Blazin.UK expose / [CEA] exploit revealed

2006-04-02 09:32:58

#1

Sophoz: Member; +3|6621

The reason the number seems so special is because it is FFFF in Hex. That is why the maximum number of rows in excel is 65535, the programers used a 4 bit register to define the row number. So the 10th row would be 000A (in computers memory, hex) or row 65535 is (FFFF). You can do conversions using the calculator on your computer. If this number is maximum for anything dealing with computers, I would gurantee it is because it was written using 4 bit registers.

Important things to notice are as follows:

-[C.E.A]-*Sinkope has a Global Score 16,777,215 which is approx 256 * 65535
-[C.E.A]-Dragon has a Global Score 6,585,191 which is approx 100 * 65535

BOTH -[C.E.A]-*Sinkope and -[C.E.A]-Dragon have best round scores of 65535

Those boys are genius....!

Also - BLAZIN UK DID EXPLOIT HIS WAS TO THE TOP!!!!!

http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:iWP … k&cd=1

look for references to 65535 which dont quite add up (MEDIC SCORES HINT HINT)

AND YET ANOTHER GLITCHER

http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:_mD … k&cd=2

If anyone is interested in exactly how the glitch works then you can e-mail me [email protected]

More Info:

65535 is off
65535 is the maximum
65535 is assumed
65535 is used because no conversion will occur at the time of an
65535 is received
65535 is considered to be completely opaque
65535 is not possible in our environment
65535 is also used for fragmented packets
65535 is that kernel 2
65535 is the maximum"
65535 is used here
65535 is acceptable in this case because new database files are created based on the qlangid value of enu
65535 is a special rule
65535 is not less than 65535
65535 is also not decremented and will remain on until the timer is set to zero
65535 is the highest rwin you can use without windows scaling being turned on
65535 is a default entry
65535 is inverted
65535 is 1111 1111 1111 1111 in binary
65535 is displayed as white
65535 is not defined
65535 is available for user
65535 is the highest;; ``signed'' order
65535 is the maximum volume
65535 is not all that much slower on old cards and 256 color mode is actually slower on some of the new cards
65535 is not all that much slower on most video cards and is in fact faster on newer hardware
65535 is relatively rare and is commonly hostile in nature
65535 is the default rule
65535 is a number that many bios manufactures use to disable this feature if the value 'none' is not present
65535 is the highest score
65535 is supposed to be the 'nobody' user/group id
65535 is equal to 2^16 *1
65535 is valid
65535 is needed since the first rule isn't inclusive and you can't use 65536 as a bound
65535 is placed in the first column of output 8 and the remaining data in this row is set to zero
65535 is the highest total you can
65535 is required
65535 is basically the same as
65535 is the highest id
65535 is kind of like 0
65535 is too big for an integer
65535 is a very bad choice of uid and gid is that it casts to
65535 is a full circle
65535 is reached
65535 is
65535 is the maximum value of video
65535 is 16
65535 is flagdefects flag
65535 is equivalent to end
65535 is max
65535 is deze 0
65535 is roughly 2gb
65535 is returned
65535 is too large
65535 is the highest value that you can set your rwin to
65535 is included in the image header record
65535 is fully opaque
65535 is administratively predefined and cannot be modified
65535 is living there
65535 is the maximum delay
65535 is a number that the bios will accept to disable this feature
65535 is followed by 0
65535 is bright
65535 is white
65535 is a tight squeeze at best
65535 is 39320 while python says 39321
65535 is returned when
65535 is a special control port for programming the ds100/em100 from the network side
65535 is identical to ucs
65535 is a 16

2006-04-02 09:45:17

#2

Hurricane: Banned; +1,153|6627|Washington, DC

So what does this have to do with anything?

2006-04-02 09:49:04

#3

[NTHW]LemonyBrainAid: Karma whore; +27|6619

ExecutionerStyle wrote:
So what does this have to do with anything?

It means possibly every player in the top ten have abused a certain glitch to gain points.

I can see chaos in BF2-land.. I see everyone's stats reset.. I see.. a new beginning

2006-04-02 09:49:08

#4

Sophoz: Member; +3|6621

Basically - when you get a certain score during around - its in excess of FF hex (in decimal) and i am working out what it is exactly, the servers are missreading (the glitch) and then reading the wrong value to the stats, as you can see - blazinuk has 65535 kills with medic, but also, 65535 total - which is bull cos there were kills in spec ops, etc which are ignore by the total - i aint 100% sure what the cause is but i am working it out.

2006-04-02 09:51:29

#5

Sophoz: Member; +3|6621

In the words of Xecutioner - "Basically they were able to score a number that's something special in hex, and the server went nuts and doubled their score a bunch of times"

2006-04-02 09:53:21

#6

xstax981: Community Modder; +93|6673

Sophoz wrote:
In the words of Xecutioner - "Basically they were able to score a number that's something special in hex, and the server went nuts and doubled their score a bunch of times"

This could explain the commander glitch. So what you're saying is that I could score a certain number and suddenly have my scored doubled crazily?

Last edited by xstax981 (2006-04-02 09:54:52)

2006-04-02 09:53:44

#7

SolidusSnake12: Member; +2|6634

Dude you are a genius -_-

2006-04-02 09:54:17

#8

j4mi3-k1ll3r: Member; +19|6644|Behind that RPK-74

the CEA guys says there scores are from COMMANDER score :S wtf going on.?
It also doesnt add the teamwork , combat scores either to global .. just commander

Last edited by j4mi3-k1ll3r (2006-04-02 09:55:55)

2006-04-02 09:56:41

#9

Hurricane: Banned; +1,153|6627|Washington, DC

The theory is that they padded their way to that score of 65535. Then, sicne they were commander, the round ended with them winning. The server got that number, and the theory is it converts into hex. The server then gets confused and starts doubling the score over and over. That's the theory anyways.

