Superior Mind wrote:
ya fucking right, you never stop with this shitJay wrote:
Not so superior now, are you? You can't even tell when someone is being facetious! I demand a name change this instant!Superior Mind wrote:
Why does such a ridiculous argument exist and persist? All your reasons to hate on each other are in reference to one another's level of contribution to or extortion of society. Every person gets their kicks a different way. Why care how an individual relates to an ideal, a disembodied object which maintains delusional and fetishized engagements between the world and people? You all know the shit you throw at each is other is long winded anal belching. My only guess is that everyone is bored of each other.
I know how hard it is to find things to talk about when you have strange interest. Apparently people getting blown up on the internet isn't a popular subject. SmhPochsy wrote:
It's the only way he knows how to interact with people. It wouldn't be so bad if he had some wit to attract more interest, but he doesn't. Thankfully he gets by on his gravitational pull.
See what I mean?Jay wrote:
Superior Mind wrote:
ya fucking right, you never stop with this shitJay wrote:
Not so superior now, are you? You can't even tell when someone is being facetious! I demand a name change this instant!
Last edited by Superior Mind (2013-02-02 09:06:51)
I wasn't serious at all when talking to pochsy. You, on the other hand, definitely need to smoke less weed.Superior Mind wrote:
See what I mean?Jay wrote:
Superior Mind wrote:
ya fucking right, you never stop with this shit
Last edited by Superior Mind (2013-02-02 09:09:42)
Thas alot o' weed.Superior Mind wrote:
Given what we know about the universe, is the fact that we exist proof enough of life spread throughout the universe?
Seeing as how all scientific models, theories, and paradigms are based on most-probabilistic-scenarios, not definite truths. Even the definite truths, the fundamental laws of the universe maybe subject to change at any given moment. The very existence of the universe and one's own being are remarkable enough of phenomena for us to not be able to rule out an absolute random turn of events. Although we think that things of this nature probably will not happen, there is a chance that anything could happen. Our notions of reality are a tiny sample size of observers compared to the size of the universe.
With this all encompassing uncertainty, why do the practices of science adhere to agreed upon standards of experimentation? No matter how bizarre anything we ever learn, dream, or imagine it must be true on some space of possible causality, because anything is possible. And so, as long as it can be experienced what makes some things more real than others?
I know this is pretty elementary stuff, but I'm interested in all of your opinions on these questions.
Last edited by Superior Mind (2013-02-02 09:11:23)
There is no other potential matter of debate. There are about 8 of us in there and we talk about what we want to talk about. If you want to discuss stoner philosophy it's not the correct group of people to discuss it with. Gotta know your audience because not everyone has the same interests.Superior Mind wrote:
I wasn't speaking exclusively about your little conversation with pocshy. And how do you know how much weed I smoke?
You and who ever else participates in the same stem vs humanities debate pollute the forum with pages of dribble, pushing aside any other potential matter of debate.
I don't really care anymore, I'd rather post in EE. You are not the root of anything, you are a flowering shit plant that stems from the roots of collective boredom. Talk about whatever you want, it's when you shit all over topics/opinions/people that don't please you then it become annoying. Just because you witness others doing it doesn't mean you have to also.Jay wrote:
Let's conduct an experiment SM. Since apparently I am the root and cause of all of your problems, how about I don't post in D&ST for a week. You can post whatever you want, and try to steer discussions in directions you want to take them. Go for it.
Last edited by Superior Mind (2013-02-02 09:20:42)
Yes... I derail all the threads...Superior Mind wrote:
Stoner philosophy? How about just regular philosophy? This isn't your personal politics, guns, and history club. Other people might actually engage in decent topics if you didn't derail every thread you enter with personal insults and some lame defense of your life choices. No one takes Uzi's bait more than you.
Last edited by Jay (2013-02-02 09:21:39)
Last edited by Macbeth (2013-02-02 09:23:23)
Last edited by Superior Mind (2013-02-02 09:28:40)
No one is preventing you from starting new topics, but it doesn't mean people will actually discuss them.Superior Mind wrote:
When have been called an idiot, when have I not responded to legitimate arguments I was involved in? The problem is that most of the time the so call philosophical debates going on are recycled topics which produce the same repetitive answers and attacks over and over. This isn't me crying about people not liking what I post. I try to post questions which haven't been discussed before to try to stimulate new avenues of interaction.
You made it personal. I responded. Am I supposed to sit here and let you criticize me without giving a response? World doesn't work that way.Superior Mind wrote:
But do you fucking see how I pose an actual complaint about the general nature of the forums and you come back with the personal attacks? The only reason I have highlighted you as an example is because you reacted like you always do.
Last edited by Superior Mind (2013-02-02 09:35:56)
Nobody here wants to write an essay properly explaining what is happening. We have professors to write those essays for. Beyond this, if we were qualified to debate philosophy to any reasonable degree, we might. As it stands, Jay can barely understand Marxism, let alone Hegel. We come here for a cheap laugh, to debate topics and say things you wouldn't consider normally, and to generally just stop thinking for a few minutes.Superior Mind wrote:
When have been called an idiot, when have I not responded to legitimate arguments I was involved in? The problem is that most of the time the so call philosophical debates going on are recycled topics which produce the same repetitive answers and attacks over and over. This isn't me crying about people not liking what I post. I try to post questions which haven't been discussed before to try to stimulate new avenues of interaction.
