BF2S Forums Infantry icons for team aircraft ?

yea i agree its especially bad on maps with bombers

Uh... look for the RED Dots, not the BLUE ones. Usually pilots don't care about friendly ground troops anyway.

imdead wrote:

Uh... look for the RED Dots, not the BLUE ones. Usually pilots don't care about friendly ground troops anyway.

Yes another flamer shows his stupidity by posting yet another ridiculous comment .

I mean do you think i fly around looking for friendly targets to bomb , (TIP) try reading posts and understanding them before trying to flame them .

Get a clue buddy !

FrankieSpankie3388 wrote:

Madhadda1 wrote:

wow "imdead" why did you even post you havnt even tryed to fly or bomb anything its not so easy so how about you stop making stupid usless post and go tank whore somewhere... if you can even aim and shoot i mean it takes so much skill i dont even think i could do it....

any way back on topic i think that would be a good idea +1

I know that was a stupid comment but why must you assume everybody that disagrees with you tankwhores? I can't even find his stats anywhere, how do you know he doesn't have an expert aviator badge or something?

Anyways, it's in there for realism. The same reason why they don't allow you to have auto fire on all guns, because they don't make it that way.

There's also allot of other aspects of the game that a far from realistic though so why not ?

souljar wrote:

FrankieSpankie3388 wrote:

Madhadda1 wrote:

wow "imdead" why did you even post you havnt even tryed to fly or bomb anything its not so easy so how about you stop making stupid usless post and go tank whore somewhere... if you can even aim and shoot i mean it takes so much skill i dont even think i could do it....

any way back on topic i think that would be a good idea +1

I know that was a stupid comment but why must you assume everybody that disagrees with you tankwhores? I can't even find his stats anywhere, how do you know he doesn't have an expert aviator badge or something?

Anyways, it's in there for realism. The same reason why they don't allow you to have auto fire on all guns, because they don't make it that way.

There's also allot of other aspects of the game that a far from realistic though so why not ?

if bf2 became realistic... then it will be completely different, soldiers wear ID tagged equipment, so friendly know theyre there.

i think this is a great idea!!

i'd be a better pilot if whenever i get in a plane, my Teammates would spot people for me.  Most of the time, i just fly around randomly bombing places because there's no UAV, or noone is spotting anything, that's part of the reason i hate flying.  I bet if i had a good commander, i would like it more.

I'd also probably like it better if i was better at dog fights (once i get someone on my tail, i'm dead... even if i'm in a J-10... yes i suck)

Bell wrote:

Dear God no, why should the fly boy's be given extra things like that, they all ready have an edge in game, tk's are one of their few draw backs, with this then......

JESUS NOOOOOO WAY

With this then........... ?

You know it makes sence , dont be an ass !

FrankieSpankie3388 wrote:

Madhadda1 wrote:

wow "imdead" why did you even post you havnt even tryed to fly or bomb anything its not so easy so how about you stop making stupid usless post and go tank whore somewhere... if you can even aim and shoot i mean it takes so much skill i dont even think i could do it....

any way back on topic i think that would be a good idea +1

I know that was a stupid comment but why must you assume everybody that disagrees with you tankwhores? I can't even find his stats anywhere, how do you know he doesn't have an expert aviator badge or something?

Anyways, it's in there for realism. The same reason why they don't allow you to have auto fire on all guns, because they don't make it that way.

Funtime again!

WE OWN a WAKE.. I know what goes on.. If you would have looked further below you would have noticed a "64 Wake" server we own. Again, me, personally find it easy to drop the payload, and really if you are decent pilot you would know your maps and AA, other than that look for the red dots, its that freaking easy, I don't fly that much, I find it better and more competition on the ground, you see, IM not all about points, If I were I would fly constantly and only go to 16 man servers.  Am I a great Pilot? NO Am I decent? YES Do I fly alot ? NO. I needed competition so I dogfight only, but at first my 3 hrs of gameplay when I bought this game I dropped payloads and racked up points, now I dogfight, and its alot better than dropping bombs, its actually quite competitive and I see more and more experienced pilots just dogfighting.

Im tired of people judging off stats. but to be honest with you guys... this is great proof of how wrong you are.

TIME:Total 1150:49:47

Armor 48:17:48 3,186 904 3.7765

% in vehicles: 13%

Bite me.

Last edited by imdead (2006-07-30 07:03:02)

IRL planes can't detect friendly infantry with IFF so the realism thing goes out the window. It should be added in because it just takes some ease off the pilot's back. It's not my fucking fault a medic decides to run up to fuck the enemy T-90's tailpipe.

If thisg ame were realistic, there wouldn't be any of that stray missile bullshit (Identification Friendly or Foe, but right now it's I Fuck-Up Friendlies), the F-35 would be one of the best planes in the game, etc.

souljar wrote:

I for one think that maybe some icons showing the position of ground troops attacking enemy bases could be a good idea , not just the radar icons but some visual ones too . I been kicked for TK,s far to many times now because i just cannot see them next to so many other markers on the radar hud . Also maybe a little less punishment going on for the fly boys trying to help you guys out .

It ain't that easy trying to pick of them tanks when your all trying to hide by them !

I give you my full support, yesterday i've got a "punish-streak" thanks of the noobs who run in front the enemy tanks when i drop my bombs, on Smoke Screen

Last edited by masterHouse (2006-08-08 11:32:09)