Rate the sig above

2007-08-04 17:00:40

#5426

Gooners: Wiki Contributor; +2,700|6832

10/10 its clean, simple; nice font, and good colour choice.

2007-08-04 19:14:31

#5427

B00MH3ADSH0T: Fresh NoobCaeks Here; +118|6590|Penrith,Nsw, Aus

Klinka-Klinko wrote:
Not Enough. 6/10

Lol i couldnt help my self but this guy seems like a hypocrit

And for the above i like it except the white coming in from the left seems a little to much 6/10

Last edited by B00MH3ADSH0T (2007-08-04 19:15:54)

2007-08-04 19:34:21

#5428

xBlackPantherx: Grow up, or die; +142|6542|California

It's good, a little too cartoonish for my likes but that's just me. It would be funny if you replaced the demon guy with Satan from Tenacious D and the Pick of Destiny.

8.5/10

EDIT: About Klinka-Klinko, total hypocrite.

Last edited by xBlackPantherx (2007-08-04 19:35:34)

2007-08-04 21:07:17

#5429

Sarrk: O-O-O A-O A; +788|6855|Brisbane, Australia

xBlackPantherx wrote:
It's good, a little too cartoonish for my likes but that's just me. It would be funny if you replaced the demon guy with Satan from Tenacious D and the Pick of Destiny.

8.5/10

EDIT: About Klinka-Klinko, total hypocrite.

I dont like it tbh. And It just seems to me that the logo in the middle is a rip off Propellerhead studios/Reason

And something about those blue lines, it just seems ugly to me.

But I like crisscrossy things, so standard 7.

2007-08-04 21:09:51

#5430

Fenris_GreyClaw: Real Хорошо; +826|6719|Adelaide, South Australia

I liked the Dukes one better, but 7/10 for this one.

2007-08-04 21:53:28

#5431

Qrite: sup g; +79|6374|Ohio

6.5/10 . its pretty good. the symbols in the top right corner dont mix so well with the rest

2007-08-04 23:42:15

#5432

xBlackPantherx: Grow up, or die; +142|6542|California

I haven't rated the right one so 7/10.

EDIT: Needs to be slowed down on the text.

PS. Since when is the standard 7? The standard is 5, thats neutral. Could go either way with 5.

Last edited by xBlackPantherx (2007-08-04 23:42:47)

2007-08-05 06:05:24

#5433

Sarrk: O-O-O A-O A; +788|6855|Brisbane, Australia

xBlackPantherx wrote:
I haven't rated the right one so 7/10.

EDIT: Needs to be slowed down on the text.

PS. Since when is the standard 7? The standard is 5, thats neutral. Could go either way with 5.

5 is a cop out, its an atleast you tried, 7 is for something that sorta looks like it has effort.

Do you really need me to disclaim everything I say is standard as the sarrk standard?

And do you really want a 5 instead of a 7?

2007-08-05 08:30:38

#5434

Ryan: Member; +1,230|7042|Alberta, Canada

It's cool and unique. 8/10

2007-08-05 08:32:49

#5435

suomalainen_äijä: Member; +64|6365

kinda weird

4/10

2007-08-05 11:56:22

#5436

Gooners: Wiki Contributor; +2,700|6832

Can't beat the simpsons! 9/10

2007-08-05 12:48:08

#5437

Qrite: sup g; +79|6374|Ohio

9/10 haha... homer

2007-08-05 20:51:35

#5438

kikkin_assssssssss: Member; +16|6661

QRITE, ill rate both your 1st one is just a stock with text boring imo. Your second funny as hell

please rate

2007-08-06 00:43:22

#5439

OmniDeath: ~; +726|6843

3/10

It looks like you have simply taken a fractal image cropped it, gave it a boarder, and some text. Also, the text is terrible. While I see what you were trying to do, it doesn't come off as successful imo because your "E" becomes an "F," not to mention it doesn't really fit at all.

Don't get me wrong, I'm sure you didn't simply resize/crop and image...it simply looks like that.

2007-08-06 01:41:19

#5440

xBlackPantherx: Grow up, or die; +142|6542|California

kikkin_assssssssss wrote:
QRITE, ill rate both your 1st one is just a stock with text boring imo. Your second funny as hell

http://fevergfx.com/gallery/76/389.png

please rate

What is it besides a stock photo that was cropped? The text would have been awesome if you had extended the canvas size another 15 pixels to the bottom and made it the forum background color so it actually came off of the picture instead of being cropped. Over all style and technique, 2/10.

2007-08-06 04:51:47