Will Iran nuke Israel?

2006-05-13 11:49:42

#1

OSS-CAPT-SPEIRS: Member; +13|6971|Orange County, CA

All the rhetoric I hear from the Iranian President seems to indicate that while he is portraying their nuclear development as peaceful, he is dead set on manufacturing weapons grade uranium. This coupled with the fact that Iran is also actively seeking/developing a multiple warhead delivery system (missle) and has said on repeated occassions that Israel "should be wiped from the face of the earth" and "Israel will be destroyed in a great firestorm" seems inicate their true intentions.

What do you think?

2006-05-13 11:51:38

#2

SysTray: "Generous mods" < Thats right Systray !; +180|7060|Delaware

They'll use it as leverage to keep the US out of their busineess. Isreal either gets it from Iran's troops or from Iran's nukes. We need to stop playing World Police =/

2006-05-13 11:52:12

#3

Varegg: Support fanatic :-); +2,206|7049|Nårvei

They are not stupid just because they are Iranians/Muslims.

Think thats answer enough !

Wait behind the line ..............................................................

2006-05-13 11:57:23

#4

duk0r: Administrator; +306|6907|Austin, TX

Yeah they are building a nuke just like the WMDs that were in Iraq. Common people, you are being played for a fool.
"A Death Star! Iran is building a DEATH STAR!!!! Darth Ahmadinejad is in league with Senator Palpatine! We gotta bomb them all NOW!" -- Official White Horse Souse

(in wrong section, moved to > Not bf2, not bf2s)

https://bf3s.com/sigs/a3a6d1102d14bf2f7e266fba7f728dc2cc38b316.png

2006-05-13 12:12:07

#5

chuckle_hound: Member; +32|6906|Edinburgh, Scotland

Odds are Israel will attack first. Out of all the asian countries they're the most aggresive and ignorant.

2006-05-13 14:46:13

#6

Spark: liquid fluoride thorium reactor; +874|6914|Canberra, AUS

(Still in wrong section, should be in debate + serious talk)

Israel will attack first. They are the most powerful nation in the area - and they have the highest military:civilians ratio in the world.

The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
^{~ Richard Feynman}

2006-05-13 14:51:04

#7

Naughty_Om: Im Ron Burgundy?; +355|6872|USA

Iran wont. Israel would blow the fuck outta iran before they could get their missile 5ft off the grond.

2006-05-13 14:52:46

#8

Answeller: Usual Suspect; +16|6938|İstanbul,Türkiye

I would love to see that but no one can nuke one another in this era even usa has no balls to do that.

2006-05-13 14:54:40

#9

Naughty_Om: Im Ron Burgundy?; +355|6872|USA

well, teh problem is not balls. in this world, those who will do the nuking have no OFFICIAL govt, no one to hold responsible except the individual. so IRAN wont do it but, some rogue SOB will do it. think terrorist organization.

2006-05-13 14:56:35

#10

stryyker: bad touch; +1,682|6959|California

IF it happens, heres what happens...

1. Onece that missile is 400 FEET off the gound, the IAF will be hitting targets in Iran.

2006-05-13 14:58:33

#11

Naughty_Om: Im Ron Burgundy?; +355|6872|USA

what im saying, the missile WONT LEAVE THE GROUND. the way it will happen. Terrorist organization acquires the nuke from iran. Places it in Israel some how. Bomb goes BOOM. Iran supports the bombing but does not claim responsibility. Saying its good is different from saying I DID IT. the Terrorist organization claims responsibilty, goes underground then is protected by IRAn

2006-05-13 14:59:36

#12

yerded: Bertinator; +255|6876|Westminster, California

duk0r wrote:
Yeah they are building a nuke just like the WMDs that were in Iraq. Common people, you are being played for a fool.
"A Death Star! Iran is building a DEATH STAR!!!! Darth Ahmadinejad is in league with Senator Palpatine! We gotta bomb them all NOW!" -- Official White Horse Souse

(in wrong section, moved to > Not bf2, not bf2s)

Now, if you'd have said source instead of " souse ", I'd have some concern.

lol

Isreal can/will do enough damage without nukes, thank you very much.

Doesn't anybody realize that bombing Iran is exactly what the president in Iran wants? It would unite the country, and his insane ass is in serious jeapordy of being over thrown. Patriotism is about the only card the mullahs can play, and without an outside aggressor there just is not a whole lot of patriotism in Iran.

