I blame El Niño. Both for the weather and your spelling.
Edit: Boo for post-edited thread titles
Edit: Boo for post-edited thread titles
Last edited by DonFck (2007-02-09 09:40:11)
I need around tree fiddy.
yes | 71% | 71% - 337 | ||||
no | 28% | 28% - 135 | ||||
Total: 472 |
Last edited by DonFck (2007-02-09 09:40:11)
Last edited by too_money2007 (2007-02-09 09:38:48)
LOL your would think so. It's BF2142 for real!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!too_money2007 wrote:
If it was globally-warmed, wouldn't it melt?
Woah. And I thought the 18+ inches that the UK had back in '63 was a lot (not old enough to remember ).
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2007/02/1 … 9529R.htmlThe Subcommittee on Energy and Air Quality hearing scheduled for Wednesday, February 14, 2007, at 10:00 a.m. in room 2123 Rayburn House Office Building has been postponed due to inclement weather. The hearing is entitled “Climate Change: Are Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Human Activities Contributing to a Warming of the Planet?”'
The study, led by Ian Howat, a researcher with the University of Colorado's National Snow and Ice Data Center and the University of Washington's Applied Physics Laboratory, shows the glaciers shrank dramatically and dumped twice as much ice into the sea during a period of less than a year between 2004 and 2005.
But then, fewer than two years later, they returned to near their previous rates of discharge.
http://www.drudgereportarchives.com/dat … _flash.htmSAVE IT FOR A SUNNY DAY: Maryville Univ. in St. Louis area cancelling screening of Al Gore's 'Inconvenient Truth' because of a snowstorm...
all from drudge (i could care less how credible you think the site is)Q: IPCC has released its report and you say that the global warming is a false myth. How did you get this idea, Mr President??
A: It's not my idea. Global warming is a false myth and every serious person and scientist says so. It is not fair to refer to the U.N. panel. IPCC is not a scientific institution: it's a political body, a sort of non-government organization of green flavor. It's neither a forum of neutral scientists nor a balanced group of scientists. These people are politicized scientists who arrive there with a one-sided opinion and a one-sided assignment. Also, it's an undignified slapstick that people don't wait for the full report in May 2007 but instead respond, in such a serious way, to the summary for policymakers where all the "but's" are scratched, removed, and replaced by oversimplified theses.? This is clearly such an incredible failure of so many people, from journalists to politicians. If the European Commission is instantly going to buy such a trick, we have another very good reason to think that the countries themselves, not the Commission, should be deciding about similar issues.?
Last edited by Chappy556 (2007-02-14 04:32:02)
damn you....Silentkillr69 wrote:
yeah im only 14 so im pretty pissed about this whole thing cause im goona have to help solve problems that generations BEFORE me created. that seems fair huh!
QFT.Silentkillr69 wrote:
yeah im only 14 so im pretty pissed about this whole thing cause im goona have to help solve problems that generations BEFORE me created. that seems fair huh!
Don't forget about the whole Middle East thing to boot.Silentkillr69 wrote:
yeah im only 14 so im pretty pissed about this whole thing cause im goona have to help solve problems that generations BEFORE me created. that seems fair huh!
Yeah, well. This is a global warming thread. Plus, wtf do you expect a 14yo to do about Iraq? What he CAN do is try and do something about the environment - just the little things help.DesertFox- wrote:
Don't forget about the whole Middle East thing to boot.Silentkillr69 wrote:
yeah im only 14 so im pretty pissed about this whole thing cause im goona have to help solve problems that generations BEFORE me created. that seems fair huh!
PLEASE TAKE NOTE :Silentkillr69 wrote:
yeah im only 14 so im pretty pissed about this whole thing cause im goona have to help solve problems that generations BEFORE me created. that seems fair huh!