Pages: 1 … 7 8 9

 

2011-07-05 12:40:20
Pug
UR father's brother's nephew's former roommate
+652|6782|Texas - Bigger than France
This might be strange, but...

charity isn't charity unless there's no strings attached.

As far as the old "I took a drug test to get a job" argument.  This isn't a job.  It's accepting a handout.

With that said, I'd like all welfare recipents drug tested.  But if it doesn't happen, that's okay with me.
2011-07-05 16:30:11
Hurricane2k9
Pendulous Sweaty Balls
+1,538|5941|College Park, MD
Welfare ain't charity though.
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/36793/marylandsig.jpg
2011-07-05 17:39:37
11 Bravo
Banned
+965|5477|Cleveland, Ohio

Jaekus wrote:

11 Bravo wrote:

11 Bravo wrote:


maybe i should change my name to lowing
So you can troll more?
my question was valid to the topic yet nobody wants to touch it.
2011-07-05 20:03:22
Jaekus
I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose
+957|5418|Sydney

11 Bravo wrote:

Jaekus wrote:

11 Bravo wrote:

maybe i should change my name to lowing
So you can troll more?
my question was valid to the topic yet nobody wants to touch it.
See your karma...

But in response to your question, no one apart from Dilbert (from what I've seen anyway) has argued against testing of welfare recipients, we've just discussed the particulars of doing so, and then the discussion moved on from there.

Last edited by Jaekus (2011-07-05 20:03:31)

2011-07-05 20:04:03
11 Bravo
Banned
+965|5477|Cleveland, Ohio
actually i thought jay was against it.  i dunno.  could be wrong.
2011-07-06 05:51:37
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,815|6346|eXtreme to the maX
Maybe checks should be done to see if people are getting drunk during work hours while unemployed, or torrenting copyrighted material on govt time.

Where do you want to stop?

Last edited by Dilbert_X (2011-07-06 05:52:30)

Fuck Israel
2011-07-06 09:15:42
Pug
UR father's brother's nephew's former roommate
+652|6782|Texas - Bigger than France

Hurricane2k9 wrote:

Welfare ain't charity though.
Sure there are requirements - like not having money
2011-07-06 09:40:00
11 Bravo
Banned
+965|5477|Cleveland, Ohio

Dilbert_X wrote:

Maybe checks should be done to see if people are getting drunk during work hours while unemployed, or torrenting copyrighted material on govt time.

Where do you want to stop?
random drug and alcohol tests are just fine thank you.  i mean if i have to work and support them and am subject to that, then so should they.  how can you argue that?

Last edited by 11 Bravo (2011-07-06 09:56:48)

2011-07-06 09:54:58
jord
Member
+2,382|6918|The North, beyond the wall.

Ilocano wrote:

Even when I've used headhunters, I at times still had to take drug tests prior to management level employment.  Even a psychological test at one place.  While California does allow "medicinal" use of marijuana, the company I work for does not allow it.  Engineering, where the slightest "out of it" situation could lead to someone's death, you better believe drug testing is at will around here.  And I wouldn't have it any other way.
I work in Engineering and we don't have drug tests. I think it's a lot rarer here though.

Freedom, fuck yeah!
2011-07-07 09:34:01
11 Bravo
Banned
+965|5477|Cleveland, Ohio

11 Bravo wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

Maybe checks should be done to see if people are getting drunk during work hours while unemployed, or torrenting copyrighted material on govt time.

Where do you want to stop?
random drug and alcohol tests are just fine thank you.  i mean if i have to work and support them and am subject to that, then so should they.  how can you argue that?

 

Pages: 1 … 7 8 9

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard