So is the OP time like the official timer on the starvation clock? Have they eaten yet?
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something. - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
Why, they stop drinking water too?Stimey wrote:
they'll be dyin within the day
Evening Mr. GSeleven bravo wrote:
\_/
hmmm.. Line of credit exhausted too?eleven bravo wrote:
Im broke
just go to jail I hear there are people dying to give away their food13rin wrote:
hmmm.. Line of credit exhausted too?eleven bravo wrote:
Im broke
id thefted13rin wrote:
hmmm.. Line of credit exhausted too?eleven bravo wrote:
Im broke
The thing is that punishment is supposed to reform offenders to either stop the crimes happening in the first place or to strongly discourage re offending. However it appears that jail time increases the likelihood for re offending.AussieReaper wrote:
It depends if you want to just punish criminals or reform them also.
How about a system that tries to stop people from offending in the first place?Cheeky_Ninja06 wrote:
Yes Lowing, I would love a system that stopped people re offending. That would be absolutely perfect actually.
So which countries judicial system do you want to adopt? Or do you prefer yours?
Mainly that you posted the stats that you liked and ignored the others, thats the main reason I dont agree that its been proven beyond all doubt.
Jail time is not worth 10mph however would anybody actually make that distinction? What about 1mph ? Im assuming you are all for zero tolerance. Try and source an example of banning anything being 100% effective. FFS look at drink driving, that gets you a jail sentence and you lose your license and everybody knows its retarded. Doesn't stop it though does it?
In many many many occasions jail time is not the best answer.The point is that you started off with a drug user, spent a whole load of money and timing or arresting, processing, sentencing and housing them and because of your decision to send them to jail, you have directly caused somebody to get raped. If you had done nothing society would arguably have been better off.Well if people are drug addicts, then go to jail to be rapists, fuck them anyway. Society does not need either one.
The alternative is to start off with a drug user and in the worst case still have a drug user, or in the best case to have a reformed member of society, but instead you have decided to have a rapist and then with a bit of luck transform them into a murderer as well. All paid for by the tax payer.
Its like the tax payer funding a criminal training camp. Its retarded.
Actually it isn't the same argument, because I little kid may or may not know the difference between right and wrong. If, as an adult, you still don't know, you are already a lost cause.Jaekus wrote:
Same argument as you can either punish then teach a child what is the wrong thing and why, or beat them into submission so they never do it again, and all they learn is resentment and to treat other people the same way. I wonder which side lowing is on.AussieReaper wrote:
It depends if you want to just punish criminals or reform them also.
No, what is naive is to think you can change people that really don't want to change. Fact is you can not. People are going to act the way they will, until THEY decide to change, not when you decide to change them. I say fuck them until thy are ready to make whatever changes they need to make to become socially acceptable, and stop with this bullshit hand holding and treating criminals like THEY are the victims.Cheeky_Ninja06 wrote:
The thing is that punishment is supposed to reform offenders to either stop the crimes happening in the first place or to strongly discourage re offending. However it appears that jail time increases the likelihood for re offending.AussieReaper wrote:
It depends if you want to just punish criminals or reform them also.
Ultimately everybody wants to stop / decrease / minimize crime rates. Lowing reckons that throwing everybody in jail for all crimes would immediately solve the problem, I am arguing that this approach is too naive and demonstrably failing while creating an overcrowding problem.
So every single person who goes to jail is a life long criminal? Nobody is just an ordinary person that fucked up once? Nobody ever goes to prison for being in a really shit position and making illegal choices?lowing wrote:
No, what is naive is to think you can change people that really don't want to change. Fact is you can not. People are going to act the way they will, until THEY decide to change, not when you decide to change them. I say fuck them until thy are ready to make whatever changes they need to make to become socially acceptable, and stop with this bullshit hand holding and treating criminals like THEY are the victims.Cheeky_Ninja06 wrote:
The thing is that punishment is supposed to reform offenders to either stop the crimes happening in the first place or to strongly discourage re offending. However it appears that jail time increases the likelihood for re offending.AussieReaper wrote:
It depends if you want to just punish criminals or reform them also.
Ultimately everybody wants to stop / decrease / minimize crime rates. Lowing reckons that throwing everybody in jail for all crimes would immediately solve the problem, I am arguing that this approach is too naive and demonstrably failing while creating an overcrowding problem.