Iran has historically had good relations with Israel, it was the nazi's that messed everything up...always the nazis!

check it out, you bleeding hearts don't have a clear understanding of just why these people are so fucked up!
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/article … 4714.shtml
http://www.sullivan-county.com/immigrat … i_arab.htm
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3a8ff1c12efe.htm
http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelrep … sp?aid=132
http://www.campus-watch.org/article/id/817

okay I'm waiting for somebody to explain the realistic beef the average muslim fanatic has with anyone beside their fellow muslims/arabs and the nazis. Go ahead...(yawn) I'm waiting ( sound of toe tapping and then snoring)

The nazis put such a mind fuck on the world it's still causing problems.

Last edited by yerded (2006-05-13 15:05:55)

2006-05-13 14:59:47

#13

herrr_smity: Member; +156|6867|space command ur anus

its more likely that Israel nukes Iran, or at least strike the first blow.

2006-05-13 15:01:47

#14

Fredrik: i hate you all; +201|6888|Norway

SysTray wrote:
They'll use it as leverage to keep the US out of their busineess. Isreal either gets it from Iran's troops or from Iran's nukes. We need to stop playing World Police =/

2006-05-13 15:10:37

#15

Answeller: Usual Suspect; +16|6938|İstanbul,Türkiye

Naughty_Om wrote:
well, teh problem is not balls. in this world, those who will do the nuking have no OFFICIAL govt, no one to hold responsible except the individual. so IRAN wont do it but, some rogue SOB will do it. think terrorist organization.

Nukes dont grow up in the tree, since no countries would like to take the whole world against them, they also dont let any terrorist group get their hands on their nuke.

2006-05-13 21:24:39

#16

duk0r: Administrator; +306|6907|Austin, TX

wow, just wow. Can everyone say "Nuclear Power plant"? Big difference between that and weapons grade Plutonium. Umm yeah, anyone who listens to and believes our government these days needs to have their head checked. Sorry guys, our government (US) has been and will lie to get what they want.

Iran's president is trying to be diplomatic about the whole situation. He has sent several letters to the president and have requested a meeting to try and solve this problem diplomatically. Yet Bush and his administration is sitting here like a 5 year old kid with his finders in his ears going: "NA! NA! NA! I CAN'T HEAR YOU!!!".
Iran wants diplomacy, Bushmerica wants war.

2006-05-13 21:28:52

#17

NB-CO-DELTA-COMMAND: Member; +6|6892

aThe US /PHalanx. Patroit. and IDOTS laser 747 defence system will prevent ANY missle. from luanching, they may get 7000ft but will be shot down by one of the three systems. or to "prevent" this we would just kick there ass on the ground... but some of our generals say it will be an massive air war... it may last just a week or so... well i hope all goes well... - peace 0 Delta

2006-05-13 21:33:05

#18

NB-CO-DELTA-COMMAND: Member; +6|6892

duk0r wrote:
wow, just wow. Can everyone say "Nuclear Power plant"? Big difference between that and weapons grade Plutonium. Umm yeah, anyone who listens to and believes our government these days needs to have their head checked. Sorry guys, our government (US) has been and will lie to get what they want.

Iran's president is trying to be diplomatic about the whole situation. He has sent several letters to the president and have requested a meeting to try and solve this problem diplomatically. Yet Bush and his administration is sitting here like a 5 year old kid with his finders in his ears going: "NA! NA! NA! I CAN'T HEAR YOU!!!".
Iran wants diplomacy, Bushmerica wants war.

sadly i disagree... there is no evidence of ANY letter going to the oval office, i sugest that nuclear reactors contain weapons grade "powder" . all you have to do is get the triggers and fuse it with a missle or bomb, "snaps" and you got a nuke... and thats why they have 30+ of these places... why would they need that many? .... with the poor country rates there you would only need 3 nuclear plants to power it all. do the math, no offence to you or anyones post... i speak of what i know is the truth, and what i think is right (=

2006-05-13 21:42:31

#19

Bubbalo: The Lizzard; +541|6801

yerded wrote:
okay I'm waiting for somebody to explain the realistic beef the average muslim fanatic has with anyone beside their fellow muslims/arabs and the nazis. Go ahead...(yawn) I'm waiting ( sound of toe tapping and then snoring)

You mean other than stealing land off Palestine to create Israel? And funding of wars in the Middle East during the Cold War for political ends? And supporting dictators so long as they don't interfere with the oil trade? Yeah, other than that, no much I guess.

