AAFCptKabbom wrote:
I continue to hear and read a lot of speculation about Flt. 93 and I've come to the conclusion that people will always speculate and at times convince themselves of what they want their version of the truth to be - all is fine and well with human nature. However, the facts from all investigations, federal and private, have concluded that it went "NOSE DOWN" into the field and "ALL" components were found, to any certain degree, in the debris field from the wreckage. Further tests and studies have shown "no traces" of any type of characteristics associated with a pre-explosion {common term - "shot down"}.
Certain facts do occur with the shooting down of an aircraft; 1} Heat seeking missiles will attack the heat from the fan jet, cause an explosion, and the crash debris field would be extensive. 2} Gunning a plane down would cause extensive damage and highly traceable signs of projectile penetration.
In all facts - the debris field was consistent with a nose down high impact {engines attached and running} crash, there was no evidence or independent reports by anyone of bullets holes, and there have been no pieces of the plane found anywhere outside of the crash site. Considering a lot of independent investigators tried to find the smoking gun to support the shooting down of Flt. 93, for many good and not so good reasons, there are no facts or evidence to support the downing of the plane. Also, civilians were some of the first on the seen and not one fact could be found that proves there was any attempt to suppress or cover-up any evidence that anything other than the fact the plane went down nose first into the field occurred.
As far as Sect. Rumsfeld's comment - what does he have to say?
God rest their soles and may their family and friends have the burden of their deaths lifted from their hearts,
A respectful American.
The crash debris field would be extensive, right? There was debris and engine parts found up to a mile away from the crash site. And yes civilians were some of the first on the "seen" (spelled scene), and have given testimony on camera that the wreckage they found there was shredded bits of metal, no identifiable plane wreckage, a trough in the ground maybe 30 feet long, and only a few small body parts. If the plane crashed into an abandoned field, there would be a mass of wreckage with at least a few intact bodies on the scene, most likely quite a few. Don't forget about the many eyewitnesses in the area who saw a low-flying plane in the area at the time of the crash.