2006-04-02 09:57:25

#10

xaven: Member; +25|6730|Berlin

that means: it's intentional and an exploit? or an accident / server error?

2006-04-02 09:58:10

#11

Sophoz: Member; +3|6621

Commander scores being 65535 and hexing back to server instead of decimaling back to server is the key.... give me a few hours and i might have a working version of the exploit on video.

2006-04-02 09:59:14

#12

Sophoz: Member; +3|6621

exploit due to server error - based on the work of blazin.uk and his predicesor who had his stats zeroed during the first week.

** I AM ALSO GIGLING AT THE NUMBER OF KIDS WHO JUST SENT ME AND E-MAIL ASKING FOR A COPY OF THE GLITCH **

Last edited by Sophoz (2006-04-02 10:00:28)

2006-04-02 09:59:30

#13

xstax981: Community Modder; +93|6673

ExecutionerStyle wrote:
The theory is that they padded their way to that score of 65535. Then, sicne they were commander, the round ended with them winning. The server got that number, and the theory is it converts into hex. The server then gets confused and starts doubling the score over and over. That's the theory anyways.

Either way, its mission impossible to even pad your way to that score. That would be almost 3 hours of padding. Never have I experienced a round to last that long. Wait.... *sniffs the air* I smell some nitro here lol

EDIT at sophoz: lol, report them. They just e-mailed themselves to a death trap rofl

Last edited by xstax981 (2006-04-02 10:01:55)

2006-04-02 10:01:03

#14

j4mi3-k1ll3r: Member; +19|6644|Behind that RPK-74

Sophoz wrote:
Commander scores being 65535 and hexing back to server instead of decimaling back to server is the key.... give me a few hours and i might have a working version of the exploit on video.

But there is just no way you can get a score of that in a round.
I did read in a diff topic about the guy who got 18,xxx command points because the admins swapped maps over and over and each time was just doubling his x2 each time ..i.e 100 x2 = 200 , then the 200 x2 = 400 and so on ?

2006-04-02 10:01:34

#15

Hurricane: Banned; +1,153|6627|Washington, DC

It can happen. If you leave some flags neutral so there is no ticket bleed, you can pad your way to that with revives. Since your team doesnt lose a ticket if you revive, you could technically go on and on and on.

EDIT: That KN guy got that BRS of 18K by this glitch/exploit, although he reported himself to EA after it and they said it was a glitch and nothing could be done. How ironic that today he woke up to find his stats wiped, while this Spanish CEA dude still has his points.

Last edited by ExecutionerStyle (2006-04-02 10:02:32)

2006-04-02 10:02:28

#16

j4mi3-k1ll3r: Member; +19|6644|Behind that RPK-74

Sophoz wrote:
exploit due to server error - based on the work of blazin.uk and his predicesor who had his stats zeroed during the first week.

** I AM ALSO GIGLING AT THE NUMBER OF KIDS WHO JUST SENT ME AND E-MAIL ASKING FOR A COPY OF THE GLITCH **

LOL i wondered how many you might recieve.. was going to ask actually

Last edited by j4mi3-k1ll3r (2006-04-02 10:03:03)

2006-04-02 10:03:48

#17

xstax981: Community Modder; +93|6673

But there had to be other players, right? The amount of players in-game for the round to even start has to be 9 or greater, for a sixteen player server. This means, either everyone in that round padded, or they're using some kind of hack or modified file that isn't picked up during the verification.

EDIT: He got his stats wiped? That wasn't even his fault, unless he kept using the exploit.

Last edited by xstax981 (2006-04-02 10:05:18)

2006-04-02 10:04:54

#18

Magnet41: Member; +1|6603|Manchester, Uk

j4mi3-k1ll3r wrote:
Sophoz wrote:
Commander scores being 65535 and hexing back to server instead of decimaling back to server is the key.... give me a few hours and i might have a working version of the exploit on video.
But there is just no way you can get a score of that in a round.
I did read in a diff topic about the guy who got 18,xxx command points because the admins swapped maps over and over and each time was just doubling his x2 each time ..i.e 100 x2 = 200 , then the 200 x2 = 400 and so on ?

if they get rezzed continously and the tickets dont count down it should be possible

2006-04-02 10:04:58

#19

Hurricane: Banned; +1,153|6627|Washington, DC

xstax, someone found a screenshot of enough of their clan guys to have the round started (i put it into my BF2RS report):

http://img91.imageshack.us/img91/1784/d … cea5ct.jpg

Cha-ching.

2006-04-02 10:06:28

#20

xstax981: Community Modder; +93|6673

Yes, that proves they padded. But look at pallijah's score. He had no teamwork points, and only one kill. How did he manage to get a 4000 something score?

Last edited by xstax981 (2006-04-02 10:06:41)

2006-04-02 10:07:22

#21

Hurricane: Banned; +1,153|6627|Washington, DC

I wonder that too. One possibility is that they were playing on an old version of BF2, before the commander could only get command points. He must've revived and crap, and I'm guessing it wouldn't show up under the team score.

2006-04-02 10:07:37

#22

Magnet41: Member; +1|6603|Manchester, Uk

xstax981 wrote:
Yes, that proves they padded. But look at pallijah's score. He had no teamwork points, and only one kill. How did he manage to get a 4000 something score?

prolly resigned as commander?

2006-04-02 10:07:59