BF2S Forums Do you believe President Bush's actions justify impeachment?

Spumantiii wrote:

wait...  Every presidential term in history has seen job growth.
           Every presidential term in history has seen housing development
on a side note, I'm sure housing IS booming after all those houses were blown away in the south.  That doesn't count.

Gas prices are lower than you think.  Look at prices for Iraqis.
Look at the price of gas in Venezuelz, where gas companies were nationalized and the people get the gas cheap
3 cents    a litre       no shit  @12 cents a gallon for you non metrics
If it wasn't for that pipeline and American oil companies that took over in Iraq, your gas, believe it or not might be cheaper.  It allows for a total monopoly of the oil by American dollars.  And you know that it's in nobody's best interest, especially Cheney/Bush's to let you have it cheap.  The cost of the oil coming oit of Iraq has been heavily inflated.  Owners of the oil companies there have made RECORD profits  (RECORD:  Highest money intake for oil in history..  Believe it)

It's not popular fashion to defend yourself against an onslaught of deception, lowing, that's called human nature.
Yes you're absolutely right, I've used my political tilt to get laid so many times, especially the part where I make fun of Bushisms....    Riiiight.

Maybe you missed where I stated before that Iraq was NOT  and IS NOT the only country to be breaking UN resolutions.  By that logic America is just as guilty by using wmd weapons in Iraq.  The list is huge.  The only fucking reason that war was started was to claim those oilfields for American companies to pay for the stupid spending Bush has done.  Tell me having airplanes with laser beams attached to their heads is NOT a waste of fucking money, jesus christ you watched too much GIJOE

If Venezuela stepped out a little sooner, it might be thier "terrorist fascist" "anti-american" "regime" country being attacked for their oil.      In Sudan the UN resolutions are being broken but there is no INTEREST to go there, since the oil companies there are ALREADY AMERICAN, do you see a pattern forming yet?

The UN forbids the illegal icarceration of so called terrorists, they may not be terrorists.
The UN forbids the use of wmds yet UK and USA use them in damn near every weapon possible ( depleted uranium ammo)

Trooper_Collider wrote:

GATOR591957 wrote:

Trooper_Collider wrote:

The only thing I'm saying is that Bush is the Commander in Chief; that's the truth and I don't care if he really sucks nor he's a lying sack of sh*t as his daddy! The fact is that he's the leader of our troops and we have to support them! If u don't like it go hug a tree and take a bath, hippies!!





Semper Fi!

So let me get this straight.  In your mind you can't support the troops and disapprove of the commander in chief?
Sorry, let's take this a step down.  You have a commander in the field who has made several missteps causing harm to his own troops.  Your theory is just leave him there for another two years?

OK, can you imagine the disorientation, confusion and discomfort that you can cause to the troops if you disagree with the Chain of Command? Do you imagine the consequences in the field if the Chain of Command it's harmed in anyway? Well, you may translate it as more dead people; people uncappable of following orders, of respecting their superiors etc. surely are gonna get killed. We don't need anyone saying to men on duty : "hey, your Commander sucks!" So, in order to support the troops you must support the Chain of Command, is not a matter if you agree or not, as the song (Over There) says:
"Is not ours to reason why"
Anyway, all soldiers are aware that Bush and this war (OIF) s*cks, but go ahead, be my guest and go telling that to them!

Semper Fi!

Last edited by GATOR591957 (2006-06-26 15:32:23)

lowing wrote:

As far as the worlds oil goes.......I said it before and I will say it again.......If we really wanted their oil we could have kept it 60 years ago and again 15 years ago, instead of giving these lands back to their citizens.

Oil prices are up because the oil supplies are threatened by rogue leaders. Prices went up after '91 when the war started nothing new is taking place. Sorry but their are no big conspiracies for you to sink your teeth into.

Sorry for taking so long to get back to ya, I am just now getting off my ban. lol

The Future Of Freedom Foundation wrote:

The world demand for dollars and the worldwide use of the dollar have served as an important cushion to maintain the value of the dollar on foreign-exchange markets, which has enabled the U.S. government to print money and run trade deficits that might otherwise have put downward pressure on the international exchange rate of the greenback.

The demand for dollars has also enabled Washington to fund the federal budget deficits of the past because foreigners have used the dollars they own to purchase U.S. Treasury securities. With so many dollars in use for so many international transactions, parking some of those dollars back in the United States in the form of U.S. government securities for a period of time has usually seemed the safest, easiest, and most logical way of putting one’s cash to work.

FEASTA wrote:

Since so many foreign-owned dollars are not spent on American goods and services, the US is able to run a huge trade deficit year after year without apparently any major economic consequences. The most recently published figures, for example, show that in November of last year US imports were worth 48% more than US exports*1. No other country can run such a large trade deficit with impunity. The financial media tell us the US is acting as the 'consumer of last resort' and the implication is that we should be thankful, but a more enlightening description of this state of affairs would be to say that it is getting a massive interest-free loan from the rest of the world.

While the US' position may seem inviolable, one should remember that the more you have, the more you have to lose. And recently there have been signs of how, for the first time in a long time, the US may be beginning to lose.

One of the stated economic objectives, and perhaps the primary objective, when setting up the euro was to turn it into a reserve currency to challenge the dollar so that Europe too could get something for nothing.

This however would be a disaster for the US. Not only would they lose a large part of their annual subsidy of effectively free goods and services, but countries switching to euro reserves from dollar reserves would bring down the value of the US currency.

Last edited by Spumantiii (2006-06-27 04:53:32)

kr@cker wrote:

the total debt is not the responsibility of the president alone, all money comes through congress

specxops wrote:

hey guys why did bill clinton get a belly ring???


its a joke ill tell ya the answer when someone replies!

specxops wrote:

CUZ george bush has a dick chaney!

kr@cker wrote:

the total debt is not the responsibility of the president alone, all money comes through congress

Last edited by kr@cker (2006-07-01 09:29:52)