You are the one constantly changing the point.
Brasso wrote:More stupid shit.
I shot a deer and left it.
You said I wasted the meat.
I said lots of animals ate it, so it technically isn't wasted.
You said there are hungry people that could use it.
I said there are lots of hungry animals that could use it.
You said that there are lots of food banks that accept it.
I said no.
You posted link.
I said it was stupid.
The only person changing the narrative here is you, but you're some how trying to blame it on me? This is the typical bf2s bullshit I hate. The worst part is that no one but Jay has had the intelligence to actual say what they feel, such as "I disagree with what you've done and I think you are a bad person for it.", instead you are trying to catch me into some sort of retarded "GOTCHA, SEE I TOLD U THAT U DON'T KNOW WHAT UR TALKIN BOUT AN UR A SHIT IDIOTT, I PROV'D IT VIA DERBATE".
Really all you need to say is that you think I what I did was wrong, state your reasons why and what you would have done differently. This isn't a scientific difference, it's an ideological one. You obviously think EVERY life is precious or some dumb shit like that and I don't. I acted according to my own philosophy and now you are REACTING to it. If I cared about donating food to someone, there are MUCH easier ways to go about it than poaching a fucking deer off the side of the road, taking it to a butcher and delivering a giant pile of meat to an organization that probably isn't even set up to handle that type of food in the first place.
Trying to convince me that I'm a bad person on that principle alone just goes to show what a fucking tard you are. Like I said before, if you want to make me feel like a bad person just tell me I'm a bad person and move on, the pointless debate only makes me feel more like I'm in the right because I'm arguing with an obvious idiot.