2006-05-13 21:44:20

#20

GunSlinger OIF II: Banned.; +1,860|6883

Bubbalo wrote:
yerded wrote:
okay I'm waiting for somebody to explain the realistic beef the average muslim fanatic has with anyone beside their fellow muslims/arabs and the nazis. Go ahead...(yawn) I'm waiting ( sound of toe tapping and then snoring)
You mean other than stealing land off Palestine to create Israel? And funding of wars in the Middle East during the Cold War for political ends? And supporting dictators so long as they don't interfere with the oil trade? Yeah, other than that, no much I guess.

read up on the subject before you go about saying how "Palestine was taken from arabs" thats a load of bullshit and its a myth. do some learning instead of passing on other peoples opinions

Last edited by GunSlinger OIF II (2006-05-13 21:44:32)

2006-05-13 21:54:42

#21

mcgid1: Meh...; +129|6956|Austin, TX/San Antonio, TX

Varegg wrote:
They are not stupid just because they are Iranians/Muslims.

True they're not stupid because of their nationality or religion, but they are religous fanatics who have expressed their desire to wipe out the Jewish state (Israel) even if it means their own annihilation. On the other hand Israel will almost certainly launch a preemptive strike if there is any hard evidence if Iran is bullding a nuke.

2006-05-13 21:56:26

#22

TrollmeaT: Aspiring Objectivist; +492|6912|Colorado

It will never happen, hopefully another war isn't needed.

2006-05-13 22:06:14

#23

vedds: Member; +52|6994|Christchurch New Zealand

duk0r wrote:
wow, just wow. Can everyone say "Nuclear Power plant"? Big difference between that and weapons grade Plutonium. Umm yeah, anyone who listens to and believes our government these days needs to have their head checked. Sorry guys, our government (US) has been and will lie to get what they want.

Iran's president is trying to be diplomatic about the whole situation. He has sent several letters to the president and have requested a meeting to try and solve this problem diplomatically. Yet Bush and his administration is sitting here like a 5 year old kid with his finders in his ears going: "NA! NA! NA! I CAN'T HEAR YOU!!!".
Iran wants diplomacy, Bushmerica wants war.

Irans president is trying to buy time to get enough uranium enriched to weapons grade before he starts getting really bolshy. Explain why Iran is spending so much on technology for nuclear power when it is sitting on top of the largest fossil fuel deposit on earth. I am struggling to see why you think Iran is going to not develop Nukes when they have purchased the technology to deliver them and they have no real need for nuclear power? Sure Iran may not nuke Israel but its overt hostility towards it, its refusal to cooperate with UN inspectors, its purchase of missile delivery technology all provide a very good reason to listen when Iran talks. In short they are going to develop Nukes to increase their barganing power within the international community. people are going to be more likely to concede points to a country with nukes and the leader who is just unhinged enough to potentially use them.

As much as Bush is portrayed as a warmongering idiot - can you really see the US deploying Nuclear Weapons on any country as a first strike?

Now read Ahmadinejad for Bush; Still get the same answer?

2006-05-13 22:09:33

#24

MooseRyder: Member; +37|6894|Montréal, Canada

Actually jewish people was living in that area WAY BEFORE the Israel we known these days.

Its actually the Romans the renamed that area as Syria and Palestina, Because, yes even the romans tried to eliminate the jews at that time. Then its the Byzantine Empire that took over the place after the romans like 200 years after. From there Muslims been theres untill the Ottoman Empire took place around like 1500. From there well most of you that know WW1 and WW2 history knows the rest.

Some will say jewish was there first, some would say muslims was there first. That area of the world been fought for, for thousands of years and yet its not over.

2006-05-13 22:21:51

#25

mcgid1: Meh...; +129|6956|Austin, TX/San Antonio, TX

MooseRyder wrote:
\Some will say jewish was there first, some would say muslims was there first. That area of the world been fought for, for thousands of years and yet its not over.

Actually the historical fact is that the Jews were there first. The Muslim religion didn't start until around 500AD. The Jews had already been in the area we now know as Israel for around a thousand years by that time.

Yes	45%	45% - 59
No	54%	54% - 71
Total: 130

BF2S Forums Will Iran nuke Israel?

Poll

duk0r wrote:

SysTray wrote:

Naughty_Om wrote:

duk0r wrote:

yerded wrote:

Bubbalo wrote:

yerded wrote:

Varegg wrote:

duk0r wrote:

MooseRyder wrote:

Board footer