Reciprocity
Member
+721|6799|the dank(super) side of Oregon

Kampframmer wrote:

I'm thinking about buying this for shits n gigs
One of the worst cars a GM factory ever shit out.  quite an accomplishment.  I'd drive a daewoo with a wrecked title before a fucking fiero.
CC-Marley
Member
+407|7047
I wanted an '88 Fiero GT so bad when i was 14.

What I've owned. I loved to go fast when I was younger.
1. 1979 Toyota Celica Supra
2. 1983 Mazda RX7 (12a)
3. 1978 Chevy Camaro LT
4. 1986 Toyota SR5 4x4 Xtra cab
5. 1986 Pontiac Trans Am
6. 1995 Toyota 4Runner ltd 4x4
7. 2006 Toyota 4Runner ltd 4x4
FFLink
There is.
+1,380|6909|Devon, England
How was the Trans Am?
Reciprocity
Member
+721|6799|the dank(super) side of Oregon
probably as wycked as a 150hp v8 will allow.
CC-Marley
Member
+407|7047
yeah the 305 was raped by emission crap . A 4 barrel and magnasomething exhaust helped a little. Looked good though. Fire engine red.
FatherTed
xD
+3,936|6718|so randum
how was the rx7?
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Kampframmer
Esq.
+313|5060|Amsterdam

Reciprocity wrote:

Kampframmer wrote:

I'm thinking about buying this for shits n gigs
One of the worst cars a GM factory ever shit out.  quite an accomplishment.  I'd drive a daewoo with a wrecked title before a fucking fiero.
I've also been looking for a VW Golf.
http://auto.marktplaats.nl/volkswagen/4 … groen.html

I want one just to do a road trip where you have to pray every mile that it wont break down.

E: problem with a Golf is that its not fast (there are a lot of fast one's but if you buy a second hand one thats been suped up its probably gonna explode after 2 miles). The Fiero, despite being ugly as shit but cool as hell is pretty fast. Downside is of course that it doesnt have a backseat.

Last edited by Kampframmer (2011-07-26 03:09:45)

ghettoperson
Member
+1,943|6867

Reciprocity wrote:

probably as wycked as a 150hp v8 will allow.
I'm always amazed at how American car companies manage to get so little power out of such gigantic engines.
RTHKI
mmmf mmmf mmmf
+1,741|6955|Oxferd Ohire
not just american but pontiac
https://i.imgur.com/tMvdWFG.png
TSI
Cholera in the time of love
+247|6199|Toronto
'88 BMW 325i. Picked her up two days ago on impulse, will be my little project/toy for the next while.
https://a2.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/284458_10150328363708980_502913979_9400548_2949069_n.jpg


The best part:
https://a6.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/281597_10150328363388980_502913979_9400541_5337911_n.jpg

Everything runs, but she needs new brakes and a lot of cosmetic work.

Last edited by TSI (2011-08-05 14:48:45)

I like pie.
Mavrk_Cobalt
Member
+7|4880|USA
I like the tires TURBO LAZER! they must be from the delorean don't go 88mph

https://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a264/Luikseer/wmplayer2009-04-2906-42-15-04.jpg
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-2oSkp9CAMCg/T4YUiR9gbLI/AAAAAAAAA7o/p04iOW9jtvw/s1600/harold-and-khumar-thumbs-up.gif
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,813|6324|eXtreme to the maX

ghettoperson wrote:

Reciprocity wrote:

probably as wycked as a 150hp v8 will allow.
I'm always amazed at how American car companies manage to get so little power out of such gigantic engines.
Historically they've been optimised for torque, there's only so much you can do to an engine and still have it work with a three-speed automatic box.
Plus they're low-tech, so very limited in their maximum revs.

