I played a bit of '42 recently, and did one of my favorite things: jumped in a Wespe and (alongside another one) shelled the hell out of an enemy base from a ridge... then I realised that this is something I really think '42 has over BF2.
I don't like the fixed artillery much. I don't like that it fires by itself, and can hit anywhere on the map. What I think would be much more fun is... self propelled guns! They would have to be manned, and moved into position to hit certain distances/points on the map. The commander could issue an order about where to fire, but the SP driver would have to actually hit the target.
They could also engage tanks! They could be stolen from the enemy team! I think it would add strategy and fun to the game in a way that is lacking with the static artillery strikes. What do you guys think?
I don't like the fixed artillery much. I don't like that it fires by itself, and can hit anywhere on the map. What I think would be much more fun is... self propelled guns! They would have to be manned, and moved into position to hit certain distances/points on the map. The commander could issue an order about where to fire, but the SP driver would have to actually hit the target.
They could also engage tanks! They could be stolen from the enemy team! I think it would add strategy and fun to the game in a way that is lacking with the static artillery strikes. What do you guys think?
Last edited by oberst_enzian (2006-06-14 21:42:31)