so i was just reading through the forums about how people are complaining about vehcile whores and noobs in helis. i randomly thought of a solution that may help. i havent thought of the pros and cons of the idea nor the willingness of every player to go along of it. but here it is.
now just like in real life, if you want to fly/drive a vehicle you gotta learn. so i thought why not have some type of qualification course that involves shooting targets, flying through obstacles, low altitude flying, low visibility flying (just for the hell of it), and advanced manuevers. it wouldnt take forever to get your "wings" but it would at least filter out the noobs from the more advanced players.
you would sign on our account like normal, but instead of joing a multiplayer game you can train in a quasi-offline qualification course.
the goal of this idea is to:
1. prevent noobs from flying
2. raising the standard of good flying
3. lower the amont of players fighting for helis
i see a lot of people insisting that player practice in offline games. why not make that offline game into a qualifying course.
its just an idea. don't get all your panties in an uprawr. feedback anyone?
now just like in real life, if you want to fly/drive a vehicle you gotta learn. so i thought why not have some type of qualification course that involves shooting targets, flying through obstacles, low altitude flying, low visibility flying (just for the hell of it), and advanced manuevers. it wouldnt take forever to get your "wings" but it would at least filter out the noobs from the more advanced players.
you would sign on our account like normal, but instead of joing a multiplayer game you can train in a quasi-offline qualification course.
the goal of this idea is to:
1. prevent noobs from flying
2. raising the standard of good flying
3. lower the amont of players fighting for helis
i see a lot of people insisting that player practice in offline games. why not make that offline game into a qualifying course.
its just an idea. don't get all your panties in an uprawr. feedback anyone?
Last edited by REYKON (2006-05-01 01:05:23)