That and emissions controls.
Fuck Israel
iceman785
Member
+93|6891|Alaska, mother fucker.
Honda for life. Low torque yes, but I can rev that shit to 9 grand all day and catch you in the top end.
Reciprocity
Member
+721|6799|the dank(super) side of Oregon

ghettoperson wrote:

I'm always amazed at how American car companies manage to get so little power out of such gigantic engines.
engines were deballed in the 70's and 80's.  low compression, very lean, restricted carburetion and very delicate and inefficient catalytic converters  were the cheapest ways early on get american cars to meed emissions spsecs -without having to actually waste money on developing new technology.  the japanese spent all the money developing modern car tech back then which is why they dominate today.
gurdeep
­
+812|4973|proll­y

ghettoperson wrote:

Reciprocity wrote:

probably as wycked as a 150hp v8 will allow.
I'm always amazed at how American car companies manage to get so little power out of such gigantic engines.
idk, but i just got back from driving around in my friend's vette, and it was quite powerful
iceman785
Member
+93|6891|Alaska, mother fucker.

Reciprocity wrote:

ghettoperson wrote:

I'm always amazed at how American car companies manage to get so little power out of such gigantic engines.
engines were deballed in the 70's and 80's.  low compression, very lean, restricted carburetion and very delicate and inefficient catalytic converters  were the cheapest ways early on get american cars to meed emissions spsecs -without having to actually waste money on developing new technology.  the japanese spent all the money developing modern car tech back then which is why they dominate today.
Let's see. Newest baddest mustang V-8 = 5 liter 412 HP.

2000 Honda S2000 4-banger = F20C 2 liter 240 HP

82 HP/liter or 120 HP/liter.

Honda is so far ahead of American motoring it's retarded =/ Now if only they could find a way to make a 4 liter 4 cyl....
UnkleRukus
That Guy
+236|5254|Massachusetts, USA
Only girls and tools buy new mustangs though.
If the women don't find ya handsome. They should at least find ya handy.
RTHKI
mmmf mmmf mmmf
+1,741|6955|Oxferd Ohire
hondas get uglier and uglier
https://i.imgur.com/tMvdWFG.png
iceman785
Member
+93|6891|Alaska, mother fucker.
Gotta let the new civics grow on you, I love the Ep3 (2004) Si Model, as well as the 2006 model. But Honestly, the 90's were honda's hayday. Tuning scene was huge back then. Now at our car meets I'm the only honda and my shit has yet to be fast.  Gonna shoot for 400 WHP or bust... Hopefully my shit doesn't get jacked... Fucking thieves.
RTHKI
mmmf mmmf mmmf
+1,741|6955|Oxferd Ohire
http://www.autoblog.com/2011/08/16/next … t=FaceBook
ugly
their crossover
ugly
new civic
uglier than previous ones. 2011 ones, i dont think my 07 looks bad

Last edited by RTHKI (2011-08-16 12:28:32)

https://i.imgur.com/tMvdWFG.png
iceman785
Member
+93|6891|Alaska, mother fucker.
I just want them to come out with atleast one car that is tuner friendly. New civic's are cool n all with the K20, but it's no B16. They were smart though, built a massive base of tuners and fans of the company in the 90s, then as people grew up and had families they made their shit family friendly.
west-phoenix-az
Guns don't kill people. . . joe bidens advice does
+632|6607

iceman785 wrote:

Let's see. Newest baddest mustang V-8 = 5 liter 412 HP.

2000 Honda S2000 4-banger = F20C 2 liter 240 HP

82 HP/liter or 120 HP/liter.

Honda is so far ahead of American motoring it's retarded =/ Now if only they could find a way to make a 4 liter 4 cyl....
You're comparing different ratings (BHP vs SAE Net HP), plus 5-liter 412 HP isn't the "newest baddest" Mustang. I'd be happy with either car.
https://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p123/west-phoenix-az/BF2S/bf2s_sig_9mmbrass.jpg
NeXuS
Shock it till ya know it
+375|6560|Atlanta, Georgia
Lol i drive 100 miles a day to and from work. So this works nicely lol. Good thing i already have a girlfriend...

https://imganuncios.mitula.net/2010_hyundai_accent_gls_gray_in_spokane_washington_93746523929038151.jpg

Chick magnet.

With the way i drive i get 35mpg. so yay.
Beduin
Compensation of Reactive Power in the grid
+510|5968|شمال
nice
الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic
Finray
Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro
+2,629|6006|Catherine Black
35? Is that it?
https://i.imgur.com/qwWEP9F.png

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard