800x600 @ 100Hz
IRNV-Field 3... New School Shit...
IRNV-Field 3... New School Shit...
800x600 @60hz. My processor sucks. And the gpu is pretty old too. I run textures/geometry on med and lighting on low, aa etc off.
Same. My screen is dieing though so it can act up.Drumedor wrote:
1280x1024 at 60 hz.
I have no idea!
pointless thread but hey....
10 x 7 everything med.
10 x 7 everything med.
800 × 600 @ 60 hz
ftw
ftw
WHO GAVE ME A NEG KARMA FFS.....show yourself noob
1600x1200 60mhz
1920x1080 for me, not sure of the refresh rate
1600x1200 LCD so can't go high on refresh but it is unnooticable because it is LCD
640*480, dont know the Hz....
And in "The Iron Gator" sometimes I use 320*240....LOL
And in "The Iron Gator" sometimes I use 320*240....LOL
Last edited by JON.ANTONSSON (2006-07-02 13:46:57)
1024 x 768 @ 75Hz everything maxed out.
800x600 100Hz
Medium/High settings.
Medium/High settings.
640x480 low and on software sound :<
Us third world country types cant afford them high tech thingy mabobs...
Us third world country types cant afford them high tech thingy mabobs...
1600x1200 @60 (LCD) w/ 4xAA and 8XAF
1280x1024 70hz
lt-grumpy wrote:
1024*768 @75Hz.
Why do a lot of you guys run it on 60Hz although your system could manage 75Hz?
Do you like pink-eye after a few hours of play?
I recently changed from 1024x768@75Hz to 1280x1024@75Hz,there's no noticeable performance loss and it looks a lot better.
On my old CRT it was a huge difference between 60 and 75Hz,on 60Hz your eyes would hurt after a few hours,on 75Hz it's way less eye-straining.I recently got a 19" TFT but I just kept the 75Hz setting....is it really unnoticeable?
Do you like pink-eye after a few hours of play?
I recently changed from 1024x768@75Hz to 1280x1024@75Hz,there's no noticeable performance loss and it looks a lot better.
LCD = TFT or is there a difference too?alpinestar wrote:
1600x1200 LCD so can't go high on refresh but it is unnooticable because it is LCD
On my old CRT it was a huge difference between 60 and 75Hz,on 60Hz your eyes would hurt after a few hours,on 75Hz it's way less eye-straining.I recently got a 19" TFT but I just kept the 75Hz setting....is it really unnoticeable?
Last edited by Mj.Blindfisch (2006-07-02 15:08:59)
i run 1600 * 1200 at 60Hz samsung 204b
2048 * 1536 i run ^^
no stretching whatsover but black borders all around, still plenty playable though
no stretching whatsover but black borders all around, still plenty playable though
its better for your eyes if you can use a higher refresh rate. Why not change your desktop refresh-rate to 75hz as well, then you only have to resize your monitor once. because then they will matchHacial wrote:
Does it make any change if I change refresh rate from 60 hz to 75 hz? I run at 1024x1028 and I keep it 60 hz because then there's nothing going out of the screen, if I change it to 75 hz the image goes much to left and I would have to rezize my monitor everytime I change between desktop and BF2.
Edit: Someone gave me negative karma from this post for no reason!?
Is it still possible to see soldiers at medium/long distances with that res? I might try it to reduce some of my lag.DeoValente9 wrote:
640x480 low and on software sound :<
Us third world country types cant afford them high tech thingy mabobs...
Right now I'm on 800 x 600 @ 75hz
TheSoprano wrote:
1024 by 1028 @ 75 hz
but........i have it on low graphics im used to it that way
1024x768@60Mhz
at mostly med settings
at mostly med settings
Last edited by tvmissleman (2006-07-02 16:47:58)
1280x1024 at 60 hz