefield Series »
- Battlefield 2 »
- Would gameplay improve if claymores were removed?