Last edited by Cheeky_Ninja06 (2011-07-12 16:29:40)
Nope. "ordinary people that fucked up once" really don't need rehab to know they fucked up do they? If they make illegal choices from shitty situations they put themselves in, then it was probably their shitty decision making that put them in their shitty situation. Stop trying to make excuses for shitheads for once and accept the fact, with all the social help available turning to crime really isn't the only choice someone has.Cheeky_Ninja06 wrote:
So every single person who goes to jail is a life long criminal? Nobody is just an ordinary person that fucked up once? Nobody ever goes to prison for being in a really shit position and making illegal choices?lowing wrote:
No, what is naive is to think you can change people that really don't want to change. Fact is you can not. People are going to act the way they will, until THEY decide to change, not when you decide to change them. I say fuck them until thy are ready to make whatever changes they need to make to become socially acceptable, and stop with this bullshit hand holding and treating criminals like THEY are the victims.Cheeky_Ninja06 wrote:
The thing is that punishment is supposed to reform offenders to either stop the crimes happening in the first place or to strongly discourage re offending. However it appears that jail time increases the likelihood for re offending.
Ultimately everybody wants to stop / decrease / minimize crime rates. Lowing reckons that throwing everybody in jail for all crimes would immediately solve the problem, I am arguing that this approach is too naive and demonstrably failing while creating an overcrowding problem.
You cant change everybody and its not something I ever said. If you check my post I said there is a balance to be found and currently we are turning citizens into repeat offenders that could otherwise be useful members of society.
At no point have I tried to say that criminals are blameless or that it is societies fault, you are just hearing what you want to hear. You have failed to address any of the points I made and have instead gone onto a baseless rant.
Its late and shit so ill answer the other post tomorrow.
And while we're on it, maybe the fact that close people to me have spent lengthy time in jail for completely retarded reasons and dealing with my ex partner announcing she had been sexually assualted by her grandfather for many years and me having to deal with the fallout from that and the entire police investigation / court cases etc, maybe because I have far more first hand experience of this shit than I ever wanted, just maybe that has had some influence on my view.
So Lowing, perhaps you would feel differently if you had actually been exposed to police / court / prison instead of gobbing off over the internet about idealistic bullshit.
Last edited by lowing (2011-07-12 17:59:08)
Shows how little you know about people. Guess that makes you a lost cause, no?lowing wrote:
Actually it isn't the same argument, because I little kid may or may not know the difference between right and wrong. If, as an adult, you still don't know, you are already a lost cause.Jaekus wrote:
Same argument as you can either punish then teach a child what is the wrong thing and why, or beat them into submission so they never do it again, and all they learn is resentment and to treat other people the same way. I wonder which side lowing is on.AussieReaper wrote:
It depends if you want to just punish criminals or reform them also.
lol, if you say so. Although, with the life I have built for myself and my family, you can stop worrying about rehabbing me.Jaekus wrote:
Shows how little you know about people. Guess that makes you a lost cause, no?lowing wrote:
Actually it isn't the same argument, because I little kid may or may not know the difference between right and wrong. If, as an adult, you still don't know, you are already a lost cause.Jaekus wrote:
Same argument as you can either punish then teach a child what is the wrong thing and why, or beat them into submission so they never do it again, and all they learn is resentment and to treat other people the same way. I wonder which side lowing is on.
Nope, so why spend money on rehab trying? Now you get my point.Jaekus wrote:
I was never worried. Can't teach an old dog new tricks.
I was referring to you as the told dog, derp.lowing wrote:
Nope, so why spend money on rehab trying? Now you get my point.Jaekus wrote:
I was never worried. Can't teach an old dog new tricks.
Oh I thought you meant all old dogs. If you meant me, you shoulda just said you can't teach ME new tricks.Jaekus wrote:
I was referring to you as the told dog, derp.lowing wrote:
Nope, so why spend money on rehab trying? Now you get my point.Jaekus wrote:
I was never worried. Can't teach an old dog new tricks.
Last edited by lowing (2011-07-12 18:50:37)
Did I say they needed Rehab? No I simply said that they do not need jail time. As you admitted, they know they fucked up and are unlikely to do it again. Handing them a significant jail term and mixing with all the people that view crime as a way of life is not beneficial and only increases the chances of re offending.lowing wrote:
Nope. "ordinary people that fucked up once" really don't need rehab to know they fucked up do they? If they make illegal choices from shitty situations they put themselves in, then it was probably their shitty decision making that put them in their shitty situation. Stop trying to make excuses for shitheads for once and accept the fact, with all the social help available turning to crime really isn't the only choice someone has.
I never moved away from personal responsibility. My case was and always has been that we send too many people to Jail. Many criminals need to go to jail, however not as many as we send.Again WE are not turning people into anything, PEOPLE are making their choices, so yes, I have addressed your posts, and my answer will ALWYS fall on the responsibility of the individual.
If you are so fussed about the victims then why ignore the fact that you are creating more of them with the failing jail system? Yes people make choices but those choices are based on their life experiences. Again even though I have stated as much in every single post I have made, Jail is the right place for a significant proportion of criminals however it is not the right place for all criminals.If you are not trying to pawn this shit on society, then stop trying to tell me what "WE are doing to TURN people into repeat offenders" and start addressing what PEOPLE are DOING to others.
Ah I see. So the whole point that I have significant first hand experience of the system, how it works and where it sucks is completely irrelevant because its my fault I know anything about it.As for the last part, maybe you should choose better people to hang around yourself, then you won't have to put up with any of their bullshit. Again, it goes back to our personal choices.
I wish I could also claim the magic sight beyond sight that you have where you can instantly tell peoples backgrounds and know them inside out. Believe it or not bad things are done by good people. Do you think all serial killers walk around with serial killer stamped across their forehead? Have you not noticed whenever somebody dies or gets arrested all the neighbors, family and friends say "I cant believe they would do something like this, they seemed such an upstanding member of society, he must be innocent..."etc etc.Perhaps I would, however I choose to distance myself from people that are in trouble with the law for dumb fuck decisions they have made. Call it my personal choice.
Gunna disagree, if you merely "fucked up once", you still "fucked up" and need to answer for it. If you are talking about drug related shit, I have always maintained, I would like to see drugs legalized, taxed and fuck them.Cheeky_Ninja06 wrote:
Did I say they needed Rehab? No I simply said that they do not need jail time. As you admitted, they know they fucked up and are unlikely to do it again. Handing them a significant jail term and mixing with all the people that view crime as a way of life is not beneficial and only increases the chances of re offending.lowing wrote:
Nope. "ordinary people that fucked up once" really don't need rehab to know they fucked up do they? If they make illegal choices from shitty situations they put themselves in, then it was probably their shitty decision making that put them in their shitty situation. Stop trying to make excuses for shitheads for once and accept the fact, with all the social help available turning to crime really isn't the only choice someone has.
FYI Good people sometimes do bad things.I never moved away from personal responsibility. My case was and always has been that we send too many people to Jail. Many criminals need to go to jail, however not as many as we send.Again WE are not turning people into anything, PEOPLE are making their choices, so yes, I have addressed your posts, and my answer will ALWYS fall on the responsibility of the individual.If you are so fussed about the victims then why ignore the fact that you are creating more of them with the failing jail system? Yes people make choices but those choices are based on their life experiences. Again even though I have stated as much in every single post I have made, Jail is the right place for a significant proportion of criminals however it is not the right place for all criminals.If you are not trying to pawn this shit on society, then stop trying to tell me what "WE are doing to TURN people into repeat offenders" and start addressing what PEOPLE are DOING to others.Ah I see. So the whole point that I have significant first hand experience of the system, how it works and where it sucks is completely irrelevant because its my fault I know anything about it.As for the last part, maybe you should choose better people to hang around yourself, then you won't have to put up with any of their bullshit. Again, it goes back to our personal choices.I wish I could also claim the magic sight beyond sight that you have where you can instantly tell peoples backgrounds and know them inside out. Believe it or not bad things are done by good people. Do you think all serial killers walk around with serial killer stamped across their forehead? Have you not noticed whenever somebody dies or gets arrested all the neighbors, family and friends say "I cant believe they would do something like this, they seemed such an upstanding member of society, he must be innocent..."etc etc.Perhaps I would, however I choose to distance myself from people that are in trouble with the law for dumb fuck decisions they have made. Call it my personal choice.
http://www.rethinking.org.uk/facts/reth … ldren.htmlReconviction rates for children leaving prison are high. Of 14-16 year olds released in 1997, 84% were reconvicted within two years, with 6 out of 10 going back to prison.
Last edited by Cheeky_Ninja06 (2011-07-13 06:46